Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09/08/2022 - Land Use Review Commission - AGENDA - Regular Meeting
Shelley La Mastra, Chair Ian Shuff, Vice Chair Nathanial Coffman David Lawton John McCoy Taylor Meyer Katie Vogel Council Liaison: Shirley Peel Staff Liaison: Noah Beals LOCATION: City Council Chambers 300 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 8, 2022 8:30 AM LAND USE REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA Participation for this hybrid Land Use Review Commission meeting will be available online or by phone, or in person. Public Participation (In Person): Individuals who wish to address the Land Use Review Commission in person may attend the meeting located in City Council Chambers at City Hall, 300 Laporte Ave. Public Participation (Online): Individuals who wish to address the Land Use Review Commission via remote public participation can do so through Zoom at https://fcgov.zoom.us/j/92102041811. Individuals participating in the Zoom session should also watch the meeting through that site. The meeting will be available to join beginning at 8:15 a.m. on September 8, 2022. Participants should try to sign in prior to 8:30 a.m. if possible. For public comments, the Chair will ask participants to click the “Raise Hand” button to indicate you would like to speak at that time. Staff will moderate the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Board or Commission. In order to participate: Use a laptop, computer, or internet-enabled smartphone. (Using earphones with a microphone will greatly improve your audio). You need to have access to the internet. Keep yourself on muted status. If you have any technical difficulties during the hearing, please email kkatsimpalis@fcgov.com. Public Participation (Phone): If you do not have access to the internet, you can call into the hearing via phone. The number to dial is +1 (346) 248-7799 or +1 (669) 900-9128, with webinar ID: 921 0204 1811. (Continued on next page) Land Use Review Commission Page 2 May 12, 2022 • CALL TO ORDER and ROLL CALL • APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING • CITIZEN PARTICIPATION (Items Not on the Agenda) • APPEALS FOR VARIANCE TO THE LAND USE CODE 1. APPEAL ZBA220026 Address: 1024 S Lemay Ave. Owner: UCHealth / Poudre Valley Hospital Petitioner: Ashley Ray, UCHealth Design & Construction Zoning District: E Code Section: 3.8.7.2(G) Table (G)(1) and Table (G)(2); 3.8.7.2(G) Table (G)(1); 3.8.7.2(G) Table (G)(1) Project Description: This is a variance request for an additional 5 ground signs in addition current ground signage currently on site. Sign "2" is requesting 3 variances: (1) 8 feet from southern property line, where 15 feet is the required setback from interior lot lines. (2) 2 feet from the western property line where 10 feet is the minimum required setback for a ground sign that is 9.67 feet tall. (3) An additional primary ground sign where only 1 is allowed per frontage. Sign "7" is requesting 1 variance: (1) An additional ground sign where only 1 is allowed per frontage. Sign "11" is requesting 1 variance: (1) An additional ground sign where only 1 is allowed per frontage. Sign "14" is requesting 2 variances: (1) An additional ground sign where only 1 is allowed per frontage. (2) 14 feet from southern property line, where 15 feet is the required setback from interior lot lines. Sign "19" is requesting 1 variance: (1) An additional ground sign where only 1 is allowed per frontage. The meeting will be available beginning at 8:15 a.m. Please call in to the meeting prior to 8:30 a.m., if possible. For public comments, the Chair will ask participants to click the “Raise Hand” button to indicate you would like to speak at that time – phone participants will need to hit *9 to do this. Staff will be moderating the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Committee. Once you join the meeting: keep yourself on muted status. If you have any technical difficulties during the hearing, please email kkatsimpalis@fcgov.com. Documents to Share: If residents wish to share a document or presentation, the Staff Liaison needs to receive those materials via email by 24 hours before the meeting. Please email any documents to nbeals@fcgov.com. Individuals uncomfortable or unable to access the Zoom platform or unable to participate by phone are encouraged to participate in person or by emailing general public comments you may have to nbeals@fcgov.com. The Staff Liaison will ensure the Commission receives your comments. If you have specific comments on any of the discussion items scheduled, please make that clear in the subject line of the email and send 24 hours prior to the meeting. As required by City Council Ordinance 079, 2020, a determination has been made by the chair after consultation with the city staff liaison that conducting the hearing using remote technology would be prudent. Land Use Review Commission Page 3 May 12, 2022 2. APPEAL ZBA220027 Address: 324 Jefferson St. Owner/Petitioner: R.T. Custer Zoning District: D Code Section: 3.8.7.2(B)Table(B) Project Description: This is a variance request for a 6.67-foot-tall wall sign to be installed within 15 feet of the elevation of the sidewalk below, where 4.5 feet is the maximum allowable height. 3. APPEAL ZBA220028 Address: 503 Mathews St. #3 Owner: Annmarie Banchy & John Green Petitioner: Steve Josephs, Contractor Zoning District: N-C-B Code Section: 4.9(D)(5); 4.9(D)(6)(c) Project Description: This is a request for a proposed 2nd floor rear entry to exceed the total square footage allowed in the rear-half by 368 square feet. The maximum allowed is 1,224 feet. Additionally, for the proposed entry to encroach 6 feet 9 inches into the required 15-foot rear-yard setback. 4. APPEAL ZBA220029 Address: 501 Edwards St. Owner/Petitioner: Adam Jasper Zoning District: N-C-M Code Section: 4.8(D)(2)(a)(2) Project Description: This is a request to exceed the total square footage allowed by 499.25 square feet. The maximum permitted is 2,556.75 square feet. • OTHER BUSINESS • ADJOURNMENT Shelley La Mastra, Chair Ian Shuff, Vice Chair David Lawton John McCoy Taylor Meyer Nathanial Coffman Katie Vogel Council Liaison: Shirley Peel Staff Liaison: Noah Beals LOCATION: City Council Chambers 300 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-6001) for assistance. REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 11, 2022 8:30 AM • CALL TO ORDER and ROLL CALL Commission members Shuff, Meyer, Coffman and Vogel were present; members La Mastra, Lawton, and McCoy were absent. • APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING Lawton made a motion, seconded by Shuff to approve the July 21, 2022 Regular Hearing Minutes and the July 1 Special Meeting Minutes. The motion was adopted; Commission members Coffman and Vogel voted to abstain. • CITIZEN PARTICIPATION (Items Not on the Agenda) • APPEALS FOR VARIANCE TO THE LAND USE CODE 1. APPEAL ZBA220023 Address: 524 Stover St. Owner/Petitioner: Reyes Sarmiento Zoning District: N-C-M Code Section: 4.8.11(D)(2)(a)(2); 4.8(D)(6) Project Description: This is a request to exceed the total floor area square footage allowed on the lot by 1,202 square feet. The maximum permitted is 3,652 square feet. Also, for the accessory building to have a footprint of 832 square feet; the maximum allowed is 600 square feet. Staff Presentation: Beals presented slides relevant to the appeal and discussed the variance request, noting that the property is located on Stover St. north of E. Myrtle. Beals explained the request is to build a garage on the back-half of the property. The proposed garage would be a two-car structure with attached carport. LAND USE REVIEW COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Land Use Review Commission Page 2 August 11, 2022 Prior to some 2014 Code changes, the applicant applied for and received a building permit to complete the garage. Circumstances led to the garage not being completed, though the concrete slab was poured. A land use change occurred at the time of permit issuance that would have prevented the permit from being issued, hence why the variance request has been made today. Beals stated that the amount of floor space in the existing home currently is more than the allowable maximum based on the total size of the lot. In this sub-district, there is both a maximum allowable square footage for the lot, as well as a maximum amount that can be placed in the rear-half of the lot. In this case, the rear-half square footage is ok, but the overall square footage is over allowable maximum. One of the code changes that applies today is how square footage is defined. In a primary building, it is everything from outside wall to outside wall, with the exception of space below-grade. When the permit for the garage was originally requested, there was another permit to finish an attic space; that finished space started to count against the allowable maximum square footage as well. Also, there has been a change to how we define floor area for accessory buildings. The intent of the code is to keep accessory buildings subordinate to primary buildings, as well as to prevent looming structures in rear-yards over neighbors’ yards. Beals also clarified that floor area includes carpo rt areas. The proposed garage structure exceeds the allowable maximum floor area. Continuing, Beals presented elevations drawings of the garage, noting it is a single-story structure that meets eave height requirements as well as setback requirements as proposed. The only requirement not being met is the 600 square-foot maximum for accessory building as well as the maximum allowable floor area for the lot. Beals presented pictures of the front and rear of the lot, noting the location of the proposed garage and the existing concrete slab. Beals also noted that there are several existing garages and accessory buildings along the alley. Vice-Chair Shuff asked Beals if it was a recent change to count carports against the allowable maximum of floor space? Beals responded that change to code occurred sometime between the 2014 updates and those made around 2018. Application Presentation: Applicant Reyes Sarmiento, 524 Stover St. addressed the Commission and agreed to hold the meeting in a hybrid format. Sarmiento explained that in the middle of the garage project, his daughter tore her ACL twice during high school, which took resource and attention away from completion of the garage. Recent code changes have prevented any additional changes to the proposed structure, such as adding a second story, and Sarmiento is now asking for a variance simply to complete the garage and carport that were started in 2014. Commission Discussion: Commission member Meyer commented on first sight it does appear to be a significant increase in square footage; however, considering the timeline and the stalled construction, along with subsequent changes in code it seems reasonable to allow this project to move forward. Meyer stated his support of the variance request. Commission member Coffman agreed with the statements offered by Meyer and noted that pictures of the alley depict existing garages adjacent to and near this lot. The proposed garage wou ld not diverge from the character of the neighborhood, and with the intention of the standard to prevent looming of structures onto neighboring lots, since the garage backs to an alley of approximately 20 feet, that won’t be an issue here. Commission member Vogel agreed with the statements offered by Meyer and Coffman, noting the existing foundation may pose a safety risk which could be remedied by completion of the garage. Vice-Chair Shuff agreed with previous comments, adding that while the increase in square footage appears to significant, a big portion of that is actually taken up by a carport that has roof area. Shuff stated his opinion that the request seems reasonable, and he can be in support. Land Use Review Commission Page 3 August 11, 2022 Commission Member Meyer made a motion, seconded by Coffman to APPROVE ZBA220023 for the following reasons: the granting of the modification of standard would not be detrimental to the public good; the existing increase to the primary building came from finishing the attic space, not increasing building size; the proposed garage is one story in height and meeting required setbacks; the carport area is currently used as a parking space; the proposed garage was issued a permit and construction started resulting in an unfinished building. Therefore, the variance request will not diverge from the standard but in a nominal, inconsequential way, when considered in the context of the neighborhood, and will continue to advance the purpose of the Land Use Code contained in Section 1.2.2 Yeas: Shuff, Meyer, Coffman, Vogel Nays: - Absent: La Mastra, Lawton, McCoy THE MOTION CARRIED, THE ITEM WAS APPROVED 2. APPEAL ZBA220025 Address: 1024 Ponderosa Dr. Owner/ Petitioner: Steve Otis Zoning District: R-L Code Section: 4.4(D)(2)(c) Project Description: This is a request to build an accessory building that will encroach 8.5 feet in the 15-foot rear setback. Staff Presentation: Beals presented slides relevant to the appeal and discussed the variance request, noting that the property is located on Ponderosa Drive, near where Tamarac Dr. T-bones into Ponderosa. The property is located in the R-L (low-density residential) zoning district; one typical design in this R-L zone is the lack of alleys. Therefore, lots tend to have a greater rear-yard setback. Setbacks are in place to prevent looming structures and adverse shading onto a neighboring property. The request is to build a shed in the rear yard; according to the set-back, the shed would be located 6.5 feet from the rear property line, which results in a total setback encroachment of 8.5 feet in the required 15-foot rear-yard setback. Referring to the site plan, Beals noted the presence of some mature trees in the rear yard and surmised that if the shed were to be moved closer to the house, the trees would risk being impacted the shed’s roof height, etc. There is also an easement that occurs along the rear property line; with the proposed setback at 6.5 feet, the shed would not encroach into the easement. Beals presented photos of the front and rear of the property, noting the proposed location of the shed and the 6.5-foot setback. Beals noted that one measurement appeared to have been taken from the exterior wall and one taken from the edge of the eave, but either way the proposed location of the shed would not encroach upon the rear easement. Commission member Meyer asked Beals if the indicated 6-foot measurement was taken from the eave rather than the wall? Beals responded that was his assumption based on the provi ded materials, but final confirmation of that measurement point would need to come from the applicant. Beals also mentioned that within the R-L district, there are not as many restrictions placed upon total allowable floor area. Application Presentation: Applicant representative Steve Otis, 1024 Ponderosa Dr., addressed the Commission and agreed to hold the meeting in a hybrid format. Otis stated that he did not understand the intent of the 15-foot setback requirement, commenting that he first learned of the requirement when he received an email from Zoning Inspector Rob Bianchetto. Otis contended that if he were to follow the 15-foot setback, the shed would consume most of the usable space within the backyard. Land Use Review Commission Page 4 August 11, 2022 Otis commented that during a subsequent conversation between himself and Bianchetto, he asked how the 15-foot rear setback was originally determined/decided. He was told that answer needed to be answered by another department. Otis voiced his frustration at not having his question answered regarding how setback requirements were decided. Otis closed his remarks by stating his opinion that is unreasonable that he be required to argue his case and pay a $300 fee, when in fact he felt the City’s requirements were unreasonable. Vice-Chair Shuff attempted to explain the requirement for a 15-foot setback, stating that every zone district in the city has certain rules and regulations. In the R-L district, there are setbacks in place for every property including front-yard, side-yard, and rear-yard. Shuff explained that because there are no alleys in the R-L district, the 15-foot setback attempts to provide buffer space between structures placed on the rear portion of abutting properties. Sightlines and privacy issues also come into play when determining setbacks. Beals commented that setbacks exist in general to prevent structures looming into adjoining properties. Also, in this case structures are regulated, but landscaping is not. Mature landscaping appears to be present on the opposite side of the property line, which may limit view lines between the properties. One characteristic of this zone district is to have more open back yards that are not surrounded by structures. A 15-foot setback helps to maintain this. Otis stated that many of his neighbors have structures present in their rear yards that are closer than 15-feet to their fence lines, and some he has talked to are planning on replacing their structures with more substantial buildings. Commission member Meyer referred to the site plan, which indicated the shed would be 12 feet by 24 feet. Meyer asked the applicant if those were the dimensions of the walls; applicant Otis responded yes. Meyer asked if the 6.5-foot measurement was taken from the rear property line; Otis confirmed. Meyer asked for the distance of the easement from the property. Beals indicated the easement is six feet from the rear of the property. Meyer asked for the size of the shed’s overhang; Otis indicated it would be only about 6 inches. Vice-Chair Shuff asked how tall the shed would be; Otis responded the shed would reach a maximum height of 13 feet. Audience member Kelsa Middough, 1025 Hillcrest Dr., addressed the Commission and agreed to participate in a hybrid format. Middough stated that she was the rear neighbor and property owner to 1024 Ponderosa Dr. and has no issues with the shed being built as proposed. Commission Discussion: Commission member Meyer stated his opinion that the request seems reasonable , especially considering the location of the mature trees within the yard. Additionally, it is helpful to hear from the neighbor to the rear, who is in support of the request; they would be most-impacted by changes made to the rear-yard setback. Meyer stated his support for approval of the request. Commission member Coffman reiterated the comments made my Meyer, noting that the mature trees along adjacent fence lines helps to mitigate the potential for looming structures. Also, with the location of the mature trees within the rear yard, the proposed shed location keeps the continuity of the larger yard space. Commission member Vogel commented that hearing from the neighbor is a big help in supporting the request and reinforces the idea that the shed location as proposed is appropriate. Vice-Chair Shuff commented that when looking at a Google Earth image of the neighborhood, it appears that there are many existing sheds in rear yards that are closer than 15 feet to the rear property lines. Whether they have been approved or not, there is now a pattern that has been Land Use Review Commission Page 5 August 11, 2022 established. The proposed structure is fairly small and reminiscent of others in the neighborhood, and the request is therefore reasonable. Shuff asked Beals if the shed was under 150 square feet, would it still have to comply with setbacks? Beals answered that there are two thresholds for not requiring a building permit: a structure would need to be under eight feet in height, and under 120 square feet. Commission Member Meyer made a motion, seconded by Coffman to APPROVE ZBA220025 based on the following findings: The granting of the modification of standard is not detrimental to the public good; there is a mature tree limiting the placement of the shed; the abutting neighbor has thick vegetation at the shared property line limiting the view of the proposed shed; the proposed location does not encroach on the easement. Therefore, the variance request will not diverge from the standard but in a nominal, inconsequential way, when considered in the context of the neighborhood, and will continue to a dvance the purpose of the Land Use Code contained in Section 1.2.2 Yeas: Shuff, Meyer, Coffman, Vogel Nays: - Absent: La Mastra, Lawton, McCoy THE MOTION CARRIED, THE ITEM WAS APPROVED • OTHER BUSINESS Assistant Attorney Claire Havelda mentioned that the City is currently in the process of re-writing the Land Use Code, and is seeking public input. Havelda asked that staff send links to new drafts to applicants if desired. Vice-Chair Shuff encouraged applicant Otis and other members of the public to share their thoughts with the City regarding the updates to the Land Use Code. • ADJOURNMENT – meeting adjourned at 9:16am Ian Shuff, Vice-Chair Noah Beals, Senior City Planner-Zoning Agenda Item 1 Item # 1 - Page 1 STAFF REPORT September 8, 2022 STAFF Noah Beals, Senior City Planner/Zoning PROJECT ZBA220026 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Address: 1024 S Lemay Ave. Owner: UCHealth / Poudre Valley Hospital Petitioner: Ashley Ray, UCHealth Design & Construction Zoning District: E Code Section: 3.8.7.2(G) Table (G)(1) and Table (G)(2); 3.8.7.2(G) Table (G)(1); 3.8.7.2(G) Table (G)(1) Variance Request: This is a variance request for an additional 5 ground signs in addition current ground signage currently on site. Sign "2" is requesting 3 variances: (1) 8 feet from southern property line, where 15 feet is the required setback from interior lot lines. (2) 2 feet from the western property line where 10 feet is the minimum required setback for a ground sign that is 9.67 feet tall. (3) An additional primary ground sign where only 1 is allowed per frontage. Sign "7" is requesting 1 variance: (1) An additional ground sign where only 1 is allowed per frontage. Sign "11" is requesting 1 variance: (1) An additional ground sign where only 1 is allowed per frontage. Sign "14" is requesting 2 variances: (1) An additional ground sign where only 1 is allowed per frontage. (2) 14 feet from southern property line, where 15 feet is the required setback from interior lot lines. Sign "19" is requesting 1 variance: (1) An additional ground sign where only 1 is allowed per frontage. COMMENTS: 1. Background: Poudre Valley Hospital (PVH) is currently going through additional remodel mainly to the south and east sides of the building. This remodel includes some site and landscape adjustments. In 2015 PVH received approval for replacement of the A-wing of their building. This replacement includes a new Emergency Center. While under construction in 2016 PVH requested additional ground sign locations located along Lemay Avenue and Doctors Lane. In 1986 the hospital received a variance for additional ground signs on the property. These signs were larger than the directional signage and some were visible from the public right-of-way. 2. Applicant’s statement of justification: See petitioner’s letter. 3. Staff Conclusion and Findings: Under Section 2.10.4(H), staff recommends approval and finds that: • The variances are not detrimental to the public good. • The increase signage will be beneficial to the public good to give clear direction to those in emergency situations Agenda Item 1 Item # 1 - Page 2 • The campus setting of the hospital includes a longer street frontage than the typical nonresidential uses • Signs 7, 11, 14, and 19 are internal to the site and a six-foot fence separates the residential properties from the hospital grounds. • Existing sidewalk location, trees and drive access limit the location of ground sign to be effectively visible during an emergency situation. Therefore, the variance requests will not diverge from the standard but in a nominal, inconsequential way, when considered in the context of the neighborhood, and will continue to advance the purpose of the Land Use Code contained in Section 1.2.2 4. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of APPEAL ZBA220026. FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC.1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital100% Design Intent: Exterior Wayfinding & Signage Variance Request Support Documentation (Sign Drawings, Sign Specifications, and Submittal Schedule)02 August 2022 FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONSPAGE TITLE / ELEMENT TYPESHEET NUMBER1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewTable of ContentsPermitting ReviewSign Location PlanVariance Signs Locations ........................ivExtent of New Excavation, New Landscaping and ConstructionSite Extent of new Landscaping and Construction. . . . .viSite Landscaping Mitigation Plan Section 1 ..........viiSite Landscaping Mitigation Plan Section 2 ..........viiiSign Location Plan DetailsSign Location PlanSign Location Details .........................SLP1Sign Location PlanSign Location Details .........................SLP2Exterior Signage DrawingsSignage DrawingsST 102 - Primary Sign: Small Site Identification Monument .......................G1Signage DrawingsPrimary Signs: ST102, Site Identification Nighttime Renderings ..........................G2Signage DrawingsST 131 - Large Vehicular Directional .............G3Signage DrawingsST 132.1 - Medium Vehicular Directional .......G4Signage DrawingsST141: Post and Panel Directional ...............G5New Signage Sign Face LayoutsNew Signage LayoutsST131 & 132 - Locations 2, 7, 14, 19 ..............G7 FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONS1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewPermitting Review iv.0FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONSPAGE TITLE / ELEMENT TYPESHEET NUMBER1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewSign Location PlanVariance Signs Locations1 UL JAAeccDbCogoPoint (AeccLa n d 1 3 0 ) AeccDbCogoPo i n t ( A e c c L a n d 1 3 0 ) AeccDbCogoPoi n t ( A e c c L a n d 1 3 0 )AABABABBABABAABBABABABABAABBAAABBBLot 1Lot 2Lot 3Lot 4Lot 5Lot 6Lot 7AB0'10'30'N60' 120'21'-0" ±39'-0"±14'-0"8'-0"edge is to be 24”from sidewalkedge is to be24” from curbmin, 48” max22'-0"5'-0"edge is to be24” from curbmin, 48” maxedge is to be24” from curbmin, 48” max5'-0"fromlight pole14'-0"consider placing this one inthe landscaping next to the treelocation as show in landscaping plans1110147612811SIGN TYPE & LOCATIONS1ST 101: Site Identification Monument - LargeSign Face Area: 66.9 sqftHeight: 7’-0”, Width: 14’-0” Location: 1, Setback: 39 ftST 102: Site Identification Monument - Small Sign Face Area: 37.9 sqftHeight: 5’-0”, Width: 10’-0” Location: 11, Setback: N/AST 103: Building Identification Sign Face Area: 43.19 sqftHeight: 4’-0”, Width: 18’-2” Location: 4, Setback: N/AST 131: Large Vehicular DirectionalSign Face Area: 31.7 sqftHeight: 9’-8”, Width: 4’-6” Location: 2, Setback: 16 ftST 132.1: Medium Vehicular Directional Sign Face Area: 17.2 sqftHeight: 6’-0”, Width: 3’-3” Locations: 7, 14, 19, Setback: 36', 15', N/AST 133.1: Small Vehicular DirectionalSign Face Area: 6.2 sqftHeight: 4’-0”, Width: 2’-5” Locations: 6, 10, 16, 21, 22, 25, 30, 31ST 140: Parking Lot IdentificationSign Face Area: 6.7 sqftHeight: 11’-0”, Width: 2’-7” Locations: 5, 9, 13, 24, Setback: N/AST 140.1: Parking Lot IdentificationSign Face Area: 6.7 sqftHeight: 3’-0”, Width: 2’-3” Locations: 17ST 141: Post and Panel SignSign Face Area: 2.0 sqftHeight: 6’-8”, Width: 1’-3” Location: 28, Setback: 10 ftST 150: Large Existing Sign to Remain Locations: 27, 37, 38 Update Message OnlyST 151: Small Existing Sign to Remain Locations: 34, 39 Update Message Only DMO: Existing Sign to be RemovedLocations: 42, 43DOT Signs are NICST108.1: Wall Mounted Panel 14" X 20"ST108.2: Double Sided Post and Panel Sign Sign Face Area: 6 sqftTemporary Sign: See Detail 3/G16.0Sign Deleted from ProjectLocations: 18, 20, 23, 26, 29, 32, 40, 41, 46 11##4282########NOTES: 1. Sign locations are to be field verified with fd2s prior to excavation and installation.#17451412071443817162124253026292827323435363940421161212.112.215293138184644333371013192245231 UL JADbC P i t ( A L d 1 3 0 )ABBABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABBBAAAAAAAAAAAABBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBAAAAABBLLLot 1t1oott1Lot 22222tt2222222LLLLot 3oot33Lot 4444LLLot 5ot 5ot5ot 5LLLot 6ot 66toAB0'10'30'N60'39'-0"±014'-0"11114414141444441414444444444'44'44'444444444'44'11111''''001'-0"444411"0000"'-0"'-0"-0"00000--004"00"00040004040---4044040441edge is to bee24” from curbmin, 48” max22'-0"220"22-025'-0""5' 0555"222m5'-0"fromlightliggpoleleoleconsider placing this one inpglpppggpgesecnethe landscaping next to the treellaandndngng g nenethhee tldanetteespppxorendttthtthe landdlocation as show in lhlandscaping planscaping pcaping pgggg pgingpip100111111066666668118115202081716AAA212425266299612122122211211222222222111111111112222222222222222211111111111111111111111111111111111122222211111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111121112.1112212.112.212.2159181464644444444444444444444444444444444444444444443333310000001132222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222454544454455555444444445445444454444444454454444444444445555555554444444444544544544444455232Signs Exempt From Permitting per Section (D) Applicability, exemptions, and permit exemptions subsection (4) (a) and/or (b).AAAABAAAABBBBBBBBBBBABBBAB343536393131331313133313133313883333A37AABBBBA27Signs Exempt From Permitting per Section (D) Applicability, exemptions, and permit exemptions subsection (2) (b). And Section 3.8.7.5 Sign Maintenance Subsection (C) Altering or Moving Existing Signs, alterations to changeable copy are exempt from permitting.replace existing sign with4 ft tall signVARIANCEREQUIREDVARIANCEREQUIREDVARIANCEREQUIREDINCLUDE INVARIANCE REQUESTVARIANCEREQUIRED FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONS1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewExtent of New Excavation, New Landscaping and Construction vi.0FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONSPAGE TITLE / ELEMENT TYPESHEET NUMBER1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewSite Extent of new Landscaping and Construction1 UL JAAeccDbCogoPoint (Aecc L a n d 1 3 0 ) AeccDbCogoPoint (Ae c c L a n d 1 3 0 ) AeccDbCogoPoint (A e c c L a n d 1 3 0 )AABABABBABABAABBABABABABAABBAAABBBLot 1Lot 2Lot 3Lot 4Lot 5Lot 6Lot 7AB0'10'30'N60' 120'21'-0" ±39'-0"±14'-0"8'-0"edge is to be 24”from sidewalkedge is to be24” from curbmin, 48” max22'-0"5'-0"edge is to be24” from curbmin, 48” maxedge is to be24” from curbmin, 48” max5'-0"fromlight pole14'-0"consider placing this one inthe landscaping next to the treelocation as show in landscaping plans1110147612811Area of new excavation and landscapingArea of new construction and remodeling vii.0FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONSPAGE TITLE / ELEMENT TYPESHEET NUMBER1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewSite Landscaping Mitigation Plan Section 112131411 D101516179 D, E7 D, E865 D,E4 C32119 D20 A1821 A22 A23 A24 A25262730283132 A33 A295936 A35 A34 A37 A38 A39 A40 A41 A58 A,D57 A, D42 A,E43 A,E44 A,E48 A,D45 E, OVER EXISTING STRUCTURE46 E, OVER EXISTING STRUCTURE47 E, OVER EXISTING STRUCTURE49 D505155 D525354 B6463616566686769626056 A,D104 A112113PROPOSED CURB, TYP.NEW OVERHEAD CANOPYEXISTING TREES TOREMAIN & BE PROTECTEDEXISTING TREES TO BEREMOVED AND MITIGATEDA = PARKING / DRIVE ISLE RECONFIGURATIONB = CONFLICT WITH NEW ADA WALKC = UTILITY CONFLICTD = REVISED GRADING CONFLICTE = SITE FEATURE / SIGNAGE CONFLICTMATCHLINE SEE SHEET L4.10 15' 30' 60'SCALE: 1"= 30'-0" NORTH/(*(1'PROJECT TITLESTAMPProject302102009L4.0TREE MITIGATIONPLANPVH Master PlanImplementation1/4"IssuanceCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSARCHITECTAltus Architectural StudiosMARK DATE DESCRIPTIONMECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING,TECHNOLOGYWSP USA5613 DTC Parkway, Suite 500Greenwood Village, CO 80111303-694-4755CLIENTCIVILAspen EngineeringLANDSCAPEBHA Design Inc1920 Market Street, Suite 201Denver, CO 80202303-433-9500Fort Collins, CO 80524970-419-43441603 Oakridge Drive, Suite 100Fort Collins, CO 80525970-223-7577© COPYRIGHTDate07/30/2021KEY PLANGolden, CO 80403REVISIONS SCHEDULECBFEADH19 Old Town Square, Suite 238INTERIORSGallun SnowMEDICAL EQUIPMENTMAIA Consulting, Inc7887 E Belleview, Suite 1100Denver, CO 80111720-739-668612499 West ColfaxLakewood, CO 80215303-431-6100STRUCTURALMartin Martin112 N Rubey Drive, Suite 101303-945-4479POUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALFORT COLLINS, CO 805241024 S LEMAY AVENUEFIRE ALARM CONSULTANTTLH FIRE6901 S Pierce StreetLittleton, CO 80128303-517-1775C:\USERS\JASONMESSAROS\ONEDRIVE - BHADESIGN\DOCUMENTS\PROJECTS\PVH MP PHASE 1 - 4\DRAWINGS\ACAD\CD\DWG\1940 LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG7/27/2021 5:34:12 PMTREE MITIGATION TABLEA PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY FORESTER BEFORE ANY TREES ORSHRUBS AS NOTED ON THIS PLAN ARE PLANTED, PRUNED OR REMOVED IN THE PUBLICRIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS INCLUDES ZONES BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND CURB, MEDIANSAND OTHER CITY PROPERTY. THIS PERMIT SHALL APPROVE THE LOCATION ANDSPECIES TO BE PLANTED. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THIS PERMIT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CITYOF FORT COLLINS CODE SUBJECT TO CITATION (SECTION 27-31) AND MAY ALSO RESULTIN REPLACING OR RELOCATING TREES AND A HOLD ON CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.1. All existing trees within the limits of the development and within any natural area buffer zones shallremain and be protected unless noted on these plans for removal.2. Within the drip line of any protected existing tree, there shall be no cut or fill over a four-inch depthunless a qualified arborist or forester has evaluated and approved the disturbance.3. All protected existing trees shall be pruned to the city of fort collins forestry standards. tree pruningand removal shall be performed by a business that holds a current city of fort collins arborist licensewhere required by code.4. Prior to and during construction, barriers shall be erected around all protected existing trees withsuch barriers to be of orange fencing a minimum of four (4) feet in height, secured with metal t-posts,no closer than six (6) feet from the trunk or one-half (½) of the drip line, whichever is greater. thereshall be no storage or movement of equipment, material, debris or fill within the fenced treeprotection zone.5. During the construction stage of development, the applicant shall prevent the cleaning of equipmentor material or the storage and disposal of waste material such as paints, oils, solvents, asphalt,concrete, motor oil or any other material harmful to the life of a tree within the drip line of anyprotected tree or group of trees.6. No damaging attachment, wires, signs or permits may be fastened to any protected tree.7. Large property areas containing protected trees and separated from construction or land clearingareas, road rights-of-way and utility easements may be "ribboned off," rather than erecting protectivefencing around each tree as required in subsection (g)(3) above. this may be accomplished byplacing metal t-post stakes a maximum of fifty (50) feet apart and tying ribbon or rope fromstake-to-stake along the outside perimeters of such areas being cleared.8. The installation of utilities, irrigation lines or any underground fixture requiring excavation deeperthan six (6) inches shall be accomplished by boring under the root system of protected existing treesat a minimum depth of twenty-four (24) inches. the auger distance is established from the face of thetree (outer bark) and is scaled from tree diameter at breast height as described in the chart below:9. All tree removal shown shall be completed outside of the songbird nesting season (feb 1 - july 31) orconduct a survey of trees ensuring no active nests in the area.TREE PROTECTION NOTESNO TREES SHALL BE REMOVED DURING THE SONGBIRD NESTING SEASON (FEBRUARY 1 TO JULY 31) WITHOUT FIRST HAVING APROFESSIONAL ECOLOGIST OR WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST COMPLETE A NESTING SURVEY TO IDENTIFY ANY ACTIVE NESTS EXISTING ONTHE PROJECT SITE. THE SURVEY SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER. IF ACTIVE NESTS ARE FOUND, THE CITY WILL COORDINATE WITH RELEVANT STATE AND FEDERAL REPRESENTATIVES TO DETERMINE WHETHER ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONSON TREE REMOVAL AND CONSTRUCTION APPLY.TREE REMOVAL NOTEL4.1 viii.0FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONSPAGE TITLE / ELEMENT TYPESHEET NUMBER1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewSite Landscaping Mitigation Plan Section 258 A,D57 A, D9 D5155 D707172737475767778 A79 A8081828384 A85 A86 A87 A88 A9289909193949596 C97 B9998100101102 A103 A104 A105 A106 A107 A108111 A110112113114115116117118119120121109122123DASHED GRAY UTILITIESARE EXISTING, TYP.NEW MANHOLE TO BE ADDED TOEXISTING STORM WATER PIPE.REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGSAD CANOPYEXISTING TREES TOREMAIN & BE PROTECTEDEXISTING TREES TO BEREMOVED AND MITIGATEDA = PARKING / DRIVE ISLE RECONFIGURATIONB = CONFLICT WITH NEW ADA WALKC = UTILITY CONFLICTD = REVISED GRADING CONFLICTE = SITE FEATURE / SIGNAGE CONFLICT0 15' 30' 60' 90'SCALE: 1"= 30'-0" NORTH MATCHLINE SEE SHEET L4.0 /(*(1'PROJECT TITLESTAMPProject302102009L4.1TREE MITIGATIONPLANPVH Master PlanImplementation1/4"IssuanceCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSARCHITECTAltus Architectural StudiosMARK DATE DESCRIPTIONMECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING,TECHNOLOGYWSP USA5613 DTC Parkway, Suite 500Greenwood Village, CO 80111303-694-4755CLIENTCIVILAspen EngineeringLANDSCAPEBHA Design Inc1920 Market Street, Suite 201Denver, CO 80202303-433-9500Fort Collins, CO 80524970-419-43441603 Oakridge Drive, Suite 100Fort Collins, CO 80525970-223-7577© COPYRIGHTDate07/30/2021KEY PLANGolden, CO 80403REVISIONS SCHEDULECBFEADH19 Old Town Square, Suite 238INTERIORSGallun SnowMEDICAL EQUIPMENTMAIA Consulting, Inc7887 E Belleview, Suite 1100Denver, CO 80111720-739-668612499 West ColfaxLakewood, CO 80215303-431-6100STRUCTURALMartin Martin112 N Rubey Drive, Suite 101303-945-4479POUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALFORT COLLINS, CO 805241024 S LEMAY AVENUEFIRE ALARM CONSULTANTTLH FIRE6901 S Pierce StreetLittleton, CO 80128303-517-1775C:\USERS\JASONMESSAROS\ONEDRIVE - BHADESIGN\DOCUMENTS\PROJECTS\PVH MP PHASE 1 - 4\DRAWINGS\ACAD\CD\DWG\1940 LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG7/27/2021 5:34:12 PMA PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY FORESTER BEFORE ANY TREES ORSHRUBS AS NOTED ON THIS PLAN ARE PLANTED, PRUNED OR REMOVED IN THE PUBLICRIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS INCLUDES ZONES BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND CURB, MEDIANSAND OTHER CITY PROPERTY. THIS PERMIT SHALL APPROVE THE LOCATION ANDSPECIES TO BE PLANTED. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THIS PERMIT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CITYOF FORT COLLINS CODE SUBJECT TO CITATION (SECTION 27-31) AND MAY ALSO RESULTIN REPLACING OR RELOCATING TREES AND A HOLD ON CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.1. All existing trees within the limits of the development and within any natural area buffer zones shallremain and be protected unless noted on these plans for removal.2. Within the drip line of any protected existing tree, there shall be no cut or fill over a four-inch depthunless a qualified arborist or forester has evaluated and approved the disturbance.3. All protected existing trees shall be pruned to the city of fort collins forestry standards. tree pruningand removal shall be performed by a business that holds a current city of fort collins arborist licensewhere required by code.4. Prior to and during construction, barriers shall be erected around all protected existing trees withsuch barriers to be of orange fencing a minimum of four (4) feet in height, secured with metal t-posts,no closer than six (6) feet from the trunk or one-half (½) of the drip line, whichever is greater. thereshall be no storage or movement of equipment, material, debris or fill within the fenced treeprotection zone.5. During the construction stage of development, the applicant shall prevent the cleaning of equipmentor material or the storage and disposal of waste material such as paints, oils, solvents, asphalt,concrete, motor oil or any other material harmful to the life of a tree within the drip line of anyprotected tree or group of trees.6. No damaging attachment, wires, signs or permits may be fastened to any protected tree.7. Large property areas containing protected trees and separated from construction or land clearingareas, road rights-of-way and utility easements may be "ribboned off," rather than erecting protectivefencing around each tree as required in subsection (g)(3) above. this may be accomplished byplacing metal t-post stakes a maximum of fifty (50) feet apart and tying ribbon or rope fromstake-to-stake along the outside perimeters of such areas being cleared.8. The installation of utilities, irrigation lines or any underground fixture requiring excavation deeperthan six (6) inches shall be accomplished by boring under the root system of protected existing treesat a minimum depth of twenty-four (24) inches. the auger distance is established from the face of thetree (outer bark) and is scaled from tree diameter at breast height as described in the chart below:9. All tree removal shown shall be completed outside of the songbird nesting season (feb 1 - july 31) orconduct a survey of trees ensuring no active nests in the area.TREE PROTECTION NOTESL4.0 FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONS1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewSign Location Plan Details SLP1.0FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONSPAGE TITLE / ELEMENT TYPESHEET NUMBER1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewST132.1: Sign Location 7ST102:Visibility Study from Adjacent Residential Lot2SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"POUDRE VALLEY HOSPITAL1024 South Lemaylines of sight6'-0" fenceSign Location PlanSign Location DetailsAB8'-0"edge is to be 24”from sidewalk22AB5'-0"edge is to be24” from curbmin, 48” max5'-0"fromlight pole779location as show in landscaping plans1111Sign Location 2ST131: Sign Location 2NOTE: LOCATION 2: Sign needed to keep emergency traffic moving north towards the Emerency entrance. Location is selected prior to the right-turn lane in an effort to keep emergency traffic from entering the right-turn lane so as to keep it from having to merge back into through traffic too late.Outcome: Mittigates traffic confusion and gets persons needing urgent services to the Emergency drop-off in a timely manner.NOTE: LOCATION 7: Sign needed to keep emergency traffic moving forward towards the Emerency entrance. Location is selected prior to the left-turn lane in an effort to keep emergency traffic from mistaking the main hospital entrance with the Emergency drop off.Outcome: Mittigates traffic congestion and gets persons needing urgent services to the Emergency drop-off in a timely manner.Addtional Comments: Although signs is exempt from permitting per Section (D) Applicability, exemptions, and permit exemptions subsection (4) (a) and/or (b).: “Signs not visible and/or legible from residental lots, adjoining property, public right-of-way ...”, the City of Fort Collins Zoning Department felt that this location required a variance.NOTE: LOCATION 11: Sign identifies the main entrance to the hospital. Location is selected to coordinate with the new landscaping.Outcome: Sign lets patients and visitors know that if they are looking for the main entrnce to Poudre Valley Hospital they have found it.Addtional Comments: Although signs is exempt from permitting per Section (D) Applicability, exemptions, and permit exemptions subsection (4) (a) and/or (b).: “Signs not visible from roadway and residences do not require a permit”, the City of Fort Collins Zoning Department felt that this location required a variance.ST102: Sign Location 11Sign Location 11 example only not final location, see detail above for final locationHospital EntryDrive6’-0” fence at property lineMain Hospital Entrance andPatient Drop-Offelevated 6’-0” fence at property lineproperty line36’-0” setback SLP2.0FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONSPAGE TITLE / ELEMENT TYPESHEET NUMBER1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewSign Location PlanSign Location DetailsABedge is to be24” from curbmin, 48” max14'-0"1414ABAB201819AABB262827ST132.1: Sign Location 14NOTE: LOCATION 14: Sign needed to keep emergency traffic moving forward towards the Emerency entrance. Location is selected in an effort to remaind emergency visitors that they are indeed going in the correct direction if they are looking for the Emergency Drop-Off.Outcome: Mittigates traffic confusion and gets persons needing urgent services to the Emergency drop-off in a timely manner.Addtional Comments: Although signs is exempt from permitting per Section (D) Applicability, exemptions, and permit exemptions subsection (4) (a) and/or (b).: “Signs not visible from roadway and residences do not require a permit”, the City of Fort Collins Zoning Department felt that this location required a variance.NOTE: LOCATION 19: Sign needed to keep emergency traffic moving forward towards the Emerency entrance. Location is selected in an effort to remaind emergency visitors that they are indeed going in the correct direction if they are looking for the Emergency Drop-Off.Outcome: Mittigates traffic confusion and gets persons needing urgent services to the Emergency drop-off in a timely manner.Addtional Comments: Although signs is exempt from permitting per Section (D) Applicability, exemptions, and permit exemptions subsection (4) (a) and/or (b).: “Signs not visible from roadway and residences do not require a permit”, the City of Fort Collins Zoning Department felt that this location required a variance.NOTE: LOCATION 28: Sign needed to keep emergency traffic moving to the right towards the Emerency entrance. Included herein to keep the sign from becomming too small and hence not be visible or legible.Location is selected to keep traffic from entering the back of the hospital area since Emergency is not in that direction. Sign also replaces a sign which is much to small for vehicular traffic to notice and read. The exisitng sign is ineffective.Outcome: Mittigates traffic confusion and gets persons needing urgent services to the Emergency drop-off in a timely manner.ST132.1: Sign Location 19 ST141: Sign Location 28ST132.1:Visibility Study from Adjacent Residential Lot1SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"POUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALLot 3Lot 4Lot 5 & 6 Service/DeliveryEmergencylines of sight6'-0" fenceSign Locations 7, 14 and 19 example only not final location, see details above for final locationsSee Sheet G5.0 for Loccation Elevation6’-0” fence at property line15’-0” setback FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONS1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewExterior Signage Drawings G1.0FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONSPAGE TITLE / ELEMENT TYPESHEET NUMBER1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewSignage DrawingsST 102 - Primary Sign: Small Site Identification MonumentFront View1SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"Side View2SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"Plan View3SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"Key Plan5SCALE: NTSPOUDRE VALLEY HOSPITAL1024 South LemayCurve Detail4SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"1fabricated aluminum detailpaints Matthews 41342SP/281342SPBrushed Aluminumsign has a photocell and is connected toa circuit with a timer to prevent the signfrom being on during the day or in cloudyor overcast daytimeinternal illumination shall be by LEDwith following minimum specs:• 5000K color temperature• 60,000 hour minimum life • 150º F max operating temperature• water sealed• UL listedsign fabricator is to submit LED technology cut sheets fro approvalinternally illuminated cabinet withrouted and infilled backlit graphics;graphics are pushed through; cabinet paints to match Pantone 1945Cfabricated aluminum detailpaints Matthews 41342SP/281342SP Brushed Aluminumfabricated aluminum detailpaints Matthews 41342SP/281342SP Brushed AluminumC Lback side is blankpaints to matchPantone 1945Cfabricated aluminum base paints to matchPantone 7544C graphics are clear acrylic with white translucent vinyl applied to face,raised 1/2" from cabinet face1'-1 3/4"1'-1 3/4"5'-0"5'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-4 3/8"10'-4 3/8"8"1'-0"1'-4"2"2"1'-0"1 1/4"3 1/4"1 3/4"NOTES: 1) Final location is to be verified on site in coordination with landscaping and utilities.2) Area has been demoed and re-landscaped by Landscape Architect to include sign and low wallsSign Area 37.9 sqftidentificationmonumenthospital mainentrancelow wallsby otherssign height: 12’-0” Allowed per sign code Table (G)(2) in accordance with a primary sign as measured from the “Flow line” and sign setback from street right-of-way, pending approval from City of Fort Collins to use allowance for second primary sign per Doctors Lane frontage, otherwise a variance is required area: 90 sqft Allowed per sign code Table (G)(2) in accordance with a primary sign NOTE: Sign requires final review from City of Fort Collins Zoning Office. G2.0FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONSPAGE TITLE / ELEMENT TYPESHEET NUMBER1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewSignage DrawingsPrimary Signs: ST102, Site Identification Nighttime RenderingsPOUDRE VALLEY HOSPTIAL1024 South LemayLocation 11: Secondary Site Identification Monument1SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"NOTES:Sign has a photocell and is connected to a circuit with a timer to prevent the sign from being on during the day or in cloudy or overcast daytimeInternal illumination shall be by LED with following minimum specs:• 5000K color temperature• 60,000 hour minimum life • 150º F max operating temperature• water sealed• UL listedSign fabricator is to submit LED technology cut sheets fro approvalST102:Visibility Study from Adjacent Residential Lot2SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"POUDRE VALLEY HOSPITAL1024 South Lemaylines of sight6'-0" fence G3.0FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONSPAGE TITLE / ELEMENT TYPESHEET NUMBER1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewSignage DrawingsST 131 - Large Vehicular DirectionalNOTES: 1) Sign Location 2: Final location is to be verified on site in coordination with landscaping and utilities.POUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALPOUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALFront View1SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"Side View2SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"Nighttime Rendering3SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"Curve Detail4SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"sign has a photocell and is connected toa circuit with a timer to prevent the signfrom being on during the day or in cloudyor overcast daytimeinternal illumination shall be by LEDwith following minimum specs:• 5000K color temperature• 60,000 hour minimum life • 150º F max operating temperature• water sealed• UL listedsign fabricator is to submit LED technology cut sheets fro approvalfabricated aluminum detailpaints Matthews 41342SP/281342SPBrushed Aluminum4'-6"1'-1 3/8"1'-5 1/8"2"1'-1 3/8"1'-5 1/8"2"1'-6"1'-6"1"2 11/16"4'-11"1 3/8"8"1'-0"internally illuminated cabinet withrouted and infilled backlit graphics;graphics are pushed through and raised 1/4" from face of sign;face paints to match Pantone 1945Cinternally illuminated cabinet withrouted and infilled backlit graphicsgraphics are pushed through andflush with sign face; all text is 4 1/2" cap. height Avenir Next LT Pro Mediumbacklit translucent clear acrylic faces with applied vinyl graphics on back sidegraphics are weeded out of red or bluevinyl, entire back has applied matte white vinyl on backRed: 3M #3630-143 Poppy RedBlue: 3M #3630-127 Bright Bluefabricated aluminum basepaints to matchPantone 7544C 2" inset on all sidesreturns paint to matchPantone 1945C2" inset paitns to match Pantone 7544C1'-4"fabricated aluminum detailpaints Matthews 41342SP/281342SP Brushed Aluminum9'-8"Main EntranceVistorParkingOutpatientSurgeryEmergencyAmbulanceMain EntranceVistorParkingOutpatientSurgeryEmergencyAmbulanceSign Area 31.7 sqftNOTE: Only used at Sign Location 2. Variance is required for this location. G4.0FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONSPAGE TITLE / ELEMENT TYPESHEET NUMBER1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewSignage DrawingsST 132.1 - Medium Vehicular DirectionalNOTES: 1) Final location is to be verified on site in coordination with landscaping and utilities.2) For Locations 7, 14, 19: Areas has been demoed and re-landscaped by Landscape Architect to include new sign POUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALPOUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALFront View1SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"Side View2SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"Nighttime Rendering3SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"Curve Detail5SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"Plan View4SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"See Primary Vehicular Directional for materialand color call outs.Sign has a photocell and is connected toa circuit with a timer to prevent the signfrom being on during the day or in cloudyor overcast daytimeinternal illumination shall be by LEDwith following minimum specs:• 5000K color temperature• 60,000 hour minimum life • 150º F max operating temperature• water sealed• UL listedsign fabricator is to submit LED technology cut sheets fro approval10 7/8"10 7/8"9 1/2"1'-0 1/4"1'-0 1/4"1 1/2"1 1/2"1 1/2" inset on all sides1 1/2" inseton all sides3'-3"3'-3"3'-6"3'-6"3/4"2"1"all text is 3 3/16" cap. heightAvenir Next LT Pro Medium6 1/2"10"6 1/2"10"6'-0"1'-1"1'-1"Lot 3Lot 4Lot 5 & 6 Service/DeliveryEmergencyLot 3Lot 4Lot 5 & 6 Service/DeliveryEmergencySign Area 17.2 sqftNOTE: Per City of Fort Collins Zoning Office, a variance is required for these locations. G5.0FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONSPAGE TITLE / ELEMENT TYPESHEET NUMBER1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewSignage DrawingsST141: Post and Panel DirectionalST141: Front View: Pole Mounted1SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"NOTE: This sign replaces an existing ST152, Extra-Small monument sign at the same location.Sign Area 2 sqft1'-3"1'-8"EmergencyEmergencyTOP VIEW3" X 3" angle paints to match P1cap topSIDE VIEWSIDE BSIDE A1"3" square pole paints to match P33" X 3" angle paints to match P12'-0" min5'-0" AFGconcrete footer asneeded by sign fabricatorpainted 4X4 squarealumium post, P3aluminum panel (P1) with white retroreflectivevinyl graphicssign is double sidedexisting signcap topNOTE: Per City of Fort Collins Zoning Office, sign approved for permitting. FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONS1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewNew Signage Sign Face Layouts G7.0FD2S INC. © 2022 FD2S INC. PROJECT NAME/PROJECT CODE ISSUES/REVISIONSPAGE TITLE / ELEMENT TYPESHEET NUMBER1634 E César ChávezAustin Texas 78702512 476 7733fd2s.comAll rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designs contained in this document are the exclusive property of fd2s inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work or project other than the specific project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of fd2s inc. UCHealthPoudre Valley Hospital Exterior Signage Updates/Variance20UCH00502AUG2022 Variance Documentation Update19JUL2022 Final Permitting Compliance17JUN2022 Permitting Adjustments01FEB2022 Permitting Adjustments13DEC2021 Permitting Review30JUN2021 IssueFor Bid14JUN2021 100% DI for Bid Review30APR2021 For Client Review 50% DI01APR2021 Preliminary City Review 100% DD07OCT2020 For Client ReviewNew Signage LayoutsST131 & 132 - Locations 2, 7, 14, 19PatientPick-UpLot 1Exit toLemayPOUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALLot 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6 Service/DeliveryExit toDoctor'sLaneEmergencyPOUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALLot 3Lot 4Lot 5 & 6 Service/DeliveryEmergencyPOUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALHospitalMainEntrancePatientPick-UpExit to LemayPOUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALHospitalMainEntranceLot 2Lots 3–6EmergencyPOUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALHospitalMainEntrancePatientPick-UpLot 1Exit toLemayPOUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALNew Sign: ST131, Location 2POUDRE VALLEY HOSPITALSide BSide AST132.1, Location 7Side BSide AST132.1, Location 14Side BSide AST132.1, Location 19Side BMain EntranceVistorParkingPatientPick-UpEmergencyAmbulanceSide A is blankNOTE: Per City of Fort Collins Zoning Office, a variance is required for these locations. Agenda Item 2 Item # 2 - Page 1 STAFF REPORT September 8, 2022 STAFF Noah Beals, Senior City Planner/Zoning PROJECT ZBA220027 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Address: 324 Jefferson St. Owner/Petitioner: R.T. Custer Zoning District: D Code Section: 3.8.7.2(B) Table (B) Variance Request: This is a variance request for a 6.67-foot-tall wall sign to be installed within 15 feet of the elevation of the sidewalk below, where 4.5 feet is the maximum allowable height. COMMENTS: 1. Background: The property was a part of the original town plat of 1873. The original building was constructed in 1946 and has occupied a variety of businesses throughout the years to the present. In general sign regulations are limit distractions and prevent sign clutter. Sign height limitations on the first story of a building in the Downtown zone district are to prevent oversized signs at the pedestrian level. 2. Applicant’s statement of justification: See petitioner’s letter. 3. Staff Conclusion and Findings: Under Section 2.10.4(H), staff recommends approval and finds that: • The variance is not detrimental to the public good. • The proposed sign location is 50ft from the back of the public sidewalk. • The parking lot is In between the public sidewalk and the building. Therefore, the variance requests will not diverge from the standard but in a nominal, inconsequential way, when considered in the context of the neighborhood, and will continue to advance the purpose of the Land Use Code contained in Section 1.2.2 4. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of APPEAL ZBA220027. Application Request IRU9DULDQFHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGH The /DQG8VH5HYLHZ&RPPLVVLRQ has been granted the authority to approve variancesIURPWKHUHTXLUHPHQWV RI$UWLFOHVDQGRIWKH/DQG8VH&RGH7KH/DQG8VH5HYLHZ&RPPLVVLRQVKDOOQRWDXWKRUL]HDQ\XVHLQD]RQLQJ GLVWULFWRWKHUWKDQWKRVHXVHVZKLFKDUHVSHFLILFDOO\SHUPLWWHGLQWKH]RQLQJGLVWULFW7KH&RPPLVVLRQPD\JUDQW YDULDQFHVZKHUHLWILQGVWKDWWKHPRGLILFDWLRQRIWKHVWDQGDUGwould not be detrimental to the publicgood $GGLWLRQDOO\WKHYDULDQFHUHTXHVWPXVWPHHWDWOHDVWRQHRIWKHIROORZLQJMXVWLILFDWLRQUHDVRQV E\UHDVRQRIH[FHSWLRQDOSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVRURWKHUH[WUDRUGLQDU\DQGH[FHSWLRQDOVLWXDWLRQVXQLTXHWR WKHSURSHUW\LQFOXGLQJEXWQRWOLPLWHGWRSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVVXFKDVH[FHSWLRQDOQDUURZQHVV VKDOORZQHVVRUWRSRJUDSK\WKHVWULFWDSSOLFDWLRQRIWKHFRGHUHTXLUHPHQWVZRXOGUHVXOWLQXQXVXDODQG H[FHSWLRQDOSUDFWLFDOGLIILFXOWLHVRUXQGXHKDUGVKLSXSRQWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQWRIWKHSURSHUW\SURYLGHG WKDWVXFKGLIILFXOWLHVRUhardshipDUHQRWFDXVHGE\DQDFWRURPLVVLRQRIWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQW LHQRW VHOILPSRVHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOSURPRWHWKHJHQHUDOSXUSRVHRIWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHG equallywell or better thanZRXOGDSURSRVDOZKLFKFRPSOLHVZLWKWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLV UHTXHVWHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOQRWGLYHUJHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGHVWDQGDUGVH[FHSWLQDnominal, inconsequential wayZKHQFRQVLGHUHGLQWKHFRQWH[WRIWKHQHLJKERUKRRG This application is only for a variance to the Land Use Code. Building Code requirements will be determined and reviewed by the Building Department separately. When a building or sign permit is required for any work for which a variance has been granted, the permit must be obtained within 6 months of the date that the variance was granted. +RZHYHUIRUJRRGFDXVHVKRZQE\WKHDSSOLFDQWWKH/DQG8VH5HYLHZ&RPPLVVLRQPD\FRQVLGHUDRQHWLPHPRQWK H[WHQVLRQLIUHDVRQDEOHDQGQHFHVVDU\XQGHUWKHIDFWVDQGFLUFXPVWDQFHVRIWKHFDVH$QH[WHQVLRQUHTXHVWPXVWEH VXEPLWWHGEHIRUHPRQWKVIURPWKHGDWHWKDWWKHYDULDQFHZDVJUDQWHGKDVODSVHG Petitioner or Petitioner’s Representative must be present at the meeting Location 9,578$/21/<YLD=RRP LQVWUXFWLRQVZLOOEHHPDLOHGWRWKHDSSOLFDQWWKH)ULGD\RU0RQGD\SULRUWRWKHKHDULQJ Date 6HFRQG7KXUVGD\RIWKHPRQWK7LPH DP ’s Name )RUW&ROOLQV&2’s Petitioner’s Address ’s NamePetitioner’s Phone # !"Petitioner’s Email ’s Name !"Representative’s Address !"Representative’s Phone # !"Representative’s Email tZ/dd E^dd D Ed yW>/E/E'd, Z ^KE&KZd, sZ/E Z Yh ^dZ Yh/Z s/ ^ WZd KhD Ed͘ 324 Jefferson Street R.T. Custer Owner & CEO 80524 324 Jefferson Street R.T. Custer 484-432-3354 Code 3.8.7 rt@vorticwatches.com Downtown Tyler Wolfe 324 Jefferson Street 970-829-9204 tyler@vorticwatches.com 08/08/2022 Choose One from List Additional Justification Additional Justification August 8, 2022 Land Use Review Commission City of Fort Collins, Downtown District To Whom It May Concern, We started Vortic Watch Company on Kickstarter here in Fort Collins in 2014 from the garage of our condo near Timberline and Lemay. We’ve been blessed with continuous support from the Fort Collins community and have upgraded our space from there to the Rocky Mountain Innosphere, to the grand opening of Jessup Farm, to a 2,000 sqft warehouse o of Link Lane, and now to 324 Je erson Street, an 8,400 sqft building which we proudly now own and have spent the last 12 months renovating. 1) “Hardship” - As a manufacturing company with our own tools, team, and machines, we decided to make the “cherry on top” for our building ourselves. We built a fantastic sign tting for the design of this historic piece of Old Town Fort Collins, and unfortunately we made a mistake. We did not rst review the code for the downtown district prior to the manufacturing of this beautiful stainless steel sign. The existing (maybe un-permitted) sign on the building was over 10 feet tall, so we mistakenly assumed our much smaller sign would be okay. To re-make this sign and scrap the current piece, we’d lose thousands of dollars in materials and labor. 2) “Equal or Better” - As engineers and designers of luxury watches we craft an experience for our customers using our products, and we believe looking at this sign and the exterior design of the building, although the sign is larger than is allowed by code, we believe it ts the overall aesthetic of the building and the area artfully. 3) “Nominal or Inconsequential” - The side of the building the sign will be mounted to sits 53 feet back from the sidewalk. From that perspective and distance, plus with cars moving as quickly as they do past on Je erson Street, we believe a larger sign far back from the road will not stand out or be distracting in any way, especially with our subtle stainless steel material. Thank you for your time and consideration, R.T. Custer and Tyler Wolfe Co-Founders, Vortic Watch Company VORTIC WATCH COMPANY, 324 JEFFERSON STREET, FORT COLLINS, CO 80524. 855-285-7884 B2109401Trash enclosure notapproved for thislocation. A limitedscope minoramendment will needto be applied for trashenclosure approval.6'-8"6'-8"18'-4"9'-0"Front Elevation EaveHeightParking Lot Elevation6'-8" Diameter StainlessSteel Dye Cut w/ distressedfinish (non reflective), wallmounted as shown above8'-0"324 Jefferson Sign Permit App Elevation & Details Agenda Item 3 Item # 3 - Page 1 STAFF REPORT September 8, 2022 STAFF Noah Beals, Senior City Planner/Zoning PROJECT ZBA220028 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Address: 503 Mathews St. #3 Owner/Petitioner: Annmarie Banchy & John Green Zoning District: N-C-B Code Section: 4.9(D)(5); 4.9(D)(6)(c) Variance Request: This is a request for a proposed 2nd floor rear entry to exceed the total square footage allowed in the rear-half by 368 square feet. The maximum allowed is 1,224 feet. Additionally, for the proposed entry to encroach 6 feet 9 inches into the required 15-foot rear-yard setback. COMMENTS: 1. Background: The property is part of the original Fort Collins town plat of 1873. The original building was constructed int 1879, it is unclear the number of changes that occurred through time. The original lot did extend to the alley. An additional dwelling was built in on the rear part of the original lot in 1899. In time the additional building was subdivided on a separate parcel creating a rear property line 21’ from the back of 503 Mathews Street. A 6’ fence exists between these two properties now. 2. Applicant’s statement of justification: See petitioner’s letter. 3. Staff Conclusion and Findings: Under Section 2.10.4(H), staff recommends approval and finds that: • The variance is not detrimental to the public good. • An existing entry is being replaced similar in size and location. • The proposed entry is at the main level. • An existing fence limits the visibility of the proposed entry. Therefore, the variance requests will not diverge from the standard but in a nominal, inconsequential way, when considered in the context of the neighborhood, and will continue to advance the purpose of the Land Use Code contained in Section 1.2.2 4. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of APPEAL ZBA220028. Application Request for Variance from the Land Use Code The Land Use Review Commission has been granted the authority to approve variances from the requirements of Articles 3 and 4 of the Land Use Code. The Land Use Review Commission shall not authorize any use in a zoning district other than those uses which are specifically permitted in the zoning district. The Commission may grant variances where it finds that the modification of the standard would not be detrimental to the public good. Additionally, the variance request must meet at least one of the following justification reasons: (1)by reason of exceptional physical conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situations unique to theproperty, including, but not limited to physical conditions such as exceptional narrowness, shallowness, ortopography, the strict application of the code requirements would result in unusual and exceptional practicaldifficulties or undue hardship upon the occupant/applicant of the property, provided that such difficulties orhardship are not caused by an act or omission of the occupant/applicant (i.e. not self-imposed); (2)the proposal will promote the general purpose of the standard for which the variance is requested equally well or better than would a proposal which complies with the standard for which the variance is requested; (3)the proposal will not diverge from the Land Use Code standards except in a nominal, inconsequential way when considered in the context of the neighborhood. This application is only for a variance to the Land Use Code. Building Code requirements will be determined and reviewed by the Building Department separately. When a building or sign permit is required for any work for which a variance has been granted, the permit must be obtained within 6 months of the date that the variance was granted. However, for good cause shown by the applicant, the Land Use Review Commission may consider a one-time 6 month extension if reasonable and necessary under the facts and circumstances of the case. An extension request must be submitted before 6 months from the date that the variance was granted has lapsed. Petitioner or Petitioner’s Representative must be present at the meeting Location: 9,R7U$L 21L< via =oom insWUuFWions wiOO Ee emaiOed Wo WKe aSSOiFanW WKe )Uida\ oU 0onda\ SUioU Wo WKHKeaUinJ Date: Second Thursday of the month 7ime: 8:30 a.m. Variance Address Petitioner’s Name, if not the Owner City Fort Collins, CO Petitioner’s Relationship to the Owner is Zip Code Petitioner’s Address Owner’s Name Petitioner’s Phone # Code Section(s) Petitioner’s Email Zoning District Additional Representative’s Name Justification(s) Representative’s Address Justification(s) Representative’s Phone # Justification(s) Representative’s Email Reasoning Date ___________________________________ Signature __________________________________________ WRITTEN STATEMENT EXPLAINING THE REASON FOR THE VARIANCE REQUEST REQUIRED VIA SEPARATE DOCUMENT. 503 Mathews St.Steve Josephs contractor 80524 319 E. Magnolia St. Annmarie Banchy &John Green 970-218-6905 steve@craftsmenbuildersinc.com NCB 8/8/22 3. Nominal and inconsequential 1. Hardship Additional Justification VARIENCE REQUEST FOR 503 MAHTEWS ST Craftsmen Builders is requesting a variance to build a larger, ground floor back entrance to a second floor apartment on the back of 503 Mathews St. Currently there is an entrance housing the stairway to the second floor. The stairs start just inside the door affording no room for a landing at the bottom. The proposed addition will allow for an interior indoor landing and covered entry. We believe this will impact the neighbor hood in a nominal or inconsequential way because it is replacing an existing entry and is only slightly smaller, while providing a entry that is safer and more user friendly for the occupant. We also believe that there is a hardship. This property was subdivided at some point putting more of the residence on the back half of the lot. This makes it impossible to improve the entry to apartment 3 without the variance. Thanks for your consideration, Steve Josephs Craftsmen Builders Inc. N 21'-4"21'-7"21'-8"11'-10" 8'-3"16'-2"21'-8" 24'-8"22'-4"EXISTING TWO STORY TRIPLEX EXISTING PORCH APARTMENTS 1& 2 ENTRY PROPOSED ENTRY TO APARTMENT 3 PROPOSED PORCH PROPOSED PORCH APARTMENT 1 ENTRY APARTMENT 2 ENTRY EAST MULBERRY ST MATHEWS ST.SITE PLAN 503 MATHEWS ST. SCALE: 1"=20' MID POINT OF LOT ZONING DISTRICT: NCB EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE MAIN FLOOR 1705 SF. FIRST FLOOR PROPOSED ADDITION 111 SF. TOTAL AFER ADDITION 1816 SF. EXISTING SF. SECOND FLOOR 1313 SF. TOTAL FOR BOTH FLOORS WITH ADDITION 3129 SF EXISTING F.A.R FOR REAR 50% OF 7420 SF. LOT 1224 SF. PROPOSED F.A.R.FOR REAR 50% OF LOT INCLUDING 111SF ADDITION 1592 SF. PROPOSED DECK PROPOSED DECK 70' 160' EXISTING CURB CUT EXISTING GRAVEL PARKING !" ! !" ! !" ! !" ! !" ! !" ! !" ! !" ! !" ! !" !# $% &$# $% &$'(() '(()'(()*+,+ -*+,+ -.+/' .+/' * 0' /0'.'.$1 2 3&4 $ $ $56 4 &44 7 83&4 7 &6 1 (( 9! !" ! !" ! !" ! !" ! !" ! !" ! ! " ! !" !'(()'(()*+,+ -*('/.+/' / //)' ///+//+ :*(( * )+ :*(('( :*(()/' /; Agenda Item 4 Item # 4 - Page 1 STAFF REPORT September 8, 2022 STAFF Noah Beals, Senior City Planner/Zoning PROJECT ZBA220029 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Address: 501 Edwards St. Owner/Petitioner: Adam Jasper Zoning District: N-C-M Code Section: 4.8(D)(2)(a)(2) Variance Request: This is a request to exceed the total square footage allowed by 499.25 square feet. The maximum permitted is 2,556.75 square feet. COMMENTS: 1. Background: The property was annexed into the City in as part of the Lake Park Addition in 1881. It received development approval at the same time but was later replatted as part of the Craft Resub Subdivision. The original building was constructed in the early 1900’s. In August of 2021 the applicant presented to this commission a plan that demolished the existing structure and a proposed new building that encroached into the side setback. This plan did receive approval for the variance request. The design standards and floor area requirements have not changed. The applicants designed the primary building taking up for the full allowable square footage. 2. Applicant’s statement of justification: See petitioner’s letter. 3. Staff Conclusion and Findings: Under Section 2.10.4(H), staff recommends denial and finds that: • The request is a 19% increase of the allowable floor area • Insufficient evidence has been provided in establishing how the proposal would be nominal and inconsequential in the context of the neighborhood. • Insufficient evidence has been provided in showing how the proposal supports the standards in a way equally well or better than a proposal that complies with the standards. • Insufficient evidence has been provided in establishing a unique hardship not caused by the applicant. 4. Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of APPEAL ZBA220029. Application Request IRU9DULDQFHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGH The /DQG8VH5HYLHZ&RPPLVVLRQ has been granted the authority to approve variancesIURPWKHUHTXLUHPHQWV RI$UWLFOHVDQGRIWKH/DQG8VH&RGH7KH/DQG8VH5HYLHZ&RPPLVVLRQVKDOOQRWDXWKRUL]HDQ\XVHLQD]RQLQJ GLVWULFWRWKHUWKDQWKRVHXVHVZKLFKDUHVSHFLILFDOO\SHUPLWWHGLQWKH]RQLQJGLVWULFW7KH&RPPLVVLRQPD\JUDQW YDULDQFHVZKHUHLWILQGVWKDWWKHPRGLILFDWLRQRIWKHVWDQGDUGwould not be detrimental to the publicgood $GGLWLRQDOO\WKHYDULDQFHUHTXHVWPXVWPHHWDWOHDVWRQHRIWKHIROORZLQJMXVWLILFDWLRQUHDVRQV E\UHDVRQRIH[FHSWLRQDOSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVRURWKHUH[WUDRUGLQDU\DQGH[FHSWLRQDOVLWXDWLRQVXQLTXHWR WKHSURSHUW\LQFOXGLQJEXWQRWOLPLWHGWRSK\VLFDOFRQGLWLRQVVXFKDVH[FHSWLRQDOQDUURZQHVV VKDOORZQHVVRUWRSRJUDSK\WKHVWULFWDSSOLFDWLRQRIWKHFRGHUHTXLUHPHQWVZRXOGUHVXOWLQXQXVXDODQG H[FHSWLRQDOSUDFWLFDOGLIILFXOWLHVRUXQGXHKDUGVKLSXSRQWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQWRIWKHSURSHUW\SURYLGHG WKDWVXFKGLIILFXOWLHVRUhardshipDUHQRWFDXVHGE\DQDFWRURPLVVLRQRIWKHRFFXSDQWDSSOLFDQW LHQRW VHOILPSRVHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOSURPRWHWKHJHQHUDOSXUSRVHRIWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLVUHTXHVWHG equallywell or better thanZRXOGDSURSRVDOZKLFKFRPSOLHVZLWKWKHVWDQGDUGIRUZKLFKWKHYDULDQFHLV UHTXHVWHG WKHSURSRVDOZLOOQRWGLYHUJHIURPWKH/DQG8VH&RGHVWDQGDUGVH[FHSWLQDnominal, inconsequential wayZKHQFRQVLGHUHGLQWKHFRQWH[WRIWKHQHLJKERUKRRG This application is only for a variance to the Land Use Code. Building Code requirements will be determined and reviewed by the Building Department separately. When a building or sign permit is required for any work for which a variance has been granted, the permit must be obtained within 6 months of the date that the variance was granted. +RZHYHUIRUJRRGFDXVHVKRZQE\WKHDSSOLFDQWWKH/DQG8VH5HYLHZ&RPPLVVLRQPD\FRQVLGHUDRQHWLPHPRQWK H[WHQVLRQLIUHDVRQDEOHDQGQHFHVVDU\XQGHUWKHIDFWVDQGFLUFXPVWDQFHVRIWKHFDVH$QH[WHQVLRQUHTXHVWPXVWEH VXEPLWWHGEHIRUHPRQWKVIURPWKHGDWHWKDWWKHYDULDQFHZDVJUDQWHGKDVODSVHG Petitioner or Petitioner’s Representative must be present at the meeting Location 9,578$/21/<YLD=RRP LQVWUXFWLRQVZLOOEHHPDLOHGWRWKHDSSOLFDQWWKH)ULGD\RU0RQGD\SULRUWRWKHKHDULQJ Date 6HFRQG7KXUVGD\RIWKHPRQWK7LPH DP Variance Address Petitioner’s Name, if not the Owner City )RUW&ROOLQV&2Petitioner’s Relationship to the Owner is Zip Code Petitioner’s Address Owner’s Name Petitioner’s Phone # Code Section(s) Petitioner’s Email Zoning District Additional Representative’s Name Justification(s) Representative’s Address Justification(s) Representative’s Phone # Justification(s) Representative’s Email Reasoning Date ___________________________________ Signature __________________________________________ tZ/dd E^dd D Ed yW>/E/E'd, Z ^KE&KZd, sZ/E Z Yh ^dZ Yh/Z s/ ^ WZd KhD Ed͘ 501 Edwards Street Same 80524 4321 Corbett, Fort Collins ADAM JASPER 970-2318632 MCM Adam@HWGColorado.com 4.8 D2A2 BRUCE HAWKINS 4321 Corbett,Fort Collins 720-648-3136 BRUCE@HWGcolorado.com 8/9/2022 Bruce Hawkins 2. Equal to or better than 3. Nominal and inconsequential Additional Justification August 9, 2022 Mr. Rob Bianchetto Senior Zoning Inspector Zoning, Community Development & Neighborhood Services City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Ave Zoning @ fcgov.com Mr. Bianchetto, We are in the process of building a new two story home located at 501 Edwards Street. We would like to add a two car (24’x 24’) detached garage in the rear portion of our lot which will daylight to a well maintained gravel alley, that we share with our neighbors. The garage will be built with the same construction material as the our new home and will follow the same color schemes. The detached garage would be a nice addition for our home owners as they would not need to search for street parking, their cars would be protected from hail damage and eliminate the scraping of snow after each storm. We submit this request under the Hardship reasoning. The Lot that we are building on has as very limited buildable area under the current land use code because we added a second story. We have a building that has a foot print of 1490sqft on the lot, because we added second story living area we used up our allotment for buildable area on the site. The current house occupies 26% of the total lot area and with the addition of the garage we occupy 36% of the lot area. Had we chosen to take a larger foot print without going vertical we could have covered as much as 42% of the surface area. We also contend that the proposal that we are suggesting is equal to or better than the existing approved plans. It is out contention that an enclosed garage for off street parking is better for the neighborhood than an exposed gravel parking area that fronts to wheebee street. Additionally the added water shed is nominal and is still less than the lots previous us as a parking lot. On the existing Plans as they have been approved we proposed a 694 sqft gravel parking area. This gravel area is located on the site directly behind the residence with the same encroachment on the side set back as the house (this had been previously approved. We are proposing to eliminate the gravel parking area, and instead build a 576 Sqft enclosed garage that matches the home. The garage will be sited on the same area that had previously been designated as gravel off street parking. This would increase the water shed by area of 576 sqft from the previously proposed 40% impermeable to 90%. The net increase of water shed on this lot is still a reduction from the previous use when the lot was used as a parking lot prior to the construction of the new home. I have attached the plot plan, grading plan, framing, structural and foundation plans for your review. I have also attached the application for land use and the Zoning board of appeals. Thanks in advance for your help! HWG Construction Services 970-231-8632 D-1D-2Main Level Floor PlanNMonolithic Foundation PlanNW-1W-1W-1W-1TAPERED AREAFOR CONCRETETRANSITION TYP.WEST ELEVATIONE4A1-1ENORTH ELEVATION1A1-1EAST ELEVATIONE2A1-1SOUTH ELEVATIONE3A1-1576 SQFTNEW GARAGEBUILDINGAREAUNCONDITIONEDGARAGE9'0 CEILINGTYP.24'-0"5 1/2"23'-1"5 1/2"12'-0"12'-0"24'-0"5 1/2"23'-1"5 1/2"5'-0"14'-0"5'-0"24'-0"5 1/2"23'-1"5 1/2"5'-0"7'-0"7'-0"5'-0"24'-0"5 1/2"23'-1"5 1/2"24'-0"18'-0"X8'-0" INSULATEDOVERHEAD GARAGEDOOR24'-0"1'-0"1'-2"19'-8"1'-2"1'-0"24'-0"1'-0"1'-2"19'-8"1'-2"1'-0"24'-0"24'-0"1'-0"1'-2"19'-8"1'-2"1'-0"1'-0"1'-2"19'-8"1'-2"1'-0"FOUNDATION NOTE:1. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR ALL FOOTINGSIZES, REBAR SIZE AND PLACEMENTWEST ELEVATION4A1-1ENORTH ELEVATION1A1-1EAST ELEVATIONE2A1-1SOUTH ELEVATIONE3A1-1ERIDGERIDGERIDGERIDGE4/124/125/125/12Roof PlanN4" WHITE ALUMINUMGUTTERS TYP.4" WHITE ALUMINUMGUTTERS TYP.DOWNSPOUTLOCATIONDOWNSPOUTLOCATIONDOWNSPOUTLOCATIONDOWNSPOUTLOCATION1. ROOFING MATERIAL TO BECOMPOSITION STYLE -CLASS #4 SHINGLES TYP. -COLOR BY OWNER.2. ALL DOWNSPOUTS TO BEDRAINED TO LIGHT AT NOLESS THAN 14" PER LINIERFOOT OF RUN.3. AT NO POINT SHALLDOWNSPOUTS DRAIN ONTOHARD SURFACES.4. PROVIDE COLLAPSIBLEDOWNSPOUT EXTENSIONS@ ALL DOWNSPOUTSDRAINING ON PERMEABLESURFACES TO A MINIMUMOF 60" BEYONDFOUNDATION WALLS TYP.GENERAL NOTES:TRUSS NOTES:1. ALL TRUSSES SHALL CARRY ENGINEEREDSTAMPED DESIGN DRAWINGS ANDMANUFACTURERS STAMP.2. ALL TRUSSES SHALL BE INSTALLED & BRACED TOMANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS3. ALL TRUSSES WILL NOT BE FIELD ALTEREDWITHOUT PRIOR BUILDING DEPT. APPROVAL OFENGINEERING CALCULATIONS.4. ALL TRUSSES SHALL HAVE DESIGN DETAILS &ENGINEERED DRAWINGS ON SITE FOR FRAMINGINSPECTION.5. ALL CONNECTIONS OF RAFTERS, JACK OR HIPTRUSSES TO MAIN GIRDER TO BE PROVIDED BYTRUSS MANUFACTURER.6. ALL ROOF FRAMING 24" O.C.7. ALL ROOF PITCH @ 5:12 UNLESS OTHERWISESTATED ON DRAWINGS.8. ALL OVERHANGS ARE @16".9. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS ANDREQUIREMENTSVENTILATION:1. PROVIDE 1" MIN. AIRGAP AT EAVES WITHINSULATION BAFFLESTYP. AT ALL TRUSSBAYS.2. PROVIDE CONTINUOUSRIDGE VENTILATION.3. PROVIDE CONTINUOUSEAVE VENTILATION.CONTINUOUSRIDGE VENTTYP.12" VENTEDSOFFIT12" VENTEDSOFFIT12" VENTEDSOFFIT12" VENTEDSOFFITTyp. Wall SectionGFCI42" AFFGFCI42" AFFGFCI42" AFFGFCI42" AFFLITHONIA CSS L48 4000LMMVOLT 40K 80CRI LEDCOORDINATE WITHGARAGE DOOROPENERNEW ELECTRICALSUPPLY ANDEATON -BR612L125RPRAIN PROOFPANEL (SUB-FEEDFROM RESIDENCE)Garage Electrical PlanNELECTRICAL, AND DATA NOTES:1. HOME OWNER SHALL DO A WALK-THRU WITH RELEVANT INSTALLERS TOVERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION FOR OUTLETS, LIGHTS, SWITCHES, CABLE,DATA, PHONE, ETC.ELECTRICAL NOTES:1. PROVIDE GROUNDING PER 2021 IRC; SECTION 36: ARTICLE E3608.1.2;CONCRETE ENCASED ELECTRODE (UFER GROUNDING).2. ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES IN GARAGES SHALL BE G.F.C.I. PER NATIONALELECTRICAL CODE REQUIREMENTS.3. CIRCUITS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH HOME OWNER PRIOR TO WIREINSTALLATION.4. FIXTURES TO BE SELECTED BY HOME OWNER (WITHIN BUDGETPARAMETERS SET BY CONTRACTOR).5. PROVIDE ONE 50-AMP 240V CIRCUIT IN GARAGE FOR ELECTRICVEHICLE CHARGING.UNCONDITIONEDGARAGEDOOR #TYPESIZEJAMBTRIMNOTESDOOR SCHEDULESWINGD-1STEEL18'-0"X8'-0"OVERHEADSTYLEWOOD INSULATED OVERHEADTBDD-2STEELWOODSIX PANELDEPTH6-9/163'-0"X6'-8"LEFT 6-9/16 TBDEXTERIOR TRIM AND JAMB PAINTEDDOOR, TRIM, AND JAMB PAINTEDWINDOW SCHEDULENUMBER LABELQTY FLOORSIZEWIDTHHEIGHTR/OEGRESS DESCRIPTION HEADER CODE MANUFACTURERCOMMENTSW012040DH 412040SH 24 " 48 " 25"X49" SINGLE HUNG2X6X28" (2)MILGARD - TUSCANY SERIESSIMULATED DIVIDED LITE (TOP ONLY)2040SHE-1 North Elevation412412MILGARD-TUSCANYSERIESVINYL24"X48"SINGLEHUNGWINDOWMILGARD-TUSCANYSERIESVINYL24"X48"SINGLEHUNGWINDOWSMARTSIDE 6"CEDAR TEXTUREFASCIA TYP.LP SMART SIDE6" CEDARTEXTURE LAPSIDING TYP.LP SMARTSIDE4" CEDARTEXTURECORNER TRIMTYP.LP SMARTSIDE4" CEDARTEXTURECORNER TRIMTYP.LP SMARTSIDE 4"CEDER TEXTURETRIM @ WINDOWSIDES AND SILLTYP.LP SMARTSIDE 6"CEDAR TEXTURETRIM @ WINDOWHEAD TYP.LP SMARTSIDE 4"CEDER TEXTURETRIM @ WINDOWSIDES AND SILLTYP.LP SMARTSIDE 6"CEDAR TEXTURETRIM @ WINDOWHEAD TYP.LP SMARTSIDE 4"CEDER TEXTURETRIM @ MANDOOR SIDESTYP.LP SMARTSIDE 6"CEDAR TEXTURETRIM @ MANDOOR HEAD TYP.E-2 East Elevation512512SMARTSIDE 6"CEDAR TEXTUREFASCIA TYP.LP SMART SIDE6" CEDARTEXTURE LAPSIDING TYP.LP SMARTSIDE4" CEDARTEXTURECORNER TRIMTYP.LP SMARTSIDE4" CEDARTEXTURECORNER TRIMTYP.E-4 West Elevation512512MILGARD-TUSCANYSERIESVINYL24"X48"SINGLEHUNGWINDOWMILGARD-TUSCANYSERIESVINYL24"X48"SINGLEHUNGWINDOWSMARTSIDE 6"CEDAR TEXTUREFASCIA TYP.LP SMART SIDE6" CEDARTEXTURE LAPSIDING TYP.LP SMARTSIDE4" CEDARTEXTURECORNER TRIMTYP.LP SMARTSIDE4" CEDARTEXTURECORNER TRIMTYP.LP SMARTSIDE 4"CEDER TEXTURETRIM @ WINDOWSIDES AND SILLTYP.LP SMARTSIDE 6"CEDAR TEXTURETRIM @ WINDOWHEAD TYP.E-3 South Elevation412412SMARTSIDE 6"CEDAR TEXTUREFASCIA TYP.LP SMART SIDE6" CEDARTEXTURE LAPSIDING TYP.LP SMARTSIDE4" CEDARTEXTURECORNER TRIMTYP.LP SMARTSIDE4" CEDARTEXTURECORNER TRIMTYP.LP SMARTSIDE 4"CEDER TEXTURETRIM @OVERHEAD DOORSIDES TYP.LP SMARTSIDE 6"CEDAR TEXTURETRIM @OVERHEAD DOORHEAD TYP.4215 WHITE DEER LANEFORT COLLINS CO 80549millardandassociatesltd.com308.539.2759SHEET:OF:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT #DRAWN BY:APPROVED BY / DATE:SCALE: AS NOTEDISSUE:DATE:MAILLARD&SSOCIATES501 Edwards Garage501 EdwardsFort Collins COA1-112 1. SETBACK USED ARE CONTEXTUAL SETBACKS AND DO NOT EXCEED EXISTING SET BACKSCURRENTLY IN PLACE ON THE NORTH, EAST, AND WEST SIDES OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURELOCATED ON THE CURRENT PROPERTY.2. PER LOCAL LAND USE JURISDICTIONAL CODE STATED IN ARTICLE 3 - GENERALDEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; DIVISION 3.8 - SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATIONS;SECTION 3.8.19 - SETBACK REGULATIONS; SUBSECTION B: REGARDLESS OF THEMINIMUM FRONT SETBACK REQUIREMENT IMPOSED BY THE ZONE DISTRICT STANDARDS OFTHIS LAND USE CODE, APPLICANTS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO USE A "CONTEXTUAL" FRONTSETBACK. A "CONTEXTUAL" FRONT SETBACK MAY FALL AT ANY POINT BETWEEN THE FRONTSETBACK REQUIRED IN THE ZONE DISTRICT AND THE FRONT SETBACK THAT EXISTS ON ALOT THAT ABUTS, AND IS ORIENTED TO, THE SAME STREET AS THE SUBJECT LOT. IF THESUBJECT LOT IS A CORNER LOT, THE "CONTEXTUAL" SETBACK MAY FALL AT ANY POINTBETWEEN THE ZONE DISTRICT REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK AND THE FRONT SETBACK THATEXISTS ON THE LOT THAT IS ABUTTING AND ORIENTED TO THE SAME STREET AS THESUBJECT LOT. IF LOTS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE SUBJECT LOT ARE VACANT, THE SETBACKSHALL BE INTERPRETED AS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK THAT APPLIES TO THEVACANT LOT. THIS PROVISION SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS REQUIRING A GREATERFRONT SETBACK THAN THAT IMPOSED BY THE UNDERLYING ZONE DISTRICT, AND IT SHALLNOT BE CONSTRUED AS ALLOWING SETBACKS TO BE REDUCED TO A LEVEL THAT RESULTSIN RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS BELOW ESTABLISHED MINIMUMS.SETBACK NOTES:501 Edwards Street, Fort Collins, Colorado80526,Legal: LOT 10, BLK 14, CRAFTSRESUBDIVISION OF LAKE PARKADDITION, CITY OF FORT COLLINS,COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OFCOLORADO.NORTH01020 40SCALE IN FEETWATERSHED NOTE:RESIDENCE WATERSHED ISINCREASED BY 1058 SQ.FT..GARAGE WATERSHEDINCLUDING WALKS AND DRIVEIS INCREASES WATERSHED ANADDITIONAL 1228 SQ.FT..S00°21'25"W 140.06'S00°21'25"W 140.13'S89°48'58"E 40.06'N89°55'26"W 40.03'884°458EDWARDS STREETWEDBEE STREETEXISTING DECIDUOUSTREE TO REMAINPROTECT DURINGCONSTRUCTIONALLEYS89°48'58"E 40.06'EDWARDS STREETWEDBEE STREETEXISTING DECIDUOUSTREE TO REMAINPROTECT DURINGCONSTRUCTIONS00°21'25"W 140.06'S00°21'25"W 140.13'N89°55'26"W 40.03'ALLEY84°45588EXISTINGRESIDENTIALSTRUCTURE8'-4"6'-0"13'-6"3'-5"10'-1 1/2"New Site PlanExisting Site Plan15'-7"14'-6"70'-11"70'-7"GRADE BREAKPROTECT EXISTINGCONCRETE WALKDURING DURATION OFCONSTRUCTION, (ANYDAMAGE DURINGCONSTRUCTION MUSTBE REPLACED PERJURISDICTIONALREQUIREMENTS)REPLACE EXISTINGWALK PERJURISDICTIONALREQUIREMENTSENTIRE EXISTINGSTRUCTURE TO BEREMOVED INCLUDINGALL EXISTING SEWER,WATER LINE, AND GASLINE TO TAP ANDREPLACE WITH NEW,REMOVE ALL FOOTINGS,FOUNDATION, WINDOWWELLS. (PREP SITE FORNEW STRUCTURECOORDINATE WITH NEWPLAN)REMOVEALLEXISTINGWOODCURBINGREMOVEEXISTINGSTOOPREMOVEEXISTINGCONCRETEWALKREMOVEEXISTINGCONCRETESTOOPREMOVEEXISTINGCONCRETEWALKPROTECTEXISTING FENCEDURING THEDURATION OFCONSTRUCTION99'0"99'0"99'0"98'0"98'0"98'0"97'0"97'0"97'0"97'0"99'0"99'0"99'0"98'0"98'0"98'0"97'0"97'0"97'0"13'-1"NEW 20'-0" X29'-4" X 6"CONCRETE DRIVE= 587 SQFT70'-0"GENERAL NOTES:THE BUILDER SHALL VERIFY THAT SITE CONDITIONS ARE CONSISTENT WITHTHESE PLANS BEFORE STARTING WORK. WORK NOT SPECIFICALLY DETAILEDSHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE SAME QUALITY AS SIMILAR WORK THAT ISDETAILED. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITHINTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES AND LOCAL CODES.WRITTEN DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFIC NOTES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCEOVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND GENERAL NOTES. THEENGINEER/DESIGNER SHALL BE CONSULTED FOR CLARIFICATION IF SITECONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED THAT ARE DIFFERENT THAN SHOWN, IFDISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE PLANS OR NOTES, OR IF A QUESTIONARISES OVER THE INTENT OF THE PLANS OR NOTES. CONTRACTOR SHALLVERIFY AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS (INCLUDING ROUGHOPENINGS).GRADING NOTES:CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES.ALL UTILITIES LOCATIONS ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.ALL UTILITIES MUST BE LOCATED BY CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION WORK PERFORMED ON SITE.PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDING.FINAL GRADE TO CONVEY SURFACE DRAINAGE TOWARD CHANNELS ANDDISPERSION GUTTER OR TRENCHES.AREAS TO BE FILLED SHALL BE CLEARED, GRUBBED TO REMOVE TREES,VEGETATION, ROOTS AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL AND STRIPPEDOF TOPSOIL.PLACE FILL SLOPES WITH A GRADIENT STEEPER THAT 3:1 IN LIFTS NOT TOEXCEED 8 INCHES, EACH LIFT TO BE COMPACTED TO A COMPACTION RATEOF 98% PRIOR TO NEXT LIFT.NORTH01020 40SCALE IN FEETDOWNSPOUTDOWNSPOUT℄NEWRESIDENTIALSTRUCTURETOTALSQUAREFOOTAGEON BOTHFLOORS =2480SQ.FT.RESIDENCE DOES NOTENCROACH ON BACKHALF OF LOTDOWNSPOUT℄ENCROACHMENT NOTE:WEST SIDE OF RESIDENCEENCROACHES 4'-7" INTOEASEMENT THE LENGTH OF THESTRUCTURE.TOTAL RESIDENCE FOOT PRINTOF ENCROACHMENT = 241SQ.FT.TOTAL GARAGE FOOT PRINT OFENCROACHMENT = 123 SQ.FT.NO OTHER ENCROACHMENTSEXIST FOR NEW RESIDENCESETBACK LINE15'-0"5'-0"13'-1 5/32"5'-0"15'-0"SETBACK LINE6'-0"17'-3"9'-11"31'-1"30'-0"20'-0"29'-4"NEWGARAGESTRUCTURETOTALSQUAREFOOTAGE =576SQ.FT.NEW CONCRETEWALK = 65 SQFTDOWNSPOUT4215 WHITE DEER LANEFORT COLLINS CO 80549millardandassociatesltd.com308.539.2759SHEET:OF:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT #DRAWN BY:APPROVED BY / DATE:SCALE: AS NOTEDISSUE:DATE:MAILLARD&SSOCIATES501 Edwards Garage501 EdwardsFort Collins COC1-122 NORTH01020 40SCALE IN FEETN89°55'26"W 40.03'EDWARDS STREETWEDBEE STREETEXISTING DECIDUOUSTREE TO REMAINPROTECT DURINGCONSTRUCTIONALLEYNew Landscape PlanNEWRESIDENTIALSTRUCTURETOTALSQUAREFOOTAGEON BOTHFLOORS =2480SQ.FT.NEWGARAGESTRUCTURETOTALSQUAREFOOTAGE =576SQ.FT.NEW MULCHEDPLANTING BED W/(3) LARGE ROCKSAND (3) POPULUSTREMULOIDES -ADDITIONALPLANTINGS TO BEDECIDED BYOWNERNEW ROCKPLANTING BEDS -PLANTINGS TO BEDECIDED BYOWNERNEW ROCKPLANTING BEDS -PLANTINGS TO BEDECIDED BYOWNERNEW ROCKPLANTING BEDS -PLANTINGS TO BEDECIDED BYOWNERNEW ROCKPLANTING BEDS -PLANTINGS TO BEDECIDED BYOWNERNEW MULCHEDPLANTING BED W/(1) PRUNUSSUBHIRTELLA'AUTUMNALIS'NEW MULCHEDPLANTING BED W/(1) PRUNUSSUBHIRTELLA'AUTUMNALIS'NEW ROCKPLANTING BED W/(1) PRUNUSBESSEYIEXISTING FENCEGENERAL NOTES FOR LANDSCAPINGAND IRRIGATION SYSTEM1. EXACT LOCATIONS OF PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE REVIEWED BYOWNER IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. OWNER RESERVES THERIGHT TO ADJUST PLANTS TO EXACT LOCATION IN THE FIELD.2. PROVIDE MATCHING FORMS AND SIZES FOR ALL PLANT MATERIALSWITHIN EACH SPECIES AND SIZE DESIGNATED ON THE DRAWINGS.3. FINISH GRADES OF ALL TURF AREAS SHALL BE ONE INCH (1 ") BELOWADJACENT CURB OR PAVEMENT. FINISH GRADES OF ALL SHRUB AREASSHALL BE ONE AND ONE HALF INCHES (1-1/2") BELOW ADJACENT CURB,PAVEMENT OR HEADER.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR APPROVAL ACTUAL PHOTOS OF ALLTREES AND SHRUBS TO BE USED. PHOTOS SHOULD INCLUDE APERSON FOR SCALE PURPOSES. ALL BOXED TREES SHALL BE OF AQUALITY AS DETERMINED BY THE OWNER. MATERIAL FOUNDUNSUITABLE FOR THE DESIGN OR SPECIFICATION INTENT WILL BEREJECTED.5. PROVIDE CONCRETE MOW CURB AS DIVIDER BETWEEN ALL TURF ANDSHRUB/ GROUNDCOVER AREAS IN ADDITION TO AREAS INDICATED ONTHE DRAWINGS.6. PROVIDE A TWO INCHES (2") LAYER OF MULCH AT PROPOSED TREE ANDSHRUB PLANTING AREAS.7. INSTALL JUTE MESH ON ALL SLOPES (3: 1) OR GREATER. INSTALLPARALLEL TO CONTOURS AND PER MANUFACTURERSRECOMMENDATION.8. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY ANDFERTILITY SOILS TESTING PER JURISDICTIONAL SOIL PREPARATIONSPECIFICATION. ANALYSIS SHALL INCLUDE RECOMMENDATIONS FORSOIL PREPARATION AND BACKFILL MIX AS WELL AS RECOMMENDATIONSFOR POST MAINTENANCE FERTILIZATION. SUBMIT SOIL ANALYSIS ANDSAMPLES OF AMENDMENTS TO OWNER FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO SOILPREPARATION.9. PROVIDE ROOT BARRIERS IN ADDITION TO THOSE INDICATED ON THEPLANS FOR ALL TREES WITHIN FIVE FEET (5') OF ANY HARDSCAPE.10. PLANT ALL TREES A MINIMUM OF TWO FEET (2') FROM ANY DRAIN LINES.THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALLDRAIN LINES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.11. TREES ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF THREE FEET (3') AWAY FROM ANYHARDSCAPE SUCH AS CURBS, WALKS, ETC.12. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF WALL, CURB OR OTHER FIXED SITEIMPROVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DIMENSIONS TOCENTERLINES AS INDICATED.13. ALL DRAINS/ BASINS SHOULD HAVE BLACK ATRIUM TYPE GRATESWITHIN SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER AREAS AND BLACK FLAT TYPE GRATESIN TURF AREAS.14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACEMENT OF ANY EXISTINGMATERIALS THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION.15. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ITEM, FORMS WITHSTEEL IN PLACE AND COMPACTED SUBGRADE COMPLETE SHALL BEREVIEWED BY OWNER.16. ALL ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOXES FOR LIGHTS SHALL BE IN PLANTINGAREAS AND LOCATION REVIEWED BY OWNER. STAKE LOCATION PRIORTO INSTALLATION.17. IRRIGATION CONTROL CABINETS SHALL BE CORROSION RESISTANT.18. ALL AREAS NOT DENOTED AS PLANTING BEDS OR OTHER, ARE TO BEEITHER BLUEGRASS OR PERENNIAL RYE GRASSES. AND APPROVED BYOWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONNEW PAVERS TYP. WITHGRASS BETWEEN(COORDINATE WITH OWNER)4215 WHITE DEER LANEFORT COLLINS CO 80549millardandassociatesltd.com308.539.2759SHEET:OF:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT #DRAWN BY:APPROVED BY / DATE:SCALE: AS NOTEDISSUE:DATE:MAILLARD&SSOCIATES501 Edwards Garage501 EdwardsFort Collins COC1-222 4215 WHITE DEER LANEFORT COLLINS CO 80549millardandassociatesltd.com308.539.2759SHEET:OF:SHEET TITLE:PROJECT #DRAWN BY:APPROVED BY / DATE:SCALE: AS NOTEDISSUE:DATE:MAILLARD&SSOCIATESHWG - Edward Street501 Edwards StreetFort Collins, CO 80524C1-2782021/06/302021/07/23Nov 18, 2021