No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/19/2020 - Planning And Zoning Board - Supplemental Documents - Regular Meeting1 Katharine Claypool From:Meaghan Overton Sent:Monday, November 9, 2020 8:08 AM To:Katharine Claypool Subject:FW: [EXTERNAL] H-25 Multi-Family Attachments:Response_to_TIS_Comment_2_Proportional_Contribution.pdf Categories:P&Z Hi Katie,    I got this message from Boardmember Katz (below) regarding the H‐25 project. I think the response should probably be  shared with the board as a whole.    Answer: Yes, a fee in lieu for the proportional share of intersection improvements has been agreed to by the developer  and the City Engineering Department. The traffic memo linked in the staff report and attached here summarize this  agreement.    Best,  Meaghan    From: David Katz <katz.davidp@gmail.com>   Sent: Friday, November 6, 2020 5:52 PM  To: Meaghan Overton <moverton@fcgov.com>  Subject: [EXTERNAL] H‐25 Multi‐Family    Meaghan- If this project is approved, will the developer be required to escrow funds for future improvements to the intersection at Kechter and Strauss Cabin? It is my understanding this was a requirement from The Wyatt Development.     Kindly,   David P Katz     Updated 11.19.20 Packet pg. 1 DELICH ASSOCIATES Traffic & Transportation Engineering 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, Colorado 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 MEMORANDUM TO: John Tufte, Sanderson Stewart Ryan McBreen, Norris Design Steve Gilchrist, Fort Collins Traffic Operation Department FROM: Michael Delich/Matt Delich DATE: August 13, 2020 SUBJECT: Harmony 25 Multi-Family TIS – Response to staff comment #2 (File: 1997ME04) This memorandum responds to comment #2 (dated March 13, 2020) and follow- up comment #2 (dated July 21, 2020) by Martina Wilkinson, Fort Collins Traffic Operation, regarding the “Harmony 25 Multi-Family Transportation Impact Study,” (TIS) February 2020. Comment #2 and follow-up is as displayed below: “(3/10/2020) Further conversations need to be had regarding the Strauss Cabin/Kechter intersection. Short term total function is VERY poor (average delay per vehicle 6 minutes). Our standards indicate that mitigation may be required.” “(7/21/2020) Comment response Indicated that this information will be forth coming. Is there an estimate of when it would be submitted? A general approach and understanding of any mitigation is needed before hearing.” As was done with Harmony 23 and an earlier version of the Harmony 25 project, a memorandum regarding the proportional contribution for the required mitigation measures at the Kechter/Strauss Cabin intersection has been prepared and accompanies this memorandum. Updated 11.19.20 Packet pg. 2 DELICH ASSOCIATES Traffic & Transportation Engineering 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, Colorado 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 MEMORANDUM TO: John Tufte, Sanderson Stewart Ryan McBreen, Norris Design Jeff Jensen, Jensen-LaPlante Development JD Padilla, Post Modern Development Jacob Steele, Terra Development Group Fort Collins Traffic Operations FROM: Michael Delich/Matt Delich DATE: August 13, 2020 SUBJECT: Harmony 25 Multi-Family TIS – Kechter/Strauss Cabin Intersection Proportional Contribution (File: 1997ME03) This memorandum documents analyses of the proportional contribution of traffic to the Kechter/Strauss Cabin intersection. This analysis provides an update of a previous analysis (memorandum dated January 10, 2017), since the development proposal on the Harmony 25 property has changed. As documented in the “Harmony 25 Multi-Family Transportation Impact Study,” (TIS) February 2020, either two auxiliary lanes or roundabout control is necessary at this intersection. The preferred control is a roundabout. Rather than build auxiliary lanes that would be “throw away” in the future, City staff suggested that the known development projects that contribute traffic to the subject intersection, be assessed cash-in-lieu for the auxiliary lanes. That money would be used to help build the roundabout in the future. It is our understanding that the City would be responsible for the difference between the cost of the auxiliary lanes and the roundabout. In this analysis, the known developments are: Harmony 23 (The Wyatt Apartments built and partially occupied), Harmony 25 – Phase 1, and Harmony 25 – Phase 2. It is our understanding that Harmony 23 has already paid their cash-in-lieu contribution based upon the TIS done for that development in 2016. In 2017, the City of Fort Collins estimated that the cost of the required auxiliary lanes at the Kechter/Strauss Cabin intersection would be approximately $260,000. According to the analysis done in 2017, the proportional contribution for Harmony 23 was calculated at $40,000. Therefore, the remaining cost estimate for the auxiliary lanes is $220,000. Figure 1 shows the long range (2040) site generated peak hour traffic for Harmony 25 (Phase 1) and Harmony 25 (Phase 2) at the Kechter/Strauss Cabin intersection (from the cited TIS). Figure 2 shows the long range (2040) total peak hour traffic at the Kechter/ Strauss Cabin intersection. Updated 11.19.20 Packet pg. 3 DELICH Kechter/Strauss Cabin Intersection Proportional Contribution, July 2020 ASSOCIATES Figure 3 shows the long range (2040) required geometry at the Kechter/Strauss Cabin intersection. In order to simplify the analyses, the combination of the morning and afternoon peak hour traffic going through the intersection (as documented in the respective TIS’s) were used. The movements included are the southbound left-turn, southbound right-turn, eastbound left-turn, and westbound right-turn. The following is the proportional share attributable to each development for the auxiliary turn lanes in the long range (2040) future: Harmony 25, Phase 1 – 22.9 percent (48/210) and Harmony 25, Phase 2 – 77.1 percent (162/210). Therefore, of the $220,000 remaining for the auxiliary lanes, Harmony 25, Phase 1 would owe $50,380 and Harmony 25, Phase 2 would owe $169,620. There are a few properties near the Kechter/Strauss Cabin intersection that, when they develop, are likely to have some impacts at the intersection. South of the Harmony 25 site are existing quarry ponds similar to that found on the Harmony 25 property. This acreage (approximately 114 acres extending to I-25) has similar potential of development if the quarry ponds were filled in. This land may be under the same ownership as Harmony 25. There are some large acre lots along both sides of Strauss Cabin Road that could be developed at a higher density. On the east side of the road are three lots with an average size of three acres. On the west side of the road are four lots with an average size of four acres. Further to the west, adjacent to Observatory Village, there is some vacant land on the north side of Kechter Road that is a proposed as the Kechter Townhomes. All of these proposed and potential developments (along with some properties east of I-25 in Timnath) could have impacts to the Kechter/Strauss Cabin intersection. If these additional developments occur that also contribute traffic to the Kechter/Strauss Cabin intersection, it is expected that traffic from these would also be similarly assessed and a proportional share would be reimbursed to both the Harmony 23 and Harmony 25 projects. Do not hesitate to contact us if you have questions or you desire additional information. Updated 11.19.20 Packet pg. 4 AM/PM HARMONY 25, PHASE 1 & HARMONY 25, PHASE 2 LONG RANGE (2040) SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 1 LONG RANGE (2040) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2 DELICH ASSOCIATES Kechter/Strauss Cabin Intersection Proportional Contribution, July 2020 Harmony 25, Phase 1 Harmony 25, Phase 2 KechterStrauss Cabin8/58/534/6 3/835/7 3/85/346/35KechterStrauss Cabin40/3025/1525/15125/14085/65 435/740 25/45 10/25 620/715 215/13515/3070/80AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles16/1011/6969/136/16Updated 11.19.20 Packet pg. 5 LONG RANGE (2040) REQUIRED GEOMETRY Figure 3 DELICH ASSOCIATES Kechter/Strauss Cabin Intersection Proportional Contribution, July 2020 KechterStrauss CabinSTOP STOP - Required Lane - Existing Lane Updated 11.19.20 Packet pg. 6 1 Steve Gilchrist From:John Tufte <Jtufte@sandersonstewart.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 8, 2020 1:40 PM To:Steve Gilchrist Cc:Matt Delich; Michael P. Delich; Nicole Hahn Subject:[EXTERNAL] H25- Strauss Cabin and Kechter Intersection memorandum - Follow-up to Meeting (2020-09-08) Follow Up Flag:For Your Information Flag Status:Flagged Steve (cc Nichole, Matt, and Michael) Thank you everyone for your time on our call today to discuss the H25 multifamily property contribution to the Strauss Cabin and Kechter intersection. Based on our discussion it was understood that the memorandum written by Delich Associates on August 13, 2020 did summarize the remaining contributions towards the intersection improvements. The last sentence of paragraph three notes that the current H25 MF project owes $50,380 and the future H25/Phase 2 project will owe $169,620. The total of these 2 projects equals $220,000 and the addition of the previous dedication by H23 of $40,000 totals the original estimate of $260,000. It is our understanding that no additional revisions are required for this memorandum. Thank you again for everyone’s time. Have a great day. John Tufte PE Principal | Colorado Region Manager t: (970) 893-2106 m: (970) 893-1688 SandersonStewart.com Billings • Bozeman • Denver • Fort Collins To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Updated 11.19.20 Packet pg. 7 21793920.5 Carolynne C. White Attorney at Law 303.223.1197 tel 303.223.0997 fax cwhite@bhfs.com 410 Seventeenth Street, Suite 2200 Denver, CO 80202-4432 main 303.223.1100 bhfs.com Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP November 14, 2020 Planning and Zoning Board City of Fort Collins 281 N College Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE:November 19, 2020 Planning and Zoning Board (“Planning and Zoning”) Meeting, City of Fort Collins (the “City”) –Harmony 25, LLC’s Project Development Plan Application (the “Application”) Dear Board Members: This letter is sent on behalf of our client, Harmony 25, LLC (“Harmony”), the owner of the property located at the corner of Harmony Road and Strauss Cabin Road (the “Property”). In this letter, we set forth a summary of Harmony’s comments on the Application for the consideration of Planning and Zoning. This letter explains in more detail why the Application merits approval by Planning & Zoning. I.BACKGROUND AND HISTORY Harmony purchased the Property in December of 2015. Prior to Harmony’s acquisition, the property had historically been used as a gravel mining operation, and consists of vacant land, and the former gravel pits, which are filled with water which has not been permitted for such use. As staff notes in its staff report for this project, existing habitat value on the site is low-quality, and most native vegetation has been removed by previous gravel mining activity and overgrazing by prairie dogs. Several years ago,Planning and Zoning approved an Overall Development Plan (an “ODP”) for a 55-acre development that included the Property. Additional minor am endments to the ODP, unrelated to this application, were approved in 2017 and 2019. Now, Harmony seeks PDP approval to construct a multi-family community on the Property, consistent with this approved ODP and the applicable regulatory framework, and to begin to restore this Property to a use which contributes to the fabric of the community. II.ANALYSIS A.Applicable Standards and Guidelines Although the Harmony Corridor Standards and Guidelines were recently amended, the applicable review standards for the Application are 2006 Harmony Corridor Standards and Guidelines (the “Standards and ITEM 7, CORRESPONDENCE 1 Updated 11.19.20 Packet pg. 8 Planning and Zoning Board November 14, 2020 Page 2 21793920.5 Guidelines”) because those were the applicable standards and guidelines in effect when the City approved the ODP and when this PDP was submitted. B.Development Plan’s Compliance with the Code As you can see from the extensive materials accompanying the Application, Harmony has thoughtfully prepared its Application, working with staff and public comment feedback to design a project that meets or exceeds the standards and implements the Harmony Corridor Plan.The site plan and details of the project have evolved considerably as Harmony held discussions with different City departments and incorporated input from staff and the public. The Application and accompanying materials clearly demonstrate that the Application complies with all requirements in Section 2.4.2(H) of the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code (the “Code”) (except for the minor modification of standards discussed below in Section II.C., which meets the standards for such modification). The Application complies with all general development standards applicable to the development proposal in Article 3 of the Code. For example, Harmony designed (1) its community to comply with the tree planting standards contained in Section 3.2.1(D) of the Code; (2) the community’s internal street-like private drive to com ply with the access and parking lot requirements contained in Section 3.2.2(D) of the Code; and (3) a visually interesting split-rail fence between the community and Harmony Road to comply with the fence requirements contained in Section 3.8.11(A) of the Code. The Application also complies with the applicable district standards in Division 4.26 of the Code. First, it is important to note that, as discussed above, the 2006 Guidelines and Standards are the applicable land use standards referenced in Section 4.26(D)(1) of the Code. Harmony’s Application complies with these standards. For example, Harmony has included a meandering sidewalk and accompanying landscaping between the community and Harmony Road and designed grading that creates naturalistic berms and soften the visual impact of the community from Harmony Road. The Application also is consistent with the ODP. For example, Harmony has included in its Application numerous access points to the community to provide for future street connections constructed in the area. Therefore, the Application applies with the requirements in Section 2.4(H) of the Code. C.Modification of Standards Additionally, we urge Planning and Zoning to recommend approval of Harmony’s request for a modification of standards with respect to the primary entrance of Building 3 being located more than 350 feet away from a public sidewalk because of the unique, site-specific development constraints and Harmony’s thoughtful proposal of an alternative walkway that fulfills the Code’s intent. This request impacts only a single building within the proposed community. As discussed in Norris Design’s letter dated October 26, 2020 (the “Norris Letter”), Harmony cannot construct a direct connection between its community and Harmony Road because (1) existing water line and irrigation ditch easements expressly prevent development and improvements in this location and (2) the area between Building 3 and Harmony Road is located within an existing floodplain and floodway. In lieu of a direct connection, Harmony plans to construct (i) a landscaped walkway spine between the community and Harmony Road that connects to the public sidewalk at the intersection of Strauss Cabin Road and Harmony Road in a manner that is safe for future residents and the general public; (ii) a rustic, split-rail fence along the northern portion of the walkway to prevent pedestrians from approaching the open irrigation ditch; and (iii) a connecting walkway to the community’s internal street-like private drive network and associated detached walkway system within the 350-foot requirement noted in Section 3.5.2(D)(1)(b) of the Code. ITEM 7, CORRESPONDENCE 1 Updated 11.19.20 Packet pg. 9 Planning and Zoning Board November 14, 2020 Page 3 21793920.5 As discussed more fully in the Norris Letter, Harmony’s modification of standards request complies with the criteria in Section 2.8.2(H) of the Code because (1) the alternative walkway promotes the general purpose of the standard for which the modification is requested equally well or better than would a plan which com plies with the standard for which a modification is requested; (2) the alternative walkway would alleviate an existed, defined and described problem of city-wide concern or would result in a substantial benefit to the City; (3) existing constraints on the Property hinder Harmony’s ability to construct a walkway between the community and Harmony Road; and (4) Harmony’s request is nominal when considered from the perspective of the entire development plan, and will continue to advance the purposes of the Code. Although Harmony believes it complies with all four criteria, it is important to note that Harmony must com ply with only one criterion. Moreover, Harmony’s request for a modification of standards has Staff support. In Staff comments dated October 20, 2020, and in the Staff Report, Staff agrees that the modification is justified, among other reasons, “because of the unique site constraints and that the way [Harmony has] addressed these constraints attempts to fulfill the intent of the Code.” Therefore, in light of Harmony’s compliance with the Code and Staff’s analysis that the application complies with all applicable standards and plans, we request that Planning and Zoning approve Harmony’s request for modification of standards. III.CONCLUSION On behalf of Harmony, we sincerely appreciate your thoughtful consideration of the Application and the materials submitted in connection therewith, including this letter. Sincerely, Carolynne C. White ITEM 7, CORRESPONDENCE 1 Updated 11.19.20 Packet pg. 10 6)'(/,35(36).,7&+(16(59,&(6)&2))((35(36)5(7$,/6)ƒ%(9(5$*(&22/(56)ƒ%((5&22/(5ƒ6725&22/(5ƒ)5((=(56725(52206725$*(9(1'255(&(,9,1*:20(1 60(1 6(;,7+$//:$<(/(&75,&$/2)),&(+286(.((3,1*3$'+$//:$<  Prototype Version: 66WDWH6WUHHW6DOW/DNH&LW\8WDKBuilding Square Footage: Construction Type/Occupancy Classification: PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STOREFORT COLLINS, CO60_L_XR_2003A-1FLOOR PLAN6,132 SFV-B / M6&$/(  )/2253/$1ITEM 6, ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGSUpdated 11.19.20Packet pg. 11 +286(.((3,1*3$'&21'(16,1*81,7+9$&522)72381,7&21'(16,1*81,76.</,*+7+9$&522)72381,7+9$&522)72381,7&21'(16,1*81,7&21'(16,1*81,7&21'(16,1*81,7&21'(16,1*81,767((/$:1,1*3$,17('%/$&.)2;7<367$1',1*6($00(7$/522)0,'1,*+7%521=(522)&5,&.(77<339&522),1*:+,7(29(555,*,',168/$7,21$$&21'(16,1*81,7($67&2817<52$'6:)5217$*(52$',2))5$03Prototype Version: 66WDWH6WUHHW6DOW/DNH&LW\8WDKBuilding Square Footage: Construction Type/Occupancy Classification: PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STOREFORT COLLINS, CO60_L_XR_2003A-2ROOF PLAN6,132 SFV-B / M6&$/(  522)3/$16&$/(  %8,/',1*6(&7,216&$/(  %8,/',1*6(&7,21ITEM 6, ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGSUpdated 11.19.20Packet pg. 12 Prototype Version: 66WDWH6WUHHW6DOW/DNH&LW\8WDKBuilding Square Footage: Construction Type/Occupancy Classification: PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STOREFORT COLLINS, CO60_L_XR_2003A-3PERSPECTIVE VIEWS6,132 SFV-B / M6&$/(5,*+73(563(&7,9(6&$/(/()73(563(&7,9(ITEM 6, ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGSUpdated 11.19.20Packet pg. 13 ),1,6+(')/225 723$5$3(7 :,1'2:+($' 72522) 72:$,16&27 67((/%($0%($5,1* )5217'(&.%($5,1* 7<37<37<37<37<37<37<37<37<3),1,6+(')/225 723$5$3(7 72522) 72:$,16&27 723,(5&$3 )5217'(&.%($5,1* 7<37<37<37<37<37<37<37<3Prototype Version: 66WDWH6WUHHW6DOW/DNH&LW\8WDKBuilding Square Footage: Construction Type/Occupancy Classification: PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STOREFORT COLLINS, CO60_L_XR_2003A-4EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS6,132 SFV-B / M6&$/(  )5217(/(9$7,21.(<('127(6 &8/785('6721(9(1((56.</,1(&28175</('*(6721( &8/785('6721(9(1((5&$36.</,1(&28175</('*(6721( 63/,7)$&(&08%/2&.&2/25&$19$6 +,*+:,7+&21&5(7(&$3 7+,1%5,&.$6+ 35(),1,6+('*877(5%5,7(5(' 3$,17('67((/%/$&.)2; 0%&,35(),1,6+('0(7$/522)67$1',1*6($00,'1,*+7%521=( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/($9()/$6+,1*%<522)0$18)$&785(50,'1,*+7%521=( 67((/$:1,1*&2/253 ),%(5&(0(17%2$5' %$77(16,',1*$*('3(:7(5 $/80,1806725()52176<67(0'$5.%521=( +2//2:0(7$/'225$1')5$0(3$,17('$*('3(:7(56&$/(  /()7(/(9$7,21ITEM 6, ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGSUpdated 11.19.20Packet pg. 14 ),1,6+(')/225 723$5$3(7 723$5$3(7 72522) 72:$,16&27 723,(5&$3 7<37<37<37<37<37<3),1,6+(')/225 723$5$3(7 72522) 72:$,16&27 723,(5&$3 67((/%($0%($5,1* )5217'(&.%($5,1* 7<37<37<37<37<37<36&$/(  5($5(/(9$7,21Prototype Version: 66WDWH6WUHHW6DOW/DNH&LW\8WDKBuilding Square Footage: Construction Type/Occupancy Classification: PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STOREFORT COLLINS, CO60_L_XR_2003A-5 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS6,132 SFV-B / M.(<('127(6 &8/785('6721(9(1((56.</,1(&28175</('*(6721( &8/785('6721(9(1((5&$36.</,1(&28175</('*(6721( 63/,7)$&(&08%/2&.&2/25&$19$6 +,*+:,7+&21&5(7(&$3 7+,1%5,&.$6+ 35(),1,6+('*877(5%5,7(5(' 3$,17('67((/%/$&.)2; 0%&,35(),1,6+('0(7$/522)67$1',1*6($00,'1,*+7%521=( 67((/$:1,1*&2/253 ),%(5&(0(17%2$5' %$77(16,',1*$*('3(:7(56&$/(  5,*+7(/(9$7,21ITEM 6, ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGSUpdated 11.19.20Packet pg. 15 ),1,6+(')/225 %277202))$6&,$ 7232)&$123< 7<37<37<37<37<37<37<37<37<37<3  7<37<37<3 7<37<3675((76,'(),1,6+(')/225 %277202))$6&,$ 7232)&$123<  7<37<37<37<37<37<37<37<3),1,6+(')/225 %277202))$6&,$ 7232)&$123< 7<37<37<37<37<37<37<37<37<37<36&$/(  )8(/',63(16,1*&$123<675((7(/(9$7,216&$/(  &$123<&2/8013/$1Prototype Version: 66WDWH6WUHHW6DOW/DNH&LW\8WDKBuilding Square Footage: Construction Type/Occupancy Classification: PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STOREFORT COLLINS, CO60_L_XR_2003A-6 CANOPY ELEVATIONS6,132 SFV-B / MPrototype Version: 66WDWH6WUHHW6DOW/DNH&LW\8WDKBuilding Square Footage: Construction Type/Occupancy Classification: PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STOREFORT COLLINS, CO60_L_XR_2003A-6 CANOPY ELEVATIONS6,132 SFV-B / M.(<('127(6 0,15$,6('&21&5(7(,6/$1':722/('('*(6$1'&251(569(5,)<6,=(:',63(16(56833/,(5 ;  120(7$/)250 $&&(66,%/(,6/$1'72%(6((&,9,/'5$:,1*6)25/2&$7,21 $/80,180&20326,7(0(7$/3$1(/($670$15(' 3$1(/&2/801&/$'',1*720$7&+%5 0(18021,7256 %<2:1(5 $1'&(,/,1*02817('%5$&.(76(('(7$,/6 216+((7$ 6,*1$*(72%(&225',1$7('%<)8(/&$123<&2175$&725:,7+2:1(5 ',63(16,1*67$7,21 %<27+(56  685)$&(02817('),5((;7,1*8,6+(5$1'&$%,1(73529,'((;7,1*8,6+(5)25(9(5<&2/8016 $///,*+7),;785(6 1276+2:1 72%()/86+02817(':,7+,17+('(&.3$1(/62)),7 62)),7&2/253 6(((/(&75,&$/$1')8(/',63(16,1*'5$:,1*6 ',$0(7(58%2//$5'6(7$1'),//(':&21&5(7(6((&,9,/'5$:,1*63$,17('3 (;3$16,21-2,17672%(),//(':-(7)8(/5(6,67$176($/$176((&,9,/'5$:,1*6 66, :,1'2::$6+3$3(572:(/ 3529,'('%<2:1(5,167$//('%<&2175$&72502817('72&2/8013(5$'$5(48,5(0(176  0$;$))723$3(572:(/)2/'  75$6+&217$,1(53529,'('%<2:1(5 3$,17&21&5(7(&85%('*(36((6&+('8/(216+((7$6&$/(  &$123<(1'(/(9$7,21,17(5,256&$/(  &$123<(1'(/(9$7,21ITEM 6, ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGSUpdated 11.19.20Packet pg. 16 &XOWXUHG6WRQH6N\OLQH&RXQWU\/HGJHVWRQH%%7KLQ%ULFN$VK&0%&,%ULWH5HG&0%&,'DUN%URQ]H$QRGL]HG'DUN%URQ]H3DLQW%ODFN)R[%%)LEHUERDUG&REEOHVWRQH%%)LEHUERDUG$JHG3HZWHUPrototype Version: 66WDWH6WUHHW6DOW/DNH&LW\8WDKBuilding Square Footage: Construction Type/Occupancy Classification: PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STOREFORT COLLINS, CO60_L_XR_2003A-7EXTERIOR MATERIALS BOARD6,132 SFV-B / MITEM 6, ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGSUpdated 11.19.20Packet pg. 17 Prototype Version: 66WDWH6WUHHW6DOW/DNH&LW\8WDKBuilding Square Footage: Construction Type/Occupancy Classification: PROPOSED MAVERIK C-STOREFORT COLLINS, COA-8RENDERINGITEM 6, ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGSUpdated 11.19.20Packet pg. 18 SS SS SS SS W W W W W W WWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWVANSTOPSTOPLOADING ZONE10'-0" UTILITYEASEMENTMAVERIK GASSTATION BUILDINGENTRANCESOUTHWEST FRONTAGE ROADTRASHENCLOSUREPATIOSPACEEXISTINGSTORMWATEROUTFALLEXISTINGSTORMWATEROUTFALL54'-0"INTERIOR PARKINGAREA 3,190 SFINTERIOR PARKINGAREA 20,545 SFFUEL PUMPSUNDER CANOPYFUEL PUMPSUNDERCANOPYMAINENTRANCEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE23134312121343121341344213216'-6"12'-2"8'-2"19'-2"28'-3"12'-1"6'-5"15'-3"23'-1"11'-5"10'-0"UTILITYEASEMENTSANDFILTERSANDFILTERSANDFILTERSANDFILTEREXISTINGSTORMWATEROUTFALL108'-4"121'-7"137'-2"131'-11"9'-2"6'-3"PROPERTY LINE /I-25 R.O.W.340'-0"5'-7"DO NOT DISTURBAND/OR REMOVEOFFSITE IRRIGATION, TREES OR SHRUBSDURING CONSTRUCTION.DO NOT DISTURBAND/OR REMOVEOFFSITE IRRIGATION, TREES OR SHRUBSDURING CONSTRUCTION.DO NOT DISTURBAND/OR REMOVEOFFSITE IRRIGATION,TREES OR SHRUBSDURINGCONSTRUCTION.30'-0"EMERGENCYACCESSEASEMENTI-25 EXITRAMPEXISTINGLANDSCAPEPLANTINGSTYP.PLANTING WITHIN TREE GRATEDECIDUOUS STREET TREELP501APLANTING IN GRATEDECIDUOUS TREELP501B30'-0"DETENTIONPOND6'-0"LANDSCAPE SCHEDULEQUANTITYSYMBOLBOTANIC NAMECOMMON NAMESIZE HEIGHTSPREADPERCENTAGEDECIDUOUS TREES7 COC CELTIS OCCINDENTALIS HACKBERRY 2" CAL./B&B 40-60' 40-60' 13.2%7 CSP CATALPA SPECIOSA NORTHERN CATALPA 2" CAL./B&B 50-60' 30-40' 13.2%5GDEGYMNOCLADUS DIOICA ESPRESSO KENTUCKY 2" CAL./B&B 50-60' 30-35' 9.4%'ESPRESSO' COFFEETREE5 QMU QUERCUS MUEHLENBERGII CHINKAPIN OAK 2" CAL./B&B 40-50' 40-50' 9.4%7 GTI GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOSTHORNLESS HONEYLOCUST2" CAL./B&B40-50' 35-45' 13.2%INERMISORNAMENTAL TREES11 ATH ACER TATARICUM 'HOT WINGS' HOT WINGS TATARIAN MAPLE 1.5" CAL. 15-20' 12-15' 20.7%EVERGREEN TREES6 JSS JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM SKYROCKET JUNIPER 6' HT. 15-20' 3-4' 11.3%'SKYROCKET'6 JSW JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM WOODWARD COLUMNAR 6' HT. 15-20' 4' 11.3%'WOODWARD' JUNIPERDECIDUOUS SHRUBS31 ACA ATRIPLEX CANESCENS FOURWING SALTBUSH 5 GAL. 3-6' 4-8'37 CIN CEROCARPUS INTRICATUS LITTLE LEAF MOUNTAIN MAHOGANY 5 GAL. 3-5' 3-5'24 CNA CHRYSOTHAMNUS NAUSEOSUS DWARF BLUE RABBITBRUSH 5 GAL. 2-3' 2-3'50 CNG CHRYSOTHAMNUS NAUSEOSUS TALL GREEN RABBITBRUSH 5 GAL. 4-6' 6''GRAVEOLENS'9 CSE CORNUS SERICEA 'ISANTI'ISANTI DOGWOOD 5 GAL. 4-5' 4-7'24 CPU CYTISUS PURGANS SPANISH GOLD BROOM 5 GAL. 3-4' 5-6'4 PAM PRUNUS AMERICANA AMERICAN PLUM 5 GAL. 8-10' 8-10'30 PBP PRUNUS BESSEYI PAWNEE BUTTES WESTERN 5 GAL. 1-2' 5-6''PAWNEE BUTTES' SAND CHERRY23 RAG RIBES AUREUM GWEN'S BUFFALO CURRANT 5 GAL. 5-6' 5-6''GWEN'S BUFFALO'ORNAMENTAL GRASSES59 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROP SEED 1 GAL. 1.5-2' 18-24"DETENTION BASIN SEED MIX(Drill rate: 14.54 lbs/ac, Broadcast rate: 29.08 lbs/ac)COMMON NAMESCIENTIFIC NAMEPLS/ACPLAINS COREOPSIS COREOPSIS TINCTORIA0.17WHITE PRAIRIE CLOVER DALEA CANDIDA 0.65PURPLE PRAIRIE CLOVER DALEA PURPUREA 0.81INDIAN BLANKETFLOWER GAILLARDIA ARISTATA 1.85MEXICAN HAT RATIBIDA COLUMNIFERA 0.2FRINGED SAGE ARTEMESIA FRIGIDA 0.47INDIAN RICEGRASS ACHNATHERUM HYMENOIDES 1.13SIDEOATS GRAMA BOUTELOUA CURTIPENDULA 1.15BUFFALOGRASS BOUTELOUA DACTYLOIDES 3.27BLUE GRAMA BOUTELOUA GRACILIS 0.25INLAND SALTGRASS DISTICHLIS STRICTA 0.35BOTTLEBRUSH SQUIRRELTAIL ELYMUS ELYMOIDES 0.95STREAMBANK WHEATGRASS ELYMUS LANCEOLATUS SSP. 1.36PRAIRIE JUNEGRASS KOELERIA MACRANTHA 0.08WESTERN WHEATGRASS PASCOPYRUM SMITHII 1.61LITTLE BLUESTEM SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM 0.7UPLAND SEED MIX(Drill rate: 13.58 lbs/ac, Broadcast: 27.16 lbs/ac)COMMON NAMESCIENTIFIC NAMEPLS/ACPLAINS COREOPSIS COREOPSIS TINCTORIA 0.17PURPLE PRAIRIE CLOVER DALEA PURPUREA 0.81INDIAN BLANKETFLOWER GAILLARDIA ARISTATA 1.85ROCKY MTN. PENSTEMON PENSTEMON STRICTUS0.35MEXICAN HATRATIBIDA COLUMNIFERA0.2INDIAN RICEGRASSACHNATHERUM HYMENOIDES 1.13SIDEOATS GRAMABOUTELOUA CURTIPENDULA 1.15BUFFALOGRASSBOUTELOUA DACTYLOIDES 3.27BLUE GRAMABOUTELOUA GRACILIS0.25BOTTLEBRUSH SQUIRRELTAIL ELYMUS ELYMOIDES0.95PRAIRIE JUNEGRASSKOELERIA MACRANTHA0.08GREEN NEEDLEGRASSNASSELLA VIRIDULA1.01SWITCHGRASSPANICUM VIRGATUM0.71WESTERN WHEATPASCOPYRUM SMITHII1.61SAND DROPSEEDSPOOBOLUS CRYPTANDRUS 0.04WATER BUDGET CHART*HYDROZONE AREA(S.F.) WATER NEED ANNUAL WATER USEHIGH 0 S.F. 18 GAL./SF 0 GAL.MODERATE 2,445 S.F. 10 GAL./SF 24,450 GAL.LOW 37,025 S.F. 3 GAL./SF 111,075 GAL.TOTAL WATER USE = 135,525 GAL.TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA = 39,470 S.F.GALLONS PER S.F. = 3.4 GAL./S.F.*BREAKDOWN OF AREAS:MODERATE = HALF OF SHRUB BEDSLOW = NATIVE SEED + HALF OF SHRUB BEDPARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPEREQUIRED FOR PARKING LOT LESS THAN 100 SPACES = 6%PARKING LOT AREA = 23,735 SFREQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA = 1,424 SFPROVIDED LANDSCAPE AREA = 1,474 SFA PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITYFORESTER BEFORE ANY TREES OR SHRUBS ASNOTED ON THIS PLAN ARE PLANTED, PRUNED ORREMOVED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THISINCLUDES ZONES BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK ANDCURB, MEDIANS AND OTHER CITY PROPERTY. THISPERMIT SHALL APPROVE THE LOCATION AND SPECIESTO BE PLANTED. FAILURE TO OBTAIN THIS PERMIT IS AVIOLATION OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS CODESUBJECT TO CITATION (SECTION 27-31) AND MAY ALSORESULT IN REPLACING OR RELOCATING TREES AND AHOLD ON CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.I-25 BUFFER LANDSCAPE1 TREE AND 10 SHRUBS REQUIRED FOR EVERY 25' LFTOTAL BUFFER LENGTH = 340' LFREQUIRED TREES = 14REQUIRED SHRUBS = 132PROVIDED TREES = 11 EXISTING + 12 PROPOSED = 23PROVIDED SHRUBS = 42 SHRUBS + 90 (10:1 CONVERSION FOR EXTRAS TREES) = 1320 15'30'30'60'N O R T H11LANDSCAPEPLANPROJECT NUMBERISSUE DATE:REVISIONS:MAVERIK INC. STOREXXXXXX XXXFORT COLLINS, CONo. Date Description2020-10-22Plot Date:File Location:/Users/rms/Russell + Mills Dropbox/rms/Projects/2019/2019 Maverik Fuel Station/Cad/Sheet/LP101.dwg OF 131331 17TH STREET SUITE 605DENVER, COLORADO 80202PHONE: (720) 439-4700 WEBSITE: www.dci-engineers.comCIVIL / STRUCTURAL10/2020© This document, and the ideas and designs may not be reused, in whole orin part, without written permission from D'Amato Conversano Inc.D'Amato Conversano Inc. disclaims any responsibility for its unauthorized use.October 22, 202019-122-0006ITEM 6, LANDSCAPE PLANUpdated 11.19.20Packet pg. 19