Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/16/2021 - Planning and Zoning Commission - AGENDA - Regular MeetingPlanning and Zoning Commission Page 1 September 16, 2021 Michelle Haefele, Chair City Council Chambers - City Hall West Ted Shepard, Vice Chair 300 Laporte Avenue Jeff Hansen Fort Collins, Colorado Per Hogestad David Katz Virtual (Zoom or Telephone) Jeff Schneider Cablecast on FCTV Channel 14 on Connexion & Channels 14 & 881 on Comcast The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. Regular Hearing September 16, 2021 6:00 PM Planning and Zoning Commission Hearing Agenda Participation for this hybrid Planning and Zoning Commission meeting will be available online, by phone, or in person. Public Participation (In Person): Individuals who wish to address the Planning & Zoning Commission in person may attend the meeting located in City Council Chambers at City Hall, 300 Laporte Ave. Public Participation (Online): Individuals who wish to address the Planning & Zoning Commission via remote public participation can do so through Zoom at https://fcgov.zoom.us/j/96892687664. Individuals participating in the Zoom session should also watch the meeting through that site. The meeting will be available to join beginning at 5:45 p.m. on September 16, 2021. Participants should try to sign in prior to 6:00 p.m. if possible. For public comments, the Chair will ask participants to click the “Raise Hand” button to indicate you would like to speak at that time. Staff will moderate the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Commission. In order to participate: Use a laptop, computer, or internet-enabled smartphone. (Using earphones with a microphone will greatly improve your audio). You need to have access to the internet. Keep yourself on muted status. If you have any technical difficulties during the hearing, please email smanno@fcgov.com. Public Participation (Phone): If you do not have access to the internet, you can call into the hearing via phone. Please dial: 253-215-8782 or 346-248-7799, with Webinar ID: 968 9268 7664. Packet pg. 1 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 September 16, 2021 ROLL CALL • AGENDA REVIEW • PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Individuals may comment on items not specifically scheduled on the hearing agenda, as follows: • Those who wish to speak are asked to sign in at the podium if they are in person or use the raise hand function if they are on Zoom or on the phone. • The presiding officer will determine and announce the length of time allowed for each speaker. • Each speaker should state their name and address and keep their comments to the allotted time. • Any written materials should be provided to the Secretary for record-keeping purposes. • In person participates will hear a timer beep once and the time light will turn to yellow to indicate that 30 seconds of speaking time remains and will beep again and turn red when a speaker’s time to speak has ended. Phone and Zoom participants will be told verbally when their allotted time has ended. • CONSENT AGENDA The Consent Agenda is intended to allow the Planning and Zoning Commission to quickly resolve items that are non-controversial. Staff recommends approval of the Consent Agenda. Anyone may request that an item on this agenda be “pulled” for consideration within the Discussion Agenda, which will provide a full presentation of the item being considered. Items remaining on the Consent Agenda will be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission with one vote. The Consent Agenda generally consists of Commission Minutes for approval, items with no perceived controversy, and routine administrative actions. The meeting will be available beginning at 5:45 p.m. Please call in to the meeting prior to 6:00 p.m., if possible. For public comments, the Chair will ask participants to click the “Raise Hand” button to indicate you would like to speak at that time – phone participants will need to hit *9 to do this. Staff will be moderating the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Committee. Once you join the meeting: keep yourself on muted status. If you have any technical difficulties during the hearing, please email smanno@fcgov.com. Documents to Share: If residents wish to share a document or presentation, City Staff needs to receive those materials via email by 24 hours before the meeting. Please email any documents to smanno@fcgov.com. Individuals uncomfortable or unable to access the Zoom platform or unable to participate by phone are encouraged to participate by emailing general public comments you may have to smanno@fcgov.com . Staff will ensure the Commission receives your comments. If you have specific comments on any of the discussion items scheduled, please make that clear in the subject line of the email and send 24 hours prior to the meeting. As required by City Council Ordinance 079, 2020, a determination has been made by the chair after consultation with the City staff liaison that conducting the hearing using remote technology would be prudent. Packet pg. 2 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 September 16, 2021 1. Draft Minutes for the P&Z August Regular Hearing The purpose of this item is to approve the draft minutes of the August 19, 2021, Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. 2. Wireless Telecommunications Master Plan Recommendations PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for a Recommendation to City Council regarding the adoption of the Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan. STAFF ASSIGNED: Will Lindsey, Associate City Planner • DISCUSSION AGENDA 3. Mars Landing PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for a Project Development Plan (PDP) for the development of two, three-story multi-family buildings with 90 total dwelling units, with a total of 151 on-site parking spaces on 3.79 acres. Access will be taken from two points along Mars Drive. The property is within the General Commercial (CG) zone district and is subject to Planning and Zoning Commission (Type 2) Review. APPLICANT: Galloway and Company James Prelog, PE 5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Ste 210 Johnstown, CO 80534 STAFF ASSIGNED: Pete Wray, Senior City Planner • OTHER BUSINESS • ADJOURNMENT Packet pg. 3 Agenda Item 1 Item 1, Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY September 16, 2021 Planning and Zoning Commission STAFF Shar Manno, Customer and Administrative Manager SUBJECT MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 19, 2021 P&Z HEARING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is the consideration and approval of the draft minutes of the August 19, 2021 Planning & Zoning Commission hearing. ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft August 19, 2021 P&Z Minutes Packet pg. 4 Michelle Haefele, Chair City Council Chamber – City Hall West Ted Shepard, Vice Chair 300 Laporte Avenue Per Hogestad Fort Collins, Colorado Jeff Hansen Jeff Schneider Virtual (Zoom or Telephone) David Katz Cablecast on FCTV Channel 14 on Connexion & Channels 14 & 881 on Comcast The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. Regular Hearing August 19, 2021 Chair Haefele called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Roll Call: Haefele, Hansen, Hogestad, Schneider, Shepard, Katz Absent: None Staff Present: Yatabe, Duval, Kleer, Sizemore, Everette, Stephens, Claypool, Mapes, Axmacher, Hahn, Virata, Havelda, Vonkoepping, Smith and Manno Chair Haefele provided background on the Commission’s role and what the audience could expect as to the order of business. She described the role of the commission, noted that members are volunteers appointed by city council. The commission members review the analysis by staff, the applicants’ presentations and input from the public and make a determination regarding whether each proposal meets the land use code. She noted that this is a legal hearing, and that she will moderate for civility and fairness. Agenda Review CDNS Director Sizemore reviewed the items on the Consent and Discussion Agendas. Public Input on Items Not on the Hearing Agenda: None. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes DRAFTPacket pg. 5 Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2021 Page 2 of 14 Consent Agenda: 1.Draft Minutes for the P&Z June Regular Hearing 2.Draft Minutes for the P&Z June 30 Special Hearing 3.Draft Minutes for the P&Z July Regular Hearing Vice Chair Shepard made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Hansen that the Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Consent Agenda for the August 19, 2021 hearing, based upon the agenda materials and the information and materials presented during the work session and based on the findings of fact included in the staff report. Yeas: Shepard, Katz, Hansen, Hogestad, Schneider, and Haefele. Nays: none. THE MOTION CARRIED. Discussion Agenda: 1.Appeal of Landmark Apartment PUD Minor Amendment (**Secretary’s Note: Assistant City Attorney Yatabe and Commissioner Hogestad withdrew from the discussion of this item due to conflicts of interest. Chair Haefele stated she socializes with one of the appellants; however, they have not spoken about this appeal, and it will not affect her decision. Commissioners Schneider and Hansen disclosed they were on the Planning and Zoning Board when the project came through initially.) Staff and Applicant Presentations Rebecca Everette, Development Review Manager, discussed the minor amendment process noting it allows for revisions to be made to an approved plan. She stated this minor amendment was required as part of the 2016 Landmark Apartments expansion (Landmark 2) project which is located to the east of the existing Landmark Apartment (Landmark 1) property. She discussed the history of the project and minor amendment, which was appealed in March of 2020; however, the Landmark 2 developer pulled building permits and began construction on the project with temporary certificates of occupancy being issued in July. She stated the delay in hearing this appeal is due to COVID and the requirement that both applicant and appellant approve a virtual hearing, which was not granted; therefore, the appeal hearing had to be postponed until the Commission was meeting in person. Everette provided additional details on the minor amendment relating to joint accessibility of common amenities. She stated the minor amendment including the following updates to the originally approved PUD: broadening the site plan to include the approved site plan for the Landmark 2 project, adding a note to reference the joint access agreement after it was recorded, and adding some drawings showing changes to the configuration of the parking lot access points and pedestrian circulation. Everette discussed the criteria for review of minor amendments and stated the intent of the minor amendment was to document actions and approvals that had already occurred through the recorded access agreement. She stated staff found the changes did not alter the fundamental character of the site and therefore did not result in a change in character; therefore, a minor amendment was the appropriate process. She stated staff approved the minor amendment in March 2020 finding it sufficiently addressed both the direction of the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council as it related to the Landmark 2 project, and it complied with the applicable process and Code requirements. She stated staff would request the Commission provide direction to staff on how to proceed with an acceptable minor amendment that would fulfill direction to document the joint accessibility of outdoor spaces and facilities and to adequately refer to the recorded joint access agreement with Larimer County should the appeal be upheld. Carolynne White, counsel for the current Landmark 1 property owner, FC1050, LLC, stated she would like to withdraw the underlying minor amendment, and if that is not approved, she would like to speak to the appeal. She provided additional details on the request to withdraw the minor amendment. Chair Haefele asked the appellants to respond to the request for withdrawal.DRAFTPacket pg. 6 Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2021 Page 3 of 14 Kathryn Dubiel, appellant, requested time to confer with the other appellants to consider the request as they were not informed of this request. (**Secretary’s Note: The Commission took a brief recess at this point in the meeting.) Ms. Dubiel stated the appellants decline the offer to withdraw the minor amendment. John Duval, Deputy City Attorney, suggested the Commission consider a motion on the request for the withdrawal of the minor amendment application. Vice Chair Shepard made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Katz, that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the request to withdraw the minor amendment based on the objection from the appellants who are not granting their consent to such a request. Commissioner Katz asked if the request to withdraw the minor amendment has the same result as the appeal being approved. Everette replied, withdrawal of the minor amendment application would vacate the decision that was previously made and, in either case, there would be a requirement that joint access is memorialized with any future plan amendments to the Landmark PUD. Additionally, if the minor amendment application is withdrawn, the Commission would not have the opportunity to provide any input as to how to best document the joint accessibility. Duval commented on reasons for continuing with the minor amendment application and appeal. Chair Haefele stated she was inclined to support the motion to disallow the withdrawal of the minor amendment in order to hear the appeal. Commissioner Schneider stated the main goal of this is to memorialize the shared access agreement on the plat and he questioned why that is necessary given the agreement has already been recorded with the county. Everette replied, the joint access agreement recorded with the county is in effect; however, it is not something that would result from a document search through City documents on which staff heavily relies to respond to questions about possible non-compliance. She stated documenting changes through the minor amendment process is a best practice and is used frequently. Vice Chair Shepard asked if the note occurs on both the plat and the site plan. Everette replied the note occurs on the site plan and plat for Landmark 2; however, for Landmark 1, it appears only on the minor amendment site plan as there is no associated plat. Vice Chair Shepard asked if re-platting Landmark 2 to remove the note would be required if the request to withdraw the minor amendment application were to be granted. Everette replied, the note on the Landmark 2 documents does not reference a minor amendment, just the recorded joint access agreement. Vice Chair Shepard asked if the Landmark 1 minor amendment would need to be amended to remove the note. Everette replied the minor amendment includes more items than just the note and the appeal is associated with the entire minor amendment. Vice Chair Shepard stated he would support the motion as a withdrawal could lead to potential future scenarios that would lead to the same place. He stated moving forward with the appeal would further the record for clarification. Commissioner Hansen concurred with Vice Chair Shepard. The vote on the motion was as follows: Yeas: Katz, Hansen, Schneider, Shepard and Haefele. Nays: none. THE MOTION CARRIED. Ms. White clarified her request was to withdraw the minor amendment that is the subject of the appeal, not the appeal itself. She also clarified the minor amendment was seeking to amend the Landmark PUD, which functionally served as the plat, though there was not a proposal to amend the plat for Landmark 1. She also DRAFTPacket pg. 7 Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2021 Page 4 of 14 noted the joint access agreement is recorded in three places: the access itself against both properties, the site plan for Landmark 2, and the plat for Landmark 2, and it cannot be changed without the consent of the City. She stated the principal purpose of the minor amendment was to amend the 1983 PUD document for Landmark 1 to also reference the joint access agreement, which was required as a condition of approval for the Landmark 2 PDP. She stated the obligations of the joint access agreement will remain the same regardless of how they are memorialized and requested the Commission uphold the underlying decision approving the minor amendment. Appellant Presentation Rick Hoffman stated this appeal is not about the Landmark 2 buildings, vehicle access, or parking, but is about the misapplication of a minor amendment that required a complex agreement pertaining to shared amenities between owners of the Landmark 1 and Landmark 2 properties. He stated the arrangement involved a significant change in character of the project and was a quasi-judicial matter, and as such, should have been treated as a major amendment and referred back to the Planning and Zoning Commission allowing for additional public input. He requested the Commission consider the following points and questions: why the City kept the decision in-house by utilizing the minor amendment process, was this an abuse of the Director’s authority, and was the minor amendment process the proper tool per the Land Use Code. He stated it is important to note that the recorded legal documents have an escape option the City can approve, thereby leaving the Landmark 2 project unable to meet the Land Use Code requirements on its own. Ms. Dubiel discussed the timeline of the Landmark 2 development and associated joint access agreement. She stated this appeal is questioning the minor amendment request to grant access to outdoor spaces and amenities to tenants of the Landmark 2 development. She stated the letter granting approval of the minor amendment is generic in nature and does not specifically discuss what was being approved or how it met the Land Use Code criteria for approval of a minor amendment. She discussed the legal advice received by the appellants which indicated the decision maker should have rejected the minor amendment application for flaws and omissions. Additionally, she argued the joint access agreement does not meet Land Use Code standards for several reasons, particularly given the termination clause that would allow either party to terminate the agreement with sufficient notice. She questioned who in the City organization has the authority to make a quasi-judicial decision and discussed the appellants’ objection to Judy Schmidt advising the Commission on this matter. She also stated then Director Leeson abused his discretion by not allowing this matter to be heard by a quasi-judicial body with no prior involvement. Ms. Dubiel noted staff asserted the minor amendment was required by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council; however, she stated a thorough review of the meeting minutes and the verbatim transcript of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting that approved the PDP showed no indication the minor amendment was required. She suggested the following as possible remedies to the situation: to treat the issue as a major amendment, ensure it is clear who in the City administration, Council, or Commissions has the authority to give written approval for modification of termination of the joint access agreement, ensure the process is transparent with accountability to the public, and that all changes to the Landmark PUD and any associated agreements take place in a public quasi-judicial setting. Public Input (3 minutes per person) None. Commission Questions Vice Chair Shepard asked about the zoning of the property and, as a multi-family project, which Code citation was used for determining the open space and active recreation area requirement. Everette replied there have been some Land Use Code amendments since the approval of the Landmark 2 project and she will need to do more research on exactly which Code sections were applied. She stated the zoning is MMN – Medium Density, Mixed-Use Neighborhood. DRAFTPacket pg. 8 Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2021 Page 5 of 14 Commissioner Katz asked if the appellants’ exhibits presented that do not address Landmark 1 should be considered if the minor amendment being considered is only for Landmark 1. Duval replied the joint use agreement is the operative document at this point. Chair Haefele asked if the site mentioned on Prospect Road west of this site is an error or is the property that is referenced in the formal, recorded shared access agreement. Everette replied the appellants referenced a separate recreational use agreement that has no relationship to the joint access agreement and was not used to satisfy any requirement. She noted that agreement would never have been found satisfactory by staff and has since been terminated. Ms. Dubiel stated the information on the previous agreement was presented in the form of background. Commissioner Schneider asked who in the City could consent to the termination of the joint access agreement. Everette replied, the decision maker would be the Community Development and Neighborhood Services Director and she noted City staff was involved in finalizing the agreement language to ensure it met requirements. Duval stated the Land Use Code requires Landmark 2 to have access to said facilities, and as long as that requirement remains, it is not theoretically possible for the Director to agree to the termination or modification of the joint access agreement. Everette noted the Land Use Code section applied for the approval of Landmark 2 was 3.8.30, access to a park, central feature, or gathering space of at least 10,000 square feet. She stated the original staff report stated the joint access would be accomplished through notes on the plan, a minor amendment, or other means necessary. Staff, Appellant and Applicant Responses Everette clarified the Land Use Code specifies a number of decision makers for different land use applications and projects, all of which are quasi-judicial decisions. Ms. Dubiel concurred there are a variety of decision-makers; however, the Planning and Zoning Commission would be the decision-maker for a major amendment, which the appellants believe this should be. She agreed the minor amendment was not an explicit condition of approval but suggested such a change should be addressed with a different process. Ms. White commented on the definition of an easement and noted the joint access agreement is an easement which also includes the requirement that the two property owners must seek the approval of the City to make a change; therefore, it is more restrictive than other easements affecting the property. Additionally, she stated treating this as a major amendment could lead to an endless loop of decisions and appeals. She requested the appeal be denied and the underlying decision upheld. Commission Discussion / Deliberation Commissioner Hansen stated this hearing will provide the opportunity to help alleviate two concerns of the appellants: why this was not considered by the Commission originally and the lack of clarity in the reasoning for the approval of this item. Vice Chair Shepard commented on a clause in Section 3.8.30 related to dwellings being located within a certain distance of parks, et cetera, either within a development or within an adjacent development. He asked if the ‘or within an adjacent development’ clause was in effect during the Landmark 2 PDP. Everette replied she would need to research that as the staff report does not specifically cite the information. Commissioner Katz stated that information is not likely relevant as the project was already approved. Chair Haefele agreed that whether the appeal is upheld or denied will have no substantive effect on the project or the outcome; however, she stated some language should be crafted that will cure some of the deficiencies, including the written approval of the CDNS Director to be able to modify the agreement. She stated the process could have been handled more cleanly and professionally. DRAFTPacket pg. 9 Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2021 Page 6 of 14 Commissioner Schneider stated that while the concerns may be valid, they should not be memorialized in any motion made tonight. He opposed making a motion related to the process. Chair Haefele stated this hearing has made these deficiencies known. Commissioner Hansen commented on the role of the Commission to base decisions on the current Code language. Everette replied to Vice Chair Shepard’s earlier question about the clause relating to ‘or in an adjacent development’ by stating it was in place at the time of the Landmark 2 PDP. Commissioner Katz thanked the appellants for bringing forth these issues; however, he stated he will vote to deny the appeal. Vice Chair Shepard stated there are hundreds of minor amendments processed each year and there is a reason for the process. He stated there was no public record of the staff deliberation as a staff report is not required for a minor amendment. Commissioner Katz concurred. Vice Chair Shepard noted this was discussed during the PDP deliberation and it was part of the Commission’s and Council’s direction to provide the joint access agreement note to be recorded on the two separate projects. Commissioner Katz made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Schneider, that the Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Commission deny the appeal and approve the Landmark Apartments PUD Minor Amendment on the basis that the minor amendment satisfies all applicable criteria of the Land Use Code Section 2.2.10(A)(2), and in further support of such approval, adopt the information, analysis, findings of fact and conclusions regarding this item contained in the staff report, included in the agenda materials, the work session, and the applicant presentation for this hearing. The vote on the motion was as follows: Yeas: Hansen, Schneider, Shepard, Katz and Haefele. Nays: none. THE MOTION CARRIED. Commissioner Hansen stated he has always defended making the appeal process as easy as possible; however, this item has pushed the limits on what is appropriate for an appeal. Chair Haefele stated the appellants did a great deal of work and brought problems to light in terms of recording keeping and public transparency, and that made this appeal a valuable public service and not an abuse of the appeal process. (**Secretary’s Note: The Commission took a brief recess at this point in the meeting.) 2. Northfield Commons Major Amendment – Kai Kleer, City Planner (**Secretary’s Note: Commissioner Schneider disclosed he was on the Planning and Zoning Board when the project came through initially and did receive a notice of the neighborhood meeting; however, he has not participated in any conversations regarding the project and does not believe he has a conflict. Commissioner Hansen disclosed he was on the Planning and Zoning Board when the project came through initially.) Manno stated one email from Nick Haas with Northern Engineering in support of the approval of the project has been received since the work session. Staff and Applicant Presentations DRAFTPacket pg. 10 Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2021 Page 7 of 14 Kai Kleer, City Planner, discussed the site and Northfield Commons project. He stated the major amendment would amend tracts U and V to replace nine 4, 5, and 6-unit single-family attached buildings with seven 12-unit multi-family buildings and make other minor site changes. Carolyn Reed, Mercy Housing, stated Mercy Housing is the largest non-profit affordable housing developer in the country and is based in Colorado. She stated Mercy Housing has one other project in Fort Collins and she discussed the 84-apartment unit affordable housing component of the Northfield Commons project. She stated all units will be rent restricted. Cathy Mathis, TB Group, provided additional details on the project and its amenity space. She mentioned a requested modification of standard to Section 3.5.2(D)(1), which requires building entryways to orient toward a street. Ian Shuff, ALM2S Architects, discussed the three building types that are part of the project and detailed the differences between the previously approved plan and the proposed amended plan. He also discussed the Code provisions related to sound requirements for buildings within a certain distance of a 4-lane arterial. Staff Analysis Kleer discussed the intent of the standard in Section 3.5.2(D)(1) and noted there are three ways in which the standard can be met. He stated this project provides all three of those with connecting walkways and a major walkway spine. He provided additional details on the proposed connections and requested modification for buildings 3 and 4. He stated staff’s finding is that the equal to or better than criteria have been met for the requested modification. Kleer noted this project supports access to affordable housing and aligns with the City’s Comprehensive Plan to integrate affordable housing into existing or new neighborhoods. He mentioned the Lake Canal regional trail components that will be built as part of this project and stated staff is recommending approval of the requested modification of standard and approval of the major amendment. Commission Questions Commissioner Katz asked about the density analysis. Kleer replied, the entire development plan site is considered for the density calculation and that is approximately 8.4 or 8.7 dwelling units per acre. Vice Chair Shepard asked where the other Mercy Housing project in Fort Collins is located. Ms. Reed, replied, Springfield Court in southwest Fort Collins, built in 1997, is a 63-unit multi-family property. Vice Chair Shepard asked if the steps that are part of the major walkway spine could potentially be a ramp instead. Jason Claeys, Highland Development Services, replied, a ramp would be possible; however, it may be quite long and would require handrails. Vice Chair Shepard asked if there are three distinct color schemes as required per Section 3.8.30(F)(3). Shuff replied the third scheme is the clubhouse portion of the building. He also noted there will be additional diversity in the approved Landmark row houses on the same side of Suniga. Vice Chair Shepard expressed concern about the proximity of the building to the arterial roadway and asked whether a denser landscape screen or sound wall has been considered. Ms. Mathis replied that could be considered. Public Input (3 minutes per person) Maggie Cordova expressed concern about traffic impacts and the proximity of the buildings to the Alta Vista neighborhood. DRAFTPacket pg. 11 Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2021 Page 8 of 14 Mark Laken stated he is still unsure what the major amendment actually consists of and suggested there may be enough new material to have warranted a neighborhood meeting. He commended the new architecture and affordable housing component. Doug Cordova asked about storm drainage plans for the site. Tanya Channel concurred with Mr. Laken and suggested the amount of information presented warranted a new neighborhood meeting. She stated she did not receive notice of this hearing. Staff and Applicant Responses Mr. Claey’s stated the Vine and Lemay overpass and the continuation of Suniga through the property will significantly alleviate traffic issues in the area. Regarding drainage, he stated there are drainage pans that surround the Alta Vista neighborhood as well as other drainage features in the area that keep all drainage from the neighborhood. Vice Chair Shepard asked about the potential for cut-through traffic in the Alta Vista neighborhood. Mr. Claey’s replied, the area’s master plan specified there were to be no vehicular connections through the Alta Vista neighborhood, though there are pedestrian connections. Mr. Shuff stated a neighborhood meeting did occur for the project and mentioned the key components of the 5- acre major amendment site. He stated the two-story townhomes will not change and they were previously approved for compatibility with Alta Vista. He commented on roof line mitigation for the three-story buildings. Ms. Mathis stated there is 100 feet between the two-story buildings and the beginning of the Alta Vista neighborhood. She stated the overall allowable density for the site is 10.75 dwelling units per acre and the proposed density is 8.9 units per acre. Kleer stated a virtual neighborhood meeting was held in March and this was one of the largest mailings for a neighborhood meeting in the city. He discussed density calculations and allowed densities, including the density bonus for affordable housing. Commissioner Katz requested staff reach out to Mr. Laken to ensure his additional questions are answered. Commission Discussion / Deliberation Vice Chair Shepard stated he would support the requested modification of standard as the extent of the divergence of standard is reasonable and mitigated. Commissioner Katz concurred. Commissioner Hansen stated this is a frequently requested modification and suggested that issue may need to be addressed in the Code. He stated the amendment is an improvement over the original project. Commissioner Schneider concurred the redesign is an improvement and agreed this area of the Code may need to be addressed. Commissioner Hogestad concurred the redesign is an improvement. He expressed concern about the neighborhood meeting and suggested that may need to be addressed in the future. Commissioner Katz made a motion, seconded by Vice Chair Shepard, that the Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Commission approve the requested modification of standard to Land Use Code Section 3.5.2(D)(1) regarding orientation to connecting sidewalks, finding that the modification under 2.8.2(H) would not be detrimental to the public good and is equal to or better than a complying plan. This decision is based on the agenda materials, the information and materials presented during the work session and this hearing, and the Commission discussion on this item. Commissioner Hansen requested a friendly amendment to add the following language: “granting this modification from the strict application of the standard would not, without impairing the intent and DRAFTPacket pg. 12 Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2021 Page 9 of 14 purpose of the Land Use Code, and substantially alleviating the lack of affordable housing, which is a problem of city-wide concern. Commissioner Katz and Vice Chair Shepard accepted the amendment as friendly. Commissioner Hansen stated this Code section needs to be examined. The vote on the motion was as follows: Yeas: Hogestad, Schneider, Shepard, Katz, Hansen and Haefele. Nays: none. THE MOTION CARRIED. Vice Chair Shepard asked requested the Commission consider the issue he raised earlier about there being only two color schemes on buildings A-C as the buildings are so closely aligned with Suniga. He asked if the Commission would be willing to entertain a motion adding a condition of approval to include a third color scheme. Commissioner Katz requested the Commission consider the fact this is a major amendment to an overall project and stated the color schemes should be considered across the project as a whole. Vice Chair Shepard concurred; however, he stated this part of the project is south of Suniga which makes it feel a bit compartmentalize into its own project separated by a 4-lane arterial and median. Commissioner Schneider noted the townhouses on the same side also contain different color schemes; therefore, there are four or four and a half different schemes. Commissioner Hansen commented on perhaps making the color scheme of the clubhouse slightly less obviously different. Chair Haefele stated she would support Vice Chair Shepard’s condition. Commissioner Katz suggested a condition is not necessary as the application meets the Land Use Code. Chair Haefele expressed support for the major amendment and additional affordable housing units. Commissioner Katz made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Hansen, that the Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Northfield Commons Major Amendment MJA210001, finding that the major amendment satisfies all applicable Land Use Code standards. This decision is based upon the agenda materials, the information and materials presented during the work session and this hearing, and the Commission discussion on this item. Furthermore, the Commission adopts the information, analysis, findings of fact and conclusions regarding the major amendment contained in the staff report, including the agenda materials for this hearing. Vice Chair Shepard echoed the comments about fulfilling the need of affordable housing. The vote on the motion was as follows: Yeas: Schneider, Shepard, Katz, Hansen, Hogestad and Haefele. Nays: none. THE MOTION CARRIED. (**Secretary’s Note: The Commission took a brief recess at this point in the meeting.) 3. Fairway Apartments – Kai Kleer, City Planner Staff and Applicant Presentations Kai Kleer, City Planner, stated this is a 10-acre site bounded by South College Avenue on the east and the South Transit Center on the west. He noted the site was previously used as a nursery; therefore, there are several existing trees on the site. He discussed the proposed access to the site and noted the site is zoned General Commercial and is within the South College Corridor Plan area and the Transit Overlay District (TOD) DRAFTPacket pg. 13 Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2021 Page 10 of 14 Kleer provided additional detail on the desired access spine that would connect South College to the South Transit Center. He stated the project proposed eight multi-family buildings housing 264 units and an associated club house. The project is also requesting a modification to the building orientation standard and is providing 226 parking spaces in compliance with the TOD standards, as well as 416 bicycle parking spaces. Ryan Will, Keystone Real Estate, stated this proposal is for a 264-unit market rate apartment complex with resident amenities including a pool, fitness center, co-working lounge, outdoor fitness equipment, and other amenities. He commented on the number of mature trees being an asset to the site and stated as many healthy trees will be preserved as possible. He stated the project plans to attain at least a silver certification in the National Green Building Standard Program and will also participate in the Energy Star program. Chad Arthur, Infusion Architects, discussed the site constraints including the existing connection to the Transit Center and the detention pond. He noted the second access to the property, on the north side, is a gated emergency only access and he commented on walkways on the site in addition to the pedestrian spine. He provided additional details on the proposed design of the pedestrian spine, amenities, modern farmhouse architecture, building layout, and color schemes. He showed a video rendering of the project and discussed sound mitigation measures that will be utilized given the proximity of the site to South College Avenue and the railroad. Mr. Will thanked the Commission members for their time and requested support of the project. Staff Analysis Kleer discussed the requested modification of standard to Section 3.5.2 (D)(1), the relationship of buildings to parking, for two buildings on the west side of the site. He stated staff finds the approach of the project to be equal to or better than a complying plan due by providing certain elements including an urban streetscape, diagonal parking, additional pedestrian amenities, landscape planters, and seating opportunities. Kleer discussed the site plan noting the central feature or gathering space far exceeds the minimum required square footage. He also noted the project exceeds the setback requirements from College Avenue and Fairway Lane. He provided additional details on the central private drive design and pedestrian spine. He detailed the required treatment plan for the ash trees on the site and discussed the tree inventory. Kleer concluded by stating staff recommends approval of the requested modification of standard and of the Fairway Apartments PDP. Commission Questions Commissioner Hogestad asked how many trees are on the site and how many are planned to be removed. Kleer replied there are 160 trees on the site, 118 of which are proposed to be removed. He stated the mitigation for that is a replacement of 228 trees. Commissioner Hogestad asked about the sidewalk widths as related to the modification request. Kleer replied, the sidewalks adjacent to the buildings requiring the modification are ten feet wide, and the sidewalks on the other side are six feet wide. Vice Chair Shepard asked if there is a parkway on the six-foot sidewalk. Kleer replied in the negative and stated there is diagonal parking, the walkway, and a landscape strip between the building and the back side of the sidewalk. He confirmed both walks are attached, and he provided additional details on where cut-outs exist on the walkways. Vice Chair Shepard requested additional details on the private street sidewalk. Kleer replied there is a ten-foot sidewalk on both sides of the street with four-by-four tree grates and canopy shade tree cut-outs. Vice Chair Shepard requested staff work with Forestry on the tree grate size. Kleer replied that will be addressed at the time of Final Development Plan. DRAFTPacket pg. 14 Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2021 Page 11 of 14 Commissioner Hansen asked about the different requirements for housing types versus design variations and color schemes. Kleer replied, projects greater than 30 acres in size are required to have a certain mix of housing types; however, this project is under that size threshold so that standard does not apply. The standard relating to three distinct designs that substantially vary the footprint, shape, and size of buildings does apply as more than five buildings are being proposed. He stated the color requirement is similar and requires at least three distinctly different color patterns. Public Input (3 minutes per person) None. Commission Discussion / Deliberation Vice Chair Shepard requested additional information on the three color schemes and expressed concern about the repetition of four materials and colors on all eight buildings. Mr. Arthur provided additional details on the paint colors, siding, and stones, noting there are now two different stone colors proposed, one for two buildings, and the other for the remaining six buildings. Vice Chair Shepard asked about the introduction of a similar but different roof color. Mr. Arthur replied, his team can certainly consider that. Commissioner Hogestad asked about the width of the pavement of the central spine. Mr. Arthur replied it is eight feet wide. Commissioner Hogestad asked how the enhanced standard of quality is met for the pedestrian spine. Commissioner Hansen commented on the lack of a public feel for the pedestrian spine. Cathy Mathis, TB Group, replied it was treated more like a major walkway spine and less like the graphic shown in the South College Corridor Plan. Kleer discussed the Code requirements and South College Corridor Plan goals for the pedestrian spine noting the Plan calls for a walkway that accommodates multi-modal access, which is being provided. He commented on goals with the corridor to help preserve the existing tree canopy and to provide an urban connection from South College Avenue to the Transit Center. Commissioner Hogestad stated the South College Corridor Plan seeks a civic expression, or something that feels like a true connection, and he stated a residential sidewalk does not provide that experience. Vice Chair Shepard asked about how many trees are being preserved with the curved alignment of the pedestrian spine. Kleer replied approximately three or four significant trees will be saved. Commissioner Hogestad stated there does not seem to be much reason for saving the trees for the pedestrian spine and expressed concern the design does not meet the South College Corridor Plan. He also questioned the circulation plan on the site. Commissioner Schneider agreed the pedestrian spine should be designed to be public; however, the requirement is for a direct connection, not a straight connection. Commissioner Hogestad disagreed stating the connection should be direct visually as well. Commissioner Hansen agreed with Commissioner Schneider that direct does not mean straight. He stated he is not opposed to the width of the spine but stated he would prefer more of an urban design rather than residential design. Commissioner Hogestad commented on the mention of a plaza design and Land Use Code standard related to an enhanced standard of quality. He stated there is a lack of an organized circulation plan. Commissioner Schneider noted the South College Corridor Plan is a guiding document but is not codified. DRAFTPacket pg. 15 Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2021 Page 12 of 14 Commissioner Hansen stated the circulation plan is well laid out. Vice Chair Shepard stated the site plan essentially replicates a city grid and stated it promotes walkability. He commented on the feelings of wideness provided by the pedestrian spine. Commissioner Hogestad disagreed the vision of the Plan is met by the pedestrian spine as designed. Commissioner Hansen noted the Plan language states the connecting walkway should be flanked by buildings. Vice Chair noted there are a number of ‘or’ statements in the Plan language. Commissioner Schneider commented on the likely low use of the pedestrian spine by individuals not in the neighborhood. Chair Haefele asked if there could be some type of signage or other way to distinguish the walkway as public. Vice Chair Shepard commented on other projects utilizing an entry portal to identify public walkways. Commissioners Hogestad and Hansen disagreed signage would be helpful. Commissioner Hansen commented on the possibility of bringing Transit Center features out along the pedestrian spine. Commissioner Hogestad reiterated his opinion the pedestrian spine is not designed as envisioned by the Corridor Plan. Commissioner Hansen stated there should be a clear distinction between the style of the pedestrian spine versus the remainder of the development. Vice Chair Shepard noted the pedestrian spine is not a public capital improvement project and the Corridor Plan does not state a requirement for civic expression or monuments but does seek a recognizable entry. He questioned what invites a pedestrian or bicyclist to enter the walkway from College Avenue and suggested some type of Transit Center design elements could be included to help meet the vision of the Plan. Commissioner Katz asked Commissioner Hogestad if he supports the current design. Commissioner Hogestad replied in the negative. Commissioner Katz asked if there would be a condition of approval he could suggest that would gain his support without redesigning the project. Commissioner Hogestad stated the Corridor Plan envisioned a wide and direct connection, which he does not believe this provides. Commissioner Katz asked Vice Chair Shepard if he would support the project as designed or if there was a condition of approval he could suggest. Vice Chair Shepard replied he could contemplate a condition to require enhancement of the spine to further meet the vision of the South College Corridor Plan by adding an entry feature near the intersection of the spine and South College Avenue. Commissioner Hansen made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Schneider, that the Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Commission, approve the modification of standard to Land Use Code Section 3.5.2(D)(1) regarding orientation to connecting sidewalks, finding that the modification under 2.8.2(H) would not be detrimental to the public good and the plan as submitted will promote the general purpose of the standard for which the modification was requested equally well or better than a complying plan. This decision is based upon the agenda materials, the information and materials presented during the work session and this hearing, and the Commission discussion on this item. Furthermore, the Commission adopts the information, analysis, findings of fact and conclusions regarding the modification of standard contained in the staff report, including the agenda materials for this hearing. DRAFTPacket pg. 16 Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2021 Page 13 of 14 Commissioner Hansen commended the design of the private drive. Commissioner Hogestad stated he would not support the motion as the circulation plan does not meet the Corridor Plan. Commissioner Katz commended the site circulation. The vote on the motion was as follows: Yeas: Katz, Hansen, Schneider, Shepard, and Haefele. Nays: Hogestad. THE MOTION CARRIED. Yatabe suggested the applicants be allowed to provide feedback on the condition prior to the motion being made. Vice Chair Shepard read his suggested language: ‘in order to meet the vision of the South College Corridor Plan, LU 3.3, the central spine shall feature an entry portal at, near, or adjacent to the intersection of the spine and the South College Avenue sidewalk. Such portal shall be designed to encourage public access in a civic fashion.’ The applicant team expressed agreement with the language. Commissioner Hansen asked if ‘portal’ implies anything specific. Commissioner Katz questioned the use of ‘civic.’ Vice Chair Shepard replied he would replace ‘civic’ with ‘urban design to encourage pedestrian and bicycle access.’ He commented on types of design for an entry portal that would invite discovery. Vice Chair Shepard stated he would replace ‘entry portal’ with ‘enhanced entry feature.’ Vice Chair Shepard made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Katz, that the Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Fairway Apartments PDP 210005 subject to the condition that at the time of submittal for final plan, the applicant team shall provide an enhanced entry feature for the benefit of pedestrians and bicyclists at, near, or adjacent to the intersection of the central spine and the South College Avenue public sidewalk. Such enhanced entry feature shall be designed to encourage public access in an urban design fashion. This decision is based upon the agenda materials, the information and materials presented during the work session and this hearing, and the Commission discussion on this item. Further, this Commission hereby adopts the information, analysis, findings of fact, and conclusions regarding this PDP contained in the staff report. Commissioner Hansen supported the condition and its less restrictive language. Commissioner Schneider commended the flow and circulation of the plan and supported the condition and motion. Commissioner Hogestad stated the project does not present a clear circulation plan that supports the South College Corridor Plan; therefore, he will not support the motion. The vote on the motion was as follows: Yeas: Schneider, Shepard, Katz, Hansen and Haefele. Nays: Hogestad. THE MOTION CARRIED. DRAFTPacket pg. 17 Planning & Zoning Commission August 19, 2021 Page 14 of 14 Other Business: Sizemore stated there will be three items on the September agenda, and though it may be a longer meeting, it should all fit in one, though he recommended Commissioners reserve the second date for a special hearing if needed. Commissioner Hogestad stated he would like to further discuss issues with neighborhood meetings with particular attention being paid to neighborhoods that may need additional outreach. Sizemore noted there is an effort within staff to discuss neighborhood meeting changes in the fall. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 12:05 AM. For more complete details on this hearing, please view our video recording located here: https://www.fcgov.com/fctv/video-archive.php?search=PLANNING%20ZONING Minutes respectfully submitted by Shar Manno. Minutes approved by a vote of the Board on: ____________. Paul Sizemore, CDNS Director Michelle Haefele, Chair DRAFTPacket pg. 18 Development Review Staff Report Item 2 Planning Services Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 p. 970-416-4311 f. 970.224.6134 www.fcgov.com 1. Introduction The Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan (Plan) is a resource to address the need for better wireless services in the community and to modernize local regulations that control the placement, design and other related impacts that result from wireless deployment. This is incredibly important for the community as it is anticipated that in the future, wireless providers will need to supplement the City of Fort Collins' (City) network of one-hundred twenty-three (123) existing wireless facilities. The research and analysis provided by Cityscape Consultants, Inc. (Cityscape) is compiled into the Plan and will inform and direct City Staff to make future changes to the City's administrative policies and Land Use Code. Ultimately, the Plan will provide tools to help the City and community become more strategic in the review of future wireless communications infrastructure. This report focuses the overall intent of the Plan, and the key strategies and policies as outlined in the attached draft (Attachment A). Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan Process An Advisory Committee consisting of City staff and community members met periodically throughout the process to review planning materials and provide feedback on various stages of the Plan. The Advisory Committee also reviewed and commented on the final Plan document. The Advisory Committee included representatives from the community and government representing different points of view and interests as they pertain to wireless telecommunication infrastructure. The planning process was conducted in three phases: Phase 1 - Research and Assessment of Existing Conditions To initiate the Wireless Master Plan and explore key issues, the first phase of the planning process took into consideration previous neighborhood concerns and asked participants to confirm feedback received through several contentious neighborhood meetings. All wireless facilities were researched, cataloged, and assessed by visiting each site. Phase II - Choices and Strategies The second planning phase documented existing wireless conditions and developed simulated coverage and capacity maps. The resulting analysis identified gaps that are assumed to be filled one day by wireless infrastructure. With this Planning and Zoning Commission: September 16, 2021 Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan Recommendation Summary of Request This is a request for a Recommendation to City Council regarding the adoption of the Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan. Next Steps • The Planning and Zoning Board’s recommendation will be forwarded to City Council for its consideration on October 5, 2021 (First Reading). • If adopted by the City Council staff will engage in the subsequent Land Use Code changes as recommended by the Plan. The update will occur during Q4 2021 and Q1 2022. Applicant City of Fort Collins PO BOX 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Staff Kai Kleer, City Planner Ryan Mounce, City Planner Will Lindsey, Associate City Planner Contents 1. Introduction .................................................. 1 2. Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan .. 2 3. Public Outreach ........................................... 3 4. Recommendation ......................................... 4 5. Attachments ................................................. 4 Staff Recommendation Approval with Conditions Packet pg. 19 Planning & Zoning Commission - Agenda Item 2 Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan Recommendation September 16, 2021 | Page 2 of 4 Back to Top information, City staff developed a targeted outreach strategy to engage the public from areas that might expect future development. Facilitated conversation, surveys and one-on-one meetings to discuss the trade-offs that are often faced when developing wireless sites Phase Ill - Plan Development During the development of the Plan, content was developed by Cityscape along with staff and curated through review by a technical advisory committee, City Boards and Commissions, community members and other wireless stakeholders. The progression of the Plan was presented at the March 26th, May 14th, and June 11th 2021 Planning & Zoning Commission Work Sessions. Additionally, the Plan progress and draft strategies were presented to the Golf Board on April 14th, and the Parks & Recreation Board on April 28th and May 26th both of which expressed support for the Plan. 2. Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan The Plan identifies a number of opportunities and challenges the City will face as the community grows, wireless technology progresses, and wireless subscribers consume more data. This Plan will serve as the basis for the City to implement targeted Land Use Code amendments that address the design, location and an updated development process for constructing wireless telecommunication facilities. The vision for the future is based on feedback received from various community members, technical experts, boards and commissions and summarized in the following vision statements: • Provide context-sensitive concealment elements that are compatible with surrounding natural and architectural environments. • Use limited public lands, such as parks, civic buildings and golf courses in an effort to allow greater community control over placement and design, protect the community from visual impacts and improve coverage in hard to reach residential areas. • Promote greater transparency from the wireless industry by requiring applicants to demonstrate radio frequency emission compliance with any new or existing wireless development. • Maintain cohesive small wireless facility design standards which require undergrounding of equipment to protect the community's visual quality. • Continually monitor, update, and publish the City's database of existing wireless communication facilities as a tool to promote collocation. The following table identifies the key strategies and policies recommended to fulfill the community vision for wireless telecommunication infrastructure. Specifically, listed below are seven of the nine strategies identified for Short Term (1-3 years) implementation which will be the focus of the subsequent Land Use Code update following adoption of the Plan. Packet pg. 20 Planning & Zoning Commission - Agenda Item 2 Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan Recommendation September 16, 2021 | Page 3 of 4 Back to Top Strategy Description Considerations Timeline Further incentivize roof or wall mounted installations. Recalibrate or develop process incentives in the Land Use Code when wall or roof mounted equipment is proposed on existing structures. Examples may include expedited review times or final approval by the CDNS director without a public hearing. Prioritizing the use of existing buildings may limit the need for new towers in the same vicinity. Short Term (1-3 years) Create a conditional use process for reviewing wireless proposals in residential zone districts. Create a process that requires more stringent set of baseline standards that control the location. design, height, and placement of wireless facilities Maintains the allowable control protecting residents and their properties. standards that control the location. design, height, and placement of wireless facilities Short Term (1-3 years) Consider the use of certain City-owned properties. Pre-designed concealed towers to increase coverage and capacity throughout the City would give the City the most control over infrastructure siting. Allows more control as property owner. Sets precedents for design type of infrastructure. Creates revenue for the City. Short Term (1-3 years) Update the City's Land Use Code to comply with Federal and State timing requirements. Decision timelines and required rules concerning local government's review and decision processes for macro cell and small wireless facilities should be included in the City's Land Use Code. Protects the City from unwanted lawsuits and provides consistency with wireless industry timelines and terminology. Short Term (1-3 years) Amend zoning standards to match federal definitions. Rules and application approval timelines would reduce the number of inconsistencies that exist in the current zoning policies and allow for streamlined staff processing. Concise process for the wireless industry to follow allowing for the types and design the City prefers. Short Term (1-3 years) Develop design standards and expectations for wireless facilities. Explore the use of a design guidelines document for large wireless facilities, similar to what currently exists for small cell placement of facilities. Design guidelines provide a resource that clearly states City preferences for the design and placement of facilities. Short Term (1-3 years) Continually update and publish a wireless inventory map for the City. Keep track of all wireless facilities in inventory form that will be updated as new applications are submitted. Promotes collocation of existing infrastructure over new facilities and maintains transparency of existing locations. Ongoing Funding has already been allocated for the Land Use Code update and implementation taking place after adoption. That work will be conducted by Kissinger and Fellman during Q4 2021 and Q1 2022. Next steps for work related to the Plan in 2021 and 2022 includes: • Fall 2021 – Initiate the short-term items as outlined in the Plan, draft Land Use Code changes, conduct community outreach • Winter 2022 – Planning & Zoning Commission Work Sessions (to be scheduled), Council Work Session (to be scheduled), adoption of Land Use Code changes 3. Public Outreach Two in-person public meetings were held on March 10th and 11th 2020 to kick-off the project, obtain input on priorities, address wireless conditions and review existing infrastructure in the City. The Plan process was paused due to the rapid growth of COVID-19 infections in the community and the subsequent lockdown that went into effect in March 2020. The Plan hiatus lasted until August 2020. When work resumed on the Plan, the public outreach strategy changed to take place virtually for the remainder of the project. A significant component of outreach for the project was a survey which was conducted from mid-March -mid-April 2021. The survey was geared towards interested stakeholders to offer input on their experiences and opinions about the current Packet pg. 21 Planning & Zoning Commission - Agenda Item 2 Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan Recommendation September 16, 2021 | Page 4 of 4 Back to Top state of wireless connectivity and aesthetics of the infrastructure in the City. The City received over 300 responses to the survey the entirety of which can be reviewed in Appendix B. Poll results and commentary from participants affirmed the gaps in coverage and capacity identified in the consultant’s analysis. An abbreviated summary of the survey results is listed below: • Aesthetics in terms of height, color and appearance are of greatest importance to the community • 198 (81.5%) of respondents live and work in Fort Collins year-round. • 209 (85.3%) respondents indicated the quality of wireless service is important to them. • 238 respondents rely on their mobile device for personal use/entertainment; 177 also rely on it for work and 41 of those polled rely on it for school. • 105 (42.9%) respondents indicated their network coverage at home is poor; 26 (10.6%) indicated it was excellent. • 160 (67.8%) respondents indicated they would prefer taller facilities with multiple collocation possibilities opposed to shorter and potential more towers. • 229 (93.9%) respondents indicated they support locating concealed cell towers on City owned property. 4. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend City Council adopt the Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan with the condition that the changes as noted in the attached Memorandum be incorporated into the final Plan prior to City Council First Reading on October 5, 2021. 5. Attachments 1. Staff Presentation 2. Staff Memorandum – 09/15/2021 6. Links 1. Wireless Telecommunications Master Plan - Planning & Zoning Commission Adoption Draft Packet pg. 22 11Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan RecommendationKai Kleer, Ryan Mounce, Will LindseySeptember 16, 2021ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet pg. 23 Adoption Recommendation2Does the Planning & Zoning Commission wish to make a recommendation to City Council regarding their adoption of the Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan (First Reading on October 5)?ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet pg. 24 Plan ProcessITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet pg. 25 Plan FindingsFindings4• City has more co-located equipment than free standing towers• 13 out of 73 towers and base stations are multi provider facilities• 60 are single provider sitesITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet pg. 26 Plan FindingsFindings5Rooftop antennas can be 15’ above the roof but:• Zoning requires maximumdistance between antenna androof edge• Architecturally difficult to addconcealment for a 2nd provider• Building owners may be limitingnumber of rooftop providersITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet pg. 27 Findings6Heat Capacity Map For A Single Provider• Over ½ of the City is deficient inwireless coverage and networkcapacityPlan FindingsITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet pg. 28 Findings7Zone Districts• Current standards favor co-location on existing structures over free-standing facilities• Denser residential areas where facilities are not allowed are also absent of tall structures for co-locationPlan FindingsITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet pg. 29 8Public OutreachKey Takeaways Spring 2021 Survey Responses•Aestheticsare of greatest importance to the community•85.3% - “Quality of wireless service is important to me.”•42.9% - “My network coverage at home is poor.”•10.6% - “My network coverage at home is excellent.”•67.8% - “I prefer taller facilities with multiple collocation possibilities opposed to shorter and potential more towers.”•93.9% - “I would support locating concealed cell towers on City owned property.”ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet pg. 30 Stories We’ve Heard9“I would like to see strong 5G connectivity through out Fort Collins. I realize that for some aesthetics are an issue for some, however wireless connectivity is becoming essential and is a public safety issue.” “There needs to be a balance between connectivity and the way this technology affects people who are electromagnetically sensitive.”“I feel less safe at work late at night, because I’m usually alone and have close to no service where I’m located.”“I have contemplated moving out of south FC strictly because the coverage is so bad. Even those that say its not a priority or concern, do not deal with bad connection issues.”“I like the idea of having greater site density on existing structuresand minimizing tall standalone towers.”“Registry Ridge is a great community in Fort Collins, however we have been forgotten regarding cell towers and cell servicein this community.”“Frequent updates on the progress of this infrastructurewould be good to know.”ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet pg. 31 Vision for the Future10•Provide context-sensitive concealment elements that are compatible with surrounding natural and architectural environments.•Use limited public lands, such as parks, civic buildings and golf coursesin an effort to allow greater community control over placement and design, protect the community from visual impacts and improve coverage in hard to reach residential areas.•Promote greater transparency from the wireless industryby requiring applicants to demonstrate radio frequency emission compliance with any new or existing wireless development.•Maintain cohesive small wireless facility design standardswhich require undergrounding of equipment to protect the community's visual quality.•Continually monitor, update, and publish the City's database of existing wireless communication facilitiesas a tool to promote collocation.ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet pg. 32 Key Strategies11StrategyDescriptionConsiderationsTimelineFurther incentivize roof or wall mounted installations.Recalibrate or develop process incentives in the Land Use Code when wall or roof mounted equipment is proposed on existing structures. Examples may include expedited review times or final approval by the CDNS director without a public hearing.Prioritizing the use of existing buildings may limit the need for new towers in the same vicinity.Short Term(1-3 years)Create a conditional use process for reviewing wireless proposals in residential zone districts.Create a process that requires more stringent set of baseline standards that control the location, design, height, and placement of wireless facilities in residential areas.Maintains the allowable control protecting residents and their properties. Short Term(1-3 years)Consider the use of certain City-owned properties.Pre-designed concealed towers to increase coverage and capacity throughout the City would give the City the most control over infrastructure siting.Allows City more control as property owner. Sets precedents for design type of infrastructure. Creates revenue for the City.Short Term(1-3 years)Update the City's Land Use Code to comply with Federal and State timing requirements.Decision timelines and required rules concerning local government's review and decision processes for macro cell and small wireless facilities should be included in the City's Land Use Code.Protects the City from unwanted lawsuits and provides consistency with wireless industry timelines and terminology.Short Term(1-3 years)Amend zoning standards to match federal definitions.Rules and application approval timelines would reduce the number of inconsistencies that exist in the current zoning policies and allow for streamlined staff processing.Concise process for the wireless industry to follow allowing for the types and design the City prefers.Short Term(1-3 years)Develop design standards and expectations for wireless facilities.Explore the use of a design guidelines document for large wireless facilities, similar to what currently exists for small cell placement of facilities.Design guidelines provide a resource that clearly states City preferences for the design and placement of facilities.Short Term(1-3 years)Publish and update a wireless inventory map for the CityThe City should build on the inventory included in the Plan by adding facilities to the map as they submit for development review. This inventory should be publicly accessible. Promotes collocation of existing infrastructure over new facilities and maintains transparency of existing locations.OngoingEncourage the use of art as a stealth deployment method for future wireless telecommunication facilities.Explore ways to incentivize the provision of public and/or private art pieces as a means of effectively disguising wireless infrastructure.What constitutes art requires extra consideration but can also create a facility that is unique to the community.Short-Term (1-3 years)ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet pg. 33 Next Steps & Implementation12Key 2021 Dates:• September 16 – Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation• October 5 – City Council Adoption (1st Reading)• October 19th–City Council Adoption (2ndReading)Fall 2021: • Initiate Short-Term items• Draft Land Use Code changes• Conduct community outreachWinter 2022: • P&Z Work Sessions (to be scheduled)• City Council Work Session (to be scheduled)• Adoption of Land Use Code ChangesOngoing: • Establish online public inventory of infrastructure and update quarterly• Guiding Principles for Overall Prioritization ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet pg. 34 Adoption Recommendation13Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend City Council adopt the Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan with the condition that the changes as noted in the attached Memorandum be incorporated into the final Plan prior to City Council First Reading on October 5, 2021.ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 1Packet pg. 35 Community Development & Neighborhood Services Planning & Development Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.221.6376 970.224.6111- fax MEMORANDUM Date: September 15, 2021 To: Chair Haefele and Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission From: Will Lindsey, Associate City Planner Re: Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan Recommended Revisions __________________________________________________________________ Recommended Revisions During the Planning & Zoning Commission Work Session on Friday September 10th several revisions to the Wireless Telecommunication Master Plan were requested by members of the Commission. Additionally, staff is proposing additional changes based on stakeholder input received prior to the Work Session. These changes are documented in the table below with an item-by-item summary of the revisions including the revised language proposed by staff. Additionally, a question was posed by the Commission about whether any direct reference to the Plan’s Glossary would be made in the Land Use Code. It is anticipated that the definitions found in the Plan Glossary will incorporated into Land Use Code Article 5 – Terms and Definitions as part of the subsequent Land Use Code changes that will be conducted in Fall 2021/Winter 2022. Page # Current Language Revised Language Explanation 3 – Executive Summary “This is incredibly important for the community as it is anticipated that in the future, wireless providers will need to supplement the City of Fort Collins' (City) network of one- hundred twenty-three (123) existing wireless facilities.” “This is incredibly important for the City as it is anticipated that in the future, wireless providers will need to expand the existing network of one- hundred twenty-three (123) existing wireless facilities in order to effectively serve the Fort Collins community.” Commission members requested that the Plan clarify that the City is not a provider of wireless service. 11 – Table 1: Short and Long Term Strategies and Policies CONSIDERATIONS “Wireless providers must follow FCC guidelines as it relates to RF emissions.” “Wireless providers must follow FCC regulations as it relates to RF emissions.” One of the strategies listed in this table relates to requiring proof of RF compliance. Under “Considerations” for this strategy it says that ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet pg. 36 “wireless providers must follow FCC guidelines as it relates to RF emissions.” These are not “guidelines” but rather are rules/regulations that the FCC adopts. 11 – Table 1: Short and Long Term Strategies and Policies N/A Strategy: Encourage the use of art as a stealth deployment method for future wireless telecommunication facilities. Description: Explore ways to incentivize the provision of public and/or private art pieces as a means of effectively disguising wireless infrastructure. Considerations: What constitutes art requires extra consideration but can also create a facility that is unique to the community. Timeline: Short-Term (1-3 years) Commission members requested that the Plan more explicitly state a Strategy related to the use of art as a method or deployment for stealth facilities. 11 – Table 1: Short and Long Term Strategies and Policies Strategy: “Continually update and publish a wireless inventory map for the City.” Description: “Keep track of all wireless applications in inventory form.” Strategy: “Publish and update a wireless inventory map for the City” Description: “The City should build on the inventory included in the Plan by adding facilities to the map as they submit for development review. This inventory should be publicly accessible.” The Commission requested clarification about the language related to “Continually Updating” the inventory map. 13 – Legal Framework, Federal Regulations “The Telecommunication Act of 1996 is the foundation that local codes build upon when drafting local regulations. Subsequent congressional and federal laws provide the definitions and timelines referenced as "shot clocks" that state and local “The Telecommunication Act of 1996 preserves local siting authority but contains a handful of specific provisions where localities are required to follow federal The Telecom Act “preserves” local land use authority, subject to a handful of specific exceptions where the federal law is controlling. The Telecom Act is not a foundation to build upon but rather a law that ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet pg. 37 governments must follow when regulating the industry.” restrictions. These limitations of local authority must be taken into account when drafting local regulations. Subsequent congressional legislation and federal regulations adopted by the Federal Communications Commission provide the definitions and timelines referenced as ‘shot clocks’ that state and local governments must follow when regulating the industry.” recognizes local control generally but specifies some limited preemption. Additionally, the reference in the second sentence to “congressional and federal laws” is inaccurate in that it is Congress that passes the laws, and the FCC rules and regulations provide the definitions and shot clocks. 13 – Legal Framework, Federal Regulations “grants local governments the authority to regulate wireless infrastructure” “preserves local government authority to regulate wireless infrastructure.” Edit to clarify that local zoning authority existed well prior to the passage of the Telecom Act. 14 - Legal Framework, Federal Regulations “Report and Order 1” “2014 Report and Order” Change the reference name of the FCC’s 2014 action to align with the more commonly used title. 15 – Table 2: Process Timelines N/A Installation Type: Eligible Facilities Request (EFRs) EFRs can involve small cell sites and they can also involve macro sites. Most significantly, EFR sites have different required timeframes for review, and different remedies for failure to comply with such timeframes. In other words, all EFRs can be modifications to small cell sites OR macro sites; but not all modifications to small cell sites or macro sites are EFRs 15 – Table 2: Process Timelines N/A Time Period For Decision: 60 Days* Under FCC rules, local governments have 60 days to review applications for EFRs. 15 – Table 2: Process Timelines N/A Review and Initial Process: Within 30 days of receipt of the application a local government may toll The addition of this information clarifies how EFRs differ from in review from other wireless facilities. Once additional ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet pg. 38 the shot clock by notifying the applicant of the incompleteness and requiring additional information related to determining whether the application qualifies as an EFR. Once additional information is provided, the shot clock resumes at the point where it was tolled. information is provided, the shot clock resumes at the point where it was tolled. Following a supplemental submission, the local government has 10 days to notify the applicant that the supplemental submission did not provide the information identified in the original notice delineating missing information. 15 – Table 2: Process Timelines “** In the event of expiry of the FCC's shot clock for a new macro facility or macro collocation on an existing PWSF, the applicant is entitled to bring action in federal court seeking to compel the jurisdiction to grant the permit, which the court is supposed to hear on an expedited basis, and the community faces a rebuttable presumption that it violated 47 USC §332 by failing to timely adjudicate the application. The community can then defend and explain why it was unable to do so within allowable timeframes.” “** In the event of expiry of the FCC's shot clock for a new macro facility or macro collocation on an existing PWSF, the applicant is entitled to bring action in federal court seeking to compel the jurisdiction to grant the permit, which the court is supposed to hear on an expedited basis, and the community faces a rebuttable presumption that it violated 47 USC §332 by failing to timely adjudicate the application. The community can then defend and explain why it was unable to do so within allowable timeframes.” The Plan does not need to reference federal court as applicants may sue in either federal or state court. 15 – Table 2: Process Timelines N/A *** Local governments may not continue to toll the shot clock by requesting additional information from providers unrelated to that initial request. If a provider responds to an initial notice of incompleteness but fails to include the information requested by the Add language to Table 2 clarifying that the City can require additional information that it may need which it neglected to request the first time around, but if it is not a subject of the initial request the City cannot use subsequent requests to toll the shot clocks. ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet pg. 39 local government in that notice, the local government may only toll the shot clock again to alert the provider that it has not provided the information it requested but may not request further information as grounds for a subsequent tolling. 16 – Colorado State Regulations Colorado State Regulations Colorado State Law Change title of section to reflect that the topic is one statute not a regulation. 16 – Colorado State Regulations The State of Colorado has imposed different timelines than the Federal Government through the FCC's regulations for various types of wireless infrastructure. When navigating different federal and state timelines it is always recommended to follow the shorter timeline for each applicable type of application to avoid creating a conflict with compliance amongst the competing timelines. The State of Colorado has imposed different timelines than the Federal Government through the FCC's regulations for various types of wireless infrastructure. When navigating different federal and state timelines it is always recommended to follow the shorter timeline for each applicable type of application to avoid creating a conflict with compliance amongst the competing timelines. It should be noted that some of the state and federal definitions are different, and that unless and until challenged, the City’s policy is to follow state law definitions where conflicts exists when the City determines that it benefits the City’s regulatory program. Additional language in the paragraph which stipulates when it is prudent for the City to follow State definitions related to wireless telecommunication infrastructure. 63 - Glossary Macro Wireless Facilities - Traditional support structures for personal wireless service facilities (PWSF) identified as macro cell facilities consist of multiple provider use towers and base stations. Macro Macro Wireless Facilities - Traditional support structures for personal wireless service facilities (PWSF) identified as macro cell facilities The Commission requested that the height listed in the definition for Macro Wireless Facilities be changed to a height more contextual to Fort Collins. In evaluating the ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet pg. 40 facilities are taller infrastructure usually in excess of 80 feet in height and have been the most commonly utilized infrastructure over the last thirty years. Macro facilities are considered the backbone of the network and allow service providers the most flexible options when deploying their usable spectrum and providing signal over the greatest area. It also allows the flexibility to target the desired signal to a specific location. consist of multiple provider use towers and base stations. Macro facilities are taller infrastructure usually ranging between 50 and 100 feet in height and have been the most commonly utilized infrastructure over the last thirty years. Macro facilities are considered the backbone of the network and allow service providers the most flexible options when deploying their usable spectrum and providing signal over the greatest area. It also allows the flexibility to target the desired signal to a specific location. inventory of facilities Staff felt that a height range between 50 and 100 feet was more appropriate as it is reflective of the range of facility heights found throughout the community. 64 - Glossary According to the FCC a small wireless facility must meet the following criteria: •Each antenna associated with the facility must be located inside an enclosure of no more than three (3) cubic feet in volume, or in the case of antenna that have exposed elements, each antenna and all of its exposed elements must be able to fit within an enclosure of not more than six (6) cubic feet in volume; and •All other wireless equipment associated with the facility is cumulatively no more than twenty-eight (28) cubic feet in volume. The following ancillary equipment is not included in this calculation� electric meters, concealment elements, telecommunications demarcation boxes, ground- based enclosures, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, cutoff switches, vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other According to Colorado Revised Statutes a small wireless facility must meet the following criteria: •Each antenna associated with the facility must be located inside an enclosure of no more than three (3) cubic feet in volume, or in the case of antenna that have exposed elements, each antenna and all of its exposed elements must be able to fit within an enclosure of not more than three (3)cubic feet in volume; and •All other wireless equipment associated with the facility is cumulatively no more than seventeen (17) cubic feet in volume. The following ancillary equipment is not Amends the size of small wireless facilities to align with the State definition rather than the Federal. ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet pg. 41 services, and utility poles or other support structures. included in this calculation: electric meters, concealment elements, telecommunications demarcation boxes, ground-based enclosures, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, and cutoff switches, vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services, and utility poles or other support structures. ITEM 2, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet pg. 42 Development Review Staff Report Agenda Item 3 Planning Services Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 p. 970-416-4311 f. 970.224.6134 www.fcgov.com Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing: September 16, 2021 Mars Landing, Project Development Plan – PDP190013 Summary of Request This is a request for a Project Development Plan (PDP) for the development of two, three-story multi-family buildings with 90 total dwelling units, with a total of 151 on-site parking spaces on 3.79 acres. Access will be taken from two points along Mars Drive. The property is within the General Commercial (CG) zone district and is subject to Planning and Zoning Commission (Type 2) Review. Zoning Map (ctrl + click map to follow link) Next Steps If approved by the decision maker, the applicant will be eligible to submit a Final Development Plan. Subsequent rounds of review will be required to finalize site engineering and corrections to the plan before the applicant can apply for site and building permits. Site Location The site is located at the northwest corner of S College Avenue and Skyway Drive and adjacent to the Storage Star enclosed mini-Storage facility (parcel # 9611421001. Zoning General Commercial (C-G) Property Owner Goodwin Knight LLC c/o Mark Johnson 8605 Explorer Drive, Ste 250 Colorado Springs, CO 80920-1013 Applicant/Representative Galloway and Company James Prelog, PE 5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Ste 210 Johnstown, CO 80534 Staff Pete Wray, Senior City Planner Contents 1. Project Introduction .................................... 2 2. Public Outreach ......................................... 4 3. Article 2 – Applicable Standards ................ 5 4. Article 3 - Applicable Standards ................. 5 5. Article 4 – Applicable Standards: ............. 20 6. Findings of Fact/Conclusion .................... 21 7. Recommendation ..................................... 21 8. Attachments ............................................. 21 9. Links ......................................................... 21 Staff Recommendation Approval of Project Development Plan with conditions Packet pg. 43 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 2 of 21 Back to Top 1. Project Introduction PROJECT DESCRIPTION • This is a request to construct two, market rate, multi-family buildings containing 90 units. The unit breakdown consists of 58 1-bedroom, 24 2-bedroom, and 6 3-bedroom apartments. • The property is rectangular in shape and is generally slopes to the south and east, with stormwater runoff draining into the southeast corner of the site. • This site contains 8 significant trees which includes: o A major belt of Cottonwood trees (in fair to poor condition) that run diagonally north to south along the existing irrigation ditch o A few other trees including Willow and Russian Olive (in fair condition) are also located along the irrigation ditch on either side of property line • The existing irrigation ditch is proposed to be relocated and piped underground. As a result, the existing trees will be removed based on condition and location. Of the 8 existing trees to be removed, the project is required to provide 9 upsized trees to be planted on site and within the buffer zone. • Primary access to the site will be taken from two curb cuts on Mars Drive, connecting to a private drive, which bisects the site and runs north to south. This project proposes to demolish the temporary roundabout and extend Mars Drive south to the south property boundary to allow for the installation of the second drive-cut. • The South College Corridor Plan includes a trail connection from Skyway Drive on the north to Trilby Road on the south, which runs parallel to S College Avenue. This future pedestrian/bike trail is located on the abutting vacant property to the west, with the PDP providing a path stub-out connection to this future trail alignment. • On-site amenities include three separate central feature and gathering spaces with shade structure, seating, grill, and tables. A soft path is located adjacent to the northwest gathering space within the landscaped buffer and drainage area. • Off-site improvements include streetscape landscaping along the south side of Skyway Drive and frontage of S. College Avenue. SITE CHARACTERISTICS 1. Development Status/Background The site is currently vacant land. This site was annexed as part of the Timan First Annexation in 1988. The overall property is divided into three lots including Lot 1 (Five-Star Storage site), and out lot B (fronting S. College Avenue), and out lot A (this proposed PDP site west of storage site). Packet pg. 44 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 3 of 21 Back to Top 2. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use North South East West Zoning General Commercial (CG) and Low Density Residential (RL) General Commercial General Commercial General Commercial Land Use Commercial and Residential Vacant land Five-Star Storage Vacant land OVERVIEW OF MAIN CONSIDERATIONS The plan has gone through five rounds of review with extensive exploration of issues between rounds of review. Major issues that required clarification and refinement through the review process have included: • Natural habitat buffer and enhanced landscaping at northwest portion of site. • Realignment and underground piping of the existing irrigation ditch. • Building model variety and architecture. • Location and design of central feature and gathering spaces. • Off-site streetscape landscaping on Skyway Drive and S College Avenue. • Ensuring that the highly visible detention pond at the corner of Skyway Drive and Mars Drive provides adequate undulation and landscaping, and viable transition between PDP and existing neighborhood. CITY PLAN (2019) City Plan is the City’s comprehensive plan for land use, transportation, and transit. Several principles and policies are relevant to the evaluation of the current proposal. While the South College Corridor Plan is the primary guiding document for this area of the community, the proposal for development of this site also aligns well with the guidance contained in City Plan: • Policy LIV 4.1 - NEW NEIGHBORHOODS Encourage creativity in the design and construction of new neighborhoods that: Provides a unifying and interconnected framework of streets, sidewalks, walkway spines and other public spaces; and expands housing options, including higher density and mixed- use buildings. • Policy LIV 4.2 - COMPATIBILITY OF ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT Ensure that development that occurs in adjacent districts complements and enhances the positive qualities of existing neighborhoods. Developments that share a property line and/or street frontage with an existing neighborhood should promote compatibility by: Continuing established block patterns and streets to improve access to services and amenities from the adjacent neighborhood; Incorporating context- sensitive buildings and site features (e.g., similar size, scale and materials); and Locating parking and service areas where impacts on existing neighborhoods—such as noise and traffic—will be minimized. • Policy LIV 5.3 - LAND FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Use density requirements to maximize the use of land for residential development to positively influence housing supply and expand housing choice. Packet pg. 45 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 4 of 21 Back to Top • Principle ENV 8 – Create and maintain a safe, healthy, and resilient urban forest. The tree preservation and mitigation plan for this PDP align with guidance to protect existing trees and enhance the urban tree canopy with new tree plantings as development takes place. City Plan designates the site of the current PDP as a “Suburban Mixed-Use” place type on the Structure Plan Map. Mixed-use district provides opportunities for a range of retail and commercial services, office and employment, multifamily residential, civic, and other complementary uses in a compact, pedestrian and transit-supportive setting. SOUTH COLLEGE CORRIDOR PLAN In 2008, City Council adopted the South College Corridor Plan, which offers the following relevant policy guidance: “Policy LU 2.3 - Residential Development. Encourage the development of additional residential uses to increase market support for neighborhood-serving retail uses.” (p 40) “Policy LU 3.2 - Transit-Oriented Uses. Uses that enhance the transit station - including high-density housing, offices, employment centers, and neighborhood commercial uses - are preferred over other uses. Such transit supportive uses will be the focus of City incentives.” (p 41) “Policy LU 3.3 - Convenient Access. Convenient multi-modal access will be provided from the PDP to South College and connecting transit. (p 41) “Policy LU 3.4 - Building Character and Orientation. The character, massing, and orientation of multi-story buildings will play a critical role in defining this area. In general, fronting the edges of buildings at the sidewalk is encouraged to create a comfortable pedestrian environment. Providing interesting building details at a human scale also creates visual interest.” (p 41) “Policy T 1.1 - Implementation of the Access Control Plan. Development projects and public highway improvement projects will implement the adopted ACP. Short-term and long-range improvements will balance the needs of pedestrians, cyclists, motorists, and businesses. Any ACP elements proposed for implementation will have meaningful involvement of the adjacent businesses and property owners.” (P. 42 “Policy T 3.1 - South College Multi-Use Path. In addition to on street bicycle lanes, pedestrian and bicycle circulation will be enhanced by the project connecting to the future pedestrian trail between Skyway and Trilby. The PDP: will provide a n eight-foot detached, multi-use path paralleling South College (as identified in the US 287 Environmental Overview Study and the US 287/South College Avenue Bicycle Lane Project). This is a slight modification to the City’s standard Six-Lane Arterial Cross Section.” (p. 43) The proposed development provides several elements that support the South College Corridor Plan, including higher density residential, an 8’ multi-use path along S College, stub out path connection to the future north/south multi-use trail, and compliance with the South College Access Control Plan. . 2. Public Outreach NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A neighborhood meeting was held on August 26, 2019. Approximately 25 members of the public were in attendance. A summary of the public comments received during the neighborhood meeting are attached. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Staff has not received any comments for this proposal. Any comments received between the public notice period and hearing will be forwarded to the P&Z Commission to be considered when making a decision on the project. Packet pg. 46 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 5 of 21 Back to Top 3. Article 2 – Applicable Standards PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCEDURAL OVERVIEW 1. Preliminary Design Review – PDR190007 A preliminary design review meeting was held on July 31, 2019. 2. Neighborhood Meeting Pursuant to LUC Section 2.2.2 – Step 2: Neighborhood Meetings, a neighborhood meeting is required for Planning and Zoning Commission (Type 2) projects. A neighborhood meeting was held for this project on August 26, 2019. 3. First Submittal – PDP190013 The first submittal of this project was completed on September 13, 2019. The PDP required 5 rounds of staff review. 4. Notice (Posted, Written and Published) Posted Notice: September 12, 2019, Sign #510 Written Hearing Notice: September 2, 2021; 253 addresses mailed. Published Hearing Notice: September 5, 2021 4. Article 3 - Applicable Standards DIVISION 3.2 - SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN STANDARDS Applicable Code Standard Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Staff Findings 3.2.1 – Landscaping and Tree Protection The standards of this section require that a development plan demonstrate a comprehensive approach to landscaping that enhances the appearance and function of the neighborhood, buildings, and pedestrian environment. The proposed plan provides the following: • The plan provides a comprehensive landscape plan that includes landscaping around the entire perimeter of each building. Special attention has been given to landscaping around ground mounted air condensers. • The plan offers a diverse palette of shrubs, grasses, and perennials in the following quantities: • 145 evergreen shrubs • 617 grasses • 65 perennials • 651 deciduous shrubs • Full tree stocking is provided within 50 feet of all high-use or high-visibility sides of the building. This includes 17 deciduous, 5 evergreen, and 24 ornamental trees for a total of 46 trees. • All proposed trees will be upsized to provide on-site mitigation for the 7 trees that are proposed to be removed. Mitigation proposes 2” canopy shade trees, 8-foot height (6’ min) for evergreen trees, and 2-inch caliper (2” min) for ornamental trees. In total, 9 mitigation trees are required and 9 are provided meeting the standard. • Trees meet maximum spacing requirements of 30-40 foot spacing for canopy shade trees and 20-40 foot spacing for evergreen or ornamental trees. • Species diversity limits do not exceed the 15% max of any one species. Complies Packet pg. 47 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 6 of 21 Back to Top • The Plan provides a total of 122 trees on and off-stie. Of that total, 61 are canopy shade trees, meeting the required minimum 50%. • Planting beds that contain shrub and ground cover in appropriate quantities and in all areas of the site not covered by impervious asphalt, concrete, buildings, or structures. Further refinement of quantities and species will be finalized at Final Development Plan. 3.2.1(E)(3) – Water Conservation Landscape plans are required to be designed in a way that employs water efficient techniques, such as using low water use plants, limiting high water-use turf to areas of high traffic, efficient irrigation design and use of mulch to conserve moisture. Landscape plans may not exceed an average of fifteen gallons per square foot of landscape. • The landscape plan demonstrates moderate (10 gallons/square feet/season) and low (3 gallons/square feet/season), and very low water zones. Combined, all landscape areas within the site are calculated to average 6 gallons per square foot, in compliance with the Maximum allowance of 15 gallons/square foot. Complies 3.2.1(F) – Tree Preservation and Mitigation This standard requires that developments provide on-site mitigation in the form of a defined number of replacement trees if existing significant trees are removed. The number of mitigation trees is determined by City Forestry staff based off existing tree species, breast diameter, and health/condition. Mitigation values can range between 1 and 6 for a tree that is removed. Dead, dying, and certain invasive species are exempt from this standard. There is a total of 7 existing trees on site proposed to be removed. A total of 9 upsized mitigation trees are provided in compliance with this standard. Complies 3.2.2 – Access, Circulation and Parking This standard requires that development projects accommodate the movement of vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, and transit throughout the project and to and from surrounding areas safely and conveniently and contribute to the attractiveness of the neighborhood. In compliance, the PDP includes the following: • Detached street sidewalk system along both Mars Drive, Skyway Drive, and S College Ave. • A central pedestrian spine provides a connection between Mars Drive and west edge of property, which then connects to the planned future multi-use trail that will provide pedestrian connectivity between Skyway and Trilby. • A series of 5,6 and 8 foot walkways internal to the site. • Curb cuts and ramps in safe and convenient locations throughout the site. Complies 3.2.2(C)(4) – Bicycle Parking Space Requirements Bicycle parking requirements for multifamily residential use are 1 space per bedroom. To meet the standards of this Section, the plan is required to provide 128 bicycle parking spaces (77 enclosed 60% and 51 fixed racks (40%). • The Plan proposes 90 units that combined, contain 128 bedrooms. • The project proposes 128 spaces, including 32 on hanging racks under building eaves, or spaces inside detached garage spaces, and 96 fixed spaces on bike racks distributed throughout the site. Staff is including a Condition of Approval No. 1 to be addressed at FDP to provide 60% covered bicycle spaces (77 spaces), and 40% fixed rack spaces (51 spaces). Complies with Condition 3.2.2(C)(5) (a, b) – Walkways and Street Crossing This standard requires that walkways within the site be located and aligned to connect areas or points of pedestrian origin or destination and where walkways cross a street or internal roadway, crossings must emphasize and place priority on the pedestrian through several mitigating elements such as pavement treatments, striping, signals, lighting, refuge areas and landscaping. The Plan provides walkways consistent with the standard of this section using decorative concrete, landscape bulb-outs and lighting. Complies Packet pg. 48 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 7 of 21 Back to Top 3.2.2(C) (6,7) – Direct On/Off- Site Access to Pedestrian and Bicycle Destinations These standards require that the on-site/off-site pedestrian and bicycle circulation system be designed to provide for direct connections to major pedestrian and bicycle destinations, including, trails, parks, schools, Neighborhood Centers, Neighborhood Commercial Districts, and transit stops that are located either within the development or adjacent to the development. The most notable pedestrian and bicycle destinations within the vicinity are along S College to the east. The Plan provides direct connections into the S College and existing Transit stop, with routes that connect to the South Transit Station. Further, the Plan provides several direct connections into the street sidewalk system that provide greater connectivity to the areas along Skyway and ultimately to Trilby by a future trail connection. Complies 3.2.2(C)(8) – Transportation Impact Study The Transportation Impact Study finds that all level of service requirements for the City of Fort Collins are met. Traffic Engineering Staff has reviewed the report and in general the conclusions have been accepted. Complies 3.2.2(K)(1)(a)(1) – Parking The following are parking requirements for multi-family projects. Number of Bedrooms/Dwelling Unit Parking Spaces Per Dwelling Unit* One or less 1.5 Two 1.75 Three 2.0 Based on the bedroom and unit count, the project is required to provide 145 parking spaces. The plan provides the following total of 151 spaces exceeding compliance with the standards of this Section: • 130 standard surface parking spaces • 8 accessible spaces • 13 garage spaces Complies 3.2.2(K)(5) – Handicap Parking Handicap-accessible spaces must have a stall width of 13 feet and be placed as close as possible to the nearest building entrance. Parking standards require a minimum amount of 8 handicap spaces based on the total spaces in the lot. The PDP complies with this standard by providing 6 accessible surface spaces located in convenient areas adjacent to entryways around the site, and 2 accessible parking garage spaces. Complies 3.2.2(L) – Parking Stall Dimensions Land Use Code Section 3.2.2(L) details parking stall and drive-aisle requirements for parking lots. The parking provided in this PDP is designed primarily for residents and qualifies as a “long term” parking use as outlined in Section 3.2.2(L)(3). The proposed project meets the parking stall and drive-aisle dimensions required in the Land Use Code for all parking stalls and provides the following: • 90°: 130, 9’x17’ spaces (8’x15’ min req) • The internal private street is 26 feet in width. (24 feet min req) Complies 3.2.2(M) – Landscaping This section requires that ten (10) percent of the interior space of any parking lot with more than one hundred (100) spaces be devoted to landscaping. • The PDP proposes interior parking lot landscaping more than the minimum standard of this section. Complies Packet pg. 49 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 8 of 21 Back to Top 3.2.4 – Site Lighting This standard requires that exterior lighting not adversely affect the properties, neighborhood, or natural features adjacent to the development. Further, the standard requires exterior lighting to be examined in a way that considers the light source, level of illumination, hours of illumination and need. The PDP provides 24 light fixtures that provide lighting around building entryways, garages, sidewalks, parking, streets, and internal drives. Pole mounted luminaires are limited to 17’- 6” feet in height. Lighting is used in all needed areas of the site and complies with the requirements of this section using fully shielded, down-directional, 3,000 Kelvin or less fixtures and do not exceed the lumen limit of 0.1 when measured 20 feet beyond the property boundary. The site is located within the LC Lighting Context Area. The proposed fixtures comply with backlight, up light and glare requirements based on the context area. Complies 3.2.5 – Trash and Recycling Enclosures The purpose of this standard is to ensure the provision of areas, compatible with surrounding land uses, for the collection, separation, storage, loading and pickup of trash, waste cooking oil, compostable and recyclable materials. The PDP proposes two trash enclosures distributed adjacent to the two buildings on site. Each enclosure contains an equal distribution of trash and recycling capacity. Enclosures are constructed of cedar fence and posts, separate pedestrian entrance, and main steel gates and posts. Colors are neutral and match the overall theme of the development. Staff is including a Condition of Approval No. 2 - to ensure the enclosures are screened with a more durable material in place of cedar fencing such as textured concrete block, CMU blocks, or all metal fencing. This will include interior curbing or metal strips to buffer dumpster bins from hitting walls. Complies with Condition 3.3 ENGINEERING STANDARDS Applicable Code Standard Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Staff Findings 3.3.1(C) – Public Sites, Reservations and Dedications This standard requires the applicant to dedicate rights-of-way for public streets, drainage easements and utility easements as needed to serve the area being developed. In cases where any part of an existing street is abutting or within the property being developed, the applicant must dedicate such additional rights-of-way to meet the minimum width required by Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards and the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code. The PDP complies with this standard by: • The College Ave., Skyway and Mars Drive ROW and utility easements were all dedicated with the South College Storage plat. • The onsite easements being dedicated include emergency access, pedestrian access, and utility. There are also temporary slope easements to be dedicated by the adjacent property owner on the south side for grading to tie into existing. Complies Packet pg. 50 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 9 of 21 Back to Top 3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL, NATURAL AREA, RECREATIONAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION STANDARDS The purpose of this Section is to ensure that when property is developed consistent with its zoning designation, the way in which the proposed physical elements of the development plan are designed and arranged on the site will protect the natural habitats and features and historic resources both on the site and in the vicinity of the site. Applicable Code Standard Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Staff Findings 3.4.1 – Natural Habitats The General Standard requires, to the maximum extent feasible, the development plan be designed and arranged to be compatible with and to protect natural habitats and features and the plants and animals that inhabit them and integrate them within the developed landscape of the community by: (1) directing development away from sensitive resources; (2) minimizing impacts and disturbance through the use of buffer zones; (3) enhancing existing conditions; or (4) restoring or replacing the resource value lost to the community when a development will result in the disturbance of natural habitats or features. b. Section 3.4.1(E)(1) (a-i) Buffer Zone Performance Standards allow the decision maker [Planning and Zoning Board] to determine buffer zones that may be multiple and noncontiguous. The general buffer zone distance for each natural habitat or feature is established in the quantitative buffer zone table, but the Planning and Zoning Board may reduce or enlarge any portion of the general buffer zone distance to ensure qualitative performance standards are achieved. Background: The Ecological Characterization Study (ECS) was completed by Wildlife Specialties, LLC in December 2019, and was later updated in October 2020. The report highlights several resources on and near the property that warrant protection or mitigation, including: the Louden Ditch, a 3.5 acre prairie dog colony, and an active Red-tailed hawk nest located 450-feet east of the project site. Other than these features, the site is dominated by non-native grasses (smooth brome and crested wheatgrass), non-native trees (Russian olive, Chinese elm) and invasive weeds (cheatgrass, bindweed, and leafy spurge). Development Proposal: In 2018 the property owner piped the ditch and City staff required the trench to remain as a wildlife movement corridor. The resulting buffer zone for the ditch amounts to 1.5 acres of low-quality uplands, and .014 ac of low-quality fringe wetlands along the ditch embankments. The Mars Landing development proposes to fill the ditch trench and prairie dog colony. Proposed onsite mitigation will create .85 ac of restored uplands and .043 ac of wetlands. The condition of the buffer will be higher in quality than what exists today through enhanced native plantings and weed mitigation. The buffer zone is located on the western and northern sides of the site and connects to the buffer zone on the adjacent property to the west. This will allow for the continuance and enhancement of the existing wildlife movement corridor. Because the onsite uplands mitigation will not amount to a 1:1 mitigation value, the development will make a payment to the City Natural Areas Department for one acre of uplands restoration. The prairie dog colony will be mitigated by trapping and donating the animals to the raptor center. To do this, the applicant will have to obtain a permit from Colorado Parks & Wildlife and provide detailed day-by-day timeline of trapping activities to the City Environmental Planner for review and approval. A final report will be submitted to the City Environmental Planner after trap and donate activities have been completed. The Red-tailed Hawk nest is located approximately 450-feet away from the development site. LUC 3.4.1 requires that Red-tailed Hawk nests be protected by a 450-foot buffer during nesting season on the first year of a multi-year construction project. Because the buffer overlaps the property boundary, work performed within this buffer must occur outside the nesting season on the first year of construction. Complies Packet pg. 51 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 10 of 21 Back to Top Performance Standards: The applicant proposes meeting LUC 3.4.1 (E) natural habitat buffer zone performance standards, which are as follows: (a) The project shall be designed to preserve or enhance the ecological character or function and wildlife use of the natural habitat or feature and to minimize or adequately mitigate the foreseeable impacts of development. The existing site contains a total of .014 ac of low-quality wetlands and 1.5 ac of low- quality uplands. The development proposes the creation of .043 ac wetlands and .85 ac of uplands. The resultant buffer zone on site will be of higher quality than what exists today through weed mitigation, species, and structural diversity. Enhanced plantings have been located near the parking area to mitigate noise and light from cars. Lighting has been designed so that no light spills into the buffer zone. (b) The project, including, by way of example and not by way of limitation, its fencing, pedestrian/bicycle paths and roadways, shall be designed to preserve or enhance the existence of wildlife movement corridors between natural habitats and features, both within and adjacent to the site. The wildlife movement corridor will be retained along the western side of the site and connects to a buffer immediately west of the property. (c) The project shall be designed to preserve existing trees and vegetation that contribute to the site's ecological, shade, canopy, aesthetic, habitat, and cooling value. Notwithstanding the requirements of Section 3.2.1(F), all trees and vegetation within the Limits of Development must be preserved or, if necessary, mitigated based on the values established by the Ecological Characterization Study or the City Environmental Planner. Such mitigation, if necessary, shall include trees, shrubs, grasses, or any combination thereof, and must be planted within the buffer zone. Existing vegetation is predominantly weedy and invasive therefore wetlands and uplands will be restored. Restoration will include a combination of shrubs and trees for improved structural and species diversity and the understory will be replaced with native seed. (d) The project shall be designed to protect from adverse impact to species utilizing special habitat features such as key raptor habitat features, including nest sites, night roosts and key feeding areas as identified by the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Division ("CPW") or the Fort Collins Natural Areas Department ("NAD"); key production areas, wintering areas and migratory feeding areas for waterfowl; heron rookeries; key use areas for wading birds and shorebirds; key use areas for migrant songbirds; key nesting areas for grassland birds; fox and coyote dens; mule deer winter concentration areas as identified by the CPW or NAD; prairie dog colonies one (1) acre or greater in size; key areas for rare, migrant or resident butterflies as identified by the NAD; areas of high terrestrial or aquatic insect diversity as identified by the NAD; remnant native prairie habitat; mixed foothill shrubland; foothill ponderosa pine forest; plains cottonwood riparian woodlands; and wetlands of any size. The Red-tailed Hawk nest will be protected per LUC 3.4.1 standards. Prairie dogs will be trapped and donated to the raptor center, which provides a higher conservation approach than euthanizing the animals. (e) The project shall be designed so that the character of the proposed development in terms of use, density, traffic generation, quality of runoff water, noise, lighting, and similar potential development impacts shall minimize the degradation of the ecological character or wildlife use of the affected natural habitats or features. The project went through several design iterations to mitigate impacts. For example, detached garage buildings were relocated to the south and the gathering area was relocated to the east to expand the buffer zone and reduce noise and lighting impacts. Additional plantings have been placed around the parking lot for screening from traffic, lighting, and noise. Packet pg. 52 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 11 of 21 Back to Top (f) The project shall be designed to integrate with and otherwise preserve existing site topography, including, but not limited to, such characteristics as steepness of slopes, existing drainage features, rock outcroppings, river and stream terraces, valley walls, ridgelines and scenic topographic features. The Louden Ditch trench will be filled which will impact the character of the site. However, the site would be rendered undevelopable if the trench remains as the ditch diagonally bisects the site. (g) The project shall be designed to enhance the natural ecological characteristics of the site. If existing landscaping within the buffer zone is determined by the decision maker to be incompatible with the purposes of the buffer zone, then the applicant shall undertake restoration and mitigation measures such as regrading and/or the replanting of native vegetation. All buffers will be restored to native vegetation. Additionally, weed mitigation and enhancement plantings will be incorporated to improve the natural ecological characteristics of the site. (h) The project may be designed to provide appropriate human access to natural habitats and features and their associated buffer zones to serve recreation purposes, provided that such access is compatible with the ecological character or wildlife use of the natural habitat or feature. A pedestrian connection is proposed through the western side of the site that connects to a future regional trail. This connection will not compromise the buffer zone serving as a wildlife corridor and provides appropriate human access to nature. (i) Fencing associated with the project shall be designed to be compatible with the ecological character and wildlife use of the natural habitat or feature. No fencing is being proposed in the buffer zone. Summary: The onsite mitigation results in the creation of .85 ac uplands and .043 ac of wetlands. Because the onsite mitigation will not amount to a 1:1 mitigation value, the development will make a payment to the City Natural Areas Department for one acre of uplands restoration. In addition, the applicant is trapping and donating existing prairie dogs on site. A native seed mix, weed mitigation, and additional native plantings throughout other areas of the site will further enhance the ecological character and habitat value of the site. 3.4.3 – Water Quality The Project is required to mitigate precipitation runoff flowing from the site is treated in accordance with the criteria set forth in the Stormwater Criteria Manual. • The Mars Landing development is meeting all City of Fort Collins Stormwater requirements. They are proposing quantity detention per City Criteria, extended detention, and underground storage (StormTech chambers) for water quality and LID respectively. The site outfalls to the east through a swale that was planned for with the “South College storage” development. All offsite easements were obtained previously, and no additional offsite easements are required with this development. Complies 3.4.7 – Historic and Cultural Resources This standard is intended to ensure that development is compatible with and protects historic resources and that the design of new structures is compatible with and protects the integrity of historic resources located within the area of adjacency. According to the requirements in 3.4.7(B), there are no historic resources within 200 feet of the subject site, therefore, Section 3.4.7 is not applicable to this project. N/A 3.4.8 – Parks and Trails This standard requires compliance of development plans with the Parks and Recreation Policy Plan to ensure that the community will have a fair and equitable system of parks, trail and recreation facilities as the community grows. The plan proposes a direct connection to the future multi-use trail rail that will connect between Skyway and Trilby. Complies Packet pg. 53 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 12 of 21 Back to Top 3.5 BUILDING STANDARDS The purpose of this Section is to ensure that the physical and operational characteristics of proposed buildings and uses are compatible when considered within the context of the surrounding area. Applicable Code Standard Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Staff Findings 3.5.1(A) and (B) – Building Project and Compatibility, Purpose and General Standard This section is designed to ensure compatibility of new buildings with the surrounding context. Absent any established character, the standard requires that new buildings set an enhanced standard of quality for future projects or redevelopment in the area. Compatibility shall mean the characteristics of different uses or activities or design which allow them to be located near or adjacent to each other in harmony. Some elements affecting compatibility include height, scale, mass, and bulk of structures. Other characteristics include pedestrian or vehicular traffic, circulation, access, and parking impacts. Other important characteristics that affect compatibility are landscaping, lighting, noise, odor, and architecture. Compatibility does not mean "the same as." Rather, compatibility refers to the sensitivity of development proposals in maintaining the character of existing development. The character of the surrounding architectural context can be described as follows: The area adjacent to the south is future vacant commercial land. To the north, the existing established Skyview neighborhood includes single-family detached homes. The existing homes are a combination of single-story and two-story building heights. To the west is the future vacant land and existing residential homes. To the east is the existing three-story Five-Star enclosed mini-storage commercial building. This building features masonry, metal siding, and stucco wall materials, and pitched metal roof treatments. In conformance with the General Standard of this section, the architectural character of the area is established with the existing residential neighborhood and newly constructed enclosed storage building across Mars Drive to the east. Therefore, in terms of the General Standard, the project is required to reflect and be compatible with the established character of the area. • The proposed building architecture reflects similar residential design elements and compatible with the adjacent commercial building design. • A generous landscape area is located behind the Skyway ROW, providing sufficient landscape buffer and transition between the north multi-family building and existing neighborhood across Skyway Drive. Complies 3.5.1 (C)– Building Size, Height, Bulk, Mass, Scale Buildings shall either be similar in size and height, or, if larger, be articulated and subdivided into massing that is proportional to the mass and scale of other structures, if any, on the same block face, abutting or adjacent to the subject property, opposing block face or cater- corner block face at the nearest intersection. • Articulation of accent details, recesses and projections are used consistently throughout all faces of the two respective building designs. These elements help subdivide the massing and create appropriate proportions compatible with the design in the surrounding area. The north building that fronts Skyway includes a two-story height reduction and step back, consistent with the one and two story homes in the adjacent Skyview neighborhood. • The proposed 42 unit building is 38’-4” in height, and the 48 unit building is 39’-6” in height, less than the 40 foot height requirement for additional analysis. Complies Packet pg. 54 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 13 of 21 Back to Top 3.5.1 (E)– Building Materials This section addresses building materials, glare, and windows. Building materials shall either be similar to the materials already being used in the neighborhood or, if dissimilar materials are being proposed, other characteristics such as scale and proportions, form, architectural detailing, color, and texture, shall be utilized to ensure that enough similarity exists for the building to be compatible, despite the differences in materials. • Exterior materials consist of, hardboard lap siding, stone veneer, architectural grade metal panels, stucco, vinyl windows and standing seam metal roofing. These elements combined are similar to the adjacent storage building and reflect similar materials and design features with the existing homes to the north. Complies 3.5.1 (F)– Building Color Color shades shall be used to facilitate blending into the neighborhood and unifying the development. The color shades of building materials shall draw from the range of color shades that already exist on the block or in the adjacent neighborhood. • The adjacent commercial building and existing residential homes consist of a range of light and dark earth tone colors. The proposed two buildings include a range of tan, brown, blue, and grey colors, consistent with the established pattern in the area. Complies 3.5.2(D) – Relationship of Dwellings to Streets and Parking This section requires that every front facade with a primary entrance to a dwelling unit face a connecting walkway with no primary entrance more than two hundred (200) feet from a street sidewalk. A primary entrance may be up to three hundred fifty (350) feet from a street sidewalk if the primary entrance faces and opens directly onto a connecting walkway that qualifies as a major walkway spine. • The two multi-family buildings face Mars Drive to the east and include primary entrances and side entrances that connect directly to the public sidewalk. • The west façade of the buildings includes two primary entrances that connect to the private street and parking areas. Complies 3.5.2(G)(1)(a, b) – Perimeter Garages To add visual interest and avoid the effect of a long blank wall with no relation to human size, accessibility needs or internal divisions within the building, this section sets standards for minimum wall articulation along rear walls of multifamily garages. This standard applies to the garages located along the west property line. The area contains three 5-space garages. The plan provides the following in compliance with the standard: • No garage exceeds the maximum length of 60 feet. • Garages are separated by generous landscaping and pedestrian path, that break up an otherwise continuous row of garage walls and that meets the intent of the standard. • Each garage design provides articulation though changes in siding materials, colors, and roof planes. Complies 3.5.2(G)(2)(a) – All Garages Rear doorways shall be provided as determined by the decision maker to be reasonably necessary to allow direct access to living units without requiring people to walk around the garage to access their living units. • No buildings are located behind the proposed three detached garages. Each garage includes an automatic door opening for vehicle access. NA Packet pg. 55 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 14 of 21 Back to Top 3.6 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION Applicable Code Standard Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Staff Findings 3.6.1(D) – Compliance with Access Control Plans The transportation network of any proposed development shall be in conformance with the City of Fort Collins Master Street Plan, as well as City adopted access control plans and the Larimer County Urban Area Street This plan provides compliance with the City’s Master Street Plan and dedicates the necessary ROW for the future 6-lane arterial cross section of S College Avenue. The plan also complies South College Avenue (US 287) Access Control Plan by proposing access from Skyway Drive and future extension of Mars Drive to the south to Trilby as development occurs. Complies 3.6.2(M) – Private Streets Private streets shall be allowed in a development, provided that their function will be primarily to provide access to property within the development. Private streets shall not be permitted if (by plan or circumstance) such streets would, in the judgment of the City Engineer, attract "through traffic" in such volumes as to render public streets necessary as connections between developments, neighborhoods or other origins and destinations outside of the development plan. All drives within the development are private and will only serve the multi-family development. Maintenance of the internal circulation system will be the responsibility of the owner and are designed in a way that promotes the health safety and welfare of the city. The private drives include 13 ft travel lanes; perpendicular parking, attached sidewalks and tree islands. Complies 3.6.3 – Street Pattern and Connectivity This standard states: “The local street system of any proposed development shall be designed to be safe, efficient, convenient and attractive, considering use by all modes of transportation that will use the system, (including, without limitation, cars, trucks, buses, bicycles, pedestrians and emergency vehicles). The local street system shall provide multiple direct connections to and between local destinations such as parks, schools, and shopping. Local streets must provide for both intra- and inter-neighborhood connections to knit developments together, rather than forming barriers between them. The street configuration within each parcel must contribute to the street system of the neighborhood.” The project fronts the extension of Mars Drive that will extend to the south based on future development. The site also fronts Skyway Drive as it connects east/west to S College. This configuration allows for future neighborhood connectivity for vehicles and bicycles and sidewalks for pedestrians. Complies Packet pg. 56 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 15 of 21 Back to Top 3.6.4 – Transportation Level of Service Requirements A Traffic Memo was required with the submittal of this project and is attached. The memo has been reviewed by the city. The study evaluates the potential impacts to the transportation system in the surrounding areas of the proposed development. The information provided in the Traffic Memo demonstrated that all the project access point and adjacent intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service for in the AM and PM peak hours. The anticipated traffic/trips that will be generated by this site are not expected to have significant impacts on the level of service, or delay that would cause these intersections to no longer meet the requirements outline in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards. The Traffic Memo also included an extensive evaluation of the College and Skyway intersection for the eastbound movement. This was based on concerns with the operation of this signal from neighborhood input. With certain limitations in the ability to expand this intersection, this evaluation concluded that the geometric modifications to the striping will help improve the operation and reduce the delay for the eastbound traffic. These changes will be implemented according to the plans. The general conclusions of the Traffic Memo have been accepted by the city along with the proposed striping changes that will be implemented as improvements to the College and Skyway intersection. Complies 3.6.6 – Emergency Access This standard states,” all developments shall provide adequate access for emergency vehicles and for those persons rendering fire protection and emergency services by complying with Article 9, Fire Department Access and Water Supply, of the Uniform Fire Code as adopted and amended pursuant to Chapter 9 of the City Code. All emergency access ways, easements, rights-of-way or other rights required to be granted pursuant to the Uniform Fire Code must include not only access rights for fire protection purposes, but also for all other emergency services.” The project has been reviewed by Poudre Fire Authority (PFA) and is found to meet aerial access, water supply, and general access requirements. Complies 3.7 COMPACT URBAN GROWTH Applicable Code Standard Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Staff Findings 3.7.3 – Adequate Public Facilities This section requires that any approval of a development is conditioned on the provision of all services necessary to serve the new development. This includes transportation, water, wastewater, storm drainage, fire and emergency services, electrical power and any other public facilities and services as required. • The project is served by the Fort Collins Loveland Water District and South Fort Collins Sanitation District, Fort Collins Light and Power, and the Poudre Fire Authority. Each party has commented on the project and have demonstrated existing infrastructure capable of serving the proposed project at the developer’s expense. • The project meets several goals of this section by improving air quality by reducing vehicle miles traveled and by encouraging mass transit and alternatives to the private automobile, making possible the efficient use of existing infrastructure and cost-effective extensions of new services: and encouraging infill development and reinvestment in built-up areas of the city. Complies Packet pg. 57 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 16 of 21 Back to Top 3.8.30 MULTI-FAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED DWELLING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The standards in this section apply to all multi-family developments that contain at least four (4) dwelling units and single-family attached developments that contain at least four (4) dwelling units where there is no reasonably sufficient area for outdoor activities and useable outdoor space on an individual per lot basis. This section is intended to promote variety in building form and product, visual interest, access to parks, pedestrian-oriented streets, and compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods. Applicable Code Standard Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Staff Findings 3.8.30(B) – Multi-Family Mix of Housing Types A complete range of the permitted housing types is encouraged in a neighborhood and within any individual development plan, to the extent reasonably feasible, depending on the size of the parcel. This standard does not apply because the PDP is contained within a 3-acre parcel. N/A 3.8.30(C) – Access to a Park, Central Feature or Gather Place For multi-family projects containing 2 or more acres, the buildings must be located within 1,320 feet (¼ mile) of either a neighborhood park, a privately owned park or a central feature or gathering place that is located either within the project or within adjacent development. The distance must be measured along street frontage without crossing an arterial street. • The PDP provides three separate central feature and gathering spaces on site. • Two of the gathering spaces are located along the frontage of Mars Drive adjacent to the buildings and includes tables, seating, and shelter amenities • The larger west gathering space is located on edge of the buffer area and detention pond. This space includes a covered shelter, tables and seating and soft path that connects to Skyway sidewalk. Complies 3.8.30(D) – Block Requirements This standard requires multi-family projects to establish a block structure that creates no greater than a 7-acre block bound by streets on all four sides. This standard allows for exceptions to this rule and allows for irrigation ditches, high-voltage power lines, and other substantial physical features to form up to two sides of a block. • The plan area is 3.79 acres in size, so this block requirement is not applicable. NA 3.8.30(E) – Buildings This standard requires that for all applicable buildings, the minimum required setbacks are: • Arterial Street (S College) 15 feet • Non-Arterial Street (Fairway Lane and Fossil Blvd) 9 feet. The project complies with all required setbacks by providing a 15 foot setback for the two buildings fronting Mars Drive. Complies Packet pg. 58 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 17 of 21 Back to Top 3.8.30(F)(2) – Variation Among Buildings The standard states, “For any such development containing more than five (5) buildings (excluding clubhouses/leasing offices), there shall be at least three (3) distinctly different building designs. For all developments, there shall be no similar buildings placed next to each other along a street, street-like private drive or major walkway spine. Building designs shall be considered similar unless they vary significantly in footprint size and shape. Building designs shall be further distinguished by including unique architectural elevations and unique entrance features within a coordinated overall theme of roof forms, massing proportions and other characteristics. Such variation among buildings shall not consist solely of different combinations of the same building features. The plan provides the following: • Two distinctly different designs. • No similar building placed next to one another along a street. • Variation among building types includes size of footprint and shape, wall articulation, building materials, finishes and colors, window treatments and roof form. South Building – 42 Unit Complies Packet pg. 59 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 18 of 21 Back to Top North Building – 48 Unit 3.8.30(F)(3) – Variation of Color The standard states, “each multi-family building shall feature a palette of muted colors, earth tone colors, natural colors found in surrounding landscape or colors consistent with the adjacent neighborhood. For all developments, there shall be no more than two (2) similarly colored structures placed next to each other along a street or major walkway spine.” • The PDP complies with the standard by placing no two similarly colored structures next to one another and by providing the following two color schemes: Color Scheme 1 – South 42 Unit Building Color shades of tan, grey, brown and forest green (see above elevations for colors). Color Scheme 2 – North 48 Unit Building Color shades of tan, brown, dark teal blue and grey (see above elevations for colors). Complies 3.8.30(F)(4) – Entrances The standard states, “entrances shall be made clearly visible from the streets and public areas through the use of architectural elements and landscaping.” • The plan provides three main entrance points for each building. Main entrances are clearly visible from the street using architectural brackets, canopy overhangs, wall projections, large planters, and landscaping around each respective entrance. Complies Packet pg. 60 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 19 of 21 Back to Top 3.8.30(F)(5) – Roofs The standard states, “Roof lines may be either sloped, flat or curved, but must include at least two (2) of the following elements: a) The primary roof line shall be articulated through a variation or terracing in height, detailing and/or change in massing. b) Secondary roofs shall transition over entrances, porches, garages, dormers, towers, or other architectural projections. c) Offsets in roof planes shall be a minimum of two (2) feet in the vertical plane. d) Termination at the top of flat roof parapets shall be articulated by design details and/or changes in materials and color. e) Rooftop equipment shall be hidden from view by incorporating equipment screens of compatible design and materials.” • The PDP complies with this standard by providing articulation of roof forms through a variation in height, variation in detailing using brackets, and changes in massing that match the projecting and recessing footprint of the building. Complies 3.8.30(F)(6) – Facades and Walls The standard states, “Each multi-family dwelling shall be articulated with projections, recesses, covered doorways, balconies, covered box or bay windows and/or other similar features, dividing large facades and walls into human-scaled proportions similar to the adjacent single- or two-family dwellings, and shall not have repetitive, undifferentiated wall planes. Building facades shall be articulated with horizontal and/or vertical elements that break up blank walls of forty (40) feet or longer. Facade articulation may be accomplished by offsetting the floor plan, recessing or projection of design elements, change in materials and/or change in contrasting colors. Projections shall fall within setback requirements.” • The PDP complies with this standard by providing projections and recesses along the façade every 12-22 foot intervals that are often paired with changes in the application of both material (manufactured stone, vertical lap siding, horizontal lap siding, board, and batten), and colors. Complies 3.8.30 – Colors and Materials Colors of non-masonry materials shall be varied from structure to structure to differentiate between buildings and provide variety and individuality. Colors and materials shall be integrated to visually reduce the scale of the buildings by contrasting trim, by contrasting shades or by distinguishing one (1) section or architectural element from another. Bright colors, if used, shall be reserved for accent and trim. • An alternating color and material scheme is applied to vertical modules of the two buildings. Vertical and horizontal color schemes are divided by individual wall panels or design features. Use of color and material combine to create a reduced sense of scale and visual interest for the project. Complies Packet pg. 61 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 20 of 21 Back to Top 5. Article 4 – Applicable Standards: DIVISION 4.21 – GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (C-G) The General Commercial District is intended to be a setting for development, redevelopment, and infill of a wide range of community and regional retail uses, offices, and personal and business services. Secondarily, it can accommodate a wide range of other uses including creative forms of housing. While some General Commercial District areas may continue to meet the need for auto-related and other auto-oriented uses, it is the City's intent that the General Commercial District emphasize safe and convenient personal mobility in many forms, with planning and design that accommodates pedestrians. Applicable Code Standard Summary of Code Requirement and Analysis Staff Findings 4.21(B) – Permitted Uses Any residential use consisting in whole or in part of multi-family dwellings that contain more than fifty (50) dwelling units, or more than seventy-five (75) bedrooms is a permitted use subject to Type 2 (Planning and Zoning Commission) review. • The PDP includes 90 dwelling units and 128 bedrooms. Complies 4.21(D) – Land Use Standards This standard limit the maximum building height to four stories. • The PDP proposes two, three-story multi-family buildings. Complies 4.21(E)(2) (a, b) – Site Design This standard requires pedestrian-oriented outdoor spaces shall be placed next to activity areas that generate the users (such as street corners, shops, stores, offices, day care and dwellings). Because liveliness created by the presence of people is the main key to the attractiveness of such spaces, to the maximum extent feasible, the development shall link outdoor spaces to and make them visible from streets and sidewalks. Sculpture, kiosks, or shelters are encouraged to be prominently placed in outdoor spaces. • The project provides compliance with this standard using a central walkway corridor that connects Mars Drive to the future multi-use trail west of property. The two multi- family buildings include a central outdoor gathering space between the buildings and public sidewalk on Mars Drive. These spaces include landscaping, tables, and seating amenities. At the northwestern boundary of the site the plan includes a larger gathering space and connection to the landscape detention area and Skyway Drive by a soft path. This outdoor space combines a covered shelter, tables, seating, and BBQ amenities. Complies Packet pg. 62 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing - Agenda Item 3 PDP190013 | Mars Landing Thursday, September 16, 2021| Page 21 of 21 Back to Top 6. Findings of Fact/Conclusion In evaluating the request for the Mars Landing Project Development Plan, PDP190013, Staff makes the following findings of fact: 1. The Project Development Plan complies with the policy direction of City Plan and the S College Corridor Plan. 2. The Project Development Plan complies with the applicable procedural and administrative requirements of Article 2 of the Land Use Code. 3. The Project Development Plan complies with relevant standards located in Article 3 – General Development Standards, with conditions of approval. 4. Staff recommends a Condition of Approval (1) regarding compliance with 3.2.2 (C) (4) – Bicycle Facilities, addressed at FDP, to provide 60% covered bicycle spaces (77 spaces), and 40% fixed rack spaces (51 spaces). 5. Staff recommends a Condition of Approval (2) regarding compliance with 3.2.5 – Trash and Recycling Enclosure Wall Materials, addressed at FDP, to ensure the enclosures are screened with a more durable material in place of cedar fencing such as textured concrete block, CMU blocks, or all metal fencing. This will include interior curbing or metal strips to buffer dumpster bins from hitting walls. 6. The Project Development Plan complies with relevant standards located in Division 4.21 General Commercial of Article 4 – Districts. 7. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Mars Landing Project Development Plan, PDP190013, based on the aforementioned Findings of Fact. 8. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Project Narrative 3. Planning Set: Project Site, Landscape, Lighting, and Building Elevations 4. Utility Plan 5. Plat 6. Neighborhood Meeting Summary 7. Updated Traffic Memo (10-30-20) 8. Updated Ecological Characterization Study (10-23-20) 9. Staff Presentation 9. Links The documents available at the following links provide additional information regarding the development proposal under review and are incorporated by reference into the hearing record for this item: 1. Drainage Report 2. TIS Report 3. ECS Report 4. Loudon Ditch Response 5. Staff Comments R1 6. Staff Comments R2 7. Staff Comments R3 8. Staff Comments R4 9. Staff Comments R5 Packet pg. 63 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Packet pg. 64 5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210 Johnstown, CO 80534 970.800.3300 • GallowayUS.com Memorandum Preliminary Development Plan Project Narrative Page 1 of 2 To: Tenae Beane Development Review Coordinator City of Fort Collins 281 N College Fort Collins, CO 80524 From: Galloway & Company, Inc. 5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd, Suite 210 Johnstown, CO 80525 Date: September 11, 2019 Re: Mars Landing Preliminary Development Plan–PROJECT NARRATIVE The Mars Landing project includes the proposed development of a 3.79 acre parcel located at the southwest corner of Mars Drive and W Skyway Drive in Fort Collins. The property is currently undeveloped. The proposed use is classified as Multi-family Dwellings with more than 50 dwelling units, which is an approved use for the General Commercial zoning. The high-density development is adjacent to an existing commercial use and is approximately 0.1 miles from the S College Avenue/US HWY 287 corridor. Development will consist of two high-density, three-story apartment buildings with a total of 90 dwelling units; separated garage buildings; a single-story clubhouse building; and associated drives, off-street parking, and utilities. An application for Preliminary Design Review (PDR190007) was submitted to Staff on July 3, 2019. The applicant and owner met with Staff on July 31, 2019 to review comments for the PDR application. A neighborhood meeting for the Mars Landing project was held on August 26, 2019. A previous Preliminary Design Review was submitted for the project site titled Skyway Townhomes (PDR180003), April 2018. Comments were issued for this review, however, this application was not pursued any further. Vehicular access to the project site will be made via two drive-cuts from Mars Drive, which is a public road. Per the comment letter issued for PDR180003, the northernmost drive-cut may align with the existing access on the east side of Mars Drive that serves the South College Storage Units. Connectivity to the surrounding neighborhood and developments will be provided via access to Skyway Drive from Mars Drive. Mars Drive currently features a temporary roundabout near the south property boundary of the project site. This project proposes to demolish the temporary roundabout and extend Mars Drive south to the south property boundary to allow for the installation of the second drive-cut. The future extension of Mars Drive beyond the limits of the south property boundary will be done by others and is not part of this project. There is an existing public sidewalk along Skyway Drive along the north property boundary. The project proposes to connect to the existing sidewalk in Skyway and install new public sidewalk along the west right-of-way of Mars Drive. Connections to the proposed public sidewalk in Mars Drive will provide pedestrian access to the project site. As part of the development agreement for the South College Storage Units on the east side of Mars Drive, development of the Mars Landing parcel requires construction of certain South College Avenue improvements adjacent to the project site. Per conversations with the City engineering department, these improvements are limited to a 7’ detached sidewalk and incidental construction relating to grading and existing utilities. Off-street parking will be ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet pg. 65 Goodwin Knight Mars Landing September 11, 2019 Preliminary Development Plan Project Narrative Galloway & Company, Inc. Page 2 of 2 provided in a surface lot on the project site. There will also be parking available to tenants in rentable garage spaces. The project proposes 140 surface parking spaces and 28 garage parking spaces, for a total of 168 off-street parking spaces. Landscape provided for this development will be consistent with City of Fort Collins xeric design standards. An evergreen buffer will be provided along the western boundary of the property to screen the garages. While ornamental plantings will be provided along the street frontages and at the clubhouse / amenity area. Mitigation has been provided for existing trees that must be removed from the site. Under existing conditions, the project site generally drains overland from west to east. Runoff generated by the project site is currently captured in an inlet at the northeast property corner where it is conveyed via underground storm sewer and open channel flow to a culvert that runs under South College Avenue. The Mars Landing development proposes to capture and detain on-site generated flows in a pond at the northeast corner of the site prior to releasing into the existing storm drain system as it does in the existing condition. Water quality treatment of captured runoff will be achieved by implementation of an approved Low-Impact Development strategy. Detention and water quality features will be designed to comply with the City of Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual and Fossil Creek Drainage Basin Master Plan. There are no designated natural features or wetlands on the project site. The proposed occupiable buildings will be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. An existing ditch bisects the project site but has been recently been abandoned. Per correspondence with the North Loudon Ditch Company, the ditch has been relocated and piped underground. A development agreement exists for the property and is recorded under Larimer County Public Records Doc. No. 20170069535. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 2 Packet pg. 66 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C0.0_Cover.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&COVER SHEETC0.0PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR:*RRGZLQ.QLJKW0DUN-RKQVRQ5/$([SORUHU'U6XLWH&RORUDGR6SULQJV&RORUDGRDEVELOPER / APPLICANTGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER(DUWK(QJLQHHULQJ&RQVXOWDQWV//&*UHHQILOHG'ULYH:LQGVRU&RORUDGRPROJECT TEAM:7KHVHSODQVKDYHEHHQUHYLHZHGE\WKH&LW\RI)RUW&ROOLQVIRUFRQFHSWRQO\7KHUHYLHZGRHVQRWLPSO\UHVSRQVLELOLW\E\WKHUHYLHZLQJGHSDUWPHQWWKH&LW\RI)RUW&ROOLQV(QJLQHHURUWKH&LW\RI)RUW&ROOLQVIRUDFFXUDF\DQGFRUUHFWQHVVRIWKHFDOFXODWLRQV)XUWKHUPRUHWKHUHYLHZGRHVQRWLPSO\WKDWTXDQWLWLHVRILWHPVRQWKHSODQVDUHWKHILQDOTXDQWLWLHVUHTXLUHG7KHUHYLHZVKDOOQRWEHFRQVWUXHGIRUDQ\UHDVRQDVDFFHSWDQFHRIILQDQFLDOUHVSRQVLELOLW\E\WKH&LW\RI)RUW&ROOLQVIRUDGGLWLRQDOTXDQWLWLHVRILWHPVVKRZQWKDWPD\EHUHTXLUHGGXULQJWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQSKDVHDISCLAIMER STATEMENT:,KHUHE\DIILUPWKDWWKHVHILQDOFRQVWUXFWLRQSODQVZHUHSUHSDUHGXQGHUP\GLUHFWVXSHUYLVLRQLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKDOODSSOLFDEOH&LW\RI)RUW&ROOLQVDQG6WDWHRI&RORUDGRVWDQGDUGVDQGVWDWXWHVUHVSHFWLYHO\DQGWKDW,DPIXOO\UHVSRQVLEOHIRUWKHDFFXUDF\RIDOOGHVLJQUHYLVLRQVDQGUHFRUGFRQGLWLRQVWKDW,KDYHQRWHGRQWKHVHSODQVCERTIFICATION STATEMENT:*DOORZD\ &RPSDQ\6DUDK$GDPVRQ5/$6:LOORZ'ULYH6XLWH*UHHQZRRG9LOODJH&RORUDGRLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUTILITY CONTACT LIST: **DOORZD\ &RPSDQ\-DPHV(3UHORJ5RQDOG5HDJDQ%OYG6XLWH-RKQVWRZQ&RORUDGRSITE ENGINEER / SURVEYORGAS Xcel Energy Stephanie Rich (970) 225-7828ELECTRIC City of Fort Collins Light and Power Janet Mctague (970) 224-6152CABLE Xfinity Don Kapperman (970) 484-7166TELECOM. Centurylink William Johnson (970) 377-6401WATER FCLWD Chris Pletcher (970) 226-3104WASTEWATER SFCSD Chris Pletcher (970) 226-3104STORMWATER City of Fort Collins Utilities Wes Lamarque (970) 416-2418UTILITY COMPANY CONTACT PHONE NUMBER $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1(((535,2572&216758&7,21PROJECT BENCHMARKS:BENCHMARKSELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON CITY OF FORT COLLINS VERTICAL CONTROL NETWORKPROJECT DATUM: NAVD88BENCHMARK '2-12' IS LOCATED & DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH COLLEGE AVE. AND SKYWAY DR. ON A CONCRETE TRAFFIC SIGNAL BASE.ELEVATION: 5005.56' (NAVD 88)PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM.SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWINGEQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRI25&,7<2))257&2//,16'$780  1$9''$780 BENCHMARK '38-94' IS LOCATED & DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:AZIMUTH MARK (3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP) ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TRILBY RD. 1/2 MILE WEST OF COLLEGE AVE. AT THESOUTHWEST CORNER OF 508 WEST TRILBY RD. (GOOD SAMARITAN RETIREMENT CENTER). ALSO 5.5 FT WEST OF APOWERPOLE AND 24.5 FT SOUTH OF A WOOD FENCE.ELEVATION: 5093.76' (NAVD 88)PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM.SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWINGEQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRI25&,7<2))257&2//,16'$780  1$9''$780 6&$/(176SHEET INDEXMARS LANDINGOUT LOT A, SOUTH COLLEGE STORAGE SUBDIVISIONLOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, T. 6 N., R. 69W. OF THE 6TH P.M.CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADOJULY 2021S. COLLEGE AVEW. TRILBY RDMARS DRVICINITY MAPSITESKYWAY DRREQUIREDSPACESSTANDARD PARKING SPACESHANDICAP PARKING SPACES145-TOTAL PARKING SPACESSTANDARD GARAGE PARKING SPACESPROVIDEDSPACES151130613-HANDICAP GARAGE PARKING SPACES2LAND USE INFORMATION:PARKING INFORMATION:EXISTING ZONING: GENERAL COMMERCIALAREA(SF)BUILDING COVERAGELANDSCAPE58,976DRIVES AND PARKINGHARDSCAPE% TOTAL32.68RIGHT-OF-WAYGROSS LAND AREA CALCULATIONS:31,91664,27910,11715,137RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE DEDICATED00TOTAL GROSS LAND AREA100180,42517.6935.635.68.4AREA(SF)BUILDING COVERAGELANDSCAPE58,976DRIVES AND PARKINGHARDSCAPE% TOTAL32.68NET LAND AREA CALCULATIONS:31,91664,27910,117NET LAND AREA (SAME AS LOT AREA)100165,28817.6935.635.6LANDSCAPEHARDSCAPEDRIVES AND PARKING9,2575.13,0221.92,8581.7TOTALRESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITSRESIDENTIAL DENSITY (UNITS/AC)83,004RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AREA (SF)RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE (AC)BUILDING DENSITY CALCULATIONS:903.7923.75TOTAL BUILDING AREA (SF)83,004165,288BUILDING FLOOR TO LOT AREA RATIO0.50:1TOTALRESIDENTIAL BUILDING A-42BUILDING INFORMATION:38'-4.5"41,742PROPOSED USE: MULTI-FAMILYMAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT (FT-IN)GROSS AREA - TOTAL (SF)42DWELLING UNITS46.67%% OF TOTAL DWELLING UNITSRESIDENTIAL BUILDING A-4839'-6.5"41,262MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT (FT-IN)48DWELLING UNITS53.33%% OF TOTAL DWELLING UNITSDWELLING UNIT BREAKDOWNLOT AREA (SF)GROSS AREA - 3RD FLOOR (SF)13,914GROSS AREA - 2ND FLOOR (SF)13,914GROSS AREA - 1ST FLOOR (SF)13,914GROSS AREA - TOTAL (SF)GROSS AREA - 3RD FLOOR (SF)GROSS AREA - 2ND FLOOR (SF)GROSS AREA - 1ST FLOOR (SF)13,75413,75413,754C0.0 COVER SHEETC1.0 SITE PLANC1.1-CD1.3 SITE PLAN DETAILSL1.0-L1.2 LANDSCAPE PLANL1.3 LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILSL1.4 COLLEGE AVENUE LANDSCAPE PLANL1.5 HYDROZONE PLANL1.6 TREE PRESERVATION PLANPP1.0 PHOTOMETRIC PLANPP1.1 PHOTOMETRIC DETAILSA1.10-A1.37 ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING PLANSA2.10-A2.33 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONSCAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267VEHICLEPARKINGRATIOREQUIREDVEHICLESPACESREQUIRED VEHICLE PARKING BREAKDOWN:1.5 SPACE/UNITMULTI-FAMILY87#58 UNITS1 BEDROOM2 BEDROOM3 BEDROOM1.75 SPACE/UNIT2.0 SPACE/UNIT461226 UNITS6 UNITSVEHICLEPARKINGRATIOREQUIREDVEHICLESPACESREQUIRED BIKE PARKING BREAKDOWN:BIKE PAKRING MULTI-FAMILY# OF UNIT128BEDROOMS1 SPACE/BEDROOM1286-132BICYCLE PARKING SPACES132TOTAL145----TOTAL REQUIRED BIKE PARKING128----32- COVERED BIKE PARKING32 - SHELTERED BIKE PARKING321 SPACE/4 BEDROOM128 BEDROOMSA-42END STUDIOLARGE STUDIO2STUDIOA-480620SMALL 1 BED62006LARGE 1 BEDSMALL 2 BED6MEDIUM 1 BEDMEDIUM 2 BED283018LARGE 2 BED333023 BEDITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 67 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C2.0_Horizontal Control.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&6&$/(  SITE PLANC1.0LEGEND:352326('&85%$1'*877(5(;,67,1*&85%$1'*877(5NOTES: 7+(6,=(7<3($1'/2&$7,212)$//.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$5($3352;,0$7(:+(16+2:1217+(6('5$:,1*6,76+$//%(7+(5(63216,%,/,7<2)7+(&2175$&725729(5,)<7+((;,67(1&(2)$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6,17+($5($2)7+(:25.%()25(&200(1&,1*1(:&216758&7,217+(&2175$&7256+$//%(5(63216,%/()25/2&$7,1*$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$1'6+$//%(5(63216,%/()25$//81.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6 5()(572/$1'6&$3(3/$16)25675((775((,1)250$7,21$1'6859(<'2&80(176)25$'',7,21$/5,*+72):$<($6(0(17$1'52$':$<&(17(5/,1(,1)250$7,21 %8,/',1*32,176$5($7&251(562)120,1$/%8,/',1*)22735,176&2175$&7256+$//&21),50$//%8,/',1*&251(56$1'',0(16,216:,7+$5&+,7(&735,2572&$//,1*)2567$.(6 $//',0(16,2165()(5(1&()/2:/,1(%8,/',1*253523(57</,1(81/(6663(&,),('27+(5:,6( &2175$&72572&225',1$7(:,7+&,9,/(1*,1((5$1'$5&+,7(&735,257267$.,1*%8,/',1*&225',1$7(6 )25$//&$7&+$1'63,//&85%,1)250$7,21$1'75$16,7,2166((*5$',1*3/$16&& $//675,3,1*$1'3$9(0(170$5.,1*66+$//&203/<:,7+7+(087&'$1'6(&7,212)7+(&'2763(&,),&$7,216)256.<:$<'5,9($1'6287+&2//(*($9(18(,17(56(&7,21,03529(0(176 $//675,3,1*$1'3$9(0(170$5.,1*)256.<:$<'5,9($1'0$56'5,9(6+$//&203/<:,7+7+(&,7<2))257&2//,16675((7'(6,*1$1'&216758&7,2167$1'$5'6 $//75$)),&&21752/6,*166+$//&21)250727+(5(48,5(0(1762)7+(087&':,7+5(*$5'726,*17<3(6,=(/2&$7,21$1'02817,1*63(&,),&$7,216 $//216,7(&85%$1'*877(56+$//%(&$7&+2563,//&85%$1'*877(581/(66127(' $//+&5$0366+$//+$9(7581&$7(''20(63(56,7(3/$1'(7$,/66+((7 5()(572'(7$,/6+((7)25+&3$5.,1*67$//'(7$,/6$1'6,*15(48,5(0(176$//63$&(6$5(9$1$&&(66,%/($1'6+28/'%(3267('$668&+3529,'( &/($5)520)/2:/,1(723267 7+(5(6+$//%($ 0,1,08075$16,7,21)52063,//72&$7&+&85%$1'*877(5 $//6,*1672%(+,*+,17(16,7<35,60$7,&*5$'(6+((7,1* )253$9(0(17'(6,*13$9(0(176(&7,216$1'68%*5$'(35(3$5$7,215()(57235(/,0,1$5<68%685)$&((;3/25$7,215(3257'$7('-8/<%<($57+(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7$176&2175$&725729(5,)<),1$/3$9(0(17$1'68%*5$'('(6,*1:,7+*(27(&+1,&$/(1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 $//352326('($6(0(176$5(72%(5(&25'('%<6(3$5$7('2&80(17352326('&85%$1'*877(563,//352326('&21&5(7(&52663$175$16,7,21352326(')(1&(352326('6,'(:$/. 7581&$7(''20(,1)$//&85%287)$//&85%+$1',&$35$03+$1',&$33$5.,1*6,*167236,*1+$1'5$,/63(5$5&+,7(&785$/'(7$,/352326(' &85%&+$6( 6((6+((7)25'(7$,/ 352326('%,.(5$&.6 6((/$1'6&$3('(7$,/6  5(,1)25&('&21&5(7('5$,1$*(3$1 :,'(1215(,1)25&('&21&5(7('5$,1$*(3$1 /$1'6&$3($5($   675((7,17(56(&7,21&52663$1 ),5($&&(6652$'6,*1123$5.,1* $552:32,17('/()7 ),5($&&(6652$'6,*1123$5.,1* $552:32,17('5,*+7 ),5($&&(6652$'6,*1123$5.,1* $552:%27+:$<6 6,7(/,*+7 &5266:$/.675,3,1* /21*[:,'( 21&(17(5CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267+($9<'87<75$)),&'5,9(/$1(63$9(0(173$9(0(176(&7,213(5*(27(&+5(3257/,*+7'87<75$)),&3$5.,1*67$//63$9(0(176(&7,213(5*(27(&+5(3257352326('1$785$/+$%,7$7%8))(5=21( 1+%= 352326(':(7/$1'0,7,*$7,21$5($EXISTING UPLANDSAREA(AC)1.50NATURAL AREAS CALCULATIONS:EXISTING PRAIRIE DOG COLONY TO REMAIN0.00EXISTING WETLANDS0.014EXISTING PRAIRIE DOG COLONY3.50EXISTING UPLANDS TO BE VACATEDEXISTING WETLANDS TO BE VACATEDEXISTING PRAIRIE DOG COLONY TO BE VACATEDEXISTING UPLANDS TO REMAIN0.00EXISTING WETLANDS TO BE VACATED0.001.500.0143.50PRAIRIE DOG COLONY MITIGATION**PROPOSED UPLANDS MITIGATON0.87PROPOSED WETLANDS MITIGATION0.043**SEE NOTE BELOWBLACK TAILED PRAIRIE DOG COLONY MITIGATION NOTEBLACK-TAILED PRAIRIE DOGS LOCATED WITHIN THE PARCEL WILL BE TRAPPED ANDDONATED TO EITHER A RAPTOR REHABILITATION PROGRAM OR A BLACK-FOOTEDFERRET RECOVERY PROGRAM. ALL CONTROL ETC. WILL BE DONE PER CITY OFFORT COLLINS, CPW AND COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUREREQUIREMENTS. CONTROL WILL BE CONDUCTED VIA THE INTRODUCTION OFCARBON MONOXIDE INTO THE BURROWS. POST-CONTROL OF THE PRAIRIE DOGS AREPORT WILL BE PREPARED WHICH WILL IDENTIFY THE CONTROL METHOD USEDAND THE NUMBER OF PRAIRIE DOGS TRAPPED/DONATED(;,67,1*5,*+72):$<(;,67,1*($6(0(17/,1(352326('($6(0(17/,1(ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 68 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_CD2.1_Site Details.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&SITE DETAILSC1.11TRASH AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURE2DETENTION POND WALL3SOUTH RETAINING WALL WITH SCREEN FENCEITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 69 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_CD2.1_Site Details.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&SITE DETAILSC1.2ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 70 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_CD2.1_Site Details.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&SITE DETAILSC1.3ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 71 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_L1.0_Landscape Plan_.dwg - Sarah Adamson - 8/31/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&675((775((127(61. A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY FORESTER BEFORE ANY TREES OR SHRUBS AS NOTED ON THISPLAN ARE PLANTED, PRUNED OR REMOVED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS INCLUDES ZONES BETWEEN THESIDEWALK AND CURB, MEDIANS AND OTHER CITY PROPERTY. THIS PERMIT SHALL APPROVE THE LOCATION ANDSPECIES TO BE PLANTED. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THIS PERMIT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS CODESUBJECT TO CITATION (SECTION 27-31) AND MAY ALSO RESULT IN REPLACING OR RELOCATING TREES AND A HOLDON CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.CITY OF FORT COLLINS STREET TREE NOTEOVERALL LANDSCAPE PLANL1.06&$/(  SHEET L1.1SHEET L1.2NOT APARTSHEETL1.465$$60,7,*$7,21'$7$EXISTING1.50 ACRES LOWER ECOLOGICAL VALUE UPLANDS0.014 ACRES OF LOWER ECOLOGICAL VALUE WETLANDS HABITATPROPOSEDUPLAND BUFFER: 0.41 ACUPLAND POLLINATOR: 0.34 ACRIPARIAN: 0.14 ACWETLAND: 0.043 ACTOTAL PROPOSED: 0.913 ACREMAINING 0.601 AC OF REQUIRED MITIGATION IS MADE UP WITH HIGHERQUALITY PLANTINGS/HABITATITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 72  66  66  66  66  66  66  66  66  66  66  66 8(8(8(8(8(8(8( 8 ( 8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8( 8(8(8(8(8(8(88(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(1-CASP4-ARCO4-POFR6-CHNA1-CASP4-PRBE11-PRBE6-CHNA25-HESE19-ARCO10-MAAQ2-PIPU1-PIFL7-MAAQ8-SYPA2-RHAR5-CACL1-AMGR8-CAAC7-ACMI23-NATE8-HESE1-SYRE6-PEAT6-CAAC3-ULDA1-SYRE8-HESE5-SANE4-CAAC20-NATE8-HESE3-CACL4-CAAC1-SYRE6-PEAT6-SANE9-HESE1-AMGR32-NATE11-JUSA1-PIPU6-JUSA9-POFR2-POFR6-SYPA3-ARCO2-ARCO7-POFR11-NATE2-PRBE1-QUMU6-CAAC2-CHNA11-CAAC9-CACL1-AMGR3-PEAT50-NATE1-AMGR1-QUMU9-ARCO7-HESE19-HESE1-GYDI6-POFR6-ARCO2-GYDI12-CAAC9-CACL1-MASP7-POFR9-MAAQ1-CASPPROPOSED BIKERACK TYPE A (10SPACES), TYP.PROPOSED BIKESHELTER & BIKERACK TYPE B (8SPACES), TYP.PROPOSED BIKERACK TYPE A (10SPACES), TYP.STEEL EDGING,TYP.CRUSHERFINES, TYP.STEEL EDGING,TYP.SOD , TYP.ROCK MULCH,TYP.UPLAND SEEDMIX, TYP.PROPOSED BIKERACK TYPE A (10SPACES), TYP.3-ULDA3-QUSH3-CEOCWETLANDMITIGATION MIX,SEE SHEET L1.4UPLAND MIXWITH FORBS,TYP.4-CAAC10-SANE8-CAAC9-CAAC1-MASP6-JUSA10-CACL2-AMGR6-SYPA3-ARCO6-PRBE1-MASP1-SYRE1-QUSHSITE DISTANCETRIANGLESITE DISTANCETRIANGLESTOP SIGN5-POFR15-NATE4-SYAL3-RIOD4-SAVE4-RAIU2-RHAT5-RIOD5-RIAU4-SYAL6-SAVE3-RIOD4-RIAU5-RHAT4-PHMO1-POAN6-RIAU8-PHMO5-SYAL6-RIAU4-CHVI2-AMAL6-RICE2-PAVM5-CHVI2-PODE8-PHMO10-RICE1-POAN4-SAVE6-CHNA4-ARAR8-CHVI2-PAVM4-RICE14-PHMO3-QUGA1-CACL8-CHVI2-PAVM2-PAVM4-RICE8-ARAR5-RHAR1-PAVM1-POAN5-RIOD1-CACL5-RHGL10-CACL6-RICE3-CHVI3-RICE1-CEOC2-AMAL4-CHNA4-POFR6-CACL3-CHVI5-POFR4-CHVI4-SYPA5-ARAR4-RICE1-CEOC10-PHMOUPLAND MIXWITH FORBS,TYP.UPLAND MIXWITH FORBS,TYP.UPLAND MIXWITH FORBS,TYP.UPLAND MIXWITH FORBS,TYP.UPLAND SEEDMIX, TYP.UPLAND SEEDMIX, TYP.UPLAND SEEDMIX, TYP.UPLAND SEEDMIX, TYP.4-CAAC2-CEOC1-QUSHDESIGN-BUILDSHADE STRUCTUREROUND PICNICTABLE, TYP.GRILL, TYP.CRUSHER FINES, TYP.SQUARE PICNICTABLE, TYP.3-CHVI5-RHAT5-SYPACRUSHER FINES, TYP.1-GYDIPROPOSED BIKERACK TYPE A (12SPACES), TYP.'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_L1.0_Landscape Plan_.dwg - Sarah Adamson - 8/31/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L1.2675((775((127(61. A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY FORESTER BEFORE ANY TREES OR SHRUBS AS NOTED ON THISPLAN ARE PLANTED, PRUNED OR REMOVED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS INCLUDES ZONES BETWEEN THESIDEWALK AND CURB, MEDIANS AND OTHER CITY PROPERTY. THIS PERMIT SHALL APPROVE THE LOCATION ANDSPECIES TO BE PLANTED. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THIS PERMIT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS CODESUBJECT TO CITATION (SECTION 27-31) AND MAY ALSO RESULT IN REPLACING OR RELOCATING TREES AND A HOLDON CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.CITY OF FORT COLLINS STREET TREE NOTE&$87,21UTILITIES EXIST WITHIN CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR IDENTIFYING THEIR LOCATIONPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.LANDSCAPE PLANL1.16&$/(  65$$60,7,*$7,21'$7$EXISTING1.50 ACRES LOWER ECOLOGICAL VALUE UPLANDS0.014 ACRES OF LOWER ECOLOGICAL VALUE WETLANDS HABITATPROPOSEDUPLAND BUFFER:0.41 ACUPLAND POLLINATOR: 0.34 ACRIPARIAN:0.14 ACWETLAND:0.043 ACTOTAL PROPOSED: 0.913 ACREMAINING 0.601 AC OF REQUIRED MITIGATION IS MADE UP WITH HIGHERQUALITY PLANTINGS/HABITATITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 73  66  668(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(13-ARCO23-NATE1-GYDI18-HESE6-NATE1-GYDI4-POFR9-HESE8-NATE1-QUMU5-ARCO4-ARCO9-HESE4-ARCO15-NATE1-QUMU4-HESE4-HESE4-MAAQ1-AMGR10-NATE6-SANE5-CAAC1-QUSH1-ULDA3-CEOC9-ARCO13-CACL19-HESE1-SYRE13-CAAC6-CACL6-PEAT6-SANE5-CAAC1-SYRE7-PEAT24-NATE5-SANE7-SANE2-QUSH5-CAAC1-QUSH6-CACL4-POFR7-ACMI8-CAAC1-AMGR3-MAAQ3-SYPA3-NATE5-CAAC3-POFR3-POFR2-CHNA2-PRBE1-QUMU3-CAAC11-NATE2-GYDI6-CHNA4-PRBE3-POFR3-CAAC4-POFR7-NATE10-POFR1-GYDI1-CASP4-POFR26-CHNAPROPOSED BIKESHELTER & BIKERACK TYPE B (8SPACES), TYP.PROPOSED BIKERACK TYPE A (10SPACES), TYP.STEEL EDGING,TYP.SOD , TYP.ROCK MULCH,TYP.CRUSHERFINES, TYP.STEEL EDGING,TYP.PROPOSED BIKE RACKTYPE A (10 SPACES), TYP.ROCK MULCH,TYP.WALL, SEE CIVIL21-NATEPROPOSED BIKE SHELTER& BIKE RACK TYPE B (8SPACES), TYP.3-ARCO3-SYPA4-CAAC1-SYRE2-JUSA3-PEAT6-SANE3-PEAT3-CACL21-NATE21-NATE2-JUSA1-QUSHSITE DISTANCETRIANGLESITE DISTANCETRIANGLESTOP SIGN2-AMAL6-CHNA4-CHVI5-SYDA3-PIST3-QUGA2-CEOC3-CHVI5-CHNA5-RICE4-CHVI9-RICE3-PIPU5-SYDA5-CHVI6-POFR1-CEOC4-PIPU3-SYPA1-ARAR3-CHVI6-PIPG8-PHMO5-PHMO2-CASP4-CHVI6-ARAR2-MASP4-PRBE5-RICE5-PHMO2-CASP6-RICE8-CACL2-AMAL4-CHNAUPLAND MIXWITH FORBS,TYP.5-RICEUPLAND MIXWITH FORBS,TYP.UPLAND SEEDMIX, TYP.UPLAND SEEDMIX, TYP.5-CAAC4-CAAC16-CAAC1-PIPU (M)1-PIPU (M)7-PIPU (M)1-QUMU1-QUMU1-QUMUROUND PICNICTABLE, TYP.GRILL, TYP.CRUSHER FINES, TYP.PROPOSED BIKERACK TYPE A (12SPACES), TYP.PROPOSED BIKERACK TYPE A (12SPACES), TYP.'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_L1.0_Landscape Plan_.dwg - Sarah Adamson - 8/31/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L1.1675((775((127(61. A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY FORESTER BEFORE ANY TREES OR SHRUBS AS NOTED ON THISPLAN ARE PLANTED, PRUNED OR REMOVED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS INCLUDES ZONES BETWEEN THESIDEWALK AND CURB, MEDIANS AND OTHER CITY PROPERTY. THIS PERMIT SHALL APPROVE THE LOCATION ANDSPECIES TO BE PLANTED. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THIS PERMIT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS CODESUBJECT TO CITATION (SECTION 27-31) AND MAY ALSO RESULT IN REPLACING OR RELOCATING TREES AND A HOLDON CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.CITY OF FORT COLLINS STREET TREE NOTE&$87,21UTILITIES EXIST WITHIN CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR IDENTIFYING THEIR LOCATIONPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.LANDSCAPE PLANL1.2DERO: SWERVE BIKE RACKQTY: 50MOUNTING: SURFACE MOUNTCOLOR: POWDER COAT IRON GRAYLOCATION: SEE PLANS%,.(5$&.7<3($NOT TO SCALE%,.(6+(/7(5NOT TO SCALE%,.(5$&.7<3(%:,7+6+(/7(5NOT TO SCALEDERO: VIZOR BIKE SHELTERQTY: 4MOUNTING: SURFACE MOUNTCOLOR: POWDER COAT LIGHT GRAYLOCATION: SEE PLANSDERO: HOOP BIKE RACKQTY: 16MOUNTING: SURFACE MOUNTCOLOR: POWDER COAT DEEP REDLOCATION: SEE PLANS6&$/(  65$$60,7,*$7,21'$7$EXISTING1.50 ACRES LOWER ECOLOGICAL VALUE UPLANDS0.014 ACRES OF LOWER ECOLOGICAL VALUE WETLANDS HABITATPROPOSEDUPLAND BUFFER:0.41 ACUPLAND POLLINATOR: 0.34 ACRIPARIAN:0.14 ACWETLAND:0.043 ACTOTAL PROPOSED: 0.913 ACREMAINING 0.601 AC OF REQUIRED MITIGATION IS MADE UP WITH HIGHERQUALITY PLANTINGS/HABITAT5281'3,&1,&7$%/(NOT TO SCALE*5,//NOT TO SCALEWABASH VALLEY: SPYDER SERIESROUND PICNIC TABLEQTY: 4MOUNTING: SURFACE MOUNTCOLOR: BLACKLOCATION: SEE PLANSWABASH VALLEY: COVERED GRILLQTY: 2MOUNTING: IN-GROUNDCOLOR BLACKLOCATION: SEE PLANS648$5(3,&1,&7$%/(NOT TO SCALEWABASH VALLEY: COVERED GRILLQTY: 2MOUNTING: IN-GROUNDCOLOR BLACKLOCATION: SEE PLANSITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 74 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_L1.0_Landscape Plan_.dwg - Sarah Adamson - 8/31/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONSPARKING LOT PERIMETERPARKING LOT INTERIORTREE BIODIVERSITY1 TREE / 25 LF ALONG ROW1 TREE / 40 LF ALONG SIDE / REAR PROPMIN. 30" HEIGHT SCREEN ALONG 70%6% OF PARKING LOT SHALL BE LANDSCAPENO LANDSCAPE OVER 24" WITHIN 15' OFCURB CUT1 CANOPY SHADE TREE / 150 SF OFINTERNAL LANDSCAPE AREAMAX. 33% OF ONE TREE SPECIESN/AN/A - WALL AT REAR, SEE CIVILN/A6% OF 63,873 = 3,834 SFNO LANDSCAPE OVER 24" ISLOCATED WITHIN 15' OF CURBCUT25 TREESLANDSCAPE NOTESAND DETAILSL1.3&$87,21UTILITIES EXIST WITHIN CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR IDENTIFYING THEIR LOCATIONPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.675((775((127(61. A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY FORESTER BEFORE ANY TREES OR SHRUBS AS NOTED ON THIS PLAN ARE PLANTED, PRUNED OR REMOVED INTHE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS INCLUDES ZONES BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND CURB, MEDIANS AND OTHER CITY PROPERTY. THIS PERMIT SHALL APPROVETHE LOCATION AND SPECIES TO BE PLANTED. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THIS PERMIT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS CODE SUBJECT TO CITATION(SECTION 27-31) AND MAY ALSO RESULT IN REPLACING OR RELOCATING TREES AND A HOLD ON CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.2. CONTACT THE CITY FORESTER TO INSPECT ALL STREET TREE PLANTINGS AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT. ALL MUST BEINSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. APPROVAL OF STREET TREE PLANTING IS REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF EACH PHASE.3. STREET LANDSCAPING, INCLUDING STREET TREES, SHALL BE SELECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY CODES AND POLICIES. ALL TREE PRUNING ANDREMOVAL WORKS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A CITY OF FORT COLLINS LICENSED ARBORS WHERE REQUIRED BY CODE.STREET TREES SHALL BE SUPPLIED ANDPLANTED BY THE DEVELOPER USING A QUALIFIED LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.4. THE DEVELOPER SHALL REPLACE DEAD OR DYING STREET TREES AFTER PLANTING UNTIL FINAL MAINTENANCE INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OFFORT COLLINS FORESTRY DIVISION. ALL STREET TREES IN THE PROJECT MUST BE ESTABLISHED, WITH AN APPROVED SPECIES AND OF ACCEPTABLE CONDITIONPRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE.5. SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY FORESTER -- STREET TREE LOCATIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS, UTILITYSEPARATIONS BETWEEN TREES, STREET SIGNS AND STREET LIGHTS. STREET TREES TO BE CENTERED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE LOT TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE.QUANTITIES SHOWN ON PLAN MUST BE INSTALLED UNLESS A REDUCTION IS APPROVED BY THE CITY TO MEET SEPARATION STANDARDS.75((3527(&7,21127(61. ALL EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND WITHIN ANY NATURAL AREA BUFFER ZONES SHALL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED UNLESSNOTED ON THESE PLANS FOR REMOVAL.2. WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF ANY PROTECTED EXISTING TREE, THERE SHALL BE NO CUT OR FILL OVER A FOUR-INCH DEPTH UNLESS A QUALIFIED ARBORIST ORFORESTER HAS EVALUATED AND APPROVED THE DISTURBANCE.3. ALL PROTECTED EXISTING TREES SHALL BE PRUNED TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS FORESTRY STANDARDS. TREE PRUNING AND REMOVAL SHALL BEPERFORMED BY A BUSINESS THAT HOLDS A CURRENT CITY OF FORT COLLINS ARBORIST LICENSE WHERE REQUIRED BY CODE.4.PRIOR TO AND DURING CONSTRUCTION, BARRIERS SHALL BE ERECTED AROUND ALL PROTECTED EXISTING TREES WITH SUCH BARRIERS TO BE OF ORANGEFENCING A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT, SECURED WITH METAL T- POSTS, NO CLOSER THAN SIX (6) FEET FROM THE TRUNK OR ONE-HALF (½) OF THEDRIP LINE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. THERE SHALL BE NO STORAGE OR MOVEMENT OF EQUIPMENT, MATERIAL, DEBRIS OR FILL WITHIN THE FENCED TREEPROTECTION ZONE.5. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT, THE APPLICANT SHALL PREVENT THE CLEANING OF EQUIPMENT OR MATERIAL OR THE STORAGE ANDDISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIAL SUCH AS PAINTS, OILS, SOLVENTS, ASPHALT, CONCRETE, MOTOR OIL OR ANY OTHER MATERIAL HARMFUL TO THE LIFE OF ATREE WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF ANY PROTECTED TREE OR GROUP OF TREES.6. NO DAMAGING ATTACHMENT, WIRES, SIGNS OR PERMITS MAY BE FASTENED TO ANY PROTECTED TREE.LARGE PROPERTY AREAS CONTAINING PROTECTED TREES AND SEPARATED FROM CONSTRUCTION OR LAND CLEARING AREAS, ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY ANDUTILITY EASEMENTS MAY BE "RIBBONED OFF," RATHER THAN ERECTING PROTECTIVE FENCING AROUND EACH TREE AS REQUIRED IN SUBSECTION (G)(3)THIS MAYBE ACCOMPLISHED BY PLACING METAL T-POST STAKES A MAXIMUM OF FIFTY (50) FEET APART AND TYING RIBBON OR ROPE FROM STAKE- TO-STAKE ALONG THEOUTSIDE PERIMETERS OF SUCH AREAS BEING CLEARED.8. THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES, IRRIGATION LINES OR ANY UNDERGROUND FIXTURE REQUIRING EXCAVATION DEEPER THAN SIX (6) INCHES SHALL BEACCOMPLISHED BY BORING UNDER THE ROOT SYSTEM OF PROTECTED EXISTING TREES AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWENTY-FOUR (24) INCHES. THE AUGERDISTANCE IS ESTABLISHED FROM THE FACE OF THE TREE (OUTER BARK) AND IS SCALED FROM TREE DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT AS DESCRIBED IN THECHART BELOW:9. TREE REMOVAL SHOWN SHALL BE COMPLETED OUTSIDE OF THE SONGBIRD NESTING SEASON (FEB 1 - JULY 31) OR CONDUCT A SURVEY OF TREES ENSURINGNO ACTIVE NESTS IN THE AREA.*(1(5$//$1'6&$3(127(61.PLANT QUALITY: ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE A-GRADE OR NO. 1 GRADE - FREE OF ANY DEFECTS, OF NORMAL HEALTH, HEIGHT, LEAF DENSITY AND SPREADAPPROPRIATE TO THE SPECIES AS DEFINED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN (AAN) STANDARDS. ALL TREES SHALL BE BALL AND BURLAP OREQUIVALENT.2.IRRIGATION: ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN THE SITE INCLUDING TURF, SHRUB BEDS AND TREE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATIONSYSTEM. THE IRRIGATION PLAN MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS WATER UTILITIES DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCEOF A BUILDING PERMIT. ALL TURF AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN AUTOMATIC POP-UP IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ALL SHRUB BEDS AND TREES, INCLUDING INNATIVE SEED AREAS, SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN AUTOMATIC DRIP (TRICKLE) IRRIGATION SYSTEM, OR WITH AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE APPROVED BYTHE CITY WITH THE IRRIGATION PLANS. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THE WATER REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL PLANTMATERIAL. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS TO BE TURNED OVER TO THE CITY PARKS DEPARTMENT FOR MAINTENANCE MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PARKS MANAGERAND MEET PARKS IRRIGATION STANDARDS. DESIGN REVIEW SHALL OCCUR DURING UTILITIES DEPARTMENT IRRIGATION REVIEW PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ABUILDING PERMIT AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND INSPECTION BY PARKS SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS.3.TOPSOIL: TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE, TOPSOIL THAT IS REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE CONSERVED FOR LATER USE ON AREASREQUIRING REVEGETATION AND LANDSCAPING.4.SOIL AMENDMENTS: SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND DOCUMENTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY CODE SECTION 12-132. THE SOIL IN ALLLANDSCAPE AREAS, INCLUDING PARKWAYS AND MEDIANS, SHALL BE THOUGHLY LOOSENED TO A DEPTH OF NOT LESS THAN EIGHT(8) INCHES AND SOILAMENDMENT SHALL BE THOROUGHLY INCORPORATED INTO THE SOIL OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST SIX(6) INCHES BY TILLING, DISCINGOR OTHER SUITABLE METHOD, AT A RATE OF AT LEAST THREE (3) CUBIC YARDS OF SOIL AMENDMENT PER ONE THOUSAND (1,000) SQUARE FEET OF LANDSCAPEAREA. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY THAT ALL PLANTED AREAS,OR AREAS TO BE PLANTED, HAVE BEEN THOROUGHLY LOOSENED AND THE SOIL AMENDED, CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN SECTION12-132.5.INSTALLATION AND GUARANTEE: ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO SOUND HORTICULTURAL PRACTICES IN A MANNER DESIGNED TOENCOURAGE QUICK ESTABLISHMENT AND HEALTHY GROWTH. ALL LANDSCAPING FOR EACH PHASE MUST BE EITHER INSTALLED OR THE INSTALLATION MUST BESECURED WITH AN IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT, PERFORMANCE BOND, OR ESCROW ACCOUNT FOR 125% OF THE VALUATION OF THE MATERIALS ANDLABOR PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR ANY BUILDING IN SUCH PHASE.6.MAINTENANCE: TREES AND VEGETATION, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, FENCES, WALLS AND OTHER LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS WITH THESE FINAL PLANS SHALL BECONSIDERED AS ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT IN THE SAME MANNER AS PARKING, BUILDING MATERIALS AND OTHER SITE DETAILS. THE APPLICANT,LANDOWNER OR SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST SHALL BE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REGULAR MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPINGELEMENTS IN GOOD CONDITION. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WEEDS AND LITTER, AND ALL LANDSCAPESTRUCTURES SUCH AS FENCES AND WALLS SHALL BE REPAIRED AND REPLACED PERIODICALLY TO MAINTAIN A STRUCTURALLY SOUND CONDITION.7.REPLACEMENT: ANY LANDSCAPE ELEMENT THAT DIES, OR IS OTHERWISE REMOVED, SHALL BE PROMPTLY REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEREQUIREMENTS OF THESE PLANS.8. THE FOLLOWING SEPARATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN TREES/SHRUBS AND UTILITIES:40 FEET BETWEEN CANOPY TREES AND STREET LIGHTS15 FEET BETWEEN ORNAMENTAL TREES AND STREETLIGHTS10 FEET BETWEEN TREES AND PUBLIC WATER, SANITARY AND STORM SEWER MAIN LINES6 FEET BETWEEN TREES AND PUBLIC WATER, SANITARY AND STORM SEWER SERVICE LINES.4 FEET BETWEEN SHRUBS AND PUBLIC WATER AND SANITARY AND STORM SEWER LINES4 FEET BETWEEN TREES AND GAS LINES9. ALL STREET TREES SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM EIGHT (8) FEET AWAY FROM THE EDGES OF DRIVEWAYS AND ALLEYS PER LUC 3.2.1(D)(2)(a).10. PLACEMENT OF ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SIGHT DISTANCE CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS. NOSTRUCTURES OR LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS GREATER THAN 24" SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE OR EASEMENTS WITH THE EXCEPTIONOF DECIDUOUS TREES PROVIDED THAT THE LOWEST BRANCH IS AT LEAST 6' FROM GRADE. ANY FENCES WITHIN THE SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE OR EASEMENTMUST BE NOT MORE THAN 42" IN HEIGHT AND OF AN OPEN DESIGN.11. THE FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH ALL OTHER FINAL PLAN ELEMENTS SO THAT THE PROPOSED GRADING, STORM DRAINAGE,AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH NOR PRECLUDE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS ON THISPLAN.12. MINOR CHANGES IN SPECIES AND PLANT LOCATIONS MAY BE MADE DURING CONSTRUCTION -- AS REQUIRED BY SITE CONDITIONS OR PLANT AVAILABILITY.OVERALL QUANTITY, QUALITY, AND DESIGN CONCEPT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT WITH THE QUANTITIESINCLUDED IN THE PLANT LIST, SPECIES AND QUANTITIES ILLUSTRATED SHALL BE PROVIDED. ALL CHANGES OF PLANT SPECIES AND LOCATION MUST HAVEWRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.13. ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF THREE INCHES.CITY OF FORT COLLINS STANDARD NOTES1. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, AND ANYOTHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE AGENCY NECESSARY FOR UTILITY LOCATION PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION.2. THIS DRAWING IS A PART OF A COMPLETE SET OF BID DOCUMENTS, SPECIFICATIONS, ADDITIONAL DRAWINGS, ANDEXHIBITS. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD THESE PLANS BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES WITHOUTEXAMINING ACTUAL LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES ON SITE, AND REVIEWING ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS.3. THE LOCATION OF THE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE LOCATED ON THE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR THISPROJECT. THE MOST CURRENT REVISION IS HERE IN MADE PART OF THIS DOCUMENT. UNDERGROUND UTILITIESEXIST THROUGHOUT THIS SITE AND MUST BE LOCATED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. WHEREUNDERGROUND UTILITIES EXIST, FIELD ADJUSTMENT MAY BE NECESSARY AND MUST BE APPROVED BY AREPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER. NEITHER THE OWNER NOR THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ASSUMES ANYRESPONSIBILITY WHATSOEVER, IN RESPECT TO THE CONTRACTORS ACCURACY IN LOCATING THE INDICATED PLANTMATERIAL, AND UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD THESE PLANS BE USED WITHOUT REFERENCING THE ABOVEMENTIONED DOCUMENTS.UTILITY NOTESNOTE: FOR ALL SEEDED AREAS USE CITY OF FORT COLLINS DETENTION BASIN MIX OR AS NOTED ON PLANS.&,7<2))257&2//,161$7,9(6(('0,;127(61. PREPARE SOIL AS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE FOR NATIVE SEED MIX SPECIES THROUGHAERATION AND ADDITION OF AMENDMENTS, THEN SEED IN TWO DIRECTIONS TO DISTRIBUTE SEEDEVENLY OVER ENTIRE AREA. DRILL SEED ALL INDICATED AREAS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTERCOMPLETION OF GRADING OPERATIONS.2. IF CHANGES ARE TO BE MADE TO SEED MIX BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS THEN APPROVAL MUST BEPROVIDED BY CITY ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER.3. APPROPRIATE NATIVE SEEDING EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED (STANDARD TURF SEEDING EQUIPMENTOR AGRICULTURE EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE USED).4. DRILL SEED APPLICATION RECOMMENDED PER SPECIFIED APPLICATION RATE TO NO MORE THAN ½INCH DEPTH (OR APPROPRIATE DEPTH FOR SELECTED SPECIES). FOR BROADCAST SEEDINGINSTEAD OF DRILL SEEDING METHOD DOUBLE SPECIFIED APPLICATION RATE. REFER TO NATIVESEED MIX TABLE FOR SPECIES, PERCENTAGES AND APPLICATION RATES.5. PREPARE A WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN TO ENSURE THAT WEEDS ARE PROPERLY MANAGEDBEFORE, DURING AND AFTER SEEDING ACTIVITIES.6. AFTER SEEDING THE AREA SHALL BE COVERED WITH CRIMPED STRAW, JUTE MESH, OR OTHERAPPROPRIATE METHODS.7. WHERE NEEDED, TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED UNTIL SEED IS ESTABLISHED. IFIRRIGATION IS USED, THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE FULLY OPERATIONALAT THE TIME OF SEEDING AND SHALL ENSURE 100% HEAD-TO-HEAD COVERAGE OVER ALL SEEDEDAREAS. ALL METHODS AND REQUIREMENTS IN THE APPROVED IRRIGATION PLAN SHALL BEFOLLOWED.8. CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR SEEDED AREA FOR PROPER IRRIGATION, EROSION CONTROL,GERMINATION AND RESEEDING AS NEEDED TO ESTABLISH COVER.9. THE APPROVED SEED MIX AREA IS INTENDED TO BE MAINTAINED IN A NATURAL LIKE LANDSCAPEAESTHETIC. IF AND WHEN MOWING OCCURS IN NATIVE GRASS SEED MIX AREAS DO NOT MOWLOWER THAN 6 TO 8 INCHES IN HEIGHT TO AVOID INHIBITING NATIVE PLANT GROWTH.10. NATIVE SEED AREA WILL BE CONSIDERED ESTABLISHED WHEN SEVENTY PERCENT VEGETATIVECOVER IS REACHED WITH NO LARGER THAN ONE FOOT SQUARE BARE SPOTS AND/OR UNTILDEEMED ESTABLISHED BY CITY PLANNING SERVICES AND EROSION CONTROL.11. THE DEVELOPER AND/OR LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATE SEEDLINGCOVERAGE AND GROWTH AT THE TIME OF FINAL STABILIZATION, AS DEFINED BY STATE AND LOCALAGENCIES. IF FINAL STABILIZATION IS NOT ACHIEVED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE AGENCY, THEDEVELOPER AND/OR LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADDITIONALCORRECTIVE MEASURES TO SATISFY FINAL VEGETATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSEOUT.SEED NOTESMIN. 2 X ROOTBALLDIAMETERTHAN ROOTBALL4" MIN. TYP.MIN. 6" DEEPER6" MIN.13456FINISH GRADE. SEE PLANTINGPLAN FOR GROUND COVERTREATMENTPLANT ROOT BALL. SET TOPROOTBALL 2" ABOVE ADJECENTGRADE. IN BERMED AREAS SETROOTBALL 2" ABOVE LOWERADJECENT GRADE - INSTALLWATER RING (2 - 3" HT.)BACKFILL MIX (PER PLANTINGSPECIFICATIONS). AMEND ANDFERTILIZE ONLY ASRECOMMENDED IN SOILFERTILITY ANALYSIS. JETBACKFILL WITH WATER TOELIMINATE VOIDS.UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL.COMPACTED BACKFILL MIX (75%).23456SHRUB AND PERENNIAL DETAILSCALE: NOT TO SCALE12SHREDDED BARK MULCH, 3" MIN.DEPTH, ROUGHLY THE EXTENTSOF ROOTBALL567489111012PREVAILINGWINDSNOTES:1. SCARIFY SIDES OF PLANTING PIT PRIOR TO SETTINGTREE.2. REMOVE EXCESS SOIL APPLIED ON TOP OF THEROOTBALL THAT COVERS THE ROOT FLARE. THEPLANTING HOLE DEPTH SHALL BE SUCH THAT THEROOTBALL RESTS ON UNDISTURBED SOIL, AND THEROOT FLARE IS 3"-5" ABOVE FINISH GRADE.3. CUT OFF BOTTOM 1/3 OF WIRE BASKET BEFORE PLACINGTREE IN HOLE, CUT OFF AND REMOVE REMAINDER OFBASKET AFTER TREE IS SET IN HOLE, REMOVE ALLNYLON TIES, TWINE, ROPE, AND OTHER PACKINGMATERIAL. REMOVE ALL BURLAP FROM AROUNDROOTBALL.4. TREE WRAP IS NOT TO BE USED ON ANY NEWPLANTINGS, EXCEPT IN LATE FALL PLANTINGSITUATIONS, AND ONLY THEN AFTER CONSULTATIONWITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WHEN WRAPPINGTREE, WRAP FROM TRUNK FLARE TO LOWEST MAJORBRANCH.5. REMOVE ALL NURSERY STAKES AFTER PLANTING.6. FOR TREES OVER 3" CALIPER, USE THREE STAKES ORDEADMEN (AS APPROPRIATE), SPACED EVENLY AROUNDTREE.7. DO NOT ALLOW AIR POCKETS TO FORM WHENBACKFILLING.123TREE CANOPY.NYLON TREE STRAPS AT ENDS OF WIRES -SECURE TO STAKE OR DEADMEN WITH NAILS.12 GAUGE GALVANIZED WIRE. SECURE TOTRUNK JUST ABOVE LOWEST MAJORBRANCHES.PRESSURE-TREATED WOOD STAKE, 2" DIA.EXTEND STAKES 12" MIN. INTO UNDISTURBEDSOIL.24" X 3/4" P.V.C. MARKERS OVER WIRES.PRESSURE-TREATED WOOD DEADMEN, TWOPER TREE (MIN.). BURY OUTSIDE OFPLANTING PIT AND 18" MIN. INTOUNDISTURBED SOIL.WOOD MULCH TREE RING 3' DIA MIN. TYPEAND DEPTH PER PLANS. DO NOT PLACEMULCH WITHIN 3" OF TRUNK.FINISH GRADE. SEE PLANTING PLAN FORGROUND COVER TREATMENTBACKFILL. AMEND AND FERTILIZE ONLY ASRECOMMENDED IN SOIL FERTILITY ANALYSIS.ROOT BALL-SEE NOTE 3, THIS DETAILUNDISTURBED NATIVE SOILTRUNK FLARE.PREVAILINGWINDSSTAKING EXAMPLES (PLAN VIEW)156TREE PLANTING DETAILSCALE: NOT TO SCALE2EVERGREENTREEDECIDUOUSTREE1257891011123463X ROOTBALL DIA.1313SOFT VELCRO, OR OTHER FABRIC WRAP1414CENTRAL LEADER, SEE PLANTING NOTESMAX. 33% OF ONE TREESPECIESTREE STOCKING 1 CANOPY SHADE TREE / 40 LF OFINTERNAL LANDSCAPE AREAMAX. 33% OF ONE TREESPECIES65$$6ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 75  66 66EXISTING WETLANDAREA TO REMAIN -PROTECT IN PLACEEXISTING TO REMAIN,CONTRACTOR TO REPAIRANY AREAS IMPACTEDDURING CONSTRUCTION3-CEOC3-ULDA3-QUSH3-CEOC1-CEOC3-CEOC3-ULDA2-QUSH3-ULDASOD , TYP.SOD , TYP.EXISTING STREET TREES TO REMAIN- PROTECT IN PLACESOD , TYP.SOD , TYP.OVERHEAD CABLEUTILITIES HAVE BEENMOVED UNDERGROUND- FINAL LOCATIONS OFUTILITY TO BEDETERMINED ANDVERIFIED BYCONTRACTOR PRIORTO CONSTRUCTIONRED-TAILED HAWKNEST BUFFERBUS STOP8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8( 8(8('DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_L1.0_Landscape Plan_.dwg - Sarah Adamson - 8/31/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&675((775((127(61. A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY FORESTER BEFORE ANY TREES OR SHRUBS AS NOTED ON THISPLAN ARE PLANTED, PRUNED OR REMOVED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS INCLUDES ZONES BETWEEN THESIDEWALK AND CURB, MEDIANS AND OTHER CITY PROPERTY. THIS PERMIT SHALL APPROVE THE LOCATION ANDSPECIES TO BE PLANTED. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THIS PERMIT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS CODESUBJECT TO CITATION (SECTION 27-31) AND MAY ALSO RESULT IN REPLACING OR RELOCATING TREES AND A HOLDON CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.CITY OF FORT COLLINS STREET TREE NOTE&$87,21UTILITIES EXIST WITHIN CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR IDENTIFYING THEIR LOCATIONPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.LANDSCAPE PLANL1.4.(<0$3SCALE: 1" = 100'08/7,)$0,/<'(9(/230(172))6,7(52:,03529(0(1766.<:$<'5,9(6&2//(*($9(127$3$572))6,7(5,*+72):$<,03529(0(1766&$/(  65$$6ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 76 8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8( 8(8(8(8(8('DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_L1.0_Landscape Plan_.dwg - Sarah Adamson - 8/31/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&675((775((127(61. A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY FORESTER BEFORE ANY TREES OR SHRUBS AS NOTED ON THISPLAN ARE PLANTED, PRUNED OR REMOVED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS INCLUDES ZONES BETWEEN THESIDEWALK AND CURB, MEDIANS AND OTHER CITY PROPERTY. THIS PERMIT SHALL APPROVE THE LOCATION ANDSPECIES TO BE PLANTED. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THIS PERMIT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS CODESUBJECT TO CITATION (SECTION 27-31) AND MAY ALSO RESULT IN REPLACING OR RELOCATING TREES AND A HOLDON CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.CITY OF FORT COLLINS STREET TREE NOTEHYDROZONE PLANL1.56&$/(  HYDROZONE CHARTHIGH HYDROZONEMODERATE HYDROZONELOW HYDROZONEVERY LOW HYDROZONE18 GALLONS / SQUARE FEET / SEASON10 GALLONS / SQUARE FEET / SEASON3 GALLONS / SQUARE FEET / SEASON0 GALLONS / SQUARE FEET / SEASON0 SQUARE FEET23,811 SQUARE FEET65,583 SQUARE FEET26,239 SQUARE FEET127($//3/$17,1*%('6127/$%(/('02'(5$7(+<'52=21($5(&216,'(5('/2:+<'52=21(65$$6HYDROZONEAREAWATER NEEDSANNUAL WATER USE0 GALLONS238,110 GALLONS590,247 GALLONS0 GALLONS727$/648$5()((7 *$//216648$5()((76($621 *$//216ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 77 8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8( 8(8(8(8(8(54367821EXISTING TREETO REMAIN'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_L1.0_Landscape Plan_.dwg - Sarah Adamson - 8/31/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&675((775((127(61. A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY FORESTER BEFORE ANY TREES OR SHRUBS AS NOTED ON THISPLAN ARE PLANTED, PRUNED OR REMOVED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS INCLUDES ZONES BETWEEN THESIDEWALK AND CURB, MEDIANS AND OTHER CITY PROPERTY. THIS PERMIT SHALL APPROVE THE LOCATION ANDSPECIES TO BE PLANTED. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THIS PERMIT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS CODESUBJECT TO CITATION (SECTION 27-31) AND MAY ALSO RESULT IN REPLACING OR RELOCATING TREES AND A HOLDON CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.CITY OF FORT COLLINS STREET TREE NOTETREE PRESERVATION PLANL1.66&$/(  1. ALL EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND WITHINANY NATURAL AREA BUFFER ZONES SHALL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTEDUNLESS NOTED ON THESE PLANS FOR REMOVAL.2. WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF ANY PROTECTED EXISTING TREE, THERE SHALL BENO CUT OR FILL OVER A FOUR-INCH DEPTH UNLESS A QUALIFIED ARBORISTOR FORESTER HAS EVALUATED AND APPROVED THE DISTURBANCE.3. ALL PROTECTED EXISTING TREES SHALL BE PRUNED TO THE CITY OF FORTCOLLINS FORESTRY STANDARDS. TREE PRUNING AND REMOVAL SHALL BEPERFORMED BY A BUSINESS THAT HOLDS A CURRENT CITY OF FORTCOLLINS ARBORIST LICENSE WHERE REQUIRED BY CODE.4.PRIOR TO AND DURING CONSTRUCTION, BARRIERS SHALL BE ERECTEDAROUND ALL PROTECTED EXISTING TREES WITH SUCH BARRIERS TO BE OFORANGE FENCING A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT, SECURED WITHMETAL T-POSTS, NO CLOSER THAN SIX (6) FEET FROM THE TRUNK ORONE-HALF (½) OF THE DRIP LINE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. THERE SHALL BENO STORAGE OR MOVEMENT OF EQUIPMENT, MATERIAL, DEBRIS OR FILLWITHIN THE FENCED TREE PROTECTION ZONE.5. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT, THE APPLICANTSHALL PREVENT THE CLEANING OF EQUIPMENT OR MATERIAL OR THESTORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIAL SUCH AS PAINTS, OILS,SOLVENTS, ASPHALT, CONCRETE, MOTOR OIL OR ANY OTHER MATERIALHARMFUL TO THE LIFE OF A TREE WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF ANYPROTECTED TREE OR GROUP OF TREES.6. NO DAMAGING ATTACHMENT, WIRES, SIGNS OR PERMITS MAY BE FASTENEDTO ANY PROTECTED TREE.7. LARGE PROPERTY AREAS CONTAINING PROTECTED TREES AND SEPARATEDFROM CONSTRUCTION OR LAND CLEARING AREAS, ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAYAND UTILITY EASEMENTS MAY BE "RIBBONED OFF," RATHER THAN ERECTINGPROTECTIVE FENCING AROUND EACH TREE AS REQUIRED IN SUBSECTION(G)(3) ABOVE. THIS MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY PLACING METAL T-POSTSTAKES A MAXIMUM OF FIFTY (50) FEET APART AND TYING RIBBON OR ROPEFROM STAKE-TO-STAKE ALONG THE OUTSIDE PERIMETERS OF SUCH AREASBEING CLEARED.8. THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES, IRRIGATION LINES OR ANY UNDERGROUNDFIXTURE REQUIRING EXCAVATION DEEPER THAN SIX (6) INCHES SHALL BEACCOMPLISHED BY BORING UNDER THE ROOT SYSTEM OF PROTECTEDEXISTING TREES AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWENTY-FOUR (24) INCHES. THEAUGER DISTANCE IS ESTABLISHED FROM THE FACE OF THE TREE (OUTERBARK) AND IS SCALED FROM TREE DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT ASDESCRIBED IN THE CHART BELOW:9. ALL TREE REMOVAL SHOWN SHALL BE COMPLETED OUTSIDE OF THESONGBIRD NESTING SEASON (FEB 1 - JULY 31) OR CONDUCT A SURVEY OFTREES ENSURING NO ACTIVE NESTS IN THE AREA.CITY OF FORT COLLINS TREE PROTECTION NOTES:TREE DIAMETER AT BREAST AUGER DISTANCE FROM FACEHEIGHT (INCHES) OF TREE (FEET)0-2 13-4 25-9 510-14 1015-19 12OVER 19 151275((66+$//%(5(029(''85,1*7+(621*%,5'1(67,1*6($621 )(%58$5<72-8/< :,7+287),567+$9,1*$352)(66,21$/(&2/2*,6725:,/'/,)(%,2/2*,67&203/(7($1(67,1*6859(<72,'(17,)<$1<$&7,9(1(676(;,67,1*217+(352-(&76,7(7+(6859(<6+$//%(6(17727+(&,7<(19,5210(17$/3/$11(5,)$&7,9(1(676$5()281'7+(&,7<:,//&225',1$7(:,7+5(/(9$1767$7($1')('(5$/5(35(6(17$7,9(672'(7(50,1(:+(7+(5$'',7,21$/5(675,&7,2162175((5(029$/$1'&216758&7,21$33/<TREE REMOVAL:FORESTRY MITIGATION REQUIRED- 7 UPSIZED TREESENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION REQUIRED- 2 UPSIZED TREES PLANTED IN BUFFER(NHBZ)MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS:CANOPY SHADE TREE: 2.0” CALIPER BALLED AND BURLAPPEDEVERGREEN TREE: 8.0' HEIGHT BALLED AND BURLAPPEDORNAMENTAL TREE: 2.0” CALIPER BALLED AND BURLAPPED65$$60,7,*$7,21'$7$EXISTING1.50 ACRES LOWER ECOLOGICAL VALUE UPLANDS0.014 ACRES OF LOWER ECOLOGICAL VALUE WETLANDS HABITATPROPOSEDUPLAND BUFFER: 0.41 ACUPLAND POLLINATOR: 0.34 ACRIPARIAN: 0.14 ACWETLAND:0.043 ACTOTAL PROPOSED: 0.913 ACREMAINING 0.601 AC OF REQUIRED MITIGATION IS MADE UP WITH HIGHERQUALITY PLANTINGS/HABITATITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 78 STAMP 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_PP1.0-Lite.dwg - Jim Galloway - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.330035(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267.QRZZKDW VEHIRUH\RXGLJ6&$/(  PHOTOMETRIC PLANPP1.0ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 79 STAMP 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_PP1.1-LiteDets.dwg - Jim Galloway - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.330035(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&PHOTOMETRIC DETAILSFIXTURES AA1 & AA1-BPOLES FOR AA1 & AA1-BFIXTURE WP & WP1174CAA1AA1-BAA1PP1.1WPWP1WPWP1ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 80 W/DREF.DWREF.DW W/DREF.DWDWREF.W/DW/DREF.DW W/DREF.DW W/DREF.DWW/D REF.DWW/DREF.DW REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/D REF.DWREF.DWW/DREF.DW(1'678',2/$5*(%('0(',80%('678',2/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(678',2/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('3'-10"64'-4"3'-10"(1'678',20(&+216'-0 1/2"7'-0"+2976543211DCBA835(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2%8,/',1*$),567/(9(/$06.09.2021CWDA1/8" = 1'-0"1FIRST FLOORITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 81 REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWREF.DWDWREF.W/DREF.DWW/DREF.DW W/DREF.DWW/D REF.DWW/DREF.DW REF.DWW/DREF.DW W/DREF.DWREF.DWW/D REF.DW (1'678',2/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('0(',80%('/$5*(678',2678',260$//%('%('(1'678',23'-10"64'-4"3'-10"/$5*(%('97654321216'-0 1/2"DCBA8135(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2%8,/',1*$6(&21'/(9(/$06.09.2021CWDA1/8" = 1'-0"1SECOND FLOORITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 82 W/DREF.DWREF.DW W/DREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DW W/DREF.DWW/DREF.DW W/DREF.DWREF.DWW/D REF.DW W/DREF.DW(1'678',2(1'678',260$//%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('216'-0 1/2"64'-4"97654321DCBA8135(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2%8,/',1*$7+,5'/(9(/$06.09.2021CWDA1/8" = 1'-0"1THIRD FLOORITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 83 REF.DWREF.DWREF.DW REF.DWREF.DWREF.DWREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWREF.DWREF.DW REF.DWW/D REF.DWDWREF.W/DDW REF.W/DREF.DW0(&++2/$5*(%('/$5*(%('0(',80%('/$5*(%('0(',80%('/$5*(678',2678',2678',2/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('60$//%('60$//%('45ABCDDEFG117889922369'-0"203'-4"135(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2%8,/',1*$),567/(9(/$06.09.2021CWDA1/8" = 1'-0"1FIRST FLOORITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 84 W/DREF.DWREF.DW REF.DWREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DW REF.DWREF.DWREF.DWW/DREF.DWREF.DW W/D REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWDWREF.W/DDW REF.W/D45ABCDDEFG117889922360$//%('/$5*(%('0(',80%('60$//%('0(',80%('/$5*(678',2678',2678',2/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('0(',80%('/$5*(%('%('60$//%('69'-0"203'-4"/$5*(678',2135(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2%8,/',1*$6(&21'/(9(/$06.09.2021CWDA1/8" = 1'-0"1SECOND FLOORITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 85 REF.DW W/D REF.DWREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DW REF.DWREF.DWREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/D REF.DWDWREF.W/DDW REF.W/DW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWREF.DW45ABCDDEFG1178899223(1'678',2/$5*(%('0(',80%('(1'678',20(',80%('/$5*(678',2678',2678',2/$5*(%('/$5*(%('/$5*(%('0(',80%('/$5*(%('%('60$//%('69'-0"203'-4"/$5*(678',2135(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2%8,/',1*$7+,5'/(9(/$06.09.2021CWDA1/8" = 1'-0"1THIRD FLOORITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 86 END UNIT9'-11 1/4" CLR. (FACE OF CONC.)1a2a3a4a5a6aAB21'-8"2'-0"10'-10"10'-4 1/2"10'-4 1/2"10'-4 1/2"10'-10"FRAME WALL CENTERED ON CONCRETE CURB BELOW31'-10 1/2"20'-11"52'-9 1/2"2'-0"3 1/2"5'-1 1/2"5'-5"3 1/2"5'-0 1/2"5'-0 1/2"3 1/2"5'-0 1/2"5'-0 1/2"3 1/2"5'-0 1/2"5'-0 1/2"3 1/2"5'-1 1/2"5'-1 1/2"3 1/2"1a2a3a4a5a6aAB35(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2*$5$*($3/$16$CWDA1/4" = 1'-0"1GARAGE A - 1ST LEVEL1/4" = 1'-0"2GARAGE A - SLAB PLAN06.09.2021ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 87 522)3/$1127(6• REFER TO GENERAL NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NOT SHOWN OR NOTED ON PLANS.• ALL OVERHANGS ARE MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM FACE OF FRAME TO END OF TRUSS/RAFTER, RE: DETAILS.ALL SOFFITS ARE TO BE FLAT, U.N.O.• ALL TRUSSES TO BE FABRICATED AND DESIGNED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A COLORADO LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.• ALL OVERFRAMING TO BEAR DIRECTLY ON TRUSSES OR OVER SOLID, IMMEDIATE BLOCKING BETWEEN TRUSSES.PROVIDE CUTOUTS IN AREAS OF OVERFRAMING TO CONNECT ROOF AREAS.• PROVIDE ROOF VENTS AND / OR SOFFIT VENTS TO PROVIDE ATTIC VENTILATION AS REQUIRED PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1203. RE: ROOF VENTING NOTES AND CALCULATIONS.• WATERPROOFING OF OPENINGS AT THE ROOF, AROUND VENT PIPES, AND AT EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE MADE WATER TIGHT PER 2015 IPC SECTION 305.5.• THE ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN PENETRATIONS OF PIPES AND SIMILAR AND ALL OPENINGS IN A BUILDING ENVELOPE WALL, FLOOR, OR CEILING ASSEMBLY SHALL BE SEALED PER 2015 IPC SECTION 315. WHERE APPLICABLE, PENETRATIONS IN FIRE-RATED ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2015 IBC SECTION 714.• PIPES AND VENTS SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT MATERIALS.2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE• ROOF ASSEMBLIES PER 2015 IBC CHAPTER 1501:ROOF ASSEMBLIES SHALL PROVIDE A WEATHER RESISTANT ROOF SYSTEM AND SHALL INCLUDE WEATHER PROTECTION PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1503 AND ROOF COVERINGS PER SECTION 1507.RE: FLASHING DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.• CRICKETS AND SADDLES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE REQUIRED LOCATIONS PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1503.6. CRICKET OR SADDLE COVERINGS SHALL BE SHEET METAL OR OF THE SAME MATERIAL AS THE ROOF COVERING. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE UNDERLAYMENT AS APPLICABLE TO THE CRICKET OR SADDLE SLOPE.• LOW SLOPE ROOFS -ASPHALT SHINGLES:ASPHALT SHINGLES SHALL ONLY BE USED ON ROOF SLOPES OF 2:12 OR GREATER.DOUBLE UNDERLAYMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ROOF SLOPES FROM 2:12 TO LESS THAN 4:12, PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1507.2.8.• AN ICE BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EAVES, EXTENDING FROM THE LOWEST EDGE TO A POINT AT LEAST 24 INCHES INSIDE THE EXTERIOR WALL PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1507.2.8.2 OR AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL AMENDMENTS.• METAL ROOF PANELS:THE INSTALLATION, ATTACHMENT, AND UNDERLAYMENT REQUIREMENTS OF METAL ROOF PANELS SHALL COMPLY WITH 2015 IBC SECTION 1507.4.• ROOF DRAINAGE PER 2015 IPC SECTION 1106:SIZE OF GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS, AND SCUPPERS PER BUILDER'S SPECIFICATION, SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 1106 BASED ON THE RAINFALL RATE AND CALCULATED AREA BEING DRAINED.WHERE APPLICABLE, SECONDARY DRAINS OR SCUPPERS SHALL BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 1108.• SCUPPERS & DOWNSPOUTS ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED FOR LOCATION BY BUILDER. DOWNSPOUTS TO HAVE ADJUSTABLE EXTENDERS TO CARRY WATER MIN. 5'-0" AWAY FROM BUILDING OR AS RECOMMENDED BY SOILS REPORT, OR, WHERE APPLICABLE, CONNECT DIRECTLY TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS AND LOCATIONS.• DRAFTSTOPPING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ATTICS AND CONCEALED ROOF SPACES PER 2015 IBC SECTION 718.4.2. INSTALL IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN PLAN; IN LINE WITH DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION WALLS, CORRIDORS, AND SUBDIVIDING THE ATTIC SPACE INTO AREAS NOT EXCEEDING 3,000 SQUARE FEET OR ABOVE EVERY TWO DWELLING UNITS, WHICHEVER IS SMALLER. OPENINGS IN DRAFTSTOPS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SELF-CLOSING DOORS PER CODE.1a2a3a4a5a6aAB35(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2*$5$*($522)3/$1$CWDA1/4" = 1'-0"2GARAGE A - ROOF PLAN06.09.2021ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 88 AB1b2b3b4b5b6b3 1/2"5'-3 1/2"4'-11 1/2"3 1/2"5'-0 1/2"5'-0 1/2"3 1/2"5'-0 1/2"5'-0 1/2"3 1/2"5'-0 1/2"5'-0 1/2"3 1/2"6'-3 1/2"8'-6 1/2"10'-6 1/2"10'-4 1/2"10'-4 1/2"10'-4 1/2"15'-1 1/2"56'-9 1/2"ACCESS AISLE5'-0"PARKING STALL8'-0"31'-3 1/2"25'-6"AB1b2b3b4b5b6b35(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2*$5$*(%3/$16$CWDA1/4" = 1'-0"1GARAGE B - 1ST LEVEL1/4" = 1'-0"2GARAGE B - SLAB PLAN06.09.2021ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 89 522)3/$1127(6• REFER TO GENERAL NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NOT SHOWN OR NOTED ON PLANS.• ALL OVERHANGS ARE MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM FACE OF FRAME TO END OF TRUSS/RAFTER, RE: DETAILS.ALL SOFFITS ARE TO BE FLAT, U.N.O.• ALL TRUSSES TO BE FABRICATED AND DESIGNED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A COLORADO LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.• ALL OVERFRAMING TO BEAR DIRECTLY ON TRUSSES OR OVER SOLID, IMMEDIATE BLOCKING BETWEEN TRUSSES.PROVIDE CUTOUTS IN AREAS OF OVERFRAMING TO CONNECT ROOF AREAS.• PROVIDE ROOF VENTS AND / OR SOFFIT VENTS TO PROVIDE ATTIC VENTILATION AS REQUIRED PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1203. RE: ROOF VENTING NOTES AND CALCULATIONS.• WATERPROOFING OF OPENINGS AT THE ROOF, AROUND VENT PIPES, AND AT EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE MADE WATER TIGHT PER 2015 IPC SECTION 305.5.• THE ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN PENETRATIONS OF PIPES AND SIMILAR AND ALL OPENINGS IN A BUILDING ENVELOPE WALL, FLOOR, OR CEILING ASSEMBLY SHALL BE SEALED PER 2015 IPC SECTION 315. WHERE APPLICABLE, PENETRATIONS IN FIRE-RATED ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2015 IBC SECTION 714.• PIPES AND VENTS SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT MATERIALS.2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE• ROOF ASSEMBLIES PER 2015 IBC CHAPTER 1501:ROOF ASSEMBLIES SHALL PROVIDE A WEATHER RESISTANT ROOF SYSTEM AND SHALL INCLUDE WEATHER PROTECTION PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1503 AND ROOF COVERINGS PER SECTION 1507.RE: FLASHING DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.• CRICKETS AND SADDLES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE REQUIRED LOCATIONS PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1503.6. CRICKET OR SADDLE COVERINGS SHALL BE SHEET METAL OR OF THE SAME MATERIAL AS THE ROOF COVERING. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE UNDERLAYMENT AS APPLICABLE TO THE CRICKET OR SADDLE SLOPE.• LOW SLOPE ROOFS -ASPHALT SHINGLES:ASPHALT SHINGLES SHALL ONLY BE USED ON ROOF SLOPES OF 2:12 OR GREATER.DOUBLE UNDERLAYMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ROOF SLOPES FROM 2:12 TO LESS THAN 4:12, PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1507.2.8.• AN ICE BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EAVES, EXTENDING FROM THE LOWEST EDGE TO A POINT AT LEAST 24 INCHES INSIDE THE EXTERIOR WALL PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1507.2.8.2 OR AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL AMENDMENTS.• METAL ROOF PANELS:THE INSTALLATION, ATTACHMENT, AND UNDERLAYMENT REQUIREMENTS OF METAL ROOF PANELS SHALL COMPLY WITH 2015 IBC SECTION 1507.4.• ROOF DRAINAGE PER 2015 IPC SECTION 1106:SIZE OF GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS, AND SCUPPERS PER BUILDER'S SPECIFICATION, SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 1106 BASED ON THE RAINFALL RATE AND CALCULATED AREA BEING DRAINED.WHERE APPLICABLE, SECONDARY DRAINS OR SCUPPERS SHALL BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 1108.• SCUPPERS & DOWNSPOUTS ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED FOR LOCATION BY BUILDER. DOWNSPOUTS TO HAVE ADJUSTABLE EXTENDERS TO CARRY WATER MIN. 5'-0" AWAY FROM BUILDING OR AS RECOMMENDED BY SOILS REPORT, OR, WHERE APPLICABLE, CONNECT DIRECTLY TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS AND LOCATIONS.• DRAFTSTOPPING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ATTICS AND CONCEALED ROOF SPACES PER 2015 IBC SECTION 718.4.2. INSTALL IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN PLAN; IN LINE WITH DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION WALLS, CORRIDORS, AND SUBDIVIDING THE ATTIC SPACE INTO AREAS NOT EXCEEDING 3,000 SQUARE FEET OR ABOVE EVERY TWO DWELLING UNITS, WHICHEVER IS SMALLER. OPENINGS IN DRAFTSTOPS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SELF-CLOSING DOORS PER CODE.1b2b3b4b5b6b35(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2*$5$*(%522)3/$1$CWDA1/4" = 1'-0"1GARAGE B - ROOF PLAN06.09.2021ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 90 AB1c2c3c4c5c6c17'-10"10'-4 1/2"10'-4 1/2"10'-4 1/2"10'-10"59'-9 1/2"END UNIT9'-11 1/4" CLR. (FACE OF CONC.)28'-6"31'-3 1/2"59'-9 1/2"3 1/2"11'-3 3/8"6'-3 1/8"3 1/2"5'-0 1/2"5'-0 1/2"3 1/2"5'-0 1/2"5'-0 1/2"3 1/2"5'-0 1/2"5'-0 1/2"3 1/2"5'-1 1/2"5'-1 1/2"3 1/2"ACCESS AISLE8'-0"VAN PARKING STALL8'-0"AB1c2c3c4c5c6c35(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2*$5$*(&3/$16$CWDA1/4" = 1'-0"1FIRST FLOOR1/4" = 1'-0"2SLAB PLAN06.09.2021ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 91 522)3/$1127(6• REFER TO GENERAL NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NOT SHOWN OR NOTED ON PLANS.• ALL OVERHANGS ARE MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM FACE OF FRAME TO END OF TRUSS/RAFTER, RE: DETAILS.ALL SOFFITS ARE TO BE FLAT, U.N.O.• ALL TRUSSES TO BE FABRICATED AND DESIGNED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A COLORADO LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.• ALL OVERFRAMING TO BEAR DIRECTLY ON TRUSSES OR OVER SOLID, IMMEDIATE BLOCKING BETWEEN TRUSSES.PROVIDE CUTOUTS IN AREAS OF OVERFRAMING TO CONNECT ROOF AREAS.• PROVIDE ROOF VENTS AND / OR SOFFIT VENTS TO PROVIDE ATTIC VENTILATION AS REQUIRED PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1203. RE: ROOF VENTING NOTES AND CALCULATIONS.• WATERPROOFING OF OPENINGS AT THE ROOF, AROUND VENT PIPES, AND AT EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE MADE WATER TIGHT PER 2015 IPC SECTION 305.5.• THE ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN PENETRATIONS OF PIPES AND SIMILAR AND ALL OPENINGS IN A BUILDING ENVELOPE WALL, FLOOR, OR CEILING ASSEMBLY SHALL BE SEALED PER 2015 IPC SECTION 315. WHERE APPLICABLE, PENETRATIONS IN FIRE-RATED ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2015 IBC SECTION 714.• PIPES AND VENTS SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT MATERIALS.2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE• ROOF ASSEMBLIES PER 2015 IBC CHAPTER 1501:ROOF ASSEMBLIES SHALL PROVIDE A WEATHER RESISTANT ROOF SYSTEM AND SHALL INCLUDE WEATHER PROTECTION PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1503 AND ROOF COVERINGS PER SECTION 1507.RE: FLASHING DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.• CRICKETS AND SADDLES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE REQUIRED LOCATIONS PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1503.6. CRICKET OR SADDLE COVERINGS SHALL BE SHEET METAL OR OF THE SAME MATERIAL AS THE ROOF COVERING. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE UNDERLAYMENT AS APPLICABLE TO THE CRICKET OR SADDLE SLOPE.• LOW SLOPE ROOFS -ASPHALT SHINGLES:ASPHALT SHINGLES SHALL ONLY BE USED ON ROOF SLOPES OF 2:12 OR GREATER.DOUBLE UNDERLAYMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ROOF SLOPES FROM 2:12 TO LESS THAN 4:12, PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1507.2.8.• AN ICE BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EAVES, EXTENDING FROM THE LOWEST EDGE TO A POINT AT LEAST 24 INCHES INSIDE THE EXTERIOR WALL PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1507.2.8.2 OR AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL AMENDMENTS.• METAL ROOF PANELS:THE INSTALLATION, ATTACHMENT, AND UNDERLAYMENT REQUIREMENTS OF METAL ROOF PANELS SHALL COMPLY WITH 2015 IBC SECTION 1507.4.• ROOF DRAINAGE PER 2015 IPC SECTION 1106:SIZE OF GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS, AND SCUPPERS PER BUILDER'S SPECIFICATION, SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 1106 BASED ON THE RAINFALL RATE AND CALCULATED AREA BEING DRAINED.WHERE APPLICABLE, SECONDARY DRAINS OR SCUPPERS SHALL BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 1108.• SCUPPERS & DOWNSPOUTS ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED FOR LOCATION BY BUILDER. DOWNSPOUTS TO HAVE ADJUSTABLE EXTENDERS TO CARRY WATER MIN. 5'-0" AWAY FROM BUILDING OR AS RECOMMENDED BY SOILS REPORT, OR, WHERE APPLICABLE, CONNECT DIRECTLY TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS AND LOCATIONS.• DRAFTSTOPPING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ATTICS AND CONCEALED ROOF SPACES PER 2015 IBC SECTION 718.4.2. INSTALL IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN PLAN; IN LINE WITH DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION WALLS, CORRIDORS, AND SUBDIVIDING THE ATTIC SPACE INTO AREAS NOT EXCEEDING 3,000 SQUARE FEET OR ABOVE EVERY TWO DWELLING UNITS, WHICHEVER IS SMALLER. OPENINGS IN DRAFTSTOPS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SELF-CLOSING DOORS PER CODE.AB1c2c3c4c5c6c35(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2*$5$*(&522)3/$1$CWDA1/4" = 1'-0"1ROOF PLAN06.09.2021ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 92 AB1d3d4d5d6d10'-10"10'-4 1/2"10'-4 1/2"10'-10"3 1/2"5'-1 1/2"5'-5"3 1/2"5'-0 1/2"5'-0 1/2"3 1/2"5'-0 1/2"5'-0 1/2"3 1/2"5'-1 1/2"5'-1 1/2"3 1/2"21'-8"2'-0"21'-6"20'-11"42'-5"2'-0"AB1d3d4d5d6d35(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2*$5$*('3/$16$CheckerAuthor1/4" = 1'-0"1FIRST FLOOR1/4" = 1'-0"2SLAB PLAN06.09.2021ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 93 AB1d3d4d5d6d522)3/$1127(6• REFER TO GENERAL NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NOT SHOWN OR NOTED ON PLANS.• ALL OVERHANGS ARE MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM FACE OF FRAME TO END OF TRUSS/RAFTER, RE: DETAILS.ALL SOFFITS ARE TO BE FLAT, U.N.O.• ALL TRUSSES TO BE FABRICATED AND DESIGNED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A COLORADO LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.• ALL OVERFRAMING TO BEAR DIRECTLY ON TRUSSES OR OVER SOLID, IMMEDIATE BLOCKING BETWEEN TRUSSES.PROVIDE CUTOUTS IN AREAS OF OVERFRAMING TO CONNECT ROOF AREAS.• PROVIDE ROOF VENTS AND / OR SOFFIT VENTS TO PROVIDE ATTIC VENTILATION AS REQUIRED PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1203. RE: ROOF VENTING NOTES AND CALCULATIONS.• WATERPROOFING OF OPENINGS AT THE ROOF, AROUND VENT PIPES, AND AT EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE MADE WATER TIGHT PER 2015 IPC SECTION 305.5.• THE ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN PENETRATIONS OF PIPES AND SIMILAR AND ALL OPENINGS IN A BUILDING ENVELOPE WALL, FLOOR, OR CEILING ASSEMBLY SHALL BE SEALED PER 2015 IPC SECTION 315. WHERE APPLICABLE, PENETRATIONS IN FIRE-RATED ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2015 IBC SECTION 714.• PIPES AND VENTS SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT MATERIALS.2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE• ROOF ASSEMBLIES PER 2015 IBC CHAPTER 1501:ROOF ASSEMBLIES SHALL PROVIDE A WEATHER RESISTANT ROOF SYSTEM AND SHALL INCLUDE WEATHER PROTECTION PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1503 AND ROOF COVERINGS PER SECTION 1507.RE: FLASHING DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.• CRICKETS AND SADDLES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE REQUIRED LOCATIONS PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1503.6. CRICKET OR SADDLE COVERINGS SHALL BE SHEET METAL OR OF THE SAME MATERIAL AS THE ROOF COVERING. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE UNDERLAYMENT AS APPLICABLE TO THE CRICKET OR SADDLE SLOPE.• LOW SLOPE ROOFS -ASPHALT SHINGLES:ASPHALT SHINGLES SHALL ONLY BE USED ON ROOF SLOPES OF 2:12 OR GREATER.DOUBLE UNDERLAYMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ROOF SLOPES FROM 2:12 TO LESS THAN 4:12, PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1507.2.8.• AN ICE BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EAVES, EXTENDING FROM THE LOWEST EDGE TO A POINT AT LEAST 24 INCHES INSIDE THE EXTERIOR WALL PER 2015 IBC SECTION 1507.2.8.2 OR AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL AMENDMENTS.• METAL ROOF PANELS:THE INSTALLATION, ATTACHMENT, AND UNDERLAYMENT REQUIREMENTS OF METAL ROOF PANELS SHALL COMPLY WITH 2015 IBC SECTION 1507.4.• ROOF DRAINAGE PER 2015 IPC SECTION 1106:SIZE OF GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS, AND SCUPPERS PER BUILDER'S SPECIFICATION, SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 1106 BASED ON THE RAINFALL RATE AND CALCULATED AREA BEING DRAINED.WHERE APPLICABLE, SECONDARY DRAINS OR SCUPPERS SHALL BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 1108.• SCUPPERS & DOWNSPOUTS ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED FOR LOCATION BY BUILDER. DOWNSPOUTS TO HAVE ADJUSTABLE EXTENDERS TO CARRY WATER MIN. 5'-0" AWAY FROM BUILDING OR AS RECOMMENDED BY SOILS REPORT, OR, WHERE APPLICABLE, CONNECT DIRECTLY TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS AND LOCATIONS.• DRAFTSTOPPING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ATTICS AND CONCEALED ROOF SPACES PER 2015 IBC SECTION 718.4.2. INSTALL IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN PLAN; IN LINE WITH DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION WALLS, CORRIDORS, AND SUBDIVIDING THE ATTIC SPACE INTO AREAS NOT EXCEEDING 3,000 SQUARE FEET OR ABOVE EVERY TWO DWELLING UNITS, WHICHEVER IS SMALLER. OPENINGS IN DRAFTSTOPS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SELF-CLOSING DOORS PER CODE.35(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2*$5$*('522)3/$1$CheckerAuthor1/4" = 1'-0"1GARAGE A - ROOF PLAN06.09.2021ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 94 1ST LEVEL100'-0"2ND LEVEL3RD LEVEL212UTILITY METERS, RE: CIVILOVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT40'-0"ADHERED MASONRY, TYP.VINYL WINDOWS, TYP.1X4 STUCCO TRIM -TRIM 01, TYP.METAL TRELLIS AND COLUMNS -TRIM 01VERTICAL SIDING -BODY 03, TYP.5/4 HARDBOARD TRIM -TRIM 01, TYP.VINYL WINDOW, TYP.METAL PANEL -ACCENT 01, TYP.METAL PARAPET CAP -TRIM 01, TYP.STUCCO -ACCENT 02LAP SIDING -BODY 01, TYP.METAL RAILING -TRIM 01, TYP.COMPOSITE WOOD SCREENSTANDING SEAM METAL ROOFPAINTED WOOD CORBELS -TRIM 01BODY 01BODY 02BODY 03ACCENT 01ACCENT 02TRIM 01COLOR (MANUF.)COMMENTSSTONE(;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/6&+('8/(NORTH HAMPTON BEIGE (BM AC-38)SWEATSHIRT GRAY (BM 2126-40)AGED COPPER (CMG METALS)CASCADE WHITE (BM 2127-70)CORONADO PROLEDGE -HURONCOMPOSITE WOODTREX -SPICED RUM* ALL MATERIALS AND COLORS SHOWN ARE PROPOSED BASIS OF DESIGN, OR EQUIVALENT, SUBJECT TO CITY APPROVAL.NIGHT HORIZON (BM 2134-10)COACHMAN'S CAPE (BM CSP-90)ARCHITECTURAL GRADE METAL PANELLAP SIDINGLAP SIDINGVERTICAL SIDINGSTUCCO(;7(5,25%8,/',1*/,*+76LIGHTS, ONCE SPECIFIED, WILL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS. ALL BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTING SHALL BE FULLY SHIELDED, DOWN DIRECTIONAL, AND DARK SKY COMPLIANT.1ST LEVEL100'-0"2ND LEVEL3RD LEVEL212LAP SIDING -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY, TYP.VINYL WINDOW, TYP.5/4 HARDBOARD TRIM -TRIM 01, TYP.1X4 STUCCO TRIM -TRIM 01, TYP.UTILITY METERS, RE: CIVILMETAL PANEL -ACCENT 01, TYP.COMPOSITE WOOD SCREENMETAL RAILING -TRIM 01, TYP.STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFVERTICAL SIDING -BODY 03, TYP.PAINTED WOOD CORBELS -TRIM 012X12 FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 01, TYP.35(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2%8,/',1*$(/(9$7,216$06.09.2021CWDA1/8" = 1'-0"1EAST ELEVATION3NORTH - EAST BUILDING PERSPECTIVE1/8" = 1'-0"2NORTH ELEVATIONITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 95 1ST LEVEL100'-0"2ND LEVEL3RD LEVELOVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT40'-0"UTILITY METERS, RE: CIVIL2X12 FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 01, TYP.LAP SIDING -BODY 02METAL PANEL -ACCENT 01STUCCO -ACCENT 02METAL PARAPET CAP -TRIM 01VERTICAL SIDING -BODY 03, TYP.5/4 HARDBOARD TRIM -TRIM 01, TYP.PAINTED STEEL AWNING -TRIM 01, TYP.STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFPAINTED WOOD CORBELS -TRIM 01LAP SIDING -BODY 01, TYP.VINYL WINDOW, TYP.METAL RAILING -TRIM 01, TYP.COMPOSITE WOOD SCREENADHERED MASONRY, TYP.1X4 STUCCO TRIM -TRIM 01, TYP.BODY 01BODY 02BODY 03ACCENT 01ACCENT 02TRIM 01COLOR (MANUF.)COMMENTSSTONE(;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/6&+('8/(NORTH HAMPTON BEIGE (BM AC-38)SWEATSHIRT GRAY (BM 2126-40)AGED COPPER (CMG METALS)CASCADE WHITE (BM 2127-70)CORONADO PROLEDGE -HURONCOMPOSITE WOODTREX -SPICED RUM* ALL MATERIALS AND COLORS SHOWN ARE PROPOSED BASIS OF DESIGN, OR EQUIVALENT, SUBJECT TO CITY APPROVAL.NIGHT HORIZON (BM 2134-10)COACHMAN'S CAPE (BM CSP-90)ARCHITECTURAL GRADE METAL PANELLAP SIDINGLAP SIDINGVERTICAL SIDINGSTUCCO(;7(5,25%8,/',1*/,*+76LIGHTS, ONCE SPECIFIED, WILL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS. ALL BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTING SHALL BE FULLY SHIELDED, DOWN DIRECTIONAL, AND DARK SKY COMPLIANT.1ST LEVEL100'-0"2ND LEVEL3RD LEVELLAP SIDING -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY, TYP.VINYL WINDOW, TYP.METAL PARAPET CAP -TRIM 015/4 HARDBOARD TRIM -TRIM 01VERTICAL SIDING -BODY 03 1X4 STUCCO TRIM -TRIM 01, TYP.METAL PANEL -ACCENT 01PAINTED WOOD CORBELS -TRIM 01, TYP. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFMETAL TRELLIS AND COLUMNS -TRIM 0135(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2%8,/',1*$(/(9$7,216$06.09.2021CWDA1/8" = 1'-0"1WEST ELEVATION3SOUTH - WEST BUILDING PERSPECTIVE1/8" = 1'-0"4SOUTH ELEVATIONITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 96 1ST LEVEL2ND LEVEL3RD LEVELMETAL PANEL -ACCENT 01METAL TRELLIS -TRIM 012X10 FASCIA BOARD AND GUTTER -TRIM 01, TYP.COMPOSITE WOOD SCREEN -TRIM 01METAL RAILING -TRIM 01, TYP.STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF STUCCO -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY, TYP.1X4 STUCCO TRIM -TRIM 01, TYP.VINYL WINDOW, TYP.VERTICAL SIDING -BODY 035/4 HARDBOARD TRIM -TRIM 01BODY 01BODY 02BODY 03ACCENT 01TRIM 01COLOR (MANUF.)COMMENTSSTONE(;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/6&+('8/(KANGAROO (BM AF-145)SWEATSHIRT GRAY (BM 2126-40)ROYAL BLUE (CMG METALS)CORONADO: SIERRA LEDGE -CATHEDRAL GREY* ALL MATERIALS AND COLORS SHOWN ARE PROPOSED BASIS OF DESIGN, OR EQUIVALENT, SUBJECT TO CITY APPROVAL.NIGHT HORIZON (BM 2134-10)COACHMAN'S CAPE (BM CSP-90)ARCHITECTURAL GRADE METAL PANELLAP SIDINGVERTICAL SIDINGSTUCCO(;7(5,25%8,/',1*/,*+76LIGHTS, ONCE SPECIFIED, WILL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS. ALL BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTING SHALL BE FULLY SHIELDED, DOWN DIRECTIONAL, AND DARK SKY COMPLIANT.1ST LEVEL2ND LEVEL3RD LEVELOVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT36'-3 1/4"METAL TRELLIS -TRIM 01COMPOSITE WOOD SCREEN -TRIM 01METAL PARAPET CAP -TRIM 01, TYP.LAP SIDING -BODY 01, TYP.5/4 HARDBOARD TRIM -TRIM 01, TYP.2X10 FASCIA BOARD AND GUTTER -TRIM 01, TYP.METAL PANEL -ACCENT 01STUCCO -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY, TYP.1X4 STUCCO TRIM -TRIM 01, TYP.VINYL WINDOW, TYP.METAL RAILING -TRIM 01, TYP.VERTICAL SIDING -BODY 0335(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2%8,/',1*$(/(9$7,216$06.09.2021CWDA1/8" = 1'-0"1NORTH ELEVATION2NORTH - EAST BUILDING PERSPECTIVE1/8" = 1'-0"4EAST ELEVATIONITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 97 1ST LEVEL2ND LEVEL3RD LEVELMETAL PANEL -ACCENT 01STUCCO -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY, TYP.LAP SIDING -BODY 01, TYP. UTILITY METERS, RE: CIVILADHERED MASONRY, TYP.VINYL WINDOW, TYP.2X10 FASCIA BOARD AND GUTTER -TRIM 01, TYP.VERTICAL SIDING -BODY 035/4 HARDBOARD TRIM -TRIM 01, TYP.BODY 01BODY 02BODY 03ACCENT 01TRIM 01COLOR (MANUF.)COMMENTSSTONE(;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/6&+('8/(KANGAROO (BM AF-145)SWEATSHIRT GRAY (BM 2126-40)ROYAL BLUE (CMG METALS)CORONADO: SIERRA LEDGE -CATHEDRAL GREY* ALL MATERIALS AND COLORS SHOWN ARE PROPOSED BASIS OF DESIGN, OR EQUIVALENT, SUBJECT TO CITY APPROVAL.NIGHT HORIZON (BM 2134-10)COACHMAN'S CAPE (BM CSP-90)ARCHITECTURAL GRADE METAL PANELLAP SIDINGVERTICAL SIDINGSTUCCO(;7(5,25%8,/',1*/,*+76LIGHTS, ONCE SPECIFIED, WILL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS. ALL BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTING SHALL BE FULLY SHIELDED, DOWN DIRECTIONAL, AND DARK SKY COMPLIANT.1ST LEVEL2ND LEVEL3RD LEVELOVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT36'-3 1/4"ADHERED MASONRY, TYP.1X4 STUCCO TRIM -TRIM 01, TYP.METAL RAILING -TRIM 01, TYP.VINYL WINDOW, TYP.ADHERED MASONRY, TYP. STUCCO -BODY 02LAP SIDING -BODY 01METAL PARAPET CAP -TRIM 01, TYP.2X10 FASCIA BOARD AND GUTTER -TRIM 01, TYP.VERTICAL SIDING -BODY 035/4 HARDBOARD TRIM -TRIM 01, TYP.PAINTED STEEL AWNING -TRIM 012X4 STUCCO TRIM -TRIM 01METAL PANEL -ACCENT 0135(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2%8,/',1*$(/(9$7,216$06.09.2021CWDA1/8" = 1'-0"1SOUTH ELEVATION2SOUTH - WEST - BUILDING PERSPECTIVE1/8" = 1'-0"3WEST ELEVATIONITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 98 1ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"LAP SIDING -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY -STONE, TYP.FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 01OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT15'-2 1/2"COMPOSITION ROOF SHINGLES2:128'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR -TRIM 01PAINTED WOOD CORBELS -TRIM 01, TYP.1ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"COMPOSITION ROOF SHINGLESLAP SIDING -BODY 03ADHERED MASONRY -STONE, TYP.FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 012:12PAINTED WOOD CORBELS -TRIM 01, TYP.COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING , TYP.15'-2 1/2"1ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"LAP SIDING -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY -STONE, TYP.FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 0121221215'-2 1/2"1ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"LAP SIDING -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY -STONE, TYP.FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 0121221215'-2 1/2"BODY 01BODY 02BODY 03ACCENT 01ACCENT 02TRIM 01COLOR (MANUF.)COMMENTSSTONE(;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/6&+('8/(COMPOSITE WOODVERSATILE GRAY (SW 6072)FOLKSTONE (SW 6005)LET IT RAIN (SW 9152)ROYAL BLUE (CMG METALS)ICICLE (SW 6238)CORONADO PROLEDGE -OAKBROOKTREX -COASTAL BLUFF* ALL MATERIALS AND COLORS SHOWN ARE PROPOSED BASIS OF DESIGN, OR EQUIVALENT, SUBJECT TO CITY APPROVAL.URBANE BRONZE (SW 7048)METAL WALL PANELLAP SIDINGLAP SIDINGVERTICAL SIDINGSTUCCO35(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2*$5$*($(/(9$7,216$CWDA1/4" = 1'-0"4GARAGE A - FRONT ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"1GARAGE A - REAR ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"2GARAGE A - LEFT SIDE ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"3GARAGE A - RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION06.09.2021ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 99 1ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"LAP SIDING -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY -STONE, TYP.FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 01COMPOSITION ROOF SHINGLES8'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR -TRIM 01PAINTED WOOD CORBELS -TRIM 01, TYP.2:1215'-1 1/2"1ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"LAP SIDING -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY -STONE, TYP.FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 0115'-1 1/2"2122121ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"LAP SIDING -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY -STONE, TYP.FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 0115'-1 1/4"2122121ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"LAP SIDING -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY -STONE, TYP.FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 01COMPOSITION ROOF SHINGLESPAINTED WOOD CORBELS -TRIM 01, TYP.COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING , TYP.14'-10 1/4"2:12BODY 01BODY 02BODY 03ACCENT 01ACCENT 02TRIM 01COLOR (MANUF.)COMMENTSSTONE(;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/6&+('8/(COMPOSITE WOODVERSATILE GRAY (SW 6072)FOLKSTONE (SW 6005)LET IT RAIN (SW 9152)ROYAL BLUE (CMG METALS)ICICLE (SW 6238)CORONADO PROLEDGE -OAKBROOKTREX -COASTAL BLUFF* ALL MATERIALS AND COLORS SHOWN ARE PROPOSED BASIS OF DESIGN, OR EQUIVALENT, SUBJECT TO CITY APPROVAL.URBANE BRONZE (SW 7048)METAL WALL PANELLAP SIDINGLAP SIDINGVERTICAL SIDINGSTUCCO35(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2*$5$*(%(/(9$7,216$CWDA1/4" = 1'-0"4GARAGE B - FRONT ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"3GARAGE B RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"2GARAGE B LEFT SIDE ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"1GARAGE B REAR ELEVATION06.09.2021ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 100 1ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"LAP SIDING -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRSTONE, TYP.FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 01OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT15'-1 1/4"2:12PAINTED WOOD CORBELS -TRIM 01, TYP.8'-0" OVERHEAD DOOR -TRIM 011ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"LAP SIDING -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY -STONE, TYP.FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 0121221215'-1 1/2"1ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"LAP SIDING -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY -STONE, TYP.FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 0121221215'-1 1/2"1ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"LAP SIDING -BODY 02ADHERED MASONRY -STONE, TYP.FASCIA BOARD -TRIM 012:12COMPOSITION ROOF SHINGLESPAINTED WOOD CORBELS -TRIM 01, TYP.COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING , TYP.15'-1 1/2"BODY 01BODY 02BODY 03ACCENT 01ACCENT 02TRIM 01COLOR (MANUF.)COMMENTSSTONE(;7(5,25),1,6+0$7(5,$/6&+('8/(COMPOSITE WOODVERSATILE GRAY (SW 6072)FOLKSTONE (SW 6005)LET IT RAIN (SW 9152)ROYAL BLUE (CMG METALS)ICICLE (SW 6238)CORONADO PROLEDGE -OAKBROOKTREX -COASTAL BLUFF* ALL MATERIALS AND COLORS SHOWN ARE PROPOSED BASIS OF DESIGN, OR EQUIVALENT, SUBJECT TO CITY APPROVAL.URBANE BRONZE (SW 7048)METAL WALL PANELLAP SIDINGLAP SIDINGVERTICAL SIDINGSTUCCO35(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2*$5$*(&(/(9$7,216$CWDA1/4" = 1'-0"4GARAGE C - FRONT ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"3GARAGE C - RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"2GARAGE C - LEFT SIDE ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"1GARAGE C - REAR ELEVATION06.09.2021ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 101 1ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"15'-2 1/2"2:121ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"15'-1 1/4"2122121ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"15'-2 1/2"2:127'-0"5'-8"9'-0 1/2"4'-5 1/2"12'-0"4'-5 1/2"1ST LEVEL100'-0"T.O. CURB100'-6"15'-1 1/4"21221235(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21GallowayUS.com5265 Ronald Reagan Blvd., Suite 210Johnstown, CO 80534970.800.3300'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\,QLW,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH*1.STAMP7+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+7F:\Acad-cga\Goodwin Knight\0974 - SKYWAY\CONSULTANTS\CIVIL\PDP\x-GNK08_TBLK 24x36.dwg - Dana Ashoori - 11/27/20180$56/$1',1* 352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&2*$5$*('(/(9$7,216$CWDA1/4" = 1'-0"4GARAGE D - FRONT ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"2GARAGE D - LEFT SIDE ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"1GARAGE D - REAR ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"3GARAGE D - RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION06.09.2021ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 3Packet pg. 102 UTILITY PLANS FOR:*RRGZLQ.QLJKW0DUN-RKQVRQ5/$([SORUHU'U6XLWH&RORUDGR6SULQJV&RORUDGRDEVELOPER / APPLICANTGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER(DUWK(QJLQHHULQJ&RQVXOWDQWV//&*UHHQILOHG'ULYH:LQGVRU&RORUDGRPROJECT TEAM:7KHVHSODQVKDYHEHHQUHYLHZHGE\WKH&LW\RI)RUW&ROOLQVIRUFRQFHSWRQO\7KHUHYLHZGRHVQRWLPSO\UHVSRQVLELOLW\E\WKHUHYLHZLQJGHSDUWPHQWWKH&LW\RI)RUW&ROOLQV(QJLQHHURUWKH&LW\RI)RUW&ROOLQVIRUDFFXUDF\DQGFRUUHFWQHVVRIWKHFDOFXODWLRQV)XUWKHUPRUHWKHUHYLHZGRHVQRWLPSO\WKDWTXDQWLWLHVRILWHPVRQWKHSODQVDUHWKHILQDOTXDQWLWLHVUHTXLUHG7KHUHYLHZVKDOOQRWEHFRQVWUXHGIRUDQ\UHDVRQDVDFFHSWDQFHRIILQDQFLDOUHVSRQVLELOLW\E\WKH&LW\RI)RUW&ROOLQVIRUDGGLWLRQDOTXDQWLWLHVRILWHPVVKRZQWKDWPD\EHUHTXLUHGGXULQJWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQSKDVHDISCLAIMER STATEMENT:,KHUHE\DIILUPWKDWWKHVHILQDOFRQVWUXFWLRQSODQVZHUHSUHSDUHGXQGHUP\GLUHFWVXSHUYLVLRQLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKDOODSSOLFDEOH&LW\RI)RUW&ROOLQVDQG6WDWHRI&RORUDGRVWDQGDUGVDQGVWDWXWHVUHVSHFWLYHO\DQGWKDW,DPIXOO\UHVSRQVLEOHIRUWKHDFFXUDF\RIDOOGHVLJQUHYLVLRQVDQGUHFRUGFRQGLWLRQVWKDW,KDYHQRWHGRQWKHVHSODQVCERTIFICATION STATEMENT:*DOORZD\ &RPSDQ\6DUDK$GDPVRQ5/$6:LOORZ'ULYH6XLWH*UHHQZRRG9LOODJH&RORUDGRLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUTILITY CONTACT LIST: **DOORZD\ &RPSDQ\-DPHV(3UHORJ5RQDOG5HDJDQ%OYG6XLWH-RKQVWRZQ&RORUDGRSITE ENGINEER / SURVEYORGAS Xcel Energy Stephanie Rich (970) 225-7828ELECTRIC City of Fort Collins Light and Power Luke Unruh (970) 416-2724CABLE Xfinity Don Kapperman (970) 484-7166TELECOM. Centurylink William Johnson (970) 377-6401WATER FCLWD Sam Lowe (970) 226-3104WASTEWATER SFCSD Sam Lowe (970) 226-3104STORMWATER City of Fort Collins Utilities Wes Lamarque (970) 416-2418UTILITY COMPANY CONTACT PHONE NUMBER $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1(((535,2572&216758&7,21PROJECT BENCHMARKS:BENCHMARKSELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON CITY OF FORT COLLINS VERTICAL CONTROL NETWORKPROJECT DATUM: NAVD88BENCHMARK '2-12' IS LOCATED & DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH COLLEGE AVE. AND SKYWAY DR. ON A CONCRETE TRAFFIC SIGNAL BASE.ELEVATION: 5005.56' (NAVD 88)PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM.SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWINGEQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRI25&,7<2))257&2//,16'$780  1$9''$780 BENCHMARK '38-94' IS LOCATED & DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:AZIMUTH MARK (3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP) ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TRILBY RD. 1/2 MILE WEST OF COLLEGE AVE. AT THESOUTHWEST CORNER OF 508 WEST TRILBY RD. (GOOD SAMARITAN RETIREMENT CENTER). ALSO 5.5 FT WEST OF APOWERPOLE AND 24.5 FT SOUTH OF A WOOD FENCE.ELEVATION: 5093.76' (NAVD 88)PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM.SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWINGEQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRI25&,7<2))257&2//,16'$780  1$9''$780 6&$/(176SHEET INDEXMARS LANDINGOUT LOT A, SOUTH COLLEGE STORAGE SUBDIVISIONLOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, T. 6 N., R. 69W. OF THE 6TH P.M.CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADOJULY 2021S. COLLEGE AVEW. TRILBY RDMARS DRVICINITY MAP'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C0.0_Cover.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&COVER SHEETC0.0SITESKYWAY DRC0.0 COVER SHEETC0.1 GENERAL NOTESC1.0-C1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLANC2.0-C2.2 GRADING PLANC3.0 UTILITY PLANC3.1-C3.2 WATER DETAILSC4.0 SANITARY SEWER PLANC4.1 SANITARY SEWER DETAILSC5.0 STORM DRAIN PLANC5.1-C5.5 STORM DRAIN DETAILSC6.0 MARS DRIVE PLAN AND PROFILEC6.1 COLLEGE AVENUE SIDEWALK PLANC6.2 SIGNAGE AND STRIPING PLANC7.0-C7.1 EROSION CONTROL PLANC7.2-C7.3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILSC8.0 DRAINAGE PLANCAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\COVER SHC$OOFKDQJHVDGGHQGXPVDGGLWLRQVGHOHWLRQVDQGPRGLILFDWLRQVWRWKHVHGUDZLQJVPXVWEHDSSURYHGLQZULWLQJE\WKH)RUW&ROOLQV/RYHODQG:DWHU'LVWULFWDQGWKH6RXWK)RUW&ROOLQV6DQLWDWLRQ'LVWULFW'LVWULFW(QJLQHHU'DWH)257&2//,16/29(/$1':$7(5',675,&76287+)257&2//,166$1,7$7,21',675,&7ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 103 A. GENERAL NOTES1. All materials, workmanship, and construction of public improvements shall meet or exceed the standards and specifications set forth in the Larimer County Urban AreaStreet Standards and applicable state and federal regulations. Where there is conflict between these plans and the specifications, or any applicable standards, themost restrictive standard shall apply. All work shall be inspected and approved by the City of Fort Collins.2. All references to any published standards shall refer to the latest revision of said standard, unless specifically stated otherwise.3. These public improvement construction plans shall be valid for a period of three years from the date of approval by the City of Fort Collins Engineer. Use of these plansafter the expiration date will require a new review and approval process by the City of Fort Collins prior to commencement of any work shown in these plans.4. The engineer who has prepared these plans, by execution and/or seal hereof, does hereby affirm responsibility to the City of Fort Collins, as beneficiary of saidengineer's work, for any errors and omissions contained in these plans, and approval of these plans by the City of Fort Collins Engineer shall not relieve the engineerwho has prepared these plans of all such responsibility. Further, to the extent permitted by law, the engineer hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City ofFort Collins, and its officers and employees, from and against all liabilities, claims, and demands which may arise from any errors and omissions contained in theseplans.5. All storm sewer construction, as well as power and other "dry" utility installations, shall conform to the City of Fort Collins standards and specifications current at thedate of approval of the plans by the City of Fort Collins Engineer.6. The type, size, location and number of all known underground utilities are approximate when shown on the drawings. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer toverify the existence and location of all underground utilities along the route of the work before commencing new construction. The Developer shall be responsible forunknown underground utilities.7. The Developer shall contact the Utility Notification Center of Colorado (UNCC) at 1-800-922-1987, at least 2 working days prior to beginning excavation or grading, tohave all registered utility locations marked. Other unregistered utility entities (i.e. ditch / irrigation company) are to be located by contacting the respectiverepresentative. Utility service laterals are also to be located prior to beginning excavation or grading. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to relocate allexisting utilities that conflict with the proposed improvements shown on these plans.8. The Developer shall be responsible for protecting all utilities during construction and for coordinating with the appropriate utility company for any utility crossingsrequired.9. If a conflict exists between existing and proposed utilities and/or a design modification is required, the Developer shall coordinate with the engineer to modify thedesign. Design modification(s) must be approved by the City of Fort Collins prior to beginning construction.10. The Developer shall coordinate and cooperate with the City of Fort Collins, and all utility companies involved, to assure that the work is accomplished in a timelyfashion and with a minimum disruption of service. The Developer shall be responsible for contacting, in advance, all parties affected by any disruption of any utilityservice as well as the utility companies.11. No work may commence within any public storm water, sanitary sewer or potable water system until the Developer notifies the utility provider. Notification shall be aminimum of 2 working days prior to commencement of any work. At the discretion of the water utility provider, a pre-construction meeting may be required prior tocommencement of any work.12. The Developer shall sequence installation of utilities in such a manner as to minimize potential utility conflicts. In general, storm sewer and sanitary sewer should beconstructed prior to installation of the water lines and dry utilities.13. The minimum cover over water lines is 5.0 feet and the maximum cover is 6.0 feet unless otherwise noted in the plans and approved by the Water Utility.14. A State Construction Dewatering Wastewater Discharge Permit is required if dewatering is required in order to install utilities or if water is discharged into a stormsewer, channel, irrigation ditch or any waters of the United States.15. The Developer shall comply with all terms and conditions of the Colorado Permit for Storm Water Discharge (Contact Colorado Department of Health, Water QualityControl Division, (303) 692-3590, the Storm Water Management Plan, and the Erosion Control Plan.16. The City of Fort Collins shall not be responsible for the maintenance of storm drainage facilities located on private property. Maintenance of onsite drainage facilitiesshall be the responsibility of the property owner(s).17. Prior to final inspection and acceptance by the City of Fort Collins, certification of the drainage facilities, by a registered engineer, must be submitted to and approvedby the Stormwater Utility Department. Certification shall be submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of a certificate ofoccupancy for single family units. For commercial properties, certification shall be submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the releaseof any building permits in excess of those allowed prior to certification per the Development Agreement.18.The City of Fort Collins shall not be responsible for any damages or injuries sustained in this Development as a result of groundwater seepage, whether resulting fromgroundwater flooding, structural damage or other damage unless such damage or injuries are sustained as a result of the City of Fort Collins failure to properly maintainits water, wastewater, and/or storm drainage facilities in the development.19. All recommendations of the Final Drainage and Erosion Control Reports for Mars Landing - Utility Plan dated MONTH, DAY 20__ by Galloway and Company, Inc.,shall be followed and implemented.20. Temporary erosion control during construction shall be provided as shown on the Erosion Control Plan. All erosion control measures shall be maintained in good repairby the Developer, until such time as the entire disturbed areas is stabilized with hard surface or landscaping.21. The Developer shall be responsible for insuring that no mud or debris shall be tracked onto the existing public street system. Mud and debris must be removed within24 hours by an appropriate mechanical method (i.e. machine broom sweep, light duty front-end loader, etc.) or as approved by the the City of Fort Collins streetinspector.22. No work may commence within any improved or unimproved public Right-of-Way until a Right-of-Way Permit or Development Construction Permit is obtained, ifapplicable.23. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits for all applicable agencies prior to commencement of construction. The Developer shall notifythe the City of Fort Collins Inspector (Fort Collins - 221-6605) and the City of Fort Collins Erosion Control Inspector (Fort Collins - 221-6700) at least 2 working daysprior to the start of any earth disturbing activity, or construction on any and all public improvements. If the City of Fort Collins Engineer is not available after propernotice of construction activity has been provided, the Developer may commence work in the Engineer absence. However, the City of Fort Collins reserves the right notto accept the improvement if subsequent testing reveals an improper installation.24. The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining soils tests within the Public Right-of-Way after right of way grading and all utility trench work is complete and prior tothe placement of curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement. If the final soils/pavement design report does not correspond with the results of the original geotechnical report,the Developer shall be responsible for a re-design of the subject pavement section or, the Developer may use the City of Fort Collins' default pavement thicknesssection(s). Regardless of the option used, all final soils/pavement design reports shall be prepared by a licensed Professional Engineer. The final report shall besubmitted to the Inspector a minimum of 10 working days prior to placement of base and asphalt. Placement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, base and asphalt shall not occuruntil the City of Fort Collins Engineer approves the final report.25. The contractor shall hire a licensed engineer or land surveyor to survey the constructed elevations of the street subgrade and the gutter flowline at all intersections,inlets, and other locations requested by the the City of Fort Collins inspector. The engineer or surveyor must certify in a letter to the City of Fort Collins that theseelevations conform to the approved plans and specifications. Any deviations shall be noted in the letter and then resolved with the City of Fort Collins before installationof base course or asphalt will be allowed on the streets.26. All utility installations within or across the roadbed of new residential roads must be completed prior to the final stages of road construction. For the purposes of thesestandards, any work except c/g above the subgrade is considered final stage work. All service lines must be stubbed to the property lines and marked so as to reducethe excavation necessary for building connections.27. Portions of Larimer County are within overlay districts. The Larimer County Flood Plain Resolution should be referred to for additional criteria for roads within thesedistricts.28. All road construction in areas designated as Wild Fire Hazard Areas shall be done in accordance with the construction criteria as established in the Wild Fire HazardArea Mitigation Regulations in force at the time of final plat approval.29. Prior to the commencement of any construction, the contractor shall contact the City of Fort Collins Forester to schedule a site inspection for any tree removal requiringa permit.30. The Developer shall be responsible for all aspects of safety including, but not limited to, excavation, trenching, shoring, traffic control, and security. Refer to OSHAPublication 2226, Excavating and Trenching.31.The Developer shall submit a Construction Traffic Control Plan, in accordance with MUTCD, to the appropriate Right-of-Way authority. (The the City of Fort Collins,Larimer County, Colorado), for approval, prior to any construction activities within, or affecting, the Right-of-Way. The Developer shall be responsible for providing anyand all traffic control devices as may be required by the construction activities.32. Prior to the commencement of any construction that will affect traffic signs of any type, the contractor shall contact the City of Fort Collins Traffic OperationsDepartment, who will temporarily remove or relocate the sign at no cost to the contractor, however, if the contractor moves the traffic sign then the contractor will becharged for the labor, materials and equipment to reinstall the sign as needed.33. The Developer is responsible for all costs for the initial installation of traffic signing and striping for the Development related to the Development's local streetoperations. In addition, the Developer is responsible for all costs for traffic signing and striping related to directing traffic access to and from the Development.34. There shall be no site construction activities on Saturdays, unless specifically approved by the City of Fort Collins Engineer, and no site construction activities onSundays or holidays, unless there is prior written approval by the City of Fort Collins.35. The Developer is responsible for providing all labor and materials necessary for the completion of the intended improvements, shown on these drawings, or designatedto be provided, installed, or constructed, unless specifically noted otherwise.36. Dimensions for layout and construction are not to be scaled from any drawing. If pertinent dimensions are not shown, contact the Designer for clarification, andannotate the dimension on the as-built record drawings.37. The Developer shall have, onsite at all times, one (1) signed copy of the approved plans, one (1) copy of the appropriate standards and specifications, and a copy ofany permits and extension agreements needed for the job.38. If, during the construction process, conditions are encountered which could indicate a situation that is not identified in the plans or specifications, the Developer shallcontact the Designer and the City of Fort Collins Engineer immediately.39. The Developer shall be responsible for recording as-built information on a set of record drawings kept on the construction site, and available to the City of Fort CollinsCounty's Inspector at all times. Upon completion of the work, the contractor(s) shall submit record drawings to the City of Fort Collins Engineer.40. The Designer shall provide, in this location on the plan, the location and description of the nearest survey benchmarks (2) for the project as well as the basis ofbearings. The information shall be as follows:ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON CITY OF FORT COLLINS VERTICAL CONTROL NETWORKPROJECT DATUM: NAVD88BENCHMARK '2-12' IS LOCATED & DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH COLLEGE AVE. AND SKYWAY DR. ON A CONCRETE TRAFFIC SIGNAL BASE.ELEVATION: 5005.56' (NAVD 88)PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM.SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BEUSED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRI25&,7<2))257&2//,16'$780  1$9''$780 BENCHMARK '38-94' IS LOCATED & DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:AZIMUTH MARK (3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP) ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TRILBY RD. 1/2 MILE WEST OF COLLEGE AVE. AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 508WEST TRILBY RD. (GOOD SAMARITAN RETIREMENT CENTER). ALSO 5.5 FT WEST OF A POWERPOLE AND 24.5 FT SOUTH OF A WOOD FENCE.ELEVATION: 5093.76' (NAVD 88)PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM.SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BEUSED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRI25&,7<2))257&2//,16'$780  1$9''$780 41. All stationing is based on centerline of roadways unless otherwise noted.42. Damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as existing fences, trees, streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, landscaping, structures, andimprovements destroyed, damaged or removed due to construction of this project, shall be replaced or restored in like kind at the Developer's expense, unlessotherwise indicated on these plans, prior to the acceptance of completed improvements and/or prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.43. When an existing asphalt street must be cut, the street must be restored to a condition equal to or better than its original condition. The existing street condition shall bedocumented by the City of Fort Collins Construction Inspector before any cuts are made. Patching shall be done in accordance with the City of Fort Collins StreetRepair Standards. The finished patch shall blend in smoothly into the existing surface. All large patches shall be paved with an asphalt lay-down machine. In streetswhere more than one cut is made, an overlay of the entire street width, including the patched area, may be required. The determination of need for a complete overlayshall be made by the City of Fort Collins Engineer and/or the City of Fort Collins Inspector at the time the cuts are made.44.Upon completion of construction, the site shall be cleaned and restored to a condition equal to, or better than, that which existed before construction, or to the gradesand condition as required by these plans.45.Standard Handicap ramps are to be constructed at all curb returns and at all "T" intersections.46. After acceptance by the City of Fort Collins, public improvements depicted in these plans shall be guaranteed to be free from material and workmanship defects for aminimum period of two years from the date of acceptance.47. Approved Variances are listed as follows:-LCUASS Chapter 7.4 as it relates to minimum allowable distances between driveways and intersections based on street classification. A variance has been requested, in association with approval of this Utility Plan, to LCUASS Chapter 8.2 as it relates to lane alignment through intersections. Theproposed configuration results in a centerline shift of approximately 7.8', which exceeds the allowable 2' shift.CONSTRUCTION NOTESA. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES1. The City Stormwater Department erosion control inspector must be notified at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to any construction on this site.2. There shall be no earth-disturbing activity outside the limits designated on the accepted plans.3. All required BMPs (e.g., perimeter silt and construction fencing) shall be installed SULRU to any land disturbing activity (e.g., stockpiling, stripping, grading, etc). All otherrequired erosion control measures shall be installed at the appropriate time in the construction sequence as indicated in the approved project schedule, constructionplans, and erosion control report.4. At all times during construction, the Developer shall be responsible for preventing and controlling on-site erosion including keeping the property sufficiently watered soas to minimize wind blown sediment. The Developer shall also be responsible for installing and maintaining all erosion control facilities shown herein.5. The property must be actively preventing the emission of fugitive dust at all times during construction and vegetation activities. All land disturbing activities that result infugitive dust shall be in accordance with Municipal Code §12-150 to reduce the impacts to adjacent properties and community health. All required practices shall beimplemented and additional ones shall be followed. These practices include watering the sites and discontinuing construction activities until the wind subsides asdetermined by any City Inspectors.6. Pre-disturbance vegetation shall be protected and retained wherever possible. Removal or disturbance of existing vegetation shall be limited to the area(s) required forimmediate construction operations, and for the shortest practical period of time.7. All soils exposed during land disturbing activity (stripping, grading, utility installations, stockpiling, filling, etc.) shall be kept in a roughened condition by ripping ordisking along land contours until mulch, vegetation, or other permanent erosion control BMPs are installed. No soils in areas outside project street rights-of-way shallremain exposed by land disturbing activity for more than thirty (30) days before required temporary or permanent erosion control (e.g., seed/mulch, landscaping, etc.) isinstalled, unless otherwise approved by the City Stormwater Department.8. In order to minimize erosion potential, all temporary (structural) erosion control measures shall:a. Be inspected at a minimum of once every fourteen (14) days and after each runoff event and repaired or reconstructed as necessary in order to ensure thecontinued performance of their intended function.b. Remain in place until such time as all the surrounding disturbed areas are sufficiently stabilized as determined by the erosion control inspector.c. Be removed after the site has been sufficiently stabilized as determined by the erosion control inspector.8. When temporary erosion control measures are removed, the Developer shall be responsible for the clean up and removal of all sediment and debris from all drainageinfrastructure and other public facilities.9. City Ordinance prohibits the tracking, dropping, or depositing of soils or any other material onto city streets by or from any vehicle. Any inadvertent deposited materialshall be cleaned immediately by the contractor.10. All retained sediments, particularly those on paved roadway surfaces, shall be removed and disposed of in a manner and location so as not to cause their release intoany drainageway.11. No soil stockpile shall exceed ten (10) feet in height. All soil stockpiles shall be protected from sediment transport by surface roughening, watering, and perimeter siltfencing. Any soil stockpile remaining after thirty (30) days shall be seeded and mulched.12. The stormwater volume capacity of detention ponds will be restored and storm sewer lines will be cleaned upon completion of the project and before turning themaintenance over to the City/County or Homeowners Association (HOA).13. City Ordinance and Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS) requirements make it unlawful to discharge or allow the discharge of any pollutant or contaminatedwater from construction sites. Pollutants include, but are not limited to discarded building materials, concrete truck washout, chemicals, oil and gas products, litter, andsanitary waste. The developer shall at all times take whatever measures are necessary to assure the proper containment and disposal of pollutants on the site inaccordance with any and all applicable local, state, and federal regulations.14. A designated area shall be provided on site for concrete truck chute washout. The area shall be constructed so as to contain washout material and located at least fifty(50) feet away from any waterway during construction. Upon completion of construction activities the concrete washout material will be removed and properly disposedof prior to the area being restored.15. Conditions in the field may warrant erosion control measures in addition to what is shown on these plans. The Developer shall implement whatever measures aredetermined necessary, as directed by the City.B. STREET IMPROVEMENT NOTES1. All street construction is subject to the General Notes on the cover sheet of these plans as well as the Street Improvements Notes listed here.2. A paving section design, signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Engineer, must be submitted to the City of Fort Collins Engineer for approval, prior to any streetconstruction activity, (full depth asphalt sections are not permitted at a depth greater than 8 inches of asphalt). The job mix shall be submitted for approval prior toplacement of any asphalt.3.Where proposed paving adjoins existing asphalt, the existing asphalt shall be saw cut, a minimum distance of 12 inches from the existing edge, to create a cleanconstruction joint. The Developer shall be required to remove existing pavement to a distance where a clean construction joint can be made. Wheel cuts shall not beallowed unless approved by the City of Fort Collins Engineer in Fort Collins.4.Street subgrades shall be scarified the top 12 inches and re-compacted prior to subbase installation. No base material shall be laid until the subgrade has beeninspected and approved by the City of Fort Collins Engineer.5. Ft. Collins only. Valve boxes and manholes are to be brought up to grade at the time of pavement placement or overlay. Valve box adjusting rings are not allowed.6. When an existing asphalt street must be cut, the street must be restored to a condition equal to or better than its original condition. The existing street condition shall bedocumented by the Inspector before any cuts are made. Cutting and patching shall be done in conformance with Chapter 25, Reconstruction and Repair. The finishedpatch shall blend smoothly into the existing surface. The determination of need for a complete overlay shall be made by the City of Fort Collins Engineer. All overlaywork shall be coordinated with adjacent landowners such that future projects do not cut the new asphalt overlay work.7. All traffic control devices shall be in conformance with these plans or as otherwise specified in M.U.T.C.D. (including Colorado supplement) and as per theRight-of-Way Work Permit traffic control plan.8. The Developer is required to perform a gutter water flow test in the presence of the City of Fort Collins Inspector and prior to installation of asphalt. Gutters that holdmore than 1/4 inch deep or 5 feet longitudinally, of water, shall be completely removed and reconstructed to drain properly.9. Prior to placement of H.B.P. or concrete within the street and after moisture/density tests have been taken on the subgrade material (when a full depth section isproposed) or on the subgrade and base material (when a composite section is proposed), a mechanical "proof roll" will be required. The entire subgrade and/or basematerial shall be rolled with a heavily loaded vehicle having a total GVW of not less than 50,000 lbs. and a single axle weight of at least 18,000 lbs. with pneumatic tiresinflated to not less that 90 p.s.i.g. "Proof roll" vehicles shall not travel at speeds greater than 3 m.p.h. Any portion of the subgrade or base material which exhibitsexcessive pumping or deformation, as determined by the City of Fort Collins Engineer, shall be reworked, replaced or otherwise modified to form a smooth,non-yielding surface. The City of Fort Collins Engineer shall be notified at least 24 hours prior to the "proof roll." All "proof rolls" shall be preformed in the presence ofan Inspector.C. TRAFFIC SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING CONSTRUCTION NOTES1. All signage and marking is subject to the General Notes on the cover sheet of these plans, as well as the Traffic Signing and Marking Construction Notes listed here.2. All symbols, including arrows, ONLYS, crosswalks, stop bars, etc. shall be pre-formed thermo-plastic.3. All signage shall be per the City of Fort Collins Standards and these plans or as otherwise specified in MUTCD.4. All lane lines for asphalt pavement shall receive two coats of latex paint with glass beads.5. All lane lines for concrete pavement should be epoxy paint.6. Prior to permanent installation of traffic striping and symbols, the Developer shall place temporary tabs or tape depicting alignment and placement of the same. Theirplacement shall be approved by the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer prior to permanent installation of striping and symbols.7. Pre-formed thermo-plastic applications shall be as specified in these Plans and/or these Standards.8. Epoxy applications shall be applied as specified in CDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction.9. All surfaces shall be thoroughly cleaned prior to installation of striping or markings.10. All sign posts shall utilize break-away assemblies and fasteners per the Standards.11. A field inspection of location and installation of all signs shall be performed by the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer. All discrepancies identified during the fieldinspection must be corrected before the 2-year warranty period will begin.12. The Developer installing signs shall be responsible for locating and protecting all underground utilities.13. Special care shall be taken in sign location to ensure an unobstructed view of each sign.14. Signage and striping has been determined by information available at the time of review. Prior to initiation of the warranty period,the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineerreserves the right to require additional signage and/or striping if the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer determines that an unforeseen condition warrants such signageaccording to the MUTCD or the CDOT M and S Standards. All signage and striping shall fall under the requirements of the 2-year warranty period for new construction(except fair wear on traffic markings).15. Sleeves for sign posts shall be required for use in islands/medians. Refer to Chapter 14, Traffic Control Devices, for additional detail.D. STORM DRAINAGE NOTE1.The City of Fort Collins shall not be responsible for the maintenance of storm drainage facilities located on private property. The Developer shall be responsible formaintenance of all storm drainage facilities that are constructed outside of the public right-of-way that are cited herein: The stormlines as noted on the plan and profilesof this plan set.2. All other storm drainage facilities designed with these utility plans are public and shall be maintained by the City of Fort Collins.3. All recommendations of the Final Drainage and Erosion Control Reports for Mars Landing - Utility Plan dated September 11, 2019 by Galloway and Company, shall befollowed and implemented.4. Prior to final inspection and acceptance by the City of Fort Collins, certification of the drainage facilities, by a registered engineer, must be submitted to and approvedby the Stormwater Utility Department. Certification shall be submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of a certificate ofoccupancy for single family units. For commercial properties, certification shall by submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the releaseof any building permits in excess of those allowed prior to certification per the Development Agreement.5. 18" minimum vertical separation from other utilities is required including storm pipes and irrigation mains. Less than 18" will require a steel or concrete encasement ofthe lower sewer or water.E. WATER AND SEWER NOTES1. ALL WATER AND SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PERFORMED ACCORDING TO THE FORT COLLINS-LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT ANDTHE SOUTH FORT COLLINS SANITATION DISTRICT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.2. CONSTRUCTION OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES REQUIRE A PRECON MEETING WITH DISTRICT OPERATIONS STAFF PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY DISTRICT INSPECTORS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE SANITATION DISTRICT FOR SEWER INSPECTION 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONNECTING TO EXISTING SEWER STUBS.5. IF GROUNDWATER IS ENCOUNTERED WITHIN DEPTH OF SEWER CONSTRUCTION, MANHOLES MUST BE WATER PROOFED.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE WATER DISTRICT FOR WATER INSPECTION 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONNECTING TO EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE.7. ALL COMMERCIAL DOMESTIC SERVICES REQUIRE A REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE.8. ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF (5) FIVE FEET AND A MAXIMUM OF (6) SIX FEET BELOW FINAL GRADE.9. ALL DISTRICT VALVES SHALL ONLY BE OPERATED BY DISTRICT OPERATIONS STAFF.10. PIPE PRESSURE AND VACUUM TESTING SHALL BE WITNESSED BY DISTRICT INSPECTORS. WATERLINE BACTERIA TESTS SHALL ALSO BE TAKEN BYDISTRICT INSPECTORS.11. ONCE THE SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL AND ALL TESTS HAVE PASSED, CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION WITH A LETTER TOTHE DISTRICT.12. AS-BUILTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN PDF AND DWG TO THE DISTRICT FOR FINAL APPROVAL.13. ONCE ALL PUNCH LIST ITEMS ARE COMPLETE, EASEMENTS ARE RECORDED, AND AS BUILT FILES ARE APPROVED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST FINALCOMPLETION WITH A LETTER TO THE DISTRICT THAT INCLUDES THE DOLLAR VALUE OF THE WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS LISTED SEPARATELY.F. GENERAL SITE PLAN NOTES1. Refer to final utility plans for exact locations and construction information for storm drainage structures, utility mains and services, proposed topography, streetimprovements.2. Refer to the subdivision plat and utility plans for exact locations, areas and dimensions of all easements, lots, tracts, streets, walks and other survey information.3. The project shall be constructed in accordance with the final plans. Amendments to the plans must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to the implementation ofany changes to the plans.4. All rooftop and ground mounted mechanical equipment must be screened from view from adjacent property and public streets. In cases where building parapets donot accomplish sufficient screening, then free-standing screen walls matching the predominant color of the building shall be constructed. Other minor equipment suchas conduit, meters and plumbing vents shall be screened or painted to match surrounding building surfaces.5. All construction with this development plan must be completed in one phase unless a phasing plan is shown with these plans.6. All exterior lighting provided shall comply with the foot-candle requirements in section 3.2.4 of the land use code and shall use a concealed, fully shielded light sourcewith sharp cut-off capability so as to minimize up-light, spill light, glare and unnecessary diffusion.7. Signage and addressing are not permitted with this planning document and must be approved by separate City permit prior to construction. Signs must comply withCity sign code unless a specific variance is granted by the City.8. Fire hydrants must meet or exceed Poudre Fire Authority standards. All buildings must provide an approved fire extinguishing system.9. All bike racks provided must be permanently anchored.10. All sidewalks and ramps must conform to City standards. Accessable ramps must be provided at all street and drive intersections and at all designated accessableparking spaces. Accessible parking spaces must slope no more than 1:48 in any direction. All accessible routes must slope no more than 1:20 in direction of traveland with no more than 1:48 cross slope.11. Common open space areas and landscaping within right of ways, street medians, and traffic circles adjacent to common open space areas are required to bemaintained by the property owner of the common area. The property owner is responsible for snow removal on all adjacent street sidewalks and sidewalks in commonopen space areas.12. Design and installation of all parkway/tree lawn and median areas in the right-of-way shall be in accordance with City standards. Unless otherwise agreed to by the Citywith the final plans, all ongoing maintenance of such areas is the responsibility of the owner/developer.13. The property owner for each residential lot is responsible for snow removal on all street sidewalks adjacent to each residential lot.14. Private conditions, covenants, and restrictions (cc&r's), or any other private restrictive covenant imposed on landowners within the development, may not be created orenforced having the effect of prohibiting or limiting the installation of xeriscape landscaping, solar/photo-voltaic collectors (if mounted flush upon any established roofline), clothes lines (if located in back yards), odor-controlled compost bins, or which have the effect of requiring that a portion of any individual lot be planted in turfgrass.15. Any damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, destroyed, damaged or removed due toconstruction of this project, shall be replaced or restored to City of Fort Collins standards at the developer's expense prior to the acceptance of completedimprovements and/or prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy.16. FIRE LANE MARKING: a fire lane marking plan must be reviewed and approved by the fire official prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy. Where requiredby the fire code official, approved signs or other approved notices that include the words no parking fire lane shall be provided for fire apparatus access roads toidentify such roads or prohibit the obstruction thereof. The means by which fire lanes are designated shall be maintained in a clean and legible condition at all times adbe replaced or repaired when necessary to provide adequate visibility.17. PREMISE IDENTIFICATION: an addressing plan is required to be reviewed and approved by the City and Poudre Fire Authority prior to the issuance of any certificateof occupancy. Unless the private drive is named, monument signage may be required to allow way_finding. All buildings shall have address numbers, building numbersor approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible, visible from the street or road fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of six_inchnumerals on a contrasting background. Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or othersign or means shall be used to identify the structure.G. BLACK-TAILED PRAIRIE DOG MITIGATION NOTES1. Black-tailed prairie dogs located within the parcel will be trapped and donated to either a raptor rehabilitation program or a black-footed ferret recovery program. Allcontrol etc. will be done per City of Fort Collins, CPW and Colorado Department of Agriculture requirements. Control will be conducted via the introduction of carbonmonoxide into the burrows. Post-control of the prairie dogs a report will be prepared which will identify the control method used and the number of prairie dogstrapped/donated'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C0.0_Cover.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&GENERAL NOTESC0.1ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 104 8(8(8(8(8(****878787878787:670670;;;;;;;'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C1.0_Existing Conditions.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&2676&$/(  EXISTING CONDITIONS &DEMO PLANC1.0UEWSSSTMGUTITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 105 6666 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666670670878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787*******6706706706706706706706706706706706706708787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787876706706708(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C1.0_Existing Conditions.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&2676&$/(  OFFSITE EXISTINGCONDITIONS & DEMO PLANC1.1UEWSSSTMGUTKEYMAPUS HWY 287MARS DRIVESKYWAY DRIVEITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 106 8(8(8( 8( 8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(670670'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C3.0_Overall Grading Plan.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267OVERALL GRADING PLANC2.06&$/(  (;,67,1*672506(:(5(;,67,1*5,*+72):$<(;,67,1*/27/,1(352326('($6(0(17/,1((;,67,1*0$1+2/(352326('&85%$1'*877(5(;,67,1*&85%$1'*877(5352326('&85%$1'*877(5287)$//(;,67,1*0,125&217285(;,67,1*0$-25&217285352326('0,125&217285352326('0$-25&217285352326('6327(/(9$7,21(;,67,1*6327(/(9$7,21352326('6/23(6352326('672506(:(575$16,7,21352326('67250,1/(7LEGEND:),1,6+('*5$'($77232):$//),1,6+('*5$'($7%277202):$//7232)*5$7((/(9$7,21)/2:/,1((/(9$7,21 $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,217+(&2175$&7256+$//%(5(63216,%/(72&$//$//87,/,7<&203$1,(6 38%/,&$1'35,9$7( 35,2572$1<&216758&7,21729(5,)<(;$&787,/,7</2&$7,21 (/(9$7,2166+2:1+$9(%((1$%%5(9,$7('7+((17,5((/(9$7,21,67+((/(9$7,216+2:13/86)((7    $//&85%632766+2:1$5()/2:/,1((/(9$7,216$//27+(563276$5(/27&251(5629(5/2725),1,6+('*5$'()25/$1'6&$3($5($6 $'$3$5.,1*67$//6+$9($0$;,0806/23(,1$1<',5(&7,21NOTES:+,*+32,17(/(9$7,21/2:32,17(/(9$7,21('*(2)&21&5(7(352326('1$785$/+$%,7$7%8))(5=21( 1+%= 352326(':(7/$1'0,7,*$7,21$5($(;,67,1*($6(0(17/,1((;,67,1*67250,1/(7352326('0$1+2/(&&ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 107 670670670670'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C3.1_Detailed Grading Plan.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267DETAILED GRADING PLANC2.16&$/(  (;,67,1*672506(:(5(;,67,1*5,*+72):$<(;,67,1*/27/,1(352326('($6(0(17/,1((;,67,1*0$1+2/(352326('&85%$1'*877(5(;,67,1*&85%$1'*877(5352326('&85%$1'*877(5287)$//(;,67,1*0,125&217285(;,67,1*0$-25&217285352326('0,125&217285352326('0$-25&217285352326('6327(/(9$7,21(;,67,1*6327(/(9$7,21352326('6/23(6352326('672506(:(575$16,7,21352326('67250,1/(7LEGEND:),1,6+('*5$'($77232):$//),1,6+('*5$'($7%277202):$//7232)*5$7((/(9$7,21)/2:/,1((/(9$7,21 $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,217+(&2175$&7256+$//%(5(63216,%/(72&$//$//87,/,7<&203$1,(6 38%/,&$1'35,9$7( 35,2572$1<&216758&7,21729(5,)<(;$&787,/,7</2&$7,21 (/(9$7,2166+2:1+$9(%((1$%%5(9,$7('7+((17,5((/(9$7,21,67+((/(9$7,216+2:13/86)((7    $//&85%632766+2:1$5()/2:/,1((/(9$7,216$//27+(563276$5(/27&251(5629(5/2725),1,6+('*5$'()25/$1'6&$3($5($6 $'$3$5.,1*67$//6+$9($0$;,0806/23(,1$1<',5(&7,21NOTES:+,*+32,17(/(9$7,21/2:32,17(/(9$7,21('*(2)&21&5(7(352326('1$785$/+$%,7$7%8))(5=21( 1+%= 352326(':(7/$1'0,7,*$7,21$5($(;,67,1*($6(0(17/,1((;,67,1*67250,1/(7352326('0$1+2/(MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET C2.2KEYMAPMARS DRIVESKYWAY DRIVEC2.1C2.2ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 108 670'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C3.1_Detailed Grading Plan.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267DETAILED GRADING PLANC2.26&$/(  (;,67,1*672506(:(5(;,67,1*5,*+72):$<(;,67,1*/27/,1(352326('($6(0(17/,1((;,67,1*0$1+2/(352326('&85%$1'*877(5(;,67,1*&85%$1'*877(5352326('&85%$1'*877(5287)$//(;,67,1*0,125&217285(;,67,1*0$-25&217285352326('0,125&217285352326('0$-25&217285352326('6327(/(9$7,21(;,67,1*6327(/(9$7,21352326('6/23(6352326('672506(:(575$16,7,21352326('67250,1/(7LEGEND:),1,6+('*5$'($77232):$//),1,6+('*5$'($7%277202):$//7232)*5$7((/(9$7,21)/2:/,1((/(9$7,21 $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,217+(&2175$&7256+$//%(5(63216,%/(72&$//$//87,/,7<&203$1,(6 38%/,&$1'35,9$7( 35,2572$1<&216758&7,21729(5,)<(;$&787,/,7</2&$7,21 (/(9$7,2166+2:1+$9(%((1$%%5(9,$7('7+((17,5((/(9$7,21,67+((/(9$7,216+2:13/86)((7    $//&85%632766+2:1$5()/2:/,1((/(9$7,216$//27+(563276$5(/27&251(5629(5/2725),1,6+('*5$'()25/$1'6&$3($5($6 $'$3$5.,1*67$//6+$9($0$;,0806/23(,1$1<',5(&7,21NOTES:+,*+32,17(/(9$7,21/2:32,17(/(9$7,21('*(2)&21&5(7(352326('1$785$/+$%,7$7%8))(5=21( 1+%= 352326(':(7/$1'0,7,*$7,21$5($(;,67,1*($6(0(17/,1((;,67,1*67250,1/(7352326('0$1+2/(MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET C2.1KEYMAPMARS DRIVESKYWAY DRIVEC2.1C2.2ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 109 8(8(8(8(8(****878787878787:670670670670670670:::::::::::: 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66: : : 66  66  66  66 8(8(8( 8( 8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8('DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C4.0_Utility Plan.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267UTILITY PLANC3.0WSSWSSS6&$/(  ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 110 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_CD4.1_Utility Details.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&UTILITY DETAILSC3.1ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 111 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_CD4.1_Utility Details.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&UTILITY DETAILSC3.2ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 112 :67066 66 66 6666666666 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 666667087878787878787878787****67067067067067067067067087878787878787878787 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 670 670 8(8(8(8(::::: 66  66  66  66 66 66 66 668(8(8 (8(8(8(8(8(8( 8(8( 8(8(8(8('DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C5.0_Sanitary Sewer Plan.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267SANITARY SEWER PLANC4.0WSSWSSS6&$/(   SANITARY 1   KEYMAPUS HWY 287MARS DRIVESKYWAY DRIVEITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 113 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_CD5.1_Sanitary Sewer Details.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267SANITARY SEWER DETAILSC4.1ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 114  66 66 66 66 66 66 66 6666  66  66  66 8(8(8( 8( 8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(****878787878787:670670670670670670'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C6.0_Storm Drain Plan.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267STORM DRAIN PLANC5.06&$/(  NOTES: 7+(6,=(7<3($1'/2&$7,212)$//.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$5($3352;,0$7(:+(16+2:1217+(6('5$:,1*6,76+$//%(7+(5(63216,%,/,7<2)7+(&2175$&725729(5,)<7+((;,67(1&(2)$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6,17+($5($2)7+(:25.%()25(&200(1&,1*1(:&216758&7,217+(&2175$&7256+$//%(5(63216,%/()25/2&$7,1*$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$1'6+$//%(5(63216,%/()25$//81.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6 $//:$7(5$1'6(:(5&216758&7,216+$//%(3(5)257&2//,16/29(/$1':$7(5',675,&7$1'6287+)257&2//,166$1,7$7,21',675,&767$1'$5'&216758&7,2163(&,),&$7,216/$7(67(',7,21 $//:$7(5),77,1*6$1'9$/9(6$5(21/<*5$3+,&$//<5(35(6(17('$1'$5(127726&$/( 87,/,7<6(59,&(6$5(6+2:1,1$6&+(0$7,&)$6+,2121/<(;$&7/2&$7,2166+$//%(3(57+(5(48,5(0(1762)7+(5(63(&7,9(87,/,7<3529,'(56$1'$5(68%-(&772&+$1*(,17+(),(/' 0$,17$,1 +25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$/0,1,0806(3$5$7,21%(7:((1$//6$1,7$5<6(:(50$,16672506(:(50$,16:$7(50$,16 6(59,&(6 &21),50(;,67,1*6$1,7$5<6(:(5,19(57,17+(),(/',),7'2(61 70$7&+7+($6680(',19(57&217$&77+('(6,*1(1*,1((5 &21),50(;,67,1*672506(:(5,19(57,17+(),(/',),7'2(61 70$7&+7+($6680(',19(57&217$&77+('(6,*1(1*,1((5 &21),50+25,=217$//2&$7,212):$7(572(;,67,1*/2&$7,21635,2572&216758&7,21&217$&7'(6,*1(1*,1((5:,7+$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6 0,1,0806(:(56/23(,6  )25',$0(7(5$1'  )25',$0(7(5 &2175$&72572&225',1$7(*$6(/(&75,&$1'7(/(3+21(&$%/(6(59,&(6 7+(3/80%,1*&2175$&7256+$//7(50,1$7(87,/,7</$7(5$/6 2876,'(2)%8,/',1*81/(6627+(5:,6(127('(;$&7/2&$7,216 +25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$/ 2)$//87,/,7<&211(&7,216,1727+(352326('%8,/',1*6+$//%(&225',1$7(':,7+7+($33529('$5&+,7(&785$/'5$:,1*6 522)'5$,1&211(&7,21672%(&225',1$7(':,7+),1$/$5&+,7(&785$/3/$16(;,67,1*:$7(50$,1(;,67,1*6$1,7$5<6(:(5(;,67,1*),5(+<'5$17(;,67,1*672506(:(5(;,67,1*5,*+72):$<(;,67,1*/27/,1(352326('($6(0(17/,1(8"W352326(':$7(50$,1352326('6$1,7$5<6(:(5352326('),5(+<'5$17352326('672506(:(5352326('67250,1/(7352326('0$1+2/(352326('&85%$1'*877(58"SSWSS(;,67,1*,55,*$7,21(;,67,1*81'(5*5281'7(/(3+21(IRRUT(;,67,1*81'(5*5281'(/(&75,&UELEGEND:(;,67,1*),%(5237,&FO(;,67,1**$6G(;,67,1*0$1+2/((;,67,1*67250,1/(7352326('1$785$/+$%,7$7%8))(5=21( 1+%= 352326(':(7/$1'0,7,*$7,21$5($(;,67,1*($6(0(17/,1(ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 115 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_CD6.1_Storm Details.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3CD\GNK08_CD6.1_Storm Details.dwg- Donald Cecil - 7/27/20211TYPE 13 INLETCOMBINATION INLET2STORM DETAILSC5.1ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 116 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_CD6.1_Storm Details.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&RIRRAP INSTALLATION AT FES4ROUND AREA INLET W/ STANDARD GRATE3STORM DETAILSC5.2ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 117 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_CD6.1_Storm Details.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&ADS STORMTECH DETAILSC5.3ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 118 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_CD6.1_Storm Details.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&ADS STORMTECH DETAILSC5.4ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 119 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_CD6.1_Storm Details.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&ADS STORMTECH DETAILSC5.5ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 120 8(8(8(8('DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C7.0_Road Plan and Profile.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267JCCJEP6&$/(  MARS DRIVE PLAN ANDPROFILEC6.0LEGEND:(;,67,1*5,*+72):$<(;,67,1*/27/,1((;,67,1*($6(0(17/,1(352326('&85%$1'*877(5(;,67,1*&85%$1'*877(5NOTES: 7+(6,=(7<3($1'/2&$7,212)$//.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$5($3352;,0$7(:+(16+2:1217+(6('5$:,1*6,76+$//%(7+(5(63216,%,/,7<2)7+(&2175$&725729(5,)<7+((;,67(1&(2)$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6,17+($5($2)7+(:25.%()25(&200(1&,1*1(:&216758&7,217+(&2175$&7256+$//%(5(63216,%/()25/2&$7,1*$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$1'6+$//%(5(63216,%/()25$//81.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6 5()(572/$1'6&$3(3/$16)25675((775((,1)250$7,21$1'6859(<'2&80(176)25$'',7,21$/5,*+72):$<($6(0(17$1'52$':$<&(17(5/,1(,1)250$7,21 %8,/',1*32,176$5($7&251(562)120,1$/%8,/',1*)22735,176&2175$&7256+$//&21),50$//%8,/',1*&251(56$1'',0(16,216:,7+$5&+,7(&735,2572&$//,1*)2567$.(6 $//',0(16,2165()(5(1&()/2:/,1(%8,/',1*253523(57</,1(81/(6663(&,),('27+(5:,6( &2175$&72572&225',1$7(:,7+&,9,/(1*,1((5$1'$5&+,7(&735,257267$.,1*%8,/',1*&225',1$7(6 )25$//&$7&+$1'63,//&85%,1)250$7,21$1'75$16,7,2166((*5$',1*3/$16&& $//675,3,1*$1'3$9(0(170$5.,1*66+$//&203/<:,7+7+(087&'$1'6(&7,212)7+(&'2763(&,),&$7,216)256.<:$<'5,9($1'6287+&2//(*($9(18(,17(56(&7,21,03529(0(176 $//675,3,1*$1'3$9(0(170$5.,1*)256.<:$<'5,9($1'0$56'5,9(6+$//&203/<:,7+7+(&,7<2))257&2//,16675((7'(6,*1$1'&216758&7,2167$1'$5'6 $//75$)),&&21752/6,*166+$//&21)250727+(5(48,5(0(1762)7+(087&':,7+5(*$5'726,*17<3(6,=(/2&$7,21$1'02817,1*63(&,),&$7,216 $//216,7(&85%$1'*877(56+$//%(&$7&+2563,//&85%$1'*877(581/(66127(' $//+&5$0366+$//+$9(7581&$7(''20(63(56,7(3/$1'(7$,/66+((7 5()(572'(7$,/6+((7)25+&3$5.,1*67$//'(7$,/6$1'6,*15(48,5(0(176$//63$&(6$5(9$1$&&(66,%/($1'6+28/'%(3267('$668&+3529,'( &/($5)520)/2:/,1(723267 7+(5(6+$//%($ 0,1,08075$16,7,21)52063,//72&$7&+&85%$1'*877(5 $//6,*1672%(+,3 )253$9(0(17'(6,*13$9(0(176(&7,216$1'68%*5$'(35(3$5$7,215()(57235(/,0,1$5<68%685)$&((;3/25$7,215(3257'$7('-8/<%<($57+(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7$176&2175$&725729(5,)<),1$/3$9(0(17$1'68%*5$'('(6,*1:,7+*(27(&+1,&$/(1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 $//352326('($6(0(176$5(72%(5(&25'('%<6(3$5$7('2&80(17352326('&85%$1'*877(563,//352326('&21&5(7(&52663$175$16,7,21352326(')(1&(352326('6,'(:$/.352326('($6(0(17/,1(KEYMAPMARS DRIVESKYWAY DRIVEITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 121  66  66  66  66 66  66  66  66 666666 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666706708787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787872+(*******6706706706706706706706706706706706706706708787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787876706706708(8(8(8(8(8(8(8( 66  66  66  66'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C7.1_287 Sidewalk Plan.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267JCCJEP6&$/(  COLLEGE AVENUESIDEWALK PLANC6.1LEGEND:(;,67,1*5,*+72):$<(;,67,1*/27/,1((;,67,1*($6(0(17/,1(352326('&85%$1'*877(5(;,67,1*&85%$1'*877(5NOTES: 7+(6,=(7<3($1'/2&$7,212)$//.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$5($3352;,0$7(:+(16+2:1217+(6('5$:,1*6,76+$//%(7+(5(63216,%,/,7<2)7+(&2175$&725729(5,)<7+((;,67(1&(2)$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6,17+($5($2)7+(:25.%()25(&200(1&,1*1(:&216758&7,217+(&2175$&7256+$//%(5(63216,%/()25/2&$7,1*$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$1'6+$//%(5(63216,%/()25$//81.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6 5()(572/$1'6&$3(3/$16)25675((775((,1)250$7,21$1'6859(<'2&80(176)25$'',7,21$/5,*+72):$<($6(0(17$1'52$':$<&(17(5/,1(,1)250$7,21 %8,/',1*32,176$5($7&251(562)120,1$/%8,/',1*)22735,176&2175$&7256+$//&21),50$//%8,/',1*&251(56$1'',0(16,216:,7+$5&+,7(&735,2572&$//,1*)2567$.(6 $//',0(16,2165()(5(1&()/2:/,1(%8,/',1*253523(57</,1(81/(6663(&,),('27+(5:,6( &2175$&72572&225',1$7(:,7+&,9,/(1*,1((5$1'$5&+,7(&735,257267$.,1*%8,/',1*&225',1$7(6 )25$//&$7&+$1'63,//&85%,1)250$7,21$1'75$16,7,2166((*5$',1*3/$16&& $//675,3,1*$1'3$9(0(170$5.,1*66+$//&203/<:,7+7+(087&'$1'6(&7,212)7+(&'2763(&,),&$7,216)256.<:$<'5,9($1'6287+&2//(*($9(18(,17(56(&7,21,03529(0(176 $//675,3,1*$1'3$9(0(170$5.,1*)256.<:$<'5,9($1'0$56'5,9(6+$//&203/<:,7+7+(&,7<2))257&2//,16675((7'(6,*1$1'&216758&7,2167$1'$5'6 $//75$)),&&21752/6,*166+$//&21)250727+(5(48,5(0(1762)7+(087&':,7+5(*$5'726,*17<3(6,=(/2&$7,21$1'02817,1*63(&,),&$7,216 $//216,7(&85%$1'*877(56+$//%(&$7&+2563,//&85%$1'*877(581/(66127(' $//+&5$0366+$//+$9(7581&$7(''20(63(56,7(3/$1'(7$,/66+((7 5()(572'(7$,/6+((7)25+&3$5.,1*67$//'(7$,/6$1'6,*15(48,5(0(176$//63$&(6$5(9$1$&&(66,%/($1'6+28/'%(3267('$668&+3529,'( &/($5)520)/2:/,1(723267 7+(5(6+$//%($ 0,1,08075$16,7,21)52063,//72&$7&+&85%$1'*877(5 $//6,*1672%(+,3 )253$9(0(17'(6,*13$9(0(176(&7,216$1'68%*5$'(35(3$5$7,215()(57235(/,0,1$5<68%685)$&((;3/25$7,215(3257'$7('-8/<%<($57+(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7$176&2175$&725729(5,)<),1$/3$9(0(17$1'68%*5$'('(6,*1:,7+*(27(&+1,&$/(1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 $//352326('($6(0(176$5(72%(5(&25'('%<6(3$5$7('2&80(17352326('&85%$1'*877(563,//352326('&21&5(7(&52663$175$16,7,21352326(')(1&(352326('6,'(:$/.352326('($6(0(17/,1(KEYMAPUS HWY 287MARS DRIVESKYWAY DRIVEITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 122 8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(EFFCCCCCG12233311G'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C7.2_Striping Plan.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&2676&$/(  SIGNAGE AND STRIPINGPLANC6.2LEGEND:352326('&85%$1'*877(5(;,67,1*&85%$1'*877(5NOTES: 7+(6,=(7<3($1'/2&$7,212)$//.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$5($3352;,0$7(:+(16+2:1217+(6('5$:,1*6,76+$//%(7+(5(63216,%,/,7<2)7+(&2175$&725729(5,)<7+((;,67(1&(2)$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6,17+($5($2)7+(:25.%()25(&200(1&,1*1(:&216758&7,217+(&2175$&7256+$//%(5(63216,%/()25/2&$7,1*$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$1'6+$//%(5(63216,%/()25$//81.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6 5()(572/$1'6&$3(3/$16)25675((775((,1)250$7,21$1'6859(<'2&80(176)25$'',7,21$/5,*+72):$<($6(0(17$1'52$':$<&(17(5/,1(,1)250$7,21 %8,/',1*32,176$5($7&251(562)120,1$/%8,/',1*)22735,176&2175$&7256+$// &21),50$//%8,/',1*&251(56$1'',0(16,216:,7+$5&+,7(&735,2572&$//,1*)2567$.(6 $//',0(16,2165()(5(1&()/2:/,1(%8,/',1*253523(57</,1(81/(6663(&,),('27+(5:,6( &2175$&72572&225',1$7(:,7+&,9,/(1*,1((5$1'$5&+,7(&735,257267$.,1*%8,/',1*&225',1$7(6 )25$//&$7&+$1'63,//&85%,1)250$7,21$1'75$16,7,2166((*5$',1*3/$16&& $//675,3,1*$1'3$9(0(170$5.,1*66+$//&203/<:,7+7+(087&'$1'6(&7,212)7+(&'2763(&,),&$7,216)256.<:$<'5,9($1'6287+&2//(*($9(18(,17(56(&7,21,03529(0(176 $//675,3,1*$1'3$9(0(170$5.,1*)256.<:$<'5,9($1'0$56'5,9(6+$//&203/<:,7+7+(&,7<2))257&2//,16675((7'(6,*1$1'&216758&7,2167$1'$5'6 $//75$)),&&21752/6,*166+$//&21)250727+(5(48,5(0(1762)7+(087&':,7+5(*$5'726,*17<3(6,=(/2&$7,21$1'02817,1*63(&,),&$7,216 $//216,7(&85%$1'*877(56+$//%(&$7&+2563,//&85%$1'*877(581/(66127(' $//+&5$0366+$//+$9(7581&$7(''20(63(56,7(3/$1'(7$,/66+((7 5()(572'(7$,/6+((7)25+&3$5.,1*67$//'(7$,/6$1'6,*15(48,5(0(176$//63$&(6$5(9$1$&&(66,%/($1'6+28/'%(3267('$668&+3529,'( &/($5)520)/2:/,1(723267 7+(5(6+$//%($ 0,1,08075$16,7,21)52063,//72&$7&+&85%$1'*877(5 $//6,*1672%(+,*+,17(16,7<35,60$7,&*5$'(6+((7,1* )253$9(0(17'(6,*13$9(0(176(&7,216$1'68%*5$'(35(3$5$7,215()(57235(/,0,1$5<68%685)$&((;3/25$7,215(3257'$7('-8/<%<($57+(1*,1((5,1*&2168/7$176&2175$&725729(5,)<),1$/3$9(0(17$1'68%*5$'('(6,*1:,7+*(27(&+1,&$/(1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 $//352326('($6(0(176$5(72%(5(&25'('%<6(3$5$7('2&80(17352326('&21&5(7(&52663$1352326(')(1&(352326('6,'(:$/.12567236,*17<3(%$55,&$'(AB35()250('3/$67,&3$9(0(170$5.,1*675$,*+7/()77851$552: 6)($ 35()250('3/$67,&3$9(0(170$5.,1*5,*+77851$552:6 6)($ D:+,7(62/,'/,1(E'28%/(<(//2:/,1(62/,'2&5123$5.,1*$1<7,0(C35()250('3/$67,&3$9(0(170$5.,1*%,&<&/,67$1'$552:F%8))(5('%,.(/$1(',$*21$/+$6+:+,7(62/,'/,1($7ƒ72/$1( 2&G:+,7(%52.(1/,1(35 63(&,$/ 123$5.,1*$1<7,0(+(5(72&251(535()250('3/$67,&3$9(0(170$5.,1*:,'(6723%$5H35()250('3/$67,&3$9(0(170$5.,1*6+$5('%,.(9(+,&/(/$1(0$5.,1*I(;,67,1*5,*+72):$<352326('($6(0(17/,1((;,67,1*($6(0(17/,1((;,67,1*/27/,1(KEYMAPUS HWY 287MARS DRIVESKYWAY DRIVEMARS DRIVESIGNAGE AND STRIPINGA6&$/(  SKYWAY DRIVE AT S COLLEGE AVENUESIGNAGE AND STRIPINGBABITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 123 :::::::::::: 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66: : : 6  66  66  66 8(8(8( 8( 8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(****878787878787:670670670670670670IPIPIPIPIPIPIPVTCRSRSRSIPSF6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)SFSFSFSFSFRCDRCDRCDSSACWARSRSRS'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C8.0_Erosion Control Plan.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267EROSION CONTROL PLANC7.06&$/(  LEGEND: 7+,6(526,21&21752/3/$1$1'$662&,$7('6:03$5(/,9,1*'2&80(1765(48,5,1*3(5,2',&5(9,(:$1'83'$7,1*$66,7(&21',7,216&+$1*(25$65(48,5('%</2&$/$87+25,7,(6,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72(1685(21*2,1*&203/,$1&(:,7+7+(5(48,5(0(1762)7+(67250:$7(5',6&+$5*(3(50,7 7+(6,=(7<3($1'/2&$7,212)$//.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$5($3352;,0$7(:+(16+2:1217+(6('5$:,1*6,76+$//%(7+(5(63216,%,/,7<2)7+(&2175$&725729(5,)<7+((;,67(1&(2)$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6,17+($5($2)7+(:25.%()25(&200(1&,1*1(:&216758&7,217+(&2175$&7256+$//%(5(63216,%/()25/2&$7,1*$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$1'6+$//%(5(63216,%/()25$//81.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6 (526,21&21752/35$&7,&(66,7(3527(&7,21$1'5(9(*(7$7,210(7+2'66+$//)2//2:&,7<2))257&2//,165(*8/$7,216 '85,1*&216758&7,213+$6,1*,167$//(526,21&21752/0($685(6)2//2:,1*%036:,7+($&+3+$6($65(48,5(' 3(5,0(7(53527(&7,21 ,(675$::$77/(6 ,66+2:1$5281'($&+%/2&.7+$7,6$3$572)7+(352326(',03529(0(1765()(5727+(/(*(1' 6((5,*+7 7+,63(5,0(7(53527(&7,216+$//%(,167$//(':+(1&85%*877(5$1'6,'(:$/.,167$//$7,21,6&203/(7(',17+($'-2,1,1*5,*+72):$<7+(&2175$&725,65(63216,%/()255(3/$&,1*3(5,0(7(53527(&7,21 LH675$::$77/(6 '$0$*('%<&216758&7,2175$)),& HJ758&.6'5,9,1*29(5675$::$77/(6$1')/$77(1,1*7+(0  )2//2:,1*29(5/27*5$',1*25$1<27+(5/$1'',6785%,1*$&7,9,7<$//27+(5$5($62)7+(6,7(72%('(9(/23(''85,1*/$7(53+$6(62)&216758&7,21$1':+,&+6+$//5(0$,1(;326(')25025(7+$17+,57<  '$<6:,//5(48,5(7(0325$5<253(50$1(17(526,21&21752/ ,(6(('08/&+/$1'6&$3,1*(7&  6((/$1'6&$3(3/$16)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21216((',1*3/$17,1*5(9(*(7$7,21(526,21)$%5,&%/$1.(76,55,*$7,21+$5'6&$3($1'27+(57(0325$5<$1'3(50$1(176,7(67$%,/,=$7,210(7+2'6 6(((526,21&21752/127(6217+,66+((7$1'*5$',1* (526,21&21752/127(6216+((7&9$6:(//$6'(7$,/6216+((76&&9(+,&/(75$&.,1*&21752/3$'6,/7)(1&(,1/(73527(&7,21&21&5(7(:$6+287$5($127($//%03 66+2:1$5(*5$3+,&$/,11$785(),1$/6,=($1'/2&$7,216+$//%('(7(50,1('%<7+(&2175$&72552&.62&.SFIPCWAVTCRSGENERAL NOTES:TEMPORARY BMPsSFSF(;,67,1*672506(:(5352326('&85%$1'*877(5(;,67,1*&85%$1'*877(5(;,67,1*0,125&217285(;,67,1*0$-25&217285352326('0,125&217285352326('0$-25&217285352326('672506(:(567$%,/,=('67$*,1*$5($SSA52&.&+(&.'$0RCD352326('1$785$/+$%,7$7%8))(5=21( 1+%= 352326(':(7/$1'0,7,*$7,21$5($(;,67,1*0$1+2/(352326('67250,1/(7(;,67,1*67250,1/(7352326('0$1+2/(ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 124 67066666 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666670670878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787*******6706706706706706706706706706706706708787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787876706706708(8(8(8(8(8(8(8(6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)6)SFSFSFSFRCD'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C8.0_Erosion Control Plan.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267OFFSITE EROSIONCONTROL PLANC7.16&$/(  LEGEND: 7+,6(526,21&21752/3/$1$1'$662&,$7('6:03$5(/,9,1*'2&80(1765(48,5,1*3(5,2',&5(9,(:$1'83'$7,1*$66,7(&21',7,216&+$1*(25$65(48,5('%</2&$/$87+25,7,(6,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72(1685(21*2,1*&203/,$1&(:,7+7+(5(48,5(0(1762)7+(67250:$7(5',6&+$5*(3(50,7 7+(6,=(7<3($1'/2&$7,212)$//.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$5($3352;,0$7(:+(16+2:1217+(6('5$:,1*6,76+$//%(7+(5(63216,%,/,7<2)7+(&2175$&725729(5,)<7+((;,67(1&(2)$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6,17+($5($2)7+(:25.%()25(&200(1&,1*1(:&216758&7,217+(&2175$&7256+$//%(5(63216,%/()25/2&$7,1*$//81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$1'6+$//%(5(63216,%/()25$//81.12:181'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6 (526,21&21752/35$&7,&(66,7(3527(&7,21$1'5(9(*(7$7,210(7+2'66+$//)2//2:&,7<2))257&2//,165(*8/$7,216 '85,1*&216758&7,213+$6,1*,167$//(526,21&21752/0($685(6)2//2:,1*%036:,7+($&+3+$6($65(48,5(' 3(5,0(7(53527(&7,21 ,(675$::$77/(6 ,66+2:1$5281'($&+%/2&.7+$7,6$3$572)7+(352326(',03529(0(1765()(5727+(/(*(1' 6((5,*+7 7+,63(5,0(7(53527(&7,216+$//%(,167$//(':+(1&85%*877(5$1'6,'(:$/.,167$//$7,21,6&203/(7(',17+($'-2,1,1*5,*+72):$<7+(&2175$&725,65(63216,%/()255(3/$&,1*3(5,0(7(53527(&7,21 LH675$::$77/(6 '$0$*('%<&216758&7,2175$)),& HJ758&.6'5,9,1*29(5675$::$77/(6$1')/$77(1,1*7+(0  )2//2:,1*29(5/27*5$',1*25$1<27+(5/$1'',6785%,1*$&7,9,7<$//27+(5$5($62)7+(6,7(72%('(9(/23(''85,1*/$7(53+$6(62)&216758&7,21$1':+,&+6+$//5(0$,1(;326(')25025(7+$17+,57<  '$<6:,//5(48,5(7(0325$5<253(50$1(17(526,21&21752/ ,(6(('08/&+/$1'6&$3,1*(7&  6((/$1'6&$3(3/$16)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21216((',1*3/$17,1*5(9(*(7$7,21(526,21)$%5,&%/$1.(76,55,*$7,21+$5'6&$3($1'27+(57(0325$5<$1'3(50$1(176,7(67$%,/,=$7,210(7+2'6 6(((526,21&21752/127(6217+,66+((7$1'*5$',1* (526,21&21752/127(6216+((7&9$6:(//$6'(7$,/6216+((76&&9(+,&/(75$&.,1*&21752/3$'6,/7)(1&(,1/(73527(&7,21&21&5(7(:$6+287$5($127($//%03 66+2:1$5(*5$3+,&$/,11$785(),1$/6,=($1'/2&$7,216+$//%('(7(50,1('%<7+(&2175$&72552&.62&.SFIPCWAVTCRSGENERAL NOTES:TEMPORARY BMPsSFSF(;,67,1*672506(:(5352326('&85%$1'*877(5(;,67,1*&85%$1'*877(5(;,67,1*0,125&217285(;,67,1*0$-25&217285352326('0,125&217285352326('0$-25&217285352326('672506(:(567$%,/,=('67$*,1*$5($SSA52&.&+(&.'$0RCD352326('1$785$/+$%,7$7%8))(5=21( 1+%= 352326(':(7/$1'0,7,*$7,21$5($(;,67,1*0$1+2/(352326('67250,1/(7(;,67,1*67250,1/(7352326('0$1+2/(KEYMAPUS HWY 287MARS DRIVESKYWAY DRIVEITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 125 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C8.2_Erosion Control Details.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&EROSION CONTROLDETAILSC7.2ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 126 'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C8.2_Erosion Control Details.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&EROSION CONTROLDETAILSC7.3ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 127 :670670$$$$$$$$%%%A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9B1B2OS1B3$'DWH'UDZQ%\3URMHFW1R&KHFNHG%\H:\Goodwin Knight\CO, Fort Collins - GNK000008.10 - Mars Landing ISP\CADD\3 CD\GNK08_C9.0_Drainage Plan.dwg - Donald Cecil - 7/27/2021,QLW ,VVXH'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH0$56/$1',1*352-(&7'(9(/230(173/$1)257&2//,16&27+(6(3/$16$5($1,167580(172)6(59,&($1'$5(7+(3523(57<2)*$//2:$<$1'0$<127%('83/,&$7('',6&/26('255(352'8&(':,7+2877+(:5,77(1&216(172)*$//2:$<&23<5,*+76$1',1)5,1*(0(176:,//%((1)25&('$1'3526(&87('&23<5,*+735(/,0,1$5<127)25%,'',1*127)25&216758&7,21*1.-(3'%&CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR $//87,/,7</2&$7,2166+2:1$5(%$6('210$363529,'('%<7+($335235,$7(87,/,7<&203$1<$1'),(/'685)$&((9,'(1&($77+(7,0(2)6859(<$1',672%(&216,'(5('$1$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,2121/<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(),(/'/2&$7,212)$//87,/,7,(638%/,&2535,9$7(:+(7+(56+2:1217+(3/$162512735,2572&216758&7,215(3257$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6727+((1*,1((5('35,2572&216758&7,21 :+(5($352326('87,/,7<&5266(6$1(;,67,1*87,/,7<,7,67+(&2175$&725 65(63216,%,/,7<72),(/'9(5,)<7+(+25,=217$/$1'9(57,&$//2&$7,212)68&+(;,67,1*87,/,7<(,7+(57+528*+327+2/,1*25$/7(51$7,9(0(7+2'5(3257,1)250$7,21727+((1*,1((535,2572&216758&7,21 &2175$&7255(63216,%/()25$6%8,/7'5$:,1*67(6765(32576$1'25$1<27+(5&(57,),&$7(625,1)250$7,21$65(48,5(')25$&&(37$1&(2):25.)520&,7<87,/,7<',675,&7625$1<27+(5*29(51,1*$*(1&< &2175$&7256+$//3527(&7$//(;,67,1*6859(<02180(17$7,21&2175$&7256+$//+$9(/,&(16('6859(<255(3/$&($1<'$0$*('25',6785%('02180(17$7,21$77+(,5&267DRAINAGE PLANC8.06&$/(  '(6,*132,170$-25%$6,1%281'$5< LH&6725( 68%%$6,1%281'$5< LH5$7,21$/0(7+2' 29(5/$1')/2:',5(&7,21 ,(/$1'6&$3,1* ',5(&7)/2:',5(&7,21 ,(3$9(0(17&85%$1'*877(5 %$6,1,'0,125 <($5 5812))&2()),&,(170$-25 <($5 5812))&2()),&,(17%$6,1$5($ $&5(6 DFUHVA1$(;,67,1*672506(:(5(;,67,1*5,*+72):$<(;,67,1*/27/,1(352326('($6(0(17/,1((;,67,1*0$1+2/(352326('&85%$1'*877(5(;,67,1*&85%$1'*877(5(;,67,1*0,125&217285(;,67,1*0$-25&217285352326('0,125&217285352326('0$-25&217285352326('672506(:(5352326('67250,1/(7LEGEND:(;,67,1*($6(0(17/,1((;,67,1*67250,1/(7352326('0$1+2/(ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 4Packet pg. 128 This unofficial copy was downloaded on Jun-26-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.comFor additional information or an official copy, please contact Engineering Office 281 North College Fort Collins, CO 80521 USA ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 5Packet pg. 129 This unofficial copy was downloaded on Jun-26-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.comFor additional information or an official copy, please contact Engineering Office 281 North College Fort Collins, CO 80521 USA ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 5Packet pg. 130 Mars Landing Neighborhood Meeting Summary (8-27-19) Overview City Staff: Pete Wray, Senior City Planner and Project Planner Sylvia Tatman-Burruss, Development Review Liaison Shawna Van Zee, City Planning Specialist Dave Betley, Civil Engineering Manager Joe Olson, City Traffic Engineer Steve Gilchrist, Traffic Engineering Sr. Technician Martina Wilkinson, Assistant City Traffic Engineer (not at mtg. but provided written responses) Stephanie Blochowiak, Environmental Planner (not at mtg. but provided written responses) Applicant: Mark Johnson, Goodwin Knight LLC James Prelog, Galloway and Company Neighborhood Meeting Date: Monday August 26, 2019 Proposed Project Review Process Purpose of meeting is to share conceptual plans at an early stage in process and gather feedback from neighbors for inclusion in record. A formal application of the project has not been submitted to the City A project development plan submittal will start a formal review by staff, with each round of review comprising three weeks Staff will determine when the project is ready for hearing Type 2 review and hearing, with the Planning and Zoning Board with Project Development Plan with Board acting decision maker. Residents who receive this meeting notice will also receive a letter for the Planning and Zoning Board Hearing Applicant Presentation The project has completed the conceptual review stage and a PDP application has not been submitted to the city. The project includes a request to build two, three story multi-family buildings with 90 total dwelling units and clubhouse. 188 parking spaces will be provided on site for both the residential uses and pool/clubhouse. Site provides a landscape buffer to the existing ditch corridor west of project and full site landscape design Primary access to the site is from Mars Drive via Skyway Drive The property is in the General Commercial (C-G) Zone District. Community Development and Neighborhood Services Planning Services 281 North College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6 Packet pg. 131 Neighborhood Meeting Notes – Mars Landing Page 2 Questions/Comments and Answers Transportation Comments: Question: Is there evidence of the traffic study that we can see? Applicant: The traffic study will be submitted with the formal application and will be public record, so it will be available upon request. Information from the traffic study will determine level of service requirements and extent of public street improvements, based on project traffic impacts. Question: Who owns the frontage road? Applicant: CDOT, the state department of transportation, owns S. College Ave. and the Frontage Rd. is in the right-of-way. CDOT is responsible for maintenance of both roadways. Question: Who completed the traffic study? Is this done by the applicant’s team? Applicant: Delich Associates, an independent contractor, is conducting the traffic study. Question: Will there be visitor parking spots? It does not look like you have many extra visitor parking spots beyond what the residents will need. Applicant: There is parking for visitors in addition to resident parking. Question: When the problem with the traffic starts, who do we contact? City Staff: You can contact Joe Olson with the City’s Traffic Engineering at jolson@fcgov.com. Question: All of the traffic from this development will be come off of Skyway Dr. Is that correct? Applicant: Yes, until Mars Drive connects through future developments to Trilby Road, the traffic will all connect to Skyway Dr. Question: Safety is our concern and even though the traffic study may show you do not need to make improvements, there are issues in this area that need to be addressed. Will there be a traffic light at Constellation? Who do we complain to about the Frontage Road? Joe Olson: Developers can’t be required to fix things that are already not working. We look at things that they are impacting directly. The Frontage Road that close to College Ave is a difficult design, which is why we don’t design roadways like this anymore. For existing deficiencies, please direct your concerns to traffic operations with the city. Joe Olson is the point of contact if you want to have conversations about traffic issues in your neighborhood. His number is 970-224-6062. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6 Packet pg. 132 Neighborhood Meeting Notes – Mars Landing Page 3 Sylvia Tatman-Burruss: The City would be happy to set up a meeting with your HOA about existing conditions and what improvements need to be addressed. Comment: Skyway Drive is dangerous in the winter. There is lots of ice and it is downhill to the light at College Avenue, so it is very easy to slide into the intersection. Joe Olson: It would be best to notify traffic operations of that specific issue to ensure the road is properly maintained in the winter. Comment: If we want to address the traffic, we need to take it to City Council to get change. Question: Who is responsible to finish Mars Drive to Trilby? Applicant: That will not be part of this development. We will extend Mars drive an additional 200 feet. The ultimate plan of the street network is for Mars Drive to extend to Trilby in the future. The remaining portions would be built by future development on the parcels to the south that connect to Trilby. Pete: If and when the middle properties come forward for development, they will be responsible for building the remainder of Mars Drive. Each project builds their section of the road to the city standards. Question: Is the traffic study already complete? Who sets the primary assumptions? Applicant: A traffic study has been done, but it has not been submitted or reviewed by the city, so it is not complete. Joe Olson: A traffic study includes a scoping meeting with the city and the group conducting the study to look at big picture to determine those assumptions. Comment: Trilby is already an issue and will get worse if this connection is eventually made. Pete Wray: This project is responsible for mitigating the traffic impacts from this development to determine local street frontage improvements and contributing to street oversizing based on those impacts. The future connection of Mars Drive between Skyway and Trilby will provide more street connectivity choices for accessing College. This project as stated will extend Mars Drive to south boundary of site. We do not know timing for when Mars Drive will be completed to Trilby, contingent on future development coming forward. Question: This conversation has all been “If this, then that”. Why isn’t there a plan that states what will happen and what the quality of life will be like as a result? I’m concerned with the quality of life for the people who will be living here. Pete Wray: As each development comes forward, we as City staff have to respond to that development and what can change as a result. Streets are built two ways, either by development or by a capital project that the city initiates. As stated previously, improvements ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6 Packet pg. 133 Neighborhood Meeting Notes – Mars Landing Page 4 of existing deficiencies of streets, sidewalks and drainage in area are not part of this development but will be addressed over time as the city has available funding. Comment: We have had multiple meetings in this area over the past several years and we always talk about traffic, and nothing ever gets better. Please recognize that there are people who have been here a long time and are very invested and we have already given a lot and we can’t have development on the backs of those who have been here. We need to have our voices considered in this process. Sylvia: Your comments are being captured and will be part of the record. Environmental Comments: Question: What about the prairie dogs? Will you kill them? Applicant: The city has a mitigation process for prairie dogs. Stephanie Blochowiak (written City Staff Response): An Ecological Characterization Study (ECS) is required to inventory all onsite natural habitats and features and those within 500-ft of project site per LUC 3.4.1. The ECS informs design of a “natural habitat buffer zone” or NHBZ. The ditch is proposed to be piped and City staff must mitigate for lost habitat value within the NHBZ design. Question: The prairie dogs got pushed out of the self-storage development area. That plan was not adequate, and those dogs have moved to this site and to the right-of-way. This has been dangerous for the prairie dogs, and we have lost many of them. Applicant: We will do our best to mitigate those effects and work with the city to handle the prairie dogs. Stephanie Blochowiak (written City Staff Response): Land Use Code Section 3.4.1 now specifies that prairie dog colonies equal to or greater than one acre in size warrant protection or mitigation as part of the development review process. The following approaches may be acceptable forms of mitigation depending on specific circumstances: • On-site habitat enhancements • Off-site habitat enhancements • Payment-in-lieu mitigation • Trap and donate • Passive relocation • Active relocation Any questions related to prairie dog mitigation can be directed to Stephanie Blochowiak, Environmental Planner with the City, at sblochowiak@fcgov.com. Other Comments: Question: Will the water on site be routed through the ditch on the north? ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6 Packet pg. 134 Neighborhood Meeting Notes – Mars Landing Page 5 Applicant: No, the flows on this development will be connected to an underground storm system. Question: What is the lighting plan for the parking lot? How will you do it safely and dimly? Applicant: This is zoned commercial, so the light pollution of a residential development is likely less than you would see with a more commercial development. We work with lower mounted lights, and the city has strict standards in regard to lighting that we will adhere to. It won’t be as dark as it is now, but the light should not be extending beyond our property. Pete: They will submit a lighting plan that includes building lights, streets lights, and sidewalk lights. They will all be down directional and low light levels. The lighting can’t extend beyond the site boundary. Question: How is it safe in the case of a fire or emergency if there is only one exit? Applicant: The fire department will review this project and they have high standards for safety. They deal with these situations a lot and will be thinking through these types of situations in their review of the plan. The PFA will have emergency access to the residential buildings and clubhouse on site. You will be able to see their comments throughout the process as well. Question: You have a clubhouse – will that be able to be rented out? Applicant: It would be available to the residence for use. The clubhouse will include an office, meeting room, and exercise room. It won’t be a big building so it would not accommodate large groups or parties. Question: How many units and bedrooms will be part of this development? Applicant: 90 units and 128 bedrooms. These are market rate, and we do market rates to determine pricing but likely $1,000-$1,800. Question: Who will manage the apartment complex? Applicant: It will be managed by management company, and they will be onsite. Question: What is the green area on the site plan? Applicant: It is the detention pond. This area is part of the storm water drainage plan for the project. Comment: People are going to have dogs and there is no place for pets. In Colorado many people have dogs. We are concerned their dogs will poop on our lawns. Please consider adding an area for dogs. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6 Packet pg. 135 Neighborhood Meeting Notes – Mars Landing Page 6 Applicant: That is something to consider. Without a formal dog park on site, residents have the option to walk their pets along the street sidewalks, open space on site, and eventually to the trail that will extend along to the west of this property. Question: How are you going to keep the neighborhood kids off the playground? Applicant: We will not be regulating children to stay out of the playground. Comment: I have two primary concerns. First, when storm water drainage was addressed at the site with the storage, they took away the graded areas that had previously leveled off, it is a fast ride down in a wheelchair and could be a safety concern. Second, the drainage in this area has some major issues. The water backs up and there is a lake at the intersection of S. College Avenue when we get rain. Pete: This project will provide streetscape improvements along frontage of Skyway Drive and Mars Drive, with new sidewalks in compliance with ADA standards. The project will also provide storm water improvements on site and connections to off-site drainage systems that meet City stormwater criteria requirements. Sylvia: Thanks for attending tonight. The conversation will be summarized and available as public record. Residents that received notice of this meeting will also be notified of hearing. The next step in the development review process is for the applicant to consider refinements to the project design in preparation of a formal project submittal and review by City staff. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 6 Packet pg. 136 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 137 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 138 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 139 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 140 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 141 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 142 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 143 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 144 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 145 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 146 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 147 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 148 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 149 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 7 Packet pg. 150 Ecological Characterization Study SE Corner of Skyway Drive and Gateway Center Drive In Support of Article 3 General Development Standards, Division 3.4 Environmental, Natural Area, Recreational and Cultural Resource Protection Standards City of Fort Collins, Colorado prepared for: Mark Johnson, RLA 8605 Explorer Dr. Suite 250 Colorado Springs, CO 8092 prepared by: Wildlife Specialties LLC PO Box 1231, Lyons, CO 80540 October 23, 2020 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 151 1 Table of Contents Section / Title Page 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................2 2.0 Environmental Setting ...............................................................................................................................................3 3.0 Proposed Development .............................................................................................................................................3 4.0 Survey Methods ..........................................................................................................................................................3 5.0 Ecological Characterization Report .......................................................................................................................4 5.1 Wildlife Use of the Area ......................................................................................................................................4 5.2 Wetlands ..................................................................................................................................................................5 5.3 Prominent Views ...................................................................................................................................................5 5.4 Native Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................................5 5.5 Significant Non-Native Tree Species................................................................................................................5 5.6 Bank, Shoreline or High-Water Mark ..............................................................................................................5 5.7 Sensitive or Specially Valued Species ..............................................................................................................5 5.8 Special Habitat Features ......................................................................................................................................6 5.9 Wildlife Movement Corridor ..............................................................................................................................6 5.10 General Ecological Function ............................................................................................................................6 5.11 Issues with Timing of Development Activities ............................................................................................6 5.12 Natural Habitat or Feature Requiring Mitigation ........................................................................................7 6.0 Conclusions & Recommendations ........................................................................................................................7 7.0 References...................................................................................................................................................................7 Appendix A ..................................................................................................................................................................... 27 List of Figures/Photos Number / Title Page Figure 1. Parcel Location. ..............................................................................................................................................8 Figure 2. Natural Habitats and Features. ....................................................................................................................9 Photos................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 List of Tables Number / Title Page Table 1. Federal Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Plant and Wildlife Species Potentially Occurring near Skyway Drive and Mars Drive, Fort Collins, CO ............................................................ 14 Table 2. Migratory Birds of Conservation Concern............................................................................................... 16 Table 3. Colorado Parks and Wildlife Endangered, Threatened, and Species of Special Concern ............ 17 Table 4. City of Fort Collins List of Sensitive Wildlife Species ......................................................................... 21 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 152 2 1.0 Introduction This Ecological Characterization Study (ECS) was prepared to identify important City of Fort Collins Natural Habitats and Features at the SE corner of Skyway Drive and Gateway Center Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado (Figure 1). Specifically, this parcel is located in the NE ¼ of the SE ¼, Section 11 of Township 6 North Range 69 West of the sixth prime meridian. Article 3 of the City of Fort Collins (City) General Development Standards section 3.4.1 Natural Habitats and Features states that if development is proposed within five hundred (500) feet of an area or feature identified as a natural habitat or feature on the city’s Natural Habitats and Features Inventory Map (completed in 1999), or if any portion of the development site possesses characteristics (including, without limitation, wetlands, riparian areas or foothills forest) which would have supported their inclusion on the Natural Habitats and Features Inventory Map, and such areas are discovered during site evaluation and/or reconnaissance associated with the development review process then a comprehensive ecological characterization study of the entire property must be prepared by a qualified consultant and submitted to the City for review. Article 3 of the City of Fort Collins (City) General Development Standards section 3.4.1 Natural Habitats and Features identifies the following Natural Communities or Habitats: a) Aquatic (e.g., rivers, streams, lakes, ponds); b) Wetland and wet meadow; c) Native grassland; d) Riparian forest; e) Urban plains forest; f) Riparian shrubland; g) Foothills shrubland; and h) Foothills forest. Article 3 of the General Development Standards section 3.4.1 Natural Habitats and Features identifies the following Special Features: a) Significant remnants of native plant communities; b) Potential habitats and known locations of rare, threatened or endangered species of plants; c) Potential habitats and known locations of rare, threatened or endangered species of wildlife; d) Raptor habitat features, including nest sites, communal roost sites and key concentration areas; e) Concentration areas for nesting and migratory shorebirds and waterfowl; f) Migratory songbird concentration areas; g) Key nesting areas for grassland birds; h) Fox and coyote dens; i) Mule deer winter concentration areas; j) Prairie dog colonies one (1) acre or greater in size; k) Concentration areas for rare, migrant or resident butterflies; l) Areas of high terrestrial or aquatic insect diversity; m) Areas of significant geological or paleontological interest; and n) Irrigation ditches that serve as wildlife corridors. The parcel includes a portion of the North Louden Ditch (a wildlife movement corridor previously identified by the City), a Black-tailed Prairie Dog (prairie dogs - Cynomys ludovicianus) colony greater than one (1) acre in size (Figure 2). Additionally, there is a Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) nest approximately 450 feet east of the east side of the parcel (Figure 3). This ECS is in response to the presence of the prairie dogs, Red-tailed Hawk nest, and the North Louden Ditch. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 153 3 2.0 Environmental Setting The parcel is located in south Fort Collins within a strip of land between South College Avenue and Gateway Center Drive (east and west respectively), and Skyway Drive and West Trilby Road (north and south respectively). The property has historically been used for livestock grazing (primarily cattle and horses). A large self-storage facility is located east of the parcel and residential development is to the north and west with open lands located to the south. Specifically, Skyway Drive defines the northern boundary, Mars Drive to the east, non-native disturbed uplands to the south and Gateway Center Drive to the west. The parcel was converted from native shortgrass prairie into pasture. The parcel is fallow land that is currently not grazed by livestock with no native plant communities present though there are remnant individual native plant species present. Vegetation within the parcel is dominated by invasive non-native plant species including crested wheat grass (Agropyron cristatum), smooth brome (Bromus inermis), field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis), leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula), and cheatgrass (downy brome – Bromus tectorum). Leafy spurge is designated as a “List B” species on the Colorado Noxious Weed Act. It is required to be eradicated, contained, or suppressed depending on the local infestations. No jurisdictional wetlands, wetland plants, or habitats associated with wetlands per the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) are found within the parcel. At the time of the survey there was no flowing or standing water in the North Louden Ditch. 3.0 Proposed Development Development of the parcel is planned; details of the development were not available at the time this ECS was prepared. 4.0 Survey Methods The parcel was visited the afternoon of October 14, 2020 by Jerry Powell, Certified Ecologist, to document wildlife use and habitat, the current plant community, and identification of Natural Habitats or Features. A pedestrian survey via north-south running transects was completed to as closely as possible document any sensitive features or habitats and to count prairie dog burrows/holes. Digital photos of the parcel were taken for inclusion in this ECS. The boundaries of the active Black-tailed Prairie Dog colonies (north and south of the North Louden Ditch) were marked by walking the edge of the active colony (determined by the presence of burrows and areas where the vegetation was cropped short) and using a Global Positioning System (GPS) to record the boundaries. The resulting information was used in ArcGIS to map the location of the prairie dogs in the fall of 2020 to show the current location and size of the colony. Sources of information on the habitat requirements for wildlife species presented in the above lists come from the 2nd Colorado Breeding Bird Atlas (Colorado Bird Atlas Partnership 2016), Mammals of Colorado 2nd Edition (Armstrong et al. 2011), Amphibians and Reptiles in Colorado (Hammerson, 1999), and Colorado’s Little Fish (Woodling, 1985). Online resources consisted of the Colorado Parks and Wildlife website, NatureServe (2019), USDA Forest Service species technical assessments, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listing documents. Likelihood of presence or absence was based on each species-specific habitat requirements and habitat types found within the parcel as well as proximity to human activity. Wildlife species designated as federally listed threatened, endangered and candidate species (as well as Designated Critical Habitats) with potential habitat near the parcel was determined via the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Information, Planning and Conservation (IPaC) website (USFWS 2020 – accessed ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 154 4 October 23, 2020, Appendix A) The IPaC tool also identified migratory birds of conservation concern potentially present within the parcel; and the Colorado Parks and Wildlife’s (CPW 2020) list of state threatened, endangered, and species of special concern. 5.0 Ecological Characterization Report The following subsections are presented in the order identified by the City in Article 3 of the City of Fort Collins General Development Standards section 3.4.1(D) (a-l). 5.1 Wildlife Use of the Area Wildlife use of the area is limited because of the location of the parcel, surrounding land uses, and non- native low diversity plant community. Wildlife species capable of existing within or using the parcel are limited to those species that are either habitat generalists capable of existing in modified urban environments (e.g. prairie dogs), or species which use a wide variety of habitats for foraging over a large area (e.g. Red-tailed Hawk). The dominant mammalian wildlife species within the parcel is the Black-tailed Prairie Dog. Numerous burrows are located within the parcel. In addition to the prairie dogs on site, prairie dogs are present south and east of the parcel. The Eastern Cottontail Rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus) was observed on the parcel as well. These prairie dogs and rabbits support predators (e.g. hawks) and species that are dependent on prairie dogs (e.g. Burrowing Owls) for burrows. Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) were observed (via tracks) using piping associated with the storm water detention pond located on the west side of the parcel. No other mammals or their sign (scat, tracks, etc.) was observed. It is probable however that several small mammalian carnivores/scavengers including Coyotes (Canis latrans), Raccoons (Procyon lotor), and Striped Skunks (Mephitis mephitis) use the parcel as part of their home ranges. Non-native trees are scattered along the western border of the parcel are well established and dominant by the parcel. Species observed within this area include Russian Olive (Elaeagnus ngustifolia) and Chinese Elm (Ulmus parvifolia), both of which are invasive species. Staghorn Sumac (Rhus typhina), non-native to Colorado and invasive, also was noted as present. These non-native trees likely provide suitable avian nesting and foraging habitat. It is likely that the American Robin (Turdus migratorius), Eurasian Collared Dove (Streptopelia decaocto – a non-native invasive species), Lesser Goldfinch (Spinus psaltria), and Western Kingbird (Tyrannus verticalis) nest in these trees (please note that no nests were observed during the site visit). Though they have not been observed, it is possible that both Vesper Sparrows (Pooecetes gramineus) and Western Meadowlarks (Sturnella neglecta) could nest within the parcel. No other evidence of wildlife use of the parcel was noted and no additional wildlife species were observed within the parcel. Aside from the Natural Habitats and Special Features described herein, the parcel does not contain any unique (e.g. fens) or critical (e.g. mule deer winter range) wildlife habitat. There are no bodies of water for use as waterfowl concentration areas. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 155 5 5.2 Wetlands Potential wetlands may occur within the detention pond west of the parcel, though no water was present and no wetlands associated plant species were observed. 5.3 Prominent Views Development of the parcel would occur per City of Fort Collins standards which would work to ensure that there are no impacts to any prominent views from other nearby properties. 5.4 Native Vegetation No intact native vegetation communities are present within the parcel. Remnant native species are present, but the parcel is dominated by non-native upland species. 5.5 Significant Non-Native Tree Species The City defines significant trees in the Land Use Code as trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) of six inches and greater. No non-native trees of this size were observed on the parcel during the survey. 5.6 Bank, Shoreline or High-Water Mark No perennial streams, bodies of water, or wetlands are present within the parcel. Therefore, there is not bank, shoreline, or high-water marks within the parcel. 5.7 Sensitive or Specially Valued Species The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Information for Planning & Conservation (IPaC) website identified nine vertebrate species that have historically or presently have the potential to occur within or near the parcel. Table 1 lists these species and indicates their potential to occur within the parcel; the parcel does not provide habitat for any of these species. Water depletions (aside from historically allocated) are not proposed that would impact any of the Laramie River/Platte River system listed fish species. Additionally, there is no federally Designated Critical Habitat within or near the parcel. The IPAC list of Trust Resources identified 11 Migratory Birds of Conservation Concern that could potentially breed within the parcel (Table 2). Based on available habitat types, only the Western Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) could potentially be present. Species identified by the CPW (CPW 2020) as state sensitive, their habitat requirements, and their potential for occurrence within the parcel is presented in Table 3. The Burrowing Owl has potential habitat (prairie dog burrows) within the parcel; suitable habitat is not present for any other species presented in Table 3. Table 4 provides The City of Fort Collins’ list of wildlife species of concern along with the likelihood of these species occurring within the parcel. Of these species listed, only the Black-tailed prairie dog currently is present within the parcel. The one large Plains Cottonwood tree does provide potential nesting habitat for the Swainson’s Hawk (Buteo swainsoni), though it is unlikely they would nest near the Red-tailed Hawk nest. No other species or habitat for species listed in Table 4 is found within the parcel. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 156 6 Red Fox tracks were observed within the storm water detention pond ditches and piping system. . It is not uncommon for Red Foxes and other small carnivores to use these types of structures. It is likely that the Red Foxes are using this underground pipe network as a den site. No addition al key wildlife production areas, wintering areas and migratory feeding areas for waterfowl; key use areas for wading birds and shorebirds; key use areas for migrant songbirds; key nesting areas for grassland birds; fox and coyote dens; mule deer winter concentration areas; key areas for rare, migrant or resident butterflies; areas of high terrestrial or aquatic insect; remnant native prairie habitat; mixed foothill shrubland; foothill ponderosa pine forest; plains cottonwood riparian woodlands; or other sensitive features are found within the parcel. 5.8 Special Habitat Features Special Habitat Features include the prairie dog colony (greater than one [1] acre in size), one mature Plains Cottonwood tree, and a portion of the North Louden Ditch (a wildlife movement corridor previously identified by the City). No additional Special Habitat Features are present. 5.9 Wildlife Movement Corridor Often times irrigation ditches mimic natural drainage features by providing water for the establishment of riparian habitat. The diversity created by the presence of the water in the plant community is reflected in the animal community. Wildlife occupy different niches and niche overlap is reduced by diversity in structure (tall and short plants) and use (day versus night) within the riparian corridors. The North Louden Ditch within the west parcel has no riparian habitat. It provides extremely limited cover and forage for wildlife; however, it may act as a movement corridor within the general area. The parcel, because of its location in the City and the lack of natural movement corridors between areas of higher quality habitat, does not contain any seasonal (i.e. migration) wildlife movement corridors. 5.10 General Ecological Function The general ecological function of the parcel is to provide habitat for species capable of existing in a very modified and urban environment that is void of an intact native plant community. The dominance of invasive non-native plant species diminishes the general ecological function and value of the parcelprojec, but it is important to those species currently using the parcel. 5.11 Issues with Timing of Development Activities No clearing, grubbing, or general earth work should occur without a nest clearance survey if construction activities occur during the avian nesting season of March 1 through August 31. The presence of the prairie dogs does create potential nesting habitat for the Western Burrowing Owl. Federal and state laws prohibit the harming or killing of Burrowing Owls and the destruction of active nests. Because Burrowing Owls often hide in burrows when alarmed, it is not practical to haze the birds away from prairie dog towns prior to construction activity. Because Burrowing Owls will retire into burrows when alarmed, it is possible to inadvertently kill burrowing owls during earth moving for construction. If earth moving activities or prairie dog management occurs between March 15 and October 31 a Burrowing Owl survey, per Colorado Parks and Wildlife protocol, is necessary. If earth moving activities (and if necessary prairie dog control) occur out of the March – November period surveys are not necessary. If Burrowing Owls are located greater than150 feet from the edge of disturbance associated with earth moving activities no limitations are placed on what type of and where work can be completed. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 157 7 5.12 Natural Habitat or Feature Requiring Mitigation Mitigation per City of Fort Collins standards will be necessary for both the North Louden Ditch and the prairie dogs. 6.0 Conclusions & Recommendations The parcel contains two special habitats or features as defined by the City Land Use Code. Overall, the parcel is of low-quality wildlife habitat in an increasingly urban setting surrounded by residential and commercial development. If earth disturbing activities or clearing/grubbing of vegetation occurs during the avian nesting season (March 1 – August 31) surveys for active nests are required. Additionally, if earth moving activities (requiring prairie dog control) occur between March 15 and October 31 a Burrowing Owl survey is required. 7.0 References Armstrong, D.M., Fitzgerald, J.P., and C.A. Meaney. 2011. Mammals of Colorado. 2nd Ed., Denver Mus. Nat. Hist. and Univ. Press of Colorado. Niwot, CO. 620 pp. Hammerson, G.A. 1999. Amphibians and reptiles in Colorado. Univ. Press of Colorado and Colo. Div. Wildl. Niwot, CO. 484 pp. Colorado Bird Atlas Partnership. 2016. 2nd Colorado Breeding Bird Atlas. Colorado Breeding Bird Partnership and the Colorado Parks and Wildlife. 727 pp. Woodling, J. 1985. Colorado's little fish: a guide to the minnows and other lesser known fishes in the state of Colorado. CDOW Denver, CO. 77 pp. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 158 Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Skyway Drive ¯ Prepared By: Wildlife Specialties LLC www.wildlifespecialtiesllc.com Scale: 1:5,000 1 Inch = 416 Feet October 2020S. College AvenueFigure 1. Project Location Legend Project Area ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 159 [b Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Skyway Drive ¯ Prepared By: Wildlife Specialties LLC www.wildlifespecialtiesllc.comS. College AvenueFigure 2. Natural Habitats & Features Scale: 1:2,500 1 Inch = 208 Feet October 2020 Legend October 2020 BTPD Colony RTHA 450 Ft. Nest Buffer [b RTHA Nest Project Area ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 160 10 Photos Photo 1: Looking south southeast from the northwest corner of the parcel. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 161 11 Photo 2: Looking south southwest from the northeast corner of the parcel. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 162 12 Photo 3: The North Louden Ditch. Note the lack of vegetation within the ditch. The area is used be homeless people and miscellaneous trash etc. was found throughout the area. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 163 13 Photo 4: These tees and the detention pond are located on the northwestern side of the parcel on private property. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 164 14 Table 1. Federal Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Plant and Wildlife Species Potentially Occurring near Skyway Drive and Mars Drive, Fort Collins, CO Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Flowering Plants Spiranthes diluvialis Ute ladies'- tresses Orchid T Commonly associated with alluvial banks, floodplains, or ox- bows associated with perennial streams No potential for occurrence. Platanthera praeclara Western Prairie Fringed Orchid T Water-related activities/use in the N. Platte, S. Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. No potential for occurrence. Fishes Oncorhynchus clarki ssp. stomias Greenback Cutthroat Trout T High altitude cold streams. No potential for occurrence. Scaphirhynchus albus Pallid Sturgeon E Affected by water depletions in N. & S. Platte and Laramie River Basins. No potential for occurrence. Birds Sternula antillarum Least Tern E In Colorado, breeds along sandy reservoir shores only along the Arkansas River valley. No potential for occurrence. Strix occidentalis lucida Mexican Spotted Owl T Rocky canyons with deciduous trees. No potential for occurrence. Charadrius melodus Piping Plover E In Colorado, breeds along sandy reservoir shores only along the Arkansas River valley. No potential for occurrence. Grus americana Whooping Crane E Breed in shallow, grassy wetlands interspersed with grasslands or scattered evergreens, may use crop fields No potential for occurrence. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 165 15 Table 1. Federal Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Plant and Wildlife Species Potentially Occurring near Skyway Drive and Mars Drive, Fort Collins, CO Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence for foraging. Mammals Zapus hudsonious preblei Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse T Riparian areas with lush vegetation. No potential for occurrence. Lynx canadensis Canada Lynx T High altitude spruce-fir forests. No potential for occurrence. Insects Capnia arapahoe Arapahoe Snowfly C Cold, clean, well- oxygenated streams and rivers No potential for occurrence. E = Endangered; T = Threatened; C = Candidate for Federal listing. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 166 16 Table 2. Migratory Birds of Conservation Concern Skyway Drive and Mars Drive, Fort Collins, CO Species Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Areas along rivers or lakes with large trees for nesting and roosting. None Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia Open areas with suitable small mammal burrows. Suitable habitat present. Cassin’s Sparrow Aimophila cassinii Heavily grazed grasslands of eastern Colorado where cholla cactus, yucca, rabbitbrush, or sand sage provides shrubby overstory (Wickersham 2016). None Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos Open and semi-open country featuring native vegetation. Avoid developed areas and uninterrupted stretches of forest. Found primarily in mountains up to 12,000 feet, canyonlands, rimrock terrain, and riverside cliffs and bluffs. Nest on cliffs and steep escarpments in grassland, chapparal, shrubland, forest, and other vegetated areas. None Lark Bunting Calamospiza melanocorys Heavily grazed grasslands of eastern Colorado where cholla cactus, yucca, rabbitbrush, or sand sage provides shrubby overstory (Wickersham 2016). None Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes Breeds only in Alaska through Quebec. None Long-billed Curlew Numenius americanus Expansive blocks of native shortgrass prairie. None Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris pusilla Breeds in sub-arctic tundra and overwinters along the coasts of South America. Migrates east of parcel. None Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus Holarctic breeding distribution; winters along Pacific Ocean into South America None Willet Tringa semipalmata In Colorado breeding is restricted to Jackson County and the San Luis Valley. None Willow Flycatcher Empidonax trailii Riparian thickets in the foothills and montane zones and willow-dominated open valleys and mountain parks – usually distant from trees. None ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 167 17 Table 3. Colorado Parks and Wildlife Endangered, Threatened, and Species of S pecial Concern Skyway Drive and College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO Species Status* Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Fish Arkansas Darter Etheostoma cragini ST Found only in tributaries of the Arkansas River. None Brassy Minnow Hybognathus hankinsoni ST Found in S. Platte and Republican Rivers. None Colorado River Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarki pleuriticus SC Found in the Colorado River Basin. None Colorado Roundtail Chub Gila robusta SC A large river fish found in western Colorado. None Common Shiner Luxilus cornutus ST Found in tributary streams of the S. Platte River. None Flathead Chub Platygobio gracilus SC Found in mainstems of turbid streams and rivers. None Iowa Darter Etheostoma exile SC Found in some plains streams in northeastern Colorado. None Lake Chub Couesius plumbeus SE Extirpated in Colorado (Woodling 1985). None Mountain Sucker Catostomus playtrhynchus SC Found in smaller rivers and streams in northwestern Colorado. None Northern Redbelly Dace Phoxinus eos SE Upper reach tributaries of the S. Platte and Platte River. None Plains Minnow Hybognathus placitus SE Prefer main channel areas with some current and sandy bottoms. Found in eastern Colorado. None Plains Orangethroat Darter Etheostoma spectabile SC Found in small streams of the Republican Basin. None Rio Grande Chub Gila pandora SC Restricted to the Rio Grande Basin in Colorado. None Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis SC Restricted to the Rio Grande Basin in Colorado. None Rio Grande Sucker Catostomus plebeius SE Restricted to the Rio Grande Basin in southern Colorado. None Southern Redbelly Dace Phoxinus erythrogaster SE One population known in Arkansas River tributary. None Stonecat Noturus flavus SC Found in fast water riffles and runs of streams. None Suckermouth Minnow Phenacobius mirabilis SE Found in riffle areas of warm prairie streams of all sizes. None Birds American Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus anatum SC Nests on ledges of high cliffs. None ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 168 18 Table 3. Colorado Parks and Wildlife Endangered, Threatened, and Species of S pecial Concern Skyway Drive and College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO Species Status* Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus SC Large, mature cottonwoods or pines near large water bodies. None Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia ST Nest in rodent burrows in grasslands, shrublands, deserts, and grassy urban areas (golf courses). Suitable habitat present. Columbian Sharp-Tailed Grouse Tympanuchus phasianellus columbianus SC Sagebrush shrublands. None Ferruginous Hawk Buteo regalis SC Vast expanses of ungrazed or lightly grazed grassland and shrubland and shortgrass prairie. None Greater Sage-Grouse Centrocercus urophasianus SC Sagebrush shrublands in northwestern Colorado. None Greater Sandhill Crane Grus canadensis tabida SC Breed in wetland habitats, particularly flooded fields and beaver ponds. None Gunnison Sage-Grouse Centrocercus minimus SC Sage communities in the Gunnison Basin. None Lesser Prairie-Chicken Tympanuchus pallidicinctus ST Optimal habitat is midgrass to tallgrass prairie for nests and winter cover. None Long-Billed Curlew Numenius americanus SC Shortgrass prairie. None Mountain Plover Charadrius montanus SC Grazed shortgrass prairie and fallow fields. None Plains Sharp-Tailed Grouse Tympanuchus phasianellus jamesii SE Rolling hills with scrub oak thickets and grassy glades. None Western Snowy Plover Charadrius alexandrinus SC Sandy open beaches, dry salt flats, dredge spoils, and river bars. None Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus SC Found along major river drainages. None Mammals Black-tailed Prairie Dog Cynomys ludovicianus SC Open prairie grasslands, disturbed areas, fallow and mowed agriculture fields. Present Botta’s Pocket Gopher Thomomy bottae rubidus SC Occur in southern Colorado. None Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis SE Deserts of the Southwest. None Northern Pocket Gopher Thomomys talpoides macrotis SC Many habitat types including agricultural lands, pasture lands, None ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 169 19 Table 3. Colorado Parks and Wildlife Endangered, Threatened, and Species of S pecial Concern Skyway Drive and College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO Species Status* Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence semidesert shrublands, and grasslands. River Otter Lontra canadensis ST Large waterways throughout Colorado. None Swift Fox Vulpes velox SC Short and mid-grass prairies of the Great Plains. None Townsend’s Big-eared Bat Corynorhinus townsendii SC Occupies semidesert shrublands, pinon-juniper woodlands, and open montane forests. None Amphibians/Reptiles Boreal Toad Bufo boreas boreas SE High altitude wetlands, ponds, etc. None Couch's Spadefoot Scaphiopus couchii SC Eastern Colorado plains. None Great Plains Narrowmouth Toad Gastrophryne olivacea SC Extreme southeastern Colorado. None Northern Cricket Frog Acris crepitans SC Found in Yuma, Weld and Morgan Counties at elevations between 3,500–3,600 feet. None Northern Leopard Frog Rana pipiens SC Wet meadows and the banks of and shallows of marshes, ponds, lakes, streams, irrigation ditches. None Plains Leopard Frog Rana blairi SC Eastern Colorado and southeastern Colorado. None Triploid Checkered Whiptail Cnemidophorus neotesselatus SC Foothills of the Rocky Mountains in Fremont County eastward to Pueblo and Stone City in Pueblo County. None Midget Faded Rattlesnake Crotalus viridis concolor SC Desert lands in northwestern Colorado. None Longnose Leopard Lizard Gambelia wislizenii SC Occurs in west-central Colorado and extreme southwestern Colorado. None Yellow Mud Turtle Kinosternon flavescens SC Occurs in eastern Colorado. None Common King Snake Lampropeltis getula SC Occurs in southwestern and southeastern Colorado. None Texas Blind Snake Leptotyphlops dulcis SC Occurs in extreme southeastern Colorado. None Texas Horned Lizard Phrynosoma cornutum SC Occurs in southeastern Colorado. None Roundtail Horned Lizard Phrynosoma modestum SC Occurs in extreme northwestern Otero County. None Massasauga SC Occurs in shortgrass prairie None ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 170 20 Table 3. Colorado Parks and Wildlife Endangered, Threatened, and Species of S pecial Concern Skyway Drive and College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO Species Status* Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Sistrurus catenatus habitats in southeastern Colorado. Common Garter Snake Thamnophis sirtalis SC Restricted to aquatic, wetland and riparian habitats at elevations below 6,000 feet: seldom found at isolated ponds. None *SE = State Endangered. ST = State Threatened. SC = State Special Concern (not a statutory category) ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 171 21 Table 4. City of Fort Collins List of Sensitive Wildlife Species Skyway Drive and Mars Drive, Fort Collins, CO Species Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Fish There is no aquatic habitat within the parcel, thus there are no fish present. Birds American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus Ponds, lake, etc. with tall emergent vegetation in which to nest. None American Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus anatum Nests on ledges of high cliffs. None American White Pelican Pelecanus erythrorhynchos Nest on islands. None Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Large, mature cottonwoods or pines near large water bodies. None Barrow’s Goldeneye Bucephala islandica Nests in a suitable nest cavity near water. None Black Tern Chlidonias niger Prefer marsh complexes of at least 50 acres with open water and fields for feeding. None Black-necked Stilt Himantopus mexicanus Black-necked stilts are wetland obligates. None Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus Grassland obligates associated with native mixed-grass and tallgrass prairie. None Brewer’s Sparrow Spizella breweri Sagebrush shrublands. None Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia Nest in rodent burrows in grasslands, shrublands, deserts, and grassy urban areas (golf courses). None Cassin’s Finch Carpodacus cassinii Breeds in Colorado in high country areas but also in Pinyon Juniper woodlands. None Cassin’s Sparrow Aimophila cassinii Heavily grazed grasslands of eastern Colorado where cholla cactus, yucca, rabbitbrush, or sand sage provides shrubby overstory (Wickersham 2016). None Chestnut-collared Longspur Calcarius ornatus Tallgrass prairies of the Great Plains; found only in northern Colorado. None ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 172 22 Table 4. City of Fort Collins List of Sensitive Wildlife Species Skyway Drive and Mars Drive, Fort Collins, CO Species Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Ferruginous Hawk Buteo regalis Vast expanses of ungrazed or lightly grazed grassland and shrubland and shortgrass prairie. None Flammulated Owl Otus flammeolus Depend on cavities for nesting, open forests for catching insects, and brush or dense foliage for roosting at altitudes between 6,000 – 10,000 ft. None Forster’s Tern Sterna forsteri Most often associated with emergent marsh habitat. None Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos Golden Eagles live in open and semi-open country featuring native vegetation across most of the Northern Hemisphere. They avoid developed areas and uninterrupted stretches of forest. They are found primarily in mountains up to 12,000 feet, canyonlands, rimrock terrain, and riverside cliffs and bluffs. Golden Eagles nest on cliffs and steep escarpments in grassland, chapparal, shrubland, forest, and other vegetated areas. None Grasshopper Sparrow Ammodramus savannarum Open grasslands and prairies with patchy bare ground. None Greater Sandhill Crane Grus canadensis tabida Breed in wetland habitats, particularly flooded fields and beaver ponds. None Lark Bunting Calamospiza melanocorys Grasslands and agricultural areas, mostly associated with the eastern plains. None Lazuli Bunting Passerina amoena Nest in shrubby habitats including hillsides, riparian areas, woodlands and forests. None Least Tern (interior population) Rivers with broad exposed sand bars. None ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 173 23 Table 4. City of Fort Collins List of Sensitive Wildlife Species Skyway Drive and Mars Drive, Fort Collins, CO Species Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Sterna antillarum Lewis’s Woodpecker Melanerpes lewis Open pine forests, burnt over area that provide snags and stumps, riparian areas and pinyon/juniper woodlands. None Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus Shortgrass prairie. None Long-Billed Curlew Numenius americanus Shortgrass prairie. None Mccown’s Longspur Calcarius mccownii Endemic to the shortgrass prairie ecosystem; need heavily grazed cattle pastures with low density vegetation (Wickersham 2016). None Mountain Plover Charadrius montanus Breeds on open plains at moderate elevations. Winters in short-grass plains and fields, plowed fields, and sandy deserts. None Northern Bobwhite Colinus virginianus Often found in riparian habitats. None Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis Predominantly uses ponderosa pine, but will also use Douglas fir, various pines and aspens. None Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus Spring & fall migrant in western valleys mountain parks, and eastern plains in CO inhabiting grasslands, agricultural areas, marshes & tundra in fall; 3,500- 13,000 ft. None Northern Pygmy Owl Glaucidium gnoma Inhabit conifer forests and deciduous woodlands in mountain regions. None Olive-sided Flycatcher Contopus cooperi Boreal forests between 7,000 – 11,000 ft. None Ovenbird Seiurus aurocapilla In Colorado are found in foothills ponderosa pine communities. None Pinyon Jay Pinyon woodlands. None ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 174 24 Table 4. City of Fort Collins List of Sensitive Wildlife Species Skyway Drive and Mars Drive, Fort Collins, CO Species Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Only breeds in southeastern Colorado at large reservoirs. None Plains Sharp-Tailed Grouse Tympanuchus phasianellus jamesii Rolling hills with scrub oak thickets and grassy glades. None Prairie Falcon Falco mexicanus Grasslands, shrub-steppe, deserts, and other open areas of the West up to about 10,000 feet elevation. None Rufous Hummingbird Selasphorus rufus Migrates south down the Rocky Mountains in late summer and early fall after leaving northern breeding grounds. None Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus Open habitats including grasslands, marsh edges, shrub-steppes, and agricultural lands. None Snowy Egret Egretta thula Nest in colonies in trees and shrubs, forage in aquatic habitats. None Swainson’s Hawk Buteo swainsoni Associated with croplands, shelterbelts, and other agricultural lands. Potential nesting habitat present. Upland Sandpiper Bartramia longicauda Breed on native prairie, mountain meadows, and blueberry barrens. None Veery Catharus fuscescens Moist deciduous forests with dense shrubby vegetation. None Virginia’s Warbler Vermivora virginiae Oak forests, pinyon juniper woodlands, and the brushy cover of foothills and montane streamsides. None Western Snowy Plover Charadrius alexandrinus Sandy open beaches, dry salt flats, dredge spoils, and river bars. None White-faced Ibis Plegadis chihi Wetlands. None Willet Tringa semipalmata In Colorado breeding is restricted to Jackson County and the San Luis Valley. None ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 175 25 Table 4. City of Fort Collins List of Sensitive Wildlife Species Skyway Drive and Mars Drive, Fort Collins, CO Species Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence Willow Flycatcher Empidonax trailii Riparian thickets in the foothills and montane zones and willow-dominated open valleys and mountain parks – usually distant from trees. None Wilson’s Phalarope Phalaropus tricolor Emergent Wetlands. None Mammals Abert’s Squirrel Sciurus aberti Ponderosa pine forests. None Bighorn Sheep Ovis canadensis canadensis Rocky areas with cliffs. None Bison Bison bison Vast expanses of unbroken prairie. None Black-footed Ferret Mustela nigripes Prairie dog colonies at least 50 acres in size. None Black-tailed Prairie Dog Cynomys ludovicianus Open prairie grasslands, disturbed areas, fallow and mowed agriculture fields. Present. Dwarf Shrew Sorex nanus In Colorado found in the Southern Rocky Mountains at elevations above 5,500 ft. None Fringed Myotis Myotis thysanodes Coniferous woodlands and shrublands below 7,500 ft. rocky outcroppings in mid- elevation ponderosa pine, pinyon/juniper, oak, & mixed conifer woodlands, grasslands, deserts, & shrublands. None Hoary Bat Lasiurus cinereus Generally a solitary species. In Colorado, the species is frequently detected in ponderosa pine forests where large deciduous trees are lacking. Can occur in any appropriate treed habitat. None Northern Pocket Gopher Thomomys talpoides macrotis Many habitat types including agricultural lands, pasture lands, semidesert shrublands, and grasslands. None. No mounds seen within parcel. Olive-backed Pocket Mouse Perognathus fasciatus In Colorado restricted to grasslands along the western None ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 176 26 Table 4. City of Fort Collins List of Sensitive Wildlife Species Skyway Drive and Mars Drive, Fort Collins, CO Species Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence margin of the plains and to shrub-grasslands of the northwestern part of the state. Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse Zapus hudsonius prebleii Riparian habitats with appropriate shrub component and available uplands for foraging. None River Otter Lontra canadensis Large waterways throughout Colorado. None Sagebrush Vole Lemmiscus curtatus Found in northwestern Colorado in sagebrush dominated habitats. None Swift Fox Vulpes velox Short and mid-grass prairies of the Great Plains. None Townsend’s Big-eared Bat Corynorhinus townsendii Occupies semidesert shrublands, pinon-juniper woodlands, and open montane forests. None Amphibians/Reptiles Northern Leopard Frog Rana pipiens Wet meadows and the banks of and shallows of marshes, ponds, lakes, streams, irrigation ditches. None Common Garter Snake Thamnophis sirtalis Restricted to aquatic, wetland and riparian habitats at elevations below 6,000 feet: seldom found at isolated ponds. None Lined Snake Tropicdoclonion lineatum Most abundant in southeastern Colorado in damp sites in flat plains grasslands, canyon bottom grasslands, riparian areas, and grassy vacant lots and gullies in cities. None Milksnake Lampropeltis triangulum Found in a wide variety of habitats including shortgrass prairie, sandhills, shrubby hillsides, canyons and arid river valleys. None Ornate box turtle Terrapene ornata Sandhills and shortgrass prairie in eastern Colorado. None ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 177 27 Appendix A USFWS IPaC Report for the SW Corner of Skyway Drive and Mars Drive, Fort Collins CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 178 October 23, 2020 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Colorado Ecological Services Field Office Denver Federal Center P.O. Box 25486 Denver, CO 80225-0486 Phone: (303) 236-4773 Fax: (303) 236-4005 http://www.fws.gov/coloradoES http://www.fws.gov/platteriver In Reply Refer To: Consultation Code: 06E24000-2018-SLI-1320 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186 Project Name: Skyway Townhomes Subject:Updated list of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 179 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   2    ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/ eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats. Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http:// www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http:// www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/ comtow.html. We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. Attachment(s): Official Species List USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries Migratory Birds Wetlands ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 180 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   3    ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 181 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   1    Official Species List This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Colorado Ecological Services Field Office Denver Federal Center P.O. Box 25486 Denver, CO 80225-0486 (303) 236-4773 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 182 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   2    Project Summary Consultation Code:06E24000-2018-SLI-1320 Event Code:06E24000-2021-E-00186 Project Name:Skyway Townhomes Project Type:DEVELOPMENT Project Description:residential development Project Location: Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/place/40.50115032914786N105.0804557109165W Counties:Larimer, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 183 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   3    1. Endangered Species Act Species There is a total of 10 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Note that 5 of these species should be considered only under certain conditions. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. Mammals NAME STATUS Canada Lynx Lynx canadensis Population: Wherever Found in Contiguous U.S. There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3652 Threatened Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse Zapus hudsonius preblei There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4090 Threatened 1 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 184 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   4    ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Birds NAME STATUS Least Tern Sterna antillarum Population: interior pop. No critical habitat has been designated for this species. This species only needs to be considered under the following conditions: Water-related activities/use in the N. Platte, S. Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8505 Endangered Mexican Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis lucida There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8196 Threatened Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations] - Wherever found, except those areas where listed as endangered. There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. This species only needs to be considered under the following conditions: Water-related activities/use in the N. Platte, S. Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039 Threatened Whooping Crane Grus americana Population: Wherever found, except where listed as an experimental population There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. This species only needs to be considered under the following conditions: Water-related activities/use in the N. Platte, S. Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/758 Endangered Fishes NAME STATUS Greenback Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarkii stomias No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2775 Threatened Pallid Sturgeon Scaphirhynchus albus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. This species only needs to be considered under the following conditions: Water-related activities/use in the N. Platte, S. Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7162 Endangered ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 185 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   5    ▪ Flowering Plants NAME STATUS Ute Ladies'-tresses Spiranthes diluvialis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2159 Threatened Western Prairie Fringed Orchid Platanthera praeclara No critical habitat has been designated for this species. This species only needs to be considered under the following conditions: Water-related activities/use in the N. Platte, S. Platte and Laramie River Basins may affect listed species in Nebraska. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1669 Threatened Critical habitats THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 186 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   1    USFWS National Wildlife Refuge Lands And Fish Hatcheries Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 187 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   1    1. 2. 3. Migratory Birds Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act . Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626 Breeds Oct 15 to Jul 31 Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9737 Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 31 1 2 ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 188 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   2    NAME BREEDING SEASON Cassin's Sparrow Aimophila cassinii This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9512 Breeds Aug 1 to Oct 10 Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680 Breeds Jan 1 to Aug 31 Lark Bunting Calamospiza melanocorys This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA Breeds May 10 to Aug 15 Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679 Breeds elsewhere Long-billed Curlew Numenius americanus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5511 Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31 Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris pusilla This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds elsewhere Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9483 Breeds elsewhere Willet Tringa semipalmata This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 5 Willow Flycatcher Empidonax traillii This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3482 Breeds May 20 to Aug 31 Probability Of Presence Summary The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 189 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   3    1. 2. 3. FAQ “Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence () Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps: The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. Breeding Season () Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey Effort () Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. No Data () A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 190 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   4    ▪ ▪ ▪ no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Bald Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable Burrowing Owl BCC - BCR Cassin's Sparrow BCC - BCR Golden Eagle BCC - BCR Lark Bunting BCC - BCR Lesser Yellowlegs BCC Rangewide (CON) Long-billed Curlew BCC Rangewide (CON) Semipalmated Sandpiper BCC Rangewide (CON) Whimbrel BCC Rangewide (CON) Willet BCC Rangewide (CON) Willow Flycatcher BCC - BCR Additional information can be found using the following links: Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/ birds-of-conservation-concern.php Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/ management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/ conservation-measures.php Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/ management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf Migratory Birds FAQ Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 191 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   5    Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location. The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool. What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets . Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 192 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   6    1. 2. 3. project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. What if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location”. Please be aware this report provides the “probability of presence” of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 193 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   7    overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no data” indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 194 10/23/2020 Event Code: 06E24000-2021-E-00186   1    ▪ Wetlands Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. RIVERINE R5UBFx ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 8 Packet pg. 195 September 16, 2021Pete Wray, AICPSenior City PlannerPlanning and Zoning CommissionMars Landing#PDP190013ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 196 2SITESiteITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 197 Looking South3ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 198 Project OverviewSouth College Corridor Plan• CommercialZoning• General CommercialProposal• 2 3-story Multi-family buildings• 90 units/128 bedroomsParking• 151 vehicle parking spaces• 128 bike parking spacesLot•3.79-acres4ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 199 5ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 200 6Main Project Considerations:ƒNatural Habitat Buffer and Stormwater requirementsƒParking/Pedestrian circulationƒOutdoor gathering space amenitiesƒOff-site streetscape improvementsƒBuilding and project compatibilityITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 201 7NHBZ AreaƒOnsite mitigation results in the creation of .85 ac uplands and .043 ac of wetlands.ƒOnsite mitigation will not amount to a 1:1 mitigation value, providing payment to City for one acre of uplands restoration.ƒApplicant is trapping and donating existing prairie dogs on site.ƒNative seed mix, weed mitigation, and additional native plantings throughout other areas of the site will further enhance the ecological character and habitat value of the site.Natural Habitat Buffer AreaITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 202 8ParkingNumber of Bedrooms/Dwelling UnitParking Spaces Per Dwelling Unit*One or less1.5Two1.75Three2.0ƒProject is required to provide 145 parking spaces.ƒPlan provides a total of 151 spaces exceeding compliance with the standards of this Section:- 130 standard surface parking spaces- 8 accessible spaces- 13 garage spacesVehicular Parking:Bicycle Parking:Bicycle parking requirements for multifamily residential use are 1 space per bedroom. ƒPlan includes 90 DU/128 Bedrooms = 128 spaces requiredƒPlan provides 128 spaces (32 enclosed/96 fixed racks)Staff recommends a Condition of Approval (1) regarding compliance with 3.2.2 (C) (4) – Bicycle Facilities, to provide 60% covered bicycle spaces (77 spaces), and 40% fixed rack spaces (51 spaces).ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 203 9Central feature and gathering spacesPedestrian SpineITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 204 10PlatSiteSkyway DriveS College AveMars Drive5-Star StorageITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 205 11LandscapingCollege/Skyway FrontageITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 206 12LandscapingScreen Fence on WallITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 207 13Project CompatibilityBuilding Stepdown-North ElevationLandscape Buffer and TransitionSkyway DriveITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 208 14Building – 42 UnitITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 209 15Building – 42 UnitITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 210 16Building – 42 UnitITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 211 17Building – 48 UnitITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 212 18Building – 48 UnitITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 213 19Building – 48 UnitITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 214 20Garage AITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 215 21Garage BITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 216 22Garage CITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 217 23Staff recommends a Condition of Approval (2) regarding compliance with 3.2.5 – Trash and Recycling Enclosure Wall Materials, addressed at FDP,to ensure the enclosures are screened with a more durable material in place of cedar fencing such as textured concrete block, CMU blocks, or all metal fencing. This will include interior curbing or metal strips to buffer dumpster bins from hitting walls. ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 218 Recommendation24Staff recommends approval of the Mars Landing project, PDP190013with two conditions of approval.ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 9Packet pg. 219 Planning & Zoning Board Hearing September 16, 2021 Mars Landing Goodwin Knight Fort Collins, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 220 2 Project Team MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO Goodwin Knight –Nicole Renner – Director of Architecture and Community Development Galloway & Company, Inc. (Landscape Architecture & Engineering) –Donald Cecil, PE - Senior Civil Project Engineer –Kara Scheetz, RLA –Landscape Architect Godden | Sudik (Architecture) –Chris Walla, NCARB, LEED-AP – Senior Project Architect ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 221 3 Project Location MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO •SWC of Skyway Drive and Mars Drive •Part of the South College Corridor Plan ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 222 4 South College Storage Subdivision MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 223 5 Context Overview MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO •Construction of two buildings with 90 total multi-family residential units •151 On-Site Parking Spaces with Three Garage Buildings •128 On-Site Bicycle Parking Spaces •Extension of Mars Drive to south property line for future Trilby connection (by others) •Part of South College Storage Subdivision (Oct. 2017) – Requirements of further development of Subdivision after South College Storage Units –Wetland and Natural Habitat Buffer Zone Mitigation Required –South College Avenue Improvements •Part of South College Corridor Plan – Requirements for trail connection through site •Neighborhood Meeting held Aug. 2019 – Initiated further traffic study and right-turn lane at eastbound Skyway Drive at College Avenue •On-Site Drainage Control and Water Quality Facilities ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 224 6 Site Plan – September 2019 MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO •Clubhouse and Large Amenity •5 Garage Buildings •Total Parking: 168 sp ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 225 7 Site Plan – September 2021 MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO •Removed Clubhouse •Dispersed Amenities •Additional Multi- Family Building Entrances •Habitat Mitigation and Wildlife Movement Corridor •Total Parking: 151 sp ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 226 8 College Avenue Improvements MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 227 9 Site Design MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 228 10 MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 229 11 Conditions of Approval MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO •Trash Enclosure Architecture and Materials •Sheltered Bicycle Parking – Required 60% of Spaces ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 230 12 Architectural Design MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO •Building Differentiation •Compatibility with Neighborhood to North ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 231 13 North Building – East Perspective MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 232 14 North Building – West Perspective MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 233 15 South Building – East Perspective MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 234 16 South Building – West Perspective MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 235 17 North Building MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 236 18 South Building MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 237 19 Questions? MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO Goodwin Knight –Nicole Renner – Director of Architecture and Community Development Galloway & Company, Inc. (Landscape Architecture & Engineering) –Donald Cecil, PE - Senior Civil Project Engineer –Kara Scheetz, RLA –Landscape Architect Godden | Sudik (Architecture) –Chris Walla, NCARB, LEED-AP – Senior Project Architect ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 238 MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO Supplemental Information ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 239 21 Garage Elevations MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 240 22 Garage Elevations MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 241 23 Garage Elevations MARS LANDING – FORT COLLINS, CO ITEM 3, ATTACHMENT 10 Packet pg. 242