The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/09/2022 - Historic Preservation Commission - AGENDA - Work Session City of HistoricCommission F6rt CollinsAGENDA Meg Dunn, Chair Location: Kurt Knierim, Vice Chair This meeting will be held Margo Carlock remotely via Zoom. Walter Dunn Eric Guenther Anne Nelsen Jim Rose Staff Liaison: Vacant Seat Maren Bzdek Vacant Seat Historic Preservation Manager Work Session February 9, 2022 5:30 PM Pursuant to City Council Ordinance 079, 2020, a determination has been made by the Chair after consultation with the City staff liaison that conducting the hearing using remote technology would be prudent. This remote Historic Preservation Commission meeting will be available online via Zoom or by phone. No one will be allowed to attend in person. The meeting will be available to join beginning at 5:15 p.m. Participants should try to join prior to the 5:30 p.m. start time. JOIN ONLINE: You will need an internet connection on a laptop, computer, or smartphone, and may join the meeting through Zoom at https://fcgov.zoom.us/'/99510585653. (Using earphones will greatly improve your audio). Keep yourself on muted status. JOIN BY PHONE: Please dial 253-215-8782 and enter Webinar ID 995 1058 5653. Keep yourself on muted status. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: No public comment is allowed during work sessions. Members of the public may join the meeting but will remain muted throughout the duration of the meeting. The public may comment in the regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission which will be held remotely on February 16, 2022. Information on how to participate is contained in the agenda for that meeting available at https://www.fcgov.com/cityclerk/landmark-preservation.php. Documents to share: Members of the public wishing to submit documents, visual presentations, or written comments for the Commission to consider regarding any item on the agenda must email them at least 24 hours prior to the February 16, 2022 meeting to abrennan(o)fcgov.com. Page 1 Packet Pg. 1 Fort Collins is a Certified Local Government(CLG)authorized by the National Park Service and History Colorado based on its compliance with federal and state historic preservation standards.CLG standing requires Fort Collins to maintain a Historic Preservation Commission composed of members of which a minimum of 40% meet federal standards for professional experience from preservation-related disciplines, including, but not limited to, historic architecture, architectural history, archaeology, and urban planning. For more information, see Article III, Division 19 of the Fort Collins Municipal Code. The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs,and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515(TDD 224-6001)for assistance. • CALL TO ORDER • ROLL CALL • REVIEW OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2022 AT 5:30 P.M. VIA ZOOM (Please see the agenda for the February 16, 2022 meeting for information on how to join that meeting.) CONSENT 1. CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 19, 2022 2. 741 LINDENMEIER RD - SF DEMOLITION NOTIFICATION DISCUSSION 3. REPORT ON STAFF DESIGN REVIEW DECISIONS FOR DESIGNATED PROPERTIES 4. 1306 W MOUNTAIN AVE— FINAL DESIGN REVIEW OTHER BUSINESS 5. ELECTION OF THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR • POLICY AND LEGISLATION 1. Presentation - Floodplain Regulations Update and City Code Refresh 2. Presentation - Land Use Code Phase 1 Update • BOARD TOPICS 3. Training—Methods and Treatment— Interpreting the SOI Standards in Hearings 4. HPC 2022 Work Plan— Progress and Priorities • OTHER BUSINESS • ADJOURNMENT Packet Pg. 2 Roll Call — Work Session Historic Preservation Commission Date: 2/9/22 Margo Carlock X Meg Dunn X Walter Dunn X Eric Guenther X Kurt Knierim Absent Anne Nelsen X Jim Rose X Vacant Seat N/A Vacant Seat N/A CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO The following disclosure statement is submitted to the Clerk of the City of Fort Collins pursuant to the requirements of Article IV, Section 9 of the City Charter and, to the extent applicable, Section 24-18-109 3 a , C.R.S. or pursuant to City of Fort Collins Personnel Policy 5.7.2.F. Name: r tz l � &U L0 �_ e►2 Title: l�l S Yz\ vvh 'I Decision(s) or contract affected (give description of item to be addressed by Council, Board, Service Area Director, etc.): rnc� b1 �= t �r�bo�1S � 3 � b WgSl' I"O L)NT P6 � Pl\' " o L 1-o12r GoLt, �� S l0 vo5z ( Brief statement of interest: Nb poasor� �'U ��j1,ley),le N 0 V- 6 N hr- C l, At- 6'6_VV L 1 5 f t7W Ptni C STD p � L/KTj 1 Date: Signature: REMOVAL OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST I affirm that the above-stated conflict of interest no longer exists. Date: Signature: cc (if Councilmember or Board or Commission member): City Attorney and City Manager cc (if City employee): HR Director Updated: March 2014 27 Work Session - Item 1 STAFF REPORT February • 2022 Historic - •n Commissio PROJECT NAME FLOODPLAIN & HISTORIC PRESERVATION —UPDATES TO FEDERAL FEMA REGULATIONS & INTRODUCTION TO CITY FLOODPLAIN CODE STAFF Marsha Hilmes-Robinson, CFM, Floodplain Administrator, Utilities Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Utilities Floodplain Administration is conducting outreach related to updates to City Code to come into compliance with federal FEMA regulations affecting buildings and structures in the 100-year floodplain. Ms. Hilmes- Robinson will provide a short presentation covering the updates, as well as providing an introduction to City Floodplains and Fort Collins Floodplain Regulations. PRESENTER: Marsha Hilmes-Robinson EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND: Fort Collins Utilities is conducting outreach related to an upcoming regulatory change to City Code to come into compliance with minimum regulations from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)that affect buildings and structures in the 100-year FEMA floodplain and modifications to them. This will have a limited effect on historic resources in Fort Collins due to the limited number of historic buildings in the 100-year FEMA floodplain. Utilities will also be providing a short introduction to the City's Floodplain Map for municipal regulation and the relevant requirements in Chapter 10 of City Code. The presentation will be followed by a discussion with the Commission regarding requirements, questions from the Commission, and how federal and municipal Floodplain regulations may interplay with other City priorities affecting historic resources, such as environmental sustainability and affordable housing. ATTACHMENTS 1. Fort Collins Utilities presentation 2. Floodplain Quick Guide for all Floodplains Other than the Poudre River 3. Floodplain Quick Guide for the Poudre River 4. Annual Mailer to Floodplain Residents and Owners (PDF version) Item 1, Page 1 Packet Pg. 3 c s rr i city of Overview of City Floodplain Regulations anj Fort Collins Additions and Su e Marsha Hilmes-Robinson,Floodplain Administrator,CFM 2022 �F�ts Floodplain Management Goals Protect people Minimize property damage Ensure development doesn't M exacerbate existing problems Historic Preservation Commission 1/5/2022 1/12/2022 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Flood Risk Mapping City of Fort Collins Flood Risk Map City and FEMA Floodplains 100-year Floodplain — 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in J t any given year light blue and dark blue 500-year Floodplain — 0.2% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year light y.. . fcgov.com/floodpiain-maps 3 at Floodplains in FortCollins Old Town Spring Creek Poudre River Fossil Creek Boxelder Creek Canal Importation Cooper Slough McClellands Creek Dry Creek Mail Creek Foothills Channel West Vine 4 Packet Pg. 5 2 Historic Preservation Commission 1/5/2022 1/12/2022 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Floodplain Permitting For All Development in the Floodplain 6 I � • Structures _ • Additions • Remodels 1 • Filling/Grading - • Utilities • Landscaping 5 • • • Structures Residential • Lowest floor must be • -• elevated (no basements) • • ' • '�` • Elevating and/or = !, floodproofing allowed Freeboard Amounts FEMA and City •••• •• _• Debris Line— • 1.5 ft-new construction Structure 2013 Flood • 1 ft. -additions and subst. imp. Poudre River-2 ft. 6 Packet Pg. 6 3 Historic Preservation Commission 1/5/2022 1/12/2022 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Substantial Improvement? . 7 Cost of Improvement If substantial improvement >_ 50% occurs, then the existing structure Market Value of Structure must be brought into compliance (elevated). Substantially Improved Example: 100-Year lOf)year L) $`ZOO 000 flood level® n &k1A level y Bacemen a .l.i $350,000 Before improvement After improvement 7 • • Floodplains in FortCollins Old Town Spring Creek Poudre River Fossil Creek Boxelder Creek Canal Importation Cooper Slough McClellands Creek Dry Creek Mail Creek Foothills Channel West Vine s Packet Pg. 7 4 Historic Preservation Commission 1/5/2022 1/12/2022 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 1 Constructionct of an Addition 9 • New Addition must be elevated to freeboard requirement. Currently we are not including the cost of the addition in the substantial xisting House improvement calculation. Addition FEMA recently flagged this as 100-year ��a �� • not being compliant with flood level minimum FEMA standards • FEMA requires the addition cost to be included unless it is stand-alone (structurally independent addition). • Does not impact City-floodplains 9 change?at What is the • In FEMA-designated floodplains, applicants will have two choices: 1. Design and certify the addition as "structurally independent" and elevate the addition. The cost of the addition will not be included in the calculation of substantial improvement. 2. Include the addition in the calculation of substantial improvement. The addition will be elevated. If the value of improvements, including the cost of the addition, is more than 50% of the value of the structure, then the existing structure will be considered substantially improved and will need to be elevated. 10 Packet Pg. 8 5 Historic Preservation Commission 1/5/2022 1/12/2022 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 1 ct Examples No Imprm 010l ®® BFE EsoBtm law„Root Lowest Floor Elevated to Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation Residential Non-Residential Structurally Independent Addition Structurally Independent Addition 11 Cot ForyeLollins Certification 12 OL The addition meets the definition of a structurally independent addition: 1. Involves no alteration of the load-bearing structure of the existing building; 2. Is attached to the existing building with minimal connection; ° 3. Has a doorway as the only modification to the common wall; and 4. Will not transfer loads exerted on the addition to the 9 existing building and will thus not share a foundation I 1 or other building elements that would create a load path between the addition and the existing building. > „ •—AENC— I J rjr 12 Packet Pg. 9 6 Historic Preservation Commission 1/5/2022 1/12/2022 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 1 • Does this Impact? • This change only impacts FEMA- designated floodplains. • This change will not impact City- f� - designated floodplains, such as Old Town, where the majority of additions take place. • FEMA and the State consider the regulation of City floodplains as a higheri standard. 13 • Collins 5-year Permit Analysis • Reviewed permits from 2014 - mid 2020 • 13 permits included an addition • 4 permits in FEMA Floodplain • 2 permits met Subst. Impv. due to remodel cost of existing structure. Existing structure and addition protected. • 1 would have met Subst. Impv. if addition cost was included. It is no longer mapped in the floodplain. • 1 permit would not have met Subst. Impv. if addition cost was included. Minimal number of permits impacted. 14 Packet Pg. 10 7 Historic - •n Commission 1/5/2022 1/12/2022 BOARD TOPIC THANK YOU ! For Questions or Comments, Please Contact: Marsha Hilmes-Robinson 15 mhilmesrobinson(a�fcgov.com, 970-224-6036 City of Packet •• BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 2 City of Fort Collins Floodplain Regulations FOR ALL FLOODPLAINS other than the Poudre River QU .1 J � J � I r l r l Note: This guide was prepared as an educational tool to help explain portions of the floodplain regulations, and is not intended as a complete or detailed explanation of the legal requirements that may apply to a particular property.Article II of Chapter 10 of the City Code specifies the requirements and prohibitions that are outlined generally in this guide and is the controlling legal document in the event of any conflict or inconsistency between this guide and the City Code. The Code provisions can be found at h ttp://www.colocode.comlftcollins/municipallchapterlO.htm. City of Prepared by Fort Collins Utilities, PO Box 580, 700 Wood St., Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Fort Collins 970-416-2632 • fcgov.com/Stormwater/fldp/ain.php �it Packet Pg3/IQ Purpose of Floodplain Regulations Minimize damage to Protect new properties existing properties from damage Protect human life and health Protect the natural areas along the river corridor required to convey flood flows Floodplain Facts • Property in the 100-year floodplain has a 1 percent chance in any given year of being flooded. • Over a 30-year period, there is a 26 percent chance that a property in the 100-year floodplain will be flooded. For comparison, there is only a 5 percent chance that the building will catch fire during that same 30-year period. • Some properties have an even higher risk of flooding because they are in areas where smaller, more frequent floods cause damage. Table of Odds for Different Events Event Odds Structure in the 100-year floodplain being flooded in any given year 1 in 100 Matching one number plus Powerball in the Powerball Lottery 1 in 124 Structure in the 500-year floodplain being flooded in any given year 1 in 500 Annual chance of being killed in a car accident if you drive 10,000 miles/year 1 in 4,000 Being struck by lightning 1 in 600,000 Winning the Powerball Lottery jackpot (matching five numbers and the Powerball) 1 in 120,526,770 Packet Pg. 13 BOARD TOPIC 4--ATTACHMENT 2 Types of Floodplains • In Fort Collins, floodplains are designated by the City as well as by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). • The FEMA-basin floodplains cover only the major drainages. Changes in these floodplains must be approved by FEMA (p. 5). • The City-basin floodplains further identify the flood hazard. Some of the flooding in City-basin floodplains is from irrigation ditch spills or undersized storm sewers that result in overland flooding. Changes in these floodplains can be approved by the City (p. 5). • For floodplain regulation purposes, a floodplain property is either in a FEMA-basin floodplain, a City-basin floodplain or the Poudre River floodplain. Floodplain Designations Floodplain Name Poudre River FEMA-Basin City-Basin Poudre River X Spring Creek X Dry Creek X Cooper Slough X Boxelder Creek X Fossil Creek x Old Town x Canal Importation x McClellands Creek x Mail Creek x Foothills Channel x West Vine x Packet Pg. 14 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Floodway 100-year Floodplain Flood Fringe City Floodway Flood Fringe 6"rise Area of floodplain that is allowed to be filled • The floodway is the portion of the floodplain with the greatest depths and velocities. • The floodway is the area of highest risk. • The floodway must be preserved to allow the floodwater to pass through without being obstructed. • Areas along the flood fringe are allowed to be filled and developed, but this raises the 100-year flood level. The City has set an allowable rise of 0.5 feet. Packet Pg. 15 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Floodway Modifications • Floodways can be modified, but the applicant must be able to show that the project casues no-rise in the 100-year flood level. • In FEMA-basin floodplains, the applicant must submit information to FEMA for approval before construction and after construction if certain changes are being made. If the applicant's project causes a rise, there are two options: 1. In FEMA-basin floodplains, the applicant must show the entire rise is on their property or obtain easements from other property owners. No structures can be impacted by a rise in the flood level. 2. In City-basin floodplains, the applicant must show that the entire rise is on their property or obtain easements from other property owners. Example of a Floodway Modification Original Floodway New Floodway 100-year flood level 100-year i flood level 1 fill %_U/ cut Packet Pg. 16 Summary of Floodway Development Regulations Residential Development Non-Residential Development Mixed-Use Development • New residential development is not allowed. • New non-residential development is allowed • New mixed-use development is not allowed. if the applicant can show no-rise (Floodway Modifications, p. 5). Must meet the freeboard requirements (p. 10-11). • Fill is not allowed unless the applicant can • Fill is not allowed unless the applicant can • Fill is not allowed unless the applicant can show no-rise (Floodway Modifications, p. 5). show no-rise (Floodway Modifications, p. 5). show no-rise (Floodway Modifications, p. 5). • Residential additions are not allowed. • Non-residential additions are allowed if • Residential additions are not allowed to a the applicant can show no-rise (Floodway mixed-use structure. Non-residential additions Modifications, p. 6). Must meet the freeboard are allowed to a mixed-use structure if requirements (p. 10-11). the applicant can show no-rise (Floodway Modifications, p. 5). Must meet the freeboard requirements (p. 10-11). • Remodels are allowed subject to the • Remodels are allowed subject to the Remodels are allowed subject to the substantial substantial improvement requirements substantial improvement requirements improvement requirements (p. 14-16). (p. 14-15). (p. 14-16). • Manufactured homes are allowed only in • Mobile buildings (modular offices) are allowed existing manufactured home parks. only in existing mobile building developments. • Redevelopment (rebuild) of an existing • Redevelopment (rebuild) of an existing Redevelopment (rebuild) of an existing structure is allowed (p. 14-15). Must meet the structure is allowed (p. 14-16). Must meet the structure is allowed (p. 14-16). Must meet the freeboard requirements for redevelopments freeboard requirements for redevelopments freeboard requirements for redevelopments (p. 10)• (p. 10-11). (p. 10-11). • Detached garages and sheds are allowed • Attached garages, detached garages and Detached garages and sheds are allowed if the if the applicant can show no-rise (p. 17 and sheds are allowed if the applicant can show applicant can show no-rise (p. 17 and Floodway Floodway Modifications, p. 5). no-rise (p. 17 and Floodway Modifications, Modifications, p. 5). p. 5). Packet Pg. 17 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Summary of Floodway Development Regulations (continued) Residential Development Non-Residential Development Mixed-Use Development • Critical facilities are not allowed (p. 18). • Critical facilities are not allowed (p. 18). • Critical facilities are not allowed (p. 18). • New basements are not allowed below the • New basements are not allowed below • New basements are not allowed below freeboard level (p. 10). An existing basement the freeboard level (p. 10-11). An existing the freeboard level (p. 10-11).An existing in a redeveloped or substantially improved basement in a redeveloped or substantially basement in a redeveloped or substantially structure is not allowed to remain (p. 10 and improved structure can remain if floodproofed improved structure is not allowed to remain 14-15). (p. 10-11 and 14-16). if it is in residential use (p. 10 and 14-15). An existing basement in a redeveloped or substantially improved structure is allowed to remain if it is in nonresidential use and floodproofed (p. 10-11 and 14-16). • New outside storage of equipment or • New outside storage of equipment or materials is not allowed unless the applicant materials is not allowed unless the applicant can show no rise (Floodway Modifications, can show no rise (Floodway Modifications, p. 5). p. 5) Packet Pg. 18 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Summary of Floodplain Fringe Development Regulations Residential DevelopmeklL Non-Residential Developriierii Mixed-Use Development • New residential development is allowed. • New non-residential development is allowed. • New mixed-use development is allowed. Must Must meet the freeboard requirements Must meet the freeboard requirements meet the freeboard requirements (p. 10-11). (p. 10). (p. 10-11). • Fill is allowed. • Fill is allowed. • Fill is allowed. • Residential additions are allowed. Must meet • Non-residential additions are allowed. Must • Mixed-use additions are allowed. Must meet the freeboard requirements (p. 10). meet the freeboard requirements (p. 10-11). the freeboard requirements (p. 10-11). • Remodels are allowed subject to the • Remodels are allowed subject to the • Remodels are allowed subject to the substantial improvement requirements substantial improvement requirements substantial improvement requirements (p. 14-15). (p. 14-16). (p. 14-16). • Manufactured homes are allowed only to • Mobile buidlings (modular offices) are allowed replace an existing manufactured home or only to replace an existing mobile building or fill a vacant lot in an existing manufactured fill a vacant lot in an existing mobile building home park. development. • Redevelopment (rebuild) of an existing • Redevelopment (rebuild) of an existing • Redevelopment (rebuild) of an existing structure is allowed (p. 14-15). Must meet the structure is allowed (p. 14-16). Must meet the structure is allowed (p. 14-16). Must meet the freeboard requirements for redevelopments freeboard requirements for redevelopments freeboard requirements for redevelopments (p. 10). (p. 10-11). (p. 10-11). • Attached garages, detached garages and • Attached garages, detached garages and • Attached garages, detached garages and sheds are allowed (p. 17). sheds are allowed (p. 17). sheds are allowed (p. 17). • Critical facilities are not allowed (p. 18). • Critical facilities are not allowed (p. 18). • Critical facilities are not allowed (p. 18). Packet Pg. 19 BOARD TOPIC -l--,-ATTACHMENT 2 Summary of Floodplain Fringe Development Regulations (continued) Residential Development Non-Residential Development Mixed-Use Development • New basements are not allowed below the New basements are allowed. Must meet New basements are not allowed below the freeboard level (p. 10). An existing basement freeboard requirements and be floodproofed freeboard level for residential portions of in a redeveloped or substantially improved (p. 10-11). An existing basement below mixed-use structures (p. 10). An existing structure is not allowed to remain (p. 10 and the freeboard level in a redeveloped or basement in a redeveloped or substantially 14-15). substantially improved structure can remain improved structure is not allowed to remain if if floodproofed (p. 10-11 and 14-16). it is in residential use (p. 10 and 14-15). New basements are allowed for non- residential portions of mixed-use structures. Must meet freeboard requirements and be floodproofed (p. 10-11). An existing basement in a redeveloped or substantially improved structure is allowed to remain if it is in non- residential use and floodproofed (p. 10-11 and 14-16). Packet Pg. 20 BOARD TOPIC 4,-ATTACHMENT 2 Freeboard • Freeboard is a factor of safety that accounts for the allowed rise in flood level due to development in the flood fringe and for larger floods and debris that may cause the flood elevation to be higher. • Freeboard is a measure of how high above the flood level the structure must be built or floodproofed. Residential Structures and Residential Portions of Mixed-Use Structures • Freeboard for new development and redevelopment of an existing structure, including any attached garages, is 18 inches; • Freeboard for additions and substantial improvements (including attached garages) is 12 inches; • Freeboard for new detached garages or sheds that are accessory to an existing structure is 12 inches (p. 17); • Must elevate the structure; not allowed to floodproof; and • The lowest floor of the structure (p. 12-13), including the basement, all HVAC and electrical, must be elevated above the freeboard height. Fill ❑ ❑ FIII ductwork elevated 18" elevated 18" crawl space Lflo 0-year r 100-year od level flood level Slab on grade foundation Crawl space foundation Example of new development residential elevation (See p. 12-13 for detailed foundation designs) Packet Pg. 21 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Freeboard continued Non-Residential Structures and Non-Residential Portions of Mixed-Use Structures xisting • Freeboard for new development and redevelopment of House an existing structure, including any attached garages, is Addition 18 inches; 100-year elevated 12" Mill • Freeboard for additions and substantial improvements flood level (including attached garages) is 12 inches; / • Freeboard for new detached garages or sheds that are accessory to an existing structure is 12 inches (p 17); Example of residential addition • Allowed to either elevate or floodproof the structure; • In the floodway, new basements are not allowed; • If elevating, the lowest floor of the structure (p. 12-13), including the basement, all HVAC and electrical, must be elevated above the freeboard height; and • If floodproofing, the structure as well as all HVAC and electrical, must be floodproofed to the freeboard height. Floodproofing uses various techniques to make a building water tight: Store • Sealants and waterproof membranes; • Closure shields in front of doorways; and 100-year I I floodproofed 18" flood level above flood level ;loodproofing Mini-walls to protect window or stair wells. Basement generally works only when flood floodproofing depths are less than 3 feet. Example of new development non-residential floodproofing Packet Pg. 22 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Determination of Lowest Floor Based on Type of Foundation Slab on Grade Enclosure (above grade crawl space) The lowest floor elevation of a slab on 1. The lowest floor elevation of a grade structure is measured at the top structure with an enclosure of the slab. that is built in accordance with the venting criteria (p. 17) is measured at the floor of the first finished ❑ ❑ Lowest floor floor. ❑ ❑ Lowest floor elevation Freeboard elevation Freeboard / E� Enclosure Unfinished area Floor ' ' % no HVAC on grade Basement 2. The lowest floor The lowest floor elevation of elevation of a structure a structure with a basement with an enclosure that is is measured at the top of the not built in accordance basement slab. with the venting criteria (p. 17) is measured at the lowest interior grade ❑ E ❑ of the enclosure. Can have ❑ ❑ HVAC in Basement enclosed area Lowest floor Freeboard elevation Freeboard Enclosure Lowest floor elevation TIN Packet Pg. 23 BOARD TOPIC �-ATTACHMENT 2 Determination of Lowest Floor Based on Type of Foundation continued Crawl Space (below grade) The lowest floor of a structure with a crawl space is measured at the lowest finished floor if the following conditions are met: a. The velocity of the flood flows hitting the structure is less that 5 feet per second; b. The interior grade elevation that is below the flood elevation ❑ ❑ is no lower than 2 feet below the lowest adjacent grade; c. The height of the crawl space, as measured from the lowest interior grade of the crawls ace to the to of the foundation Duct Work g p p Freeboard � Vent No more than wall, does not exceed 4 feet at any point; Crawl space 4 feet to top of d. An adequate drainage system is in place, including a totally d foundation wall immersible pump; ' e. All ductwork, HVAC, hot water heater and electrical is PP" 2 feet elevated to the regulatory flood protection elevation; and a Velocity < 5 ft. per sec. f. Venting requirements (p. 17) are met. If the above conditions are not met, the lowest floor is determined based on the criteria for a basement (p. 12). Packet Pg. 24 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Remodels or Repair of Damaged Buildings Remodels and repairs are allowed subject to the substantial improvement requirements (p. 15-16). Vertical additions (pop-tops) are considered a remodel and are subject to the substantial improvement requirements (p. 15-16). All remodel work, Vertical � including vertical /� (POP-top) addition, counts , addition toward substantial improvement ❑ Basement Packet Pg. 25 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Substantial Improvement and Redevelopment Substantial improvement occurs when all of the following conditions are met: 1. A building permit is requested for any repair, reconstruction or improvement to a non-conforming structure, involving alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor or other structural part of the building; 2. The cost of the improvement, or the amount of damage, equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure either before the improvement or repair is started or before the building was damaged; and 3. The cost is calculated on a per project basis. A project is based on all building permits issued during the 12-month period preceeding the floodplain permit application date. A substantial improvement policy ensures that non-conforming structures are brought into conformance over time and are therefore, protected from flood damage and the risk to occupants is reduced. Redevelopment occurs when there is a substantial improvement and more than 50 percent of the wall perimeter of any floor of a structure that is partially or completely below the flood elevation is removed or replaced and the building footprint is not increased. Residential Structures and Residential Portions of Mixed-Use Structures If a substantial improvement occurs, the lowest floor (p. 12-13) of a non-conforming structure, including the basement, and all HVAC, electrical and utilities, must be elevated 12 inches above the ❑ ❑ flood elevation. After improvements, the structure 100-year 100-year will be protected from flood damage. flood level ❑ ❑ flood level i, elevated :12" or 18" If a redevelopment occurs, the lowest floor (p. 12-13) of a non-conforming structure, including the basement, all HVAC, electrical and utilities, Basement Basement must be elevated 18 inches above the flood filled-in elevation. After improvements, the structure will be protected from flood damage. J Before improvement After improvement Example of residential substantial improvement or redevelopment Packet Pg. 26 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Substantial Improvement and Redevelopment continued Non-Residential Structures and Non-Residential Portion of Mixed-Use Structures If a substantial improvement occurs, the lowest floor (p. 12-13) of a non-conforming structure, including the basement and all HVAC and electrical, must be elevated or floodproofed 12 inches above the flood elevation. After improvements, the structure will be protected from flood damage. If a redevelopment occurs, the lowest floor (p. 12-13) of a non-conforming structure, including the basement and all HVAC and electrical, must be elevated or floodproofed 18 inches above the flood elevation. After improvements, the structure will be protected from flood damage. m m m m Apartments Apartments m m m m Store Store Store Floodproofed Store 12"or18"above El El El _n El flood level 100-year 100-year 1 I y z 1 flood level �' �' flood level Store Store Basement Basement Basement Basement Before improvement After improvement Example of non-residential and mixed-use substantial improvements or redevelopments Packet Pg. 27 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Garages, Sheds and Accessory Structures • Used only for parking or storage; • Is an accessory to a main structure; • Must be anchored to resist flotation; • Can either elevate to freeboard level (p. 10-11) or be built at grade; Use flood ❑ ❑ Primary resistant If not elevated to freeboard level, the garage or shed 1 00- ear Structure Garage materials to must meet the following requirements: y or Shed 12"above flood level \ flood level — Must have 1 square inch of venting for every li � fill vents square foot of enclosed area; — Must have at least two vents located on different sides of the structure; Example of detached structure — Have at least one vent on the upstream side of the structure; — Bottom of vents cannot be higher than 1 foot above grade; Primary — Flood resistant materials must be used below the structure freeboard level (p. 10-11); and ❑ El — All HVAC and electrical must be elevated to the 100-year Garage o Use flood resistant freeboard level (p. 10-11). []— L11 L11 LI or Shed materials to 18" flood level � above flood level Venting Calculation Example fill vents 600 square foot shed 600 square inches of venting required Example of attached structure Vent size: 12" x 10" = 120 sq. inches per vent 600 divided by 120 = 5 vents Packet Pg. 28 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Critical Facilities Critical facilities are not allowed in the floodplain fringe or floodway. Examples of critical facilities are shown below- At-Risk Populations Critical Facilities Essential Services NURSING HOME Critical Facilities SCHOOL OR DAYCARE MMUNICATI O NS HUB O Government Services MUNICIPAL Critical Facilities BUILDING PERMITS CITY ADMIN ❑ D 7WRiv" POLICE LIBRARY or FIRE STATION oi Hazardous Materials Critical Facilities GAS STATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ STORAGE OSPITAL, URGENT CARE,SURGICAL CENTER doft Packet Pg. 29 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Letter of Map Revision Based on Fill • A Letter of Map Revision Based on Fill (LOMR-Fill) is a FEMA process whereby a property in the flood fringe can be filled and is no longer considered in the floodplain for insurance requirements. • A community must sign-off on the application to FEMA and certify that all existing and future structures will be "reasonably safe from flooding." • To meet this "reasonably safe from flooding" standard, all floodplain requirements (p. 8-9) must be met even if fill is placed and the property is "removed" from the floodplain by FEMA. 100-year Floodplain Floodway 100-year Fill flood level elevated 18" Floodplain Fringe Example of fill placed in the flood fringe Plan View: Fill _ - - - - - - - - - , Floodplain Fringe - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - Floodway - - _ Packet Pg. 30 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Erosion Buffer Limits • Erosion hazard areas occur where the channel bed and banks are unstable, causing the stream to move over time. • Migration is a natural characteristic of a stream. Some streams are more prone to migration than others depending on the type of material that makes up the bed and banks. • Urbanization can have a pronounced impact on these natural processes, resulting in accelerated erosion. • Erosion buffer limits have been delineated for those streams that are subject to severe erosion hazards. These include Fossil Creek, Boxelder Creek, McClellands Creek and Mail Creek. • If development is restricted from these unstable areas, there will be less need in the future to defend the development from the stream. Defending the development may solve one problem but could create another upstream or downstream. At ❑ ❑ 0 i 40 ♦ `'- _ _ l ` i �♦ 00 ♦♦ Unstable stream or creek Packet Pg. 31 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Erosion Buffer Limits continued Requirements within erosion buffer limits • Structures are not allowed. • Irrigated grasses or shrubs are not allowed. • Detention ponds or water quality ponds are not allowed. • Parking lots are not allowed. • Temporary or permanent storage of materials is not allowed. • The area within the buffer must not be used for construction traffic for any development. • All utilities must be kept out except for necessary stream crossings. • Bike paths must be kept out except for necessary stream crossings. • Road bridges must span the entire buffer limit. If there is no possibility of spanning the entire limit, the location crossing and design of abutments must be done so as to limit disturbance of the channel banks. • Grading or excavation is not allowed in the buffer unless associated with a bridge or utility crossing as noted above. • A stability study may be required. Packet Pg. 32 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Required Documentation and Submittals (Note: Some items may require a registered professional engineer.) Building Permit and Development Review Approval Requirements • Floodplain Use Permit for any work being done on a structure or property in the floodplain. The permit fees are shown in the table on page 23. • Building plans showing foundation design, flood elevation, floor elevations, HVAC elevations, size and locations of vents, floodproofing design, emergency response and preparedness plan and other relevant information. • No-Rise certification if working in the floodway. • Floodplain Modeling Report if doing a floodway modification (p. 5). (See separate modeling guidelines handout.) • Other plans or reports to document information such as grading, fill, channel stability and floodplain boundaries. Certificate of Occupancy Approval Requirements • FEMA Elevation Certificate or FEMA Floodproofing Certificate for any new structure, addition, substantial improvement or redevelopment built in any floodplain. Allow two weeks for review and approval. Requires licensed surveyor for elevation certificate; requires licensed engineer or architect for floodproofing certificate. • No-Rise certification if working in the floodway. • As-built modeling report, if applicable. Variances The Fort Collins Water Board has the authority to issue variances to the floodplain regulations if certain requirements are met. The Board meets the third Thursday of the month. An application packet must be submitted three weeks prior to the board meeting, with a $1,000 application fee. (See separate variance submittal handout for documentation and justification requirements.) loodplain Information and Assistance Call Fort Collins Utilities at (970) 416-2632 or e-mail utilities@fcgov.com to determine if a property is in the floodplain or to discuss floodplain regulations. More information about floodplain managment in Fort Collins is available at fcgov.com/Stormwater/flooding. Packet Pg. 33 BOARD TOPIC 4,-ATTACHMENT 2 Floodplain Permit Fees City of Fort Collins FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT(FPU) $50 N/A N/A All fees in categories 1 through 5A are in addition to the$50 FPU permit application fee and are based on the type of review submittal. The highest single applicable fee will be assessed. CATEGORY 1 MINOR IMPROVEMENTS/ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Fence/Accessory Structure/Change of use $0 Deck/improvement or remodel< 50%Bldg.Value $1S0 Included in SSO FPU fee Included in S50 FPU fee Fill or Grading Only CATEGORY 2 REDEVELOPMENT,NEW BUILDINGS,ADDITIONS,SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENTS OR REMODELS GREATER THAN 50%OF THE VALUE OF THE EXISTIN Slab on Grade $150 Enclosure $200 Included in$50 FPU fee Included in$50 FPU fee Crawl Space $250 CATEGORY 3 MOBILE HOMES,FLOODPROOFING Mobile Home Floodproofing 5?50 Included in$50 FPU fee Included in$SO FPU fee CATEGORY 4 VARIANCES Variance Application 51,000 CATEGORY SA PRE-PROJECT FLOODPLAIN ANALYSES(CITY BASIN,FEMA,CLOMR) FEMA CLOMR/CPMR 51,000 Included in$1,000 fee $500 each time+$SO/hr, for each City of Fort Collins Basin.Preliminary Map Revision review hour over 10 hours Hydraulic Analysis for No-Rise Certification 5500 Included in$500 fee $250 each time+$50/hr.for each review hour over 5 hours CLOMR-Fill Included in$250 fee $125 each time+$50/hr.for each 5250 review hour over 3 hours No-Rise Certification-without Hydraulic Analysis Included in S50 FPU tee Included in$50 FPU fee CATEGORY SB POST-PROJECT FLOODPLAIN ANALYSES(CITY BASIN,FEMA,LOMR) FEMA LOMR/PMR S1,000 Included in$1,000 fee $500 each time *S50/hr. for each City of Fort Collins Basin Final Map Revision review hour over 10 hours Hydraulic Analysis for No-Rise Certification 5500 Included in$500 fee $250 each time+$SO/hr,for each review hour over S hours LOMR-Fill included in$250 fee 5125 each time+$50/hr.for each $250 review hour over 3 hours No-Rise Certification-w/o Hydraulic Analysis Included in$SO FPU fee Included in$50 FPU fee Packet Pg. 34 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Flood Insurance Information Who needs flood insurance? EVERYONE. Flood Insurance is available for ALL properties in the City of Fort Collins, regardless of location. Approximately 25% of damages occur in low risk areas. Flood Insurance is required by lenders for any structure in a Important Considerations FEMA 100-year flood plain.Lenders have the option of requiring • There is a 30-day waiting period before flood insurance it in any other area. becomes effective. • New flood insurance policies will require a FEMA Elevation • Disaster assistance is only available for major flood events Certificate documenting the elevation of the structure. and does not cover the entire cost to rebuild your home or • Fort Collins Utilities has elevation certificates on file for many business. structures in the City of Fort Collins, free of charge, by calling • Fort Collins is subject to flash flooding—there is little warning 970-416-2632 or visiting www.fcgov.com/elevation-certificate. time to move your contents to safer locations. • Documenting the elevation of the structure allows the flood You can receive up to a 40% discount on your insurance premium to be calculated based on the risk. flood insurance premiums. • The higher the structure is elevated above the 100-year flood • Fort Collins has some of the lowest flood insurance level, the lower the insurance premium. premiums in the United States due to its proactive floodplain Flood Insurance is not mandatory in City-designated management program. floodplains. However, it is strongly recommended. • Check with your insurance agent to make sure you are receiving the FEMA Community Rating System (CRS) • Look into a "Preferred Risk" Flood Insurance Policy. It Discount for Fort Collins being a Class 4 Community. combines structural coverage and contents coverage at a more affordable price. To learn more, visit http://www.floodsmart.govl, contact your insurance agent, or call FEMA at 1-888-379-9531 . Packet Pg. 35 BOARD TOPIC ,-ATTACHMENT 2 Example of Flood Risk Map r ; x SE FyU� Ll p� � C°�oo0 Q °om D< DDv A��DDm v m nw 'mmmm`< 7r mm m y U wo ww � `D.mwr01nD �D z NEED amok � m000 `mo ---� n R LAKES �a ° mmm �w coma Q. n L� m L LJ L �T nNocDn � D�ioDm y� A� �� ❑ � op G o 'c ID'< D G7En Li D O N N N O i N vD < Nm o SLEMAYAVE m m ID m m m Q o no v o m o 0 o o n v� 3 �m� �v�, m.�n CD CD N m -0 > o o Nm ID W a M 0 M D m o n N y N o CD N N p CDD CD .m CD D <° 0 n � J m D o0 o �_.a °o m m m to o CD a a� CL m dO '� CD X :CD D m 7 m v M WL ST � �] N3�3^71-y C 0 = io a ro m omm o ,u1 4 �`'✓ 7 fD.m33o 0— ,�n� �c —J J� }oa^a oao va ~, r I CDO �°3m 3.�m n O .. I Cj 0�o 3 Li o �. No30oDN-o�my of.dmy� mn JJJ � ma dvo3 d 1 o /1--in omo �o��m3 � •J N � mmTo (J C oa3 n11 [y�J O a n o o.Z m n m V a IlLlll N N m�oo3 Q Lam° � �O m m 3 m 0-''2? -4 ° Packet Pg. 36 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 3 City of Fort Collins Floodplain Regulations for the POUDRE RIVER — J J J s Note: This guide was prepared as an educational tool to help explain portions of the floodplain regulations, and is not intended as a complete or detailed explanation of the legal requirements that may apply to a particular property.Article II of Chapter 10 of the City Code specifies the requirements and prohibitions that are outlined generally in this guide and is the controlling legal document in the event of any conflict or inconsistency between this guide and the City Code. The Code provisions can be found at http://www.colocode.comlftcollins/municipallchapter10.htm. City of Fort Collins Prepared by Fort Collins Utilities, PO Box 580, 700 Wood St., Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 �it 970-416-2632 • fcgov.com/stormwater/fidplain.php 3118 Packet Pg. 37 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt 3 Purpose of Floodplain Regulations Minimize damage to Protect new properties existing properties from damage Protect human life and health Protect the natural areas along the river corridor required to convey flood flows 4( ,i Floodplain Facts • Property in the 100-year floodplain has a 1 percent chance in any given year of being flooded. • Over a 30-year period, there is a 26 percent chance that a property in the 100-year floodplain will be flooded. For comparison, there is only a 5 percent chance that the building will catch fire during that same 30-year period. • Some properties have an even higher risk of flooding because they are in areas where smaller, more frequent floods cause damage. Table of Odds for Different Events Event Odds Structure in the 100-year floodplain being flooded in any given year 1 in 100 Matching one number plus Powerball in the Powerball Lottery 1 in 124 Structure in the 500-year floodplain being flooded in any given year 1 in 500 Annual chance of being killed in a car accident if you drive 10,000 miles/year 1 in 4,000 Being struck by lightning 1 in 600,000 Winning the Powerball Lottery jackpot (matching five numbers and the Powerball) 1 in 120,526,770 Packet Pg. 38 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt 3 Types of Floodplains • In Fort Collins, floodplains are designated by the City as well as by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). • The FEMA-basin floodplains cover only the major drainages. Changes in these floodplains must be approved by FEMA (p. 5). • The City-basin floodplains further identify the flood hazard. Some of the flooding in City-basin floodplains is from irrigation ditch spills or undersized storm sewers that result in overland flooding. Changes in these floodplains can be approved by the City (p. 5). • For floodplain regulation purposes, a floodplain property is either in a FEMA-basin floodplain, a City-basin floodplain or the Poudre River floodplain. Floodplain Designations Floodplain Name Poudre River FEMA-Basin City-Basin Poudre River X Spring Creek X Dry Creek X Cooper Slough X Boxelder Creek X Fossil Creek X Old Town X Canal Importation X McClellands Creek X Mail Creek X Foothills Channel X West Vine X Packet Pg. 39 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt 3 Floodway 100-year Floodplain Flood Fringe City Floodway Flood Fringe 6"rise Area of floodplain that is allowed to be filled • The floodway is the portion of the floodplain with the greatest depths and velocities. • The floodway is the area of highest risk. • The floodway must be preserved to allow the floodwater to pass through without being obstructed. • Areas along the flood fringe are allowed to be filled and developed, but this raises the 100-year flood level. The City has set an allowable rise of 0.5 feet. Packet Pg. 40 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt 3 Floodway Modifications • Floodways can be modified, but the applicant must be able to show that the project casues no-rise in the 100-year flood level. • In FEMA-basin floodplains, the applicant must submit information to FEMA for approval before construction and after construction if certain changes are being made. If the applicant's project causes a rise, there are two options: 1. In FEMA-basin floodplains, the applicant must show the entire rise is on their property or obtain easements from other property owners. No structures can be impacted by a rise in the flood level. 2. In City-basin floodplains, the applicant must show that the entire rise is on their property or obtain easements from other property owners. Example of a Floodway Modification Original Floodway New Floodway 100-year flood level ar le food v i flood level G � fill ` � cut Packet Pg. 41 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt 3 Summary of Floodway Development Regulations Residential Development Non-Residential Development Mixed-Use Development (Residential and Non-Residential in the same building) • New residential development is not • New non-residential development is not New mixed-use development is not allowed. allowed. allowed. • Fill is not allowed unless the • Fill is not allowed unless the Fill is not allowed unless the applicant can applicant can show no-rise (Floodway applicant can show no-rise (Floodway show no-rise (Floodway Modifications, p. Modifications, p. 5). Modifications, p. 5). 5). • Residential additions are not allowed. Non-residential additions are not Additions are not allowed to a mixed-use allowed. structure. • Remodels are allowed subject to the Remodels are allowed subject to the Remodels are allowed subject to the substantial improvement requirements substantial improvement requirements substantial improvement requirements (p. (p. 14-15). (p. 14-16). 14-16). • Manufactured homes are allowed only in Mobile buildings (modular offices) are existing manufactured home parks. allowed only in existing mobile building developments. • Redevelopment (rebuild) of an existing Redevelopment (rebuild) of an existing Redevelopment (rebuild) of an existing structure is not allowed. structure is not allowed. structure is not allowed. • Reconstruction of a substantially Reconstruction of a substantially Reconstruction of a substantially damaged structure is prohibited damaged structure is prohibited damaged structure is prohibited • Detached garages and sheds are not Detached garages and sheds are Detached garages and sheds are not allowed. not allowed. allowed. Packet Pg. 42 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt 3 Summary of Floodway Development Regulations (continued) Residential Development Non-Residential Development Mixed-Use Development (Residential and Non-Residential in the same building) • Critical facilities are not allowed (See • Critical facilities are not allowed (See • Critical facilities are not allowed (See proposed alternatives on p. 18). proposed alternatives on p. 18). proposed alternatives on p. 18). • An emergency response and • An emergency response and preparedness plan is required (p. 19). preparedness plan is required (p. 19). • New basements are not allowed below • New basements are not allowed below • New basements are not allowed below the freeboard level (p. 10). An existing the freeboard level (p. 10-11). An the freeboard level (p. 10-11). An basement in a substantially improved existing basement in a substantially existing basement in a substantially structure is not allowed to remain improved structure can remain if improved structure is not allowed to (p. 10 and 14-15). floodproofed (p. 10-11 and 14-16). remain if it is in residential use (p. 10 and 14-15). An existing basement in a substantially improved structure is allowed to remain if it is in non- residential use and floodproofed (p. 10-11 and 14-16). • New outside storage of material or New outside storage of material or equipment, including flotable materials, equipment, including flotable materials, is not allowed (p. 21). is not allowed (p. 21). Packet Pg. 43 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt 3 Summary of Floodplain Fringe Development Regulations Residential Development Non-Residential Development Mixed-Use Development (Residential and Non-Residential in the same building) • New residential development is not • New non-residential development . New mixed-use development is allowed. is allowed. Must meet the freeboard not allowed. requirements (p. 10-11). • Fill is allowed. • Fill is allowed. • Fill is allowed. • Residential additions are not allowed. • Non-residential additions are allowed. • Residential additions are not allowed to Must meet the freeboard requirements a mixed-use structure. Non-residential (p. 10-11). additions are allowed to a mixed-use structure. Must meet the freeboard requirements (p. 10-11). • Remodels are allowed subject to the • Remodels are allowed subject to the Remodels are allowed subject to the substantial improvement requirements substantial improvement requirements substantial improvement requirements (p. 14-15). (p. 14-16). (p. 14-16). • Manufactured homes are allowed only • Mobile buildings (modular offices) are to replace an existing manufactured allowed only to replace an existing home or fill a vacant lot in an existing mobile building or fill a vacant lot in an manufactured home park. existing mobile building development. • Redevelopment (rebuild) of an existing • Redevelopment (rebuild) of an existing Redevelopment (rebuild) of an existing structure is allowed (p. 14-15). Must structure is allowed (p. 14-16). Must structure is allowed (p. 14-16). Must meet the freeboard requirements meet the freeboard requirements. meet the freeboard requirements (p. 10). (p. 10-11). (p. 10-11). • Attached garages are not allowed. • Attached garages, detached garages • Attached garages, detached garages Detached garages and sheds are and sheds are allowed (p. 17). and sheds are allowed (p. 17). allowed (p. 17). • Critical facilities are not allowed (See • Critical facilities are not allowed (See • Critical facilities are not allowed (See proposed alternatives on p. 18). proposed alternatives on p. 18). proposed alternatives on p. 18). Packet Pg. 44 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt 3 Summary of Floodplain Fringe Development Regulations (continued) Residential Development Non-Residential Development Mixea-Use Deveiopment (Residential and Non-Residential in the same building) • New outside storage of equipment or • New outside storage of equipment or materials that are considered "floatable" materials that are considered "floatable" is not allowed (p. 21). is not allowed (p. 21). • New basements are not allowed • New basements are allowed. Must • New basements are not allowed below below the freeboard level (p. 10). An meet freeboard requirements and be the freeboard level for residential existing basement in a redeveloped or floodproofed (p. 10-11). An existing portions of mixed-use structures (p. 10). substantially improved structure is not basement below the freeboard level in An existing basement in a redeveloped allowed to remain (p. 10 and 14-15). a redeveloped or substantially improved or substantially improved structure structure can remain if floodproofed is not allowed to remain if it is in (p. 10-11 and 14-16). residential use (p. 10 and 14-15). New basements are allowed for non-residential portions of mixed- use structures. Must meet freeboard requirements and be floodproofed (p. 10-11). An existing basement in a redeveloped or substantially improved structure is allowed to remain if it is in non-residential use and floodproofed (p. 10-11 and 14-16). • An emergency response and An emergency response and preparedness plan is required (p. 19). preparedness plan is required (p. 19). Summary of 500-Year Floodplain Development Regulations Residential Development Non-Residential DevelopmenL Mixed-Use Development Residential and Non-Residential in the same building) • At-risk populations and essential At-risk populations and essential At-risk populations and essential services critical facilities are not allowed services critical facilities are not allowed services critical facilities are not allowed (p' 18). Packet Pg. 45 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENtO3 Freeboard • Freeboard is a factor of safety that accounts for the allowed rise in flood level due to development in the flood fringe and for larger floods and debris that may cause the flood elevation to be higher. • Freeboard is a measure of how high above the flood level the structure must be built or floodproofed. Residential Structures and Residential Portions of Mixed-Use Structures • Freeboard is 24 inches; • Must elevate the structure; not allowed to floodproof; and • The lowest floor of the structure (p. 12-13), including the basement, all HVAC and electrical, must be elevated above the freeboard height. Fill ❑ ❑ / Fill ductwork elevated 24" elevated 24" crawl space 100-year 100-yea r flood level flood level l� Slab on grade foundation Crawl space foundation Example of redevelopment residential elevation (See p. 12-13 for detailed foundation designs) Packet Pg. 46 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENV3 Freeboard continued Non-Residential Structures and Non-Residential Portions of Mixed-Use Structures • Freeboard is 24 inches; • Allowed to either elevate or floodproof the structure; • In the floodway, new basements are not allowed; • If elevating, the lowest floor of the structure (p. 12-13), including the basement, all HVAC and electrical, must be elevated above the freeboard height; and • If floodproofing, the structure as well as all HVAC and electrical, must be floodproofed to the freeboard height. Floodproofing uses various techniques to make a building water tight: • Sealants and waterproof membranes; • Closure shields in front of doorways; and • Mini-walls to protect window or stair wells. Floodproofing generally works only when flood depths are less than 3 feet. Store 100-year I i floodproofed 24" flood level t , above flood level Basement �floodproofing Example of new development non-residential floodproofing Packet Pg. 47 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt23 Determination of Lowest Floor Based on Type of Foundation Slab on Grade Enclosure (above grade crawl space) The lowest floor elevation of a slab on 1. The lowest floor elevation of a grade structure is measured at the top structure with an enclosure of the slab. that is built in accordance with the venting criteria (p. 17) is measured at the floor of the first finished ❑ ❑ Lowest floor floor. ❑ ❑ Lowest floor elevation Freeboard elevation Freeboard / E� Enclosure Unfinished area Floor ' ' 1 7 no HVAC on . ..- Basement 2. The lowest floor The lowest floor elevation of elevation of a structure a structure with a basement with an enclosure that is is measured at the top of the not built in accordance basement slab. with the venting criteria (p. 17) is measured at the lowest interior grade ❑ ❑ of the enclosure. Can have ❑ ❑ HVAC in Basement enclosed area Lowest floor Freeboard elevation Freeboard Enclosure Lowest floor elevation .. Packet Pg. 48 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt-t Determination of Lowest Floor Based on Type of Foundation continued Crawl Space (below grade) The lowest floor of a structure with a crawl space is measured at the lowest finished floor if the following conditions are met: a. The velocity of the flood flows hitting the structure is less that 5 feet per second; b. The interior grade elevation that is below the flood elevation is no lower than 2 feet below the lowest adjacent grade; c. The height of the crawl space, as measured from the lowest interior grade of the crawl space to the top of the ❑ ❑ foundation wall, does not exceed 4 feet at any point; d. An adequate drainage system is in place, including a totally immersible pump; Duct Work Freeboard f Vent No more than e. All ductwork, HVAC, hot water heater and electrical is Crawl space 4 feet to top of elevated to the regulatory flood protection elevation; and foundation wall f. Venting requirements (p. 17) are met. If the above conditions are not met, the lowest floor is determined based on the criteria for a basement (p. 12). a Velocity < 5 ft. per sec. Packet Pg. 49 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENV3 Remodels or Repair of Damaged Buildings • Remodels and repairs are allowed subject to the substantial improvement requirements (p. 15-16). • Vertical additions (pop-tops) are considered a remodel and are subject to the substantial improvement requirements (p. 15-16). All remodel work, ;/ Vertical � including vertical /� (Pop-top) addition, counts , addition toward substantial improvement Basement Packet Pg. 50 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENtS3 Substantial Improvement and Redevelopment Substantial improvement occurs when all of the following conditions are met: 1. A building permit is requested for any repair, reconstruction or improvement to a non-conforming structure, involving alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor or other structural part of the building; 2. The cost of the improvement, or the amount of damage, equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure either before the improvement or repair is started or before the building was damaged; and 3. The cost is calculated cumulatively over the life of the structure during the time the structure has been located in a designated floodplain. A substantial improvement policy ensures that non-conforming structures are brought into conformance over time and are therefore protected from flood damage and the risk to occupants is reduced. Redevelopment occurs when there is a substantial improvement and more than 50 percent of the wall perimeter of any floor of a structure that is partially or completely below the flood elevation is removed or replaced and the building footprint is not increased. Residential Structures and Residential Portions of Mixed-Use Structures If a substantial improvement occurs, the lowest floor (p. 12-13) of a non-conforming structure, including the basement, and all HVAC, electrical and utilities, must be elevated 24 inches above the flood elevation. After improvements, the structure 100-year ❑ ❑ flood level ❑ ❑ 100-year will be protected from flood damage. \ flood level j Televated 24" If a redevelopment occurs, the lowest floor (p. 12-13) of a non-conforming structure, including the Basement Basement basement, all HVAC, electrical and utilities, must be filled-in elevated 24 inches above the flood elevation. After improvements, the structure will be protected from flood damage. �J Before improvement After improvement Example of residential substantial improvement or redevelopment Packet Pg. 51 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt3 Substantial Improvement and Redevelopment continued Non-Residential Structures and Non-Residential Portion of Mixed-Use Structures If a substantial improvement occurs, the lowest floor (p. 12-13) of a non-conforming structure, including the basement and all HVAC and electrical, must be elevated or floodproofed 24 inches above the flood elevation. After improvements, the structure will be protected from flood damage. If a redevelopment occurs, the lowest floor (p. 12-13) of a non-conforming structure, including the basement and all HVAC and electrical, must be elevated or floodproofed 24 inches above the flood elevation. After improvements, the structure will be protected from flood damage. m m m m ❑❑artments ❑❑artments m m m m Store Store Store Floodproofed Store 24"above 100-year ❑ ME ❑ P❑ 100-year I Iflood levelflood Ievel flood Ievel \y Store Store Basement Basement Basement Basement Before improvement After improvement Example of non-residential and mixed-use substantial improvements or redevelopments Packet Pg. 52 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt73 Garages, Sheds and Accessory Structures • Used only for parking or storage; • Is an accessory to a main structure; • Must be anchored to resist flotation; • All HVAC and electrical must be elevated to the Use flood freeboard level (p. 10-11); ❑ ❑ Primary resistant 100-year Structure Garage materials Can either elevate to freeboard level (p. 10-11) or be j or Shed to 24"above built at grade; and flood level n flood level •fill ve nts If not elevated to freeboard level, the garage or shed must meet the following requirements: • Must have 1 square inch of venting for every Example of detached structure square foot of enclosed area; • Must have at least two vents located on different sides of the structure; • Have at least one vent on the upstream side of the structure; ?E] rimary Bottom of vents cannot be higher than 1 foot ructure above grade; and 100- ear ElGarage Use flood resistant Flood resistant materials must be used below the y or Shed materials to 24" flood level I above flood level freeboard level (p. 10-11). fill vents Venting Calculation Example 600 square foot shed Example of attached structure 600 square inches of venting required Vent size: 12" x 10" = 120 sq. inches per vent 600 divided by 120 = 5 vents Packet Pg. 53 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENtt Critical Facilities 100-year floodplain: 500-year floodplain: • All Critical Facilities not allowed in the 100-year floodplain. At-risk Populations and Essential Services Critical Facilities are not allowed in the 500-year floodplain. At-Risk Populations Critical Facilities Essential Services Critical Facilities NURSING HOME SCHOOL OR DAYCARE ❑ OMMUNICATIONS HUB 1 []] F-1 Government Services Critical Facilities MUNICIPAL BLDG BUILDING PERMITS CITY ADMIN ❑ POLICE JAIL LIBRARY or FIRE STATION Hazardous Materials Critical Facilities GAS STATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ STORAGE OSPITAL, URGENT CARE,SURGICAL CENTER - €- Packet Pg. 54 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENI3 Emergency Response and Preparedness Plan • Required for new non-residential or mixed-use structure, City of addition, cumulative substantial improvement, redevelopment Fit Collins or change of occupancy Emergency Response and Preparedness Plan(ERPP) • The following must be included in the plan. In order to mitigate life-safety hazards to occupants of private property within the Poudre River floodplain, Chapter 10 of City Code requires for non-residential and mixed-use additions,substantial improvements, change of use,redevelopment and/or new development that private property owners demonstrate flood- - Flood Risk Assessment preparedness through the development and implementation ofa site-specific Emergency Response and Preparedness Plan(ERPP). The plan includes,at a minimum,conditions and methods for emergency Preparedness and evacuation from the property.If desired by the property owner,additional measures for flood — Method of receiving a flood warning protection may be included. — Identification and assignment of personnel to implement Applicant Information Name of Business: Type of Business: the plan Address: — Procedures for notifying employees, customers and other Street Address ur;t# building occupants City State ZIP Code County Parcel ID#: Business Phone Number: ( ) — Description of procedures for evacuation and Reason for Review: ❑ Redevelopment ❑ Annual Update shelter-in-place El New Structure El Addition El Change of Occupancy ❑ Other: — Procedures for protecting the building from damage or El Substantial Improvement hazardous conditions Authorized Persons(Staff Contacts) These persons will be the responsible parties in the event of an emergency.They will redirect resources and,ultimately, — Process for distribution of the plan, evacuation routes and shut down operations,ifnecessary.These persons will also initiate evacuation in the event ofan emergency. shelter-in-place instructions Primary Person: (Name) E-Mail Address: — Description of mandatory training and practice drills Title: Work Phone: Cell Phone: ( ) — Description of post-recovery measures Other Contact: Designation of responsible party The back-up person should be trained to fulfill all the duties of the primary person(monitor weather radio,have necessary apps/programs installed on personal devices). Plan and documentation of training and drills to remain on file Back-Up Person: (Name) E-Mail Address: •• The plan must be reviewed in the first quarter of every year and Title: Work Phone: Cell Phone: documentation submitted to the City Other Contact: Sample: page 1 of Emergency Response and Preparedness Plan Packet Pg. 55 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMEI\ItC3 Letter of Map Revision Based on Fill • A Letter of Map Revision Based on Fill (LOMR-Fill) is a FEMA process whereby a property in the flood fringe can be filled and is no longer considered in the floodplain for insurance requirements. • A community must sign-off on the application to FEMA and certify that all existing and future structures will be "reasonably safe from flooding." • To meet this "reasonably safe from flooding" standard, all floodplain requirements (p. 8-9) must be met even if fill is placed and the property is "removed" from the floodplain by FEMA. 100-year Floodplain Floodway 100-yea r Fi I I flood level elevated 18" Floodplain Fringe Example of fill placed in the flood fringe Plan View: Fill _ - - - - - - - Floodplain Fringe _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - Flood- - - - - - - - - -way -� , Packet Pg. 56 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENV3 Outside Storage of Materials or Equipment and Floatable Materials • "Fooatable material" is defined as material that is not secured in place or completely enclosed in a structure so that it could float off-site during a flood and potentially cause harm to downstream property owners or that could cause blockage of a culvert, bridge or other drainage facility. • In the floodway, all outside storage of material or equipment, including floatable materials, associated with any non-residential use is not allowed. • In the flood fringe, floatable materials associated with any non-residential use is not allowed. • In the flood fringe, outside storage of material or equipment that is not considered "floatable material" is allowed. Stacks of Lumber Containers and Drums Fleet Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 Equipment Material Stockpile uuu All of these examples are floatable materials if not • adequately secured. .SAFE 7 Packet Pg. 57 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt23 Required Documentation and Submittals (Note: Some items may require a registered professional engineer.) Building Permit and Development Review Approval Requirements • Floodplain Use Permit for any work being done on a structure or property in the floodplain. The permit fees are shown in the table on page 23. • Building plans showing foundation design, flood elevation, floor elevations, HVAC elevations, size and locations of vents, floodproofing design and other relevant information. • Emergency Response and Preparedness Plan (p. 19). • No-Rise certification if working in the floodway. • Floodplain Modeling Report if doing a floodway modification (p. 5). (See separate modeling guidelines handout.) • Other plans or reports to document information such as grading, fill, channel stability and floodplain boundaries. Certificate of Occupancy Approval Requirements • FEMA Elevation Certificate or FEMA Floodproofing Certificate for any new structure, addition, substantial improvement or redevelopment built in any floodplain. Allow two weeks for review and approval. Requires licensed surveyor for elevation certificate; requires licensed engineer or architect for floodproofing certificate. • No-rise certification if working in the floodway. • As-built modeling report, if applicable. Variances The Fort Collins Water Board has the authority to issue variances to the floodplain regulations if certain requirements are met. The Board meets the third Thursday of the month. An application packet must be submitted three weeks prior to the board meeting, with a $1,000 application fee. (See separate variance submittal handout for documentation and justification requirements.) ioodplain Information and Assistance Call Fort Collins Utilities at (970) 416-2632 or e-mail utilities@fcgov.com to determine if a property is in the floodplain or to discuss floodplain regulations. More information about floodplain managment in Fort Collins is available at fcgov.com/stormwater/flooding. Packet Pg. 58 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt-t Floodplain Permit Fees City of Fort Collins Fees Ist and 2nd Reviews 3rd,4th,5th etc.Reviews FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT(FPU) $50 1 N/A N/A All fees in categories 1 through SA are in addition to the 550 FPU permit application fee and are based on the type of review submittal. The highest single applicable fee will be assessed. CATEGORY 1 MINOR IMPROVEMENTS/ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Fence/Accessory Structure/Change of use $0 Deck/Improvement or remodel< SO%Bldg,Value 5150 Included in S50 FPU fee Included in 550 FPU fee Fill or Grading Only CATEGORY 2 REDEVELOPMENT,NEW BUILDINGS,ADDITIONS,SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENTS OR REMODELS GREATER THAN 50%OF THE VALUE OF THE EXISTIN Slab on Grade $150 Enclosure $200 Included in$50 FPU fee Included in$50 FPU fee Crawl Space 5250 CATEGORY 3 MOBILE HOMES,FLOODPROOFING Mobile Home Floodproohng $250 Included in$50 FPU tee Included in$50 FPU fee CATEGORY Q VARIANCES Variance Application $1,000 CATEGORY SA PRE-PROJECT FLOODPLAIN ANALYSES(CITY BASIN,FEMA,CLOMR) FEMA CLOMR/CPMR 51,000 Included nn>1.COU ."' $500 each time+$50/hr. for each � City of Fort Collins Basin Preliminary Map Revision review hour over 10 hours Hydraulic Analysis for No-Rise Certification S500 Included in$500 fee $250 each time+$50/hr,for eachreview hour over 5 hours CLOMR-Fill Included in$250 fee $125 each time+$SO/hr.for each 0 review hour over 3 hours No-Rise Certification-without Hydraulic Analyse Included in$50 FPU fee Included in$50 FPU fee CATEGORY SB POST-PROJECT FLOODPLAIN ANALYSES(CITY BASIN,FEMA,LOMR) FEMA LOMR/PMR $1,000 Included in 51,000 fee $500 each time }$50/hr.for each Cityof Fort Collins Basin Final Map Revision review hour over 10 hours Hydraulic Analysis for No-Rise Certification $500 Included in$500 fee 5250 each time+$SO/hr.for each review hour over S hours LOMR-Fill Included in$250 fee 5125 each time+$5O/hr.for each �: �� review hour over 3 hours No-Rise Certification- w/o Hydraulic Analysis Included in SSO FPU fef, Included in$50 FPU fe, Packet Pg. 59 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENt43 Flood Insurance Information Who needs flood insurance? EVERYONE. Flood Insurance is available for ALL properties in the City of Fort Collins, regardless of location. Approximately 25% of damages occur in low risk areas. Flood Insurance is required by lenders for any structure in a Important Considerations FEMA 100-year flood plain.Lenders have the option of requiring • There is a 30-day waiting period before flood insurance it in any other area. becomes effective. • New flood insurance policies will require a FEMA Elevation • Disaster assistance is only available for major flood events Certificate documenting the elevation of the structure. and does not cover the entire cost to rebuild your home or • Fort Collins Utilities has elevation certificates on file for many business. structures in the City of Fort Collins, free of charge, by calling Fort Collins is subject to flash flooding—there is little warning 970-416-2632 or visiting www.fcgov.com/elevation-certificate. time to move your contents to safer locations. • Documenting the elevation of the structure allows the flood You can receive up to a 40% discount on your insurance premium to be calculated based on the risk. flood insurance premiums. • The higher the structure is elevated above the 100-year flood Fort Collins has some of the lowest flood insurance level, the lower the insurance premium. premiums in the United States due to its proactive floodplain Flood Insurance is not mandatory in City-designated management program. floodplains. However, it is strongly recommended. Check with your insurance agent to make sure you are receiving the FEMA Community Rating System (CRS) • Look into a "Preferred Risk" Flood Insurance Policy. It Discount for Fort Collins being a Class 4 Community. combines structural coverage and contents coverage at a more affordable price. RIM Know The Risk. NATIONAL FLOOQ* To learn more, visit http://www.floodsmart.gov/, contact your insurance agent, or call FEMA at 1-888-379-9531. Packet Pg. 60 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENf-53 Example of Flood Risk Map 0 ■ ■ » 2 X \ ){{ƒƒ) (§ - _ „ » &» q {\[ | < I \ \/))- \\ / _!4 Ez» 01 )\)\\ I<D ID N N COLLEGE AVE \ \ / Ej (�~ ! )k /\ 2 S. 2� CL M \/\ ( > !J> 2 CD 7w {' . V / . \\ }} CL \» 2 / ¥_CD . G m \ \{ CL D �« o O {\ _ # � 3ROMEp ID -5D ° - >� ��` � E !/9\�; !\({ \f )&7/\* ! !%\ !,§0.-391& / E /``!f\i$(k g / ° E !�)%*0 2 © 3 • »)�;`AFa n 3,10/ F @ D ! O o % a!/! 3 � �« �! 0 D �- - ; E/! `�O \ . + % O } \//(((� :7§#&-0 q aC e Pg. 61 BOARD TOPIC zl ;♦ fir. 47 :s�r��R'`_ � �- �i � �� ' - �'•,� per.. - FORT COLLINS: BE FLOOD READY Flooding on College Avenue south of Drake Road, May 31,2020. Fort Collins Para mas informacion acerca de inundaciones, visite kgov.com/inundacion. �'L- utilities Packet '• 62 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 4 Knowledge is Power! Stay Informed During Floods View Real-Time Rainfall and Streamflow Data Have you ever wondered how much rain is falling near your house or what the flow is in on the Poudre River? Real-time data is available from the City's early flood warning system, which includes the same streamflow and precipitation gauges monitored by City staff. Visit fcgov.com/floodwarningsystem. Other Sources of Weather and Emergency Information • National Weather Service -online or via an NOAA Weather Radio Local TV and radio LETA911 - Sign up for emergency notifications at leta977. org. To report general flooding, call 970-221-6700. Do not call 911 for information. Know the Difference Between a `Watch' and a `Warning' Flood Watch Flood Warning • • Flooding is possible. I • Flooding is happening Be alert and prepared. or will happen soon. • Take immediate action. Play It Safe on the Poudre - Know Before You Go With the new Poudre River Whitewater Park open on the Poudre River, it is important to respect the power of water- Play It Safe. Make sure to wear a life vest. Know the flow and weather conditions. Plan where you are going and especially where your take-out location is located. Find more safety information at fcgov.com/PFA-river-safety. r pA Kayakers at the new Whitewater Park. Be alert for hazards. o—u e F; C'lrcfre.r Poudre Wirier Iff Authority Nauoial Heritage Area Foe Collier*Colorvlo Packet Pg. 63 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 4 PIN W Completed in 2075, this s ection of Fossil Creek, upstream of Lemay Avenue, was part of the City's stream rehabilitation program. The stream banks were laid back for safety, and the meanders of the stream were restored. Vegetation now protects the stream banks from erosion. Protect Wetlands, Waterways, and the Banks of Rivers and Streams ... They Protect You Flooding is a natural process. A healthy ecosystem along the river relies upon frequent inundations to survive and thrive. Floodplains help reduce flood damage by allowing water to spread out over a large area. This reduces the speed of floodwater as it is soaked up in wetlands like a sponge, lowering peak flows downstream. You can experience the natural beauty and wildlife habitats that help Fort Collins be flood ready at over 17 conserved natural areas along the Cache la Poudre River. Learn more at fcgovcom/naturalareas. City of There are many City-conserved open spaces that also Fort Collins reduce the flood hazard along Spring Creek, Fossil �y� Natural Creek and other drainages. areas Open space along waterways provides natural flood and erosion control, as well as a place for us to enjoy the outdoors. Look for birds such as kingfishers, great blue herons, redtail hawks, great horned owls and a diversity of migratory songbirds that use drainage corridors, too. Packet Pg. 64 BOARD TOPIC Learn How toProtectYour • • . • Family BEFORE A FLOOD DURING A FLOOD AFTER A FLOOD Purchase flood Do not drive through Check for structural insurance. floodwater. damage to your building. Make an emergency Move to upper floors Document all damages. plan. of your home or climb American to higher ground. Document your Don't walk through Remove all wet items. belongings. flowing water. Store valuable items Listen for emergency Get a Floodplain Use (computers,family updates. Permit and a Building photos,heirlooms, Permit before making etc.)at higher any repairs. locations in your home. Sign up for emergency Turn off electricity at the Contact your insurance messages at/eta911.org. main power switch and agent and file a flood shut off water and gas. insurance claim. �1Red Cross OWBe Red Cross Ready. Get a kit. Make a plan.Be informed. redcross.orglprepare Packet '• 65 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 4 Only Flood Insurance Covers Floods - Purchase Flood Insurance Flood insurance is highly recommended and covers all surface floods. Most standard property insurance policies do not cover flood damage. You don't have to live in a floodplain or high-risk area to purchase flood insurance. Any walled and roofed . structure can be insured, ?el and separate coverage •' g is available for building contents. Renters can purchase S insurance for their belongings, even if the owner has not purchased %% structural coverage. I tJ Don't wait for the next flood to buy insurance- there is a 30-day waiting period before ' National Flood Insurance takes effect. Insurance agents sell policies under 3 ' FEMA Visit Floodsmart.gov rules and rates set by the guy when it's dry. Don't wait to get flood insurance. federal government. The City of Fort Collins Has Some of the Lowest Flood Insurance Premiums The Community Rating System (CRS) provides reduced flood insurance premiums to communities that exceed the minimum federal NFIP requirements. Fort Collins floodplain residents receive one of the lowest flood Residents and businesses in insurance rates in the country as Fort Collins can receive up a result of Fort Collins Utilities' to a 40% discount on flood Floodplain Management Program and from several drainage improvement insurance premiums. projects constructed using Call 970-416-2632 to learn stormwater fees. more about flood insurance. Packet Pg. 66 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 4 Build Responsibly: Know the Floodplain Regulations Before you begin any construction (new development, addition, remodel, filling, grading, etc.) on your building or property, contact Fort Collins Utilities for specific floodplain regulation requirements. Some important considerations are listed below. Get a Floodplain Use Permit Before You Build or Grade These required permits ensure that structures are protected from flood damage and that construction projects do not cause flooding problems for existing properties. According to Fort Collins City Code, all new residential structures and additions built in the 100-year floodplain must be elevated above the 100- year water surface elevation. New non-residential buildings and additions also must be elevated or floodproofed above the 100-year flood elevation. Floodway Requirements The floodway is the most dangerous section of the floodplain. New residential development is not allowed and commercial development is very restricted. For all other permitted development, an engineering analysis that shows no-rise in the 100-year flood elevation is required. Substantial Improvement Requirement If the cost of reconstruction, rehabilitation or other improvements to a building equals or exceeds 50%of the existing market value, the structure must meet some of the same requirements as those of a new building. Substantially damaged buildings must meet the same standards upon reconstruction. Improvement requirements are addressed during the floodplain development permitting process. For more information, call 970-416-2632 or email utilities@fcgovcom. Lucky's Market met the substantial improvement requirements and raised the interior floor by approximately 6 inches. This building now is better protected from flood damage. Packet Pg. 67 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 4 Protect the Environment You may think it's OK for little things to be put down the storm drain, but it all adds up and can create problems. Our storm drains run directly into our lakes and streams and eventually to the Cache la Poudre River. To help keep them clean, properly dispose of motor oil, pick up grass clippings and pet waste, and use car washes instead of washing your car at home. • Do not dump or throw anything into ditches or streams. Obstruction and pollution of our waterways and ditches are violations of Fort Collins City Code. Report any debris or dumping in ditches or • streams to Fort Collins Utilities at 0 970-221-6700 or email utilities@fcgov.com. Turn Around, Don't Drown Do you really know how deep the water is? It only takes 12 inches of water to sweep a car away and 18-24 inches for a large truck or SUV. 12 inches of fast-moving water can carry away a small car. WHEN FLOODED TURNAROUND .-. DON'T ° o DROWN jr6 inches of • • water can knockover • carry away an adult. Packet Pg. 68 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 4 Fort Collins Has a Flood History: It's Not If, but When Fort Collins has experienced numerous floods. The table below lists some of the more notable floods in each of the city's 12 drainage basins. Fort Collins is subject to flooding from snowmelt on the Poudre River and flash flooding due to intense thunderstorms. Typically, monsoon season runs from mid-July to mid-August, often bringing heavy rainfall to Fort Collins. Some past floods, like the July 28, 1997 Spring Creek Flood, are hard to forget. There are high water mark reminders along the Spring Creek Trail, which document the 1997 flood. However, it does not take a large flood to cause problems. Afternoon or evening thunderstorms can cause issues in isolated areas, including street and basement flooding. Urban Flooding - Know the Risk On May 22, 2018, an intense rain and hail storm tracked through Fort Collins. Areas of town received 1.8 inches of rain in 30 minutes and hail accumulations to depths of more than a foot. The hail clogged inlets, which resulted in localized flooding. Numerous buildings were flooded in Old Town and on the CSU campus. Motorists were stranded and had to be rescued. The following photos document a few of these smaller floods that caused problems for motorists, homeowners and businesses. June 24,1992-An intense thunderstorm in Old Town caused the flooding of basements and many roads, including near Moby Arena,pictured left. ,o, a August 2007-Street flooding near Shields Street June 6,2009-Flooding on Plum Street west of CSU. and Horsetooth Road. Packet Pg. 69 BOARD TOPIC _ N� � �•1-1i I � _ y - �. y � r� August I 2017-A quick rainstorm •/in May22,2018 //I Ialong O due to rain street flooding. and Flooding due toIII drainage a I I the MulberryFrontage II•I near 1-25. �-',are'��`w►\ a I I -Floodingalong the Spring Creek Trail westof Packet 70 BOARD TOPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 4 Protecting for the Future . The Master Drainage Plan includes plans for the 12 stormwater basins across the city.The purpose is to identify stormwater management issues and develop solutions that reduce flood risk,improve stormwater quality and promote stream rehabilitation.Each plan looks at the unique characteristics of the basin,identifies potential problems,and provides an alternative analysis and recommended improvements. Utilities prioritizes all stormwater and stream rehabilitation projects on an annual basis.The main categories used to evaluate each project include protection of structures from flooding, road overtopping,cost-benefit ratio,health and safety,water quality and habitat improvement. LefCAnewstorm pipe enters5pringCreekjustdownstream of Remington Street Above:A stream rehabilitation project on Mail Creek just after completion in May 2020. Flood History Information Drainage Basins DatesDescriptions Cache la 1844,1864,1891,1904, The three largest floods occurred in 1864,1891 and 1904,with peaks of approximately 21,000 cubic feet per second(cfs).For comparison,the Poudre River 1923,1930,1976,1983, discharge of the Poudre River at"flood stage"is about 4,000 cfs.Flooding on the Poudre is primarily from snowmelt in late May and June.However, 1999,2010,2011,2013 and 2014 flash flooding can occur at any time.A severe flood has not occurred in more than 100 years. Spring Creek 1902,1904,1938,1949,1951,1961, The 1997 flood resulted in five deaths,destruction of 120 mobile homes and damage to 2,000 homes and businesses. 1977,1983 and 1997 This flood was considered to be greater than a 500-year event. Dry Creek ❑ No serious flooding since The absence of even minor flooding is generally attributed to the network of irrigation canals that have some capacity for intercepting small about 1950 to moderate Dry Creek flows. Fossil Creek 1902,1938,1965,1977,1979,1997, Fossil Creek is relatively undeveloped and past floods have gone unnoticed.In addition to flooding hazards,Fossil Creek also is susceptible 1999 and 2007 to bank erosion. Boxelder Creek/ 1909,1922,1930,1937,1947,1963, Boxelder Creek has a drainage area of 251 square miles,and 176 square miles now are controlled by Soil Conservation Service flood control Cooper Slough 1967,1969 and 2007 dams near Wellington. Old Town Basin 1904,1933,1938,1951,1977,1983, Street flooding is the primary problem in this basin. 1988,1992,1997,2009 and 2018 Canal Importation 1938,1951,1975,1992,1997,1999 There are several small drainage areas in this basin.Development prior to drainage criteria encroached on the channels,reduced the flow capacity Basin and 2009 and caused flooding.The irrigation canals also overflow their banks and cause flooding. West Vine Basin 1980,1997 and 1999(Past floods were Localized flooding occurs due to encroachment on drainages and from irrigation ditch spills. not well documented.) Packet Pg. 71 Everyone Has Flood Risks: Know JPAURD Or$OPIC 1, ATTACHMENT 4 This map represents Fort Collins'floodplains and is continuously updated.To determine if a property is within a floodplain,call Fort Collins Utilities at 970-416-2632, email utilities@fcgou.com or view a detailed map at fcgou.com/floodplain-maps.Additional map information,such as erosion buffer zones,flood elevations and historic flood data is available. All rivers,streams,tributaries and canals-regardless of size-have the potential to flood.In Fort Collins,major sources of flooding include the Cache la Poudre River, Spring Creek,Dry Creek,Fossil Creek and Boxelder Creek.Urban street flooding also is a hazard.All drainage basins flow to the Cache la Poudre River. Dry Creek Boxelder/Cooper Slough Basin °sy Basin Douglas Rd 9h� n m L W �2 N coo 2flj x w 9 y Richards Lake Rd Cache Ca o = Ra m o mR/per Country Club Rd N C F Willox Ln� Mountain Vista or � m E � d 1 Gac a Vine or�� _ Lake _ �r or West Vine Laporte Ave l o 68SIn ------ Mountain Ave fdoo/' Uo h ..dW Mulberry St �e Mulberry St Plum Channel Laurel St Old Town Clearview Channel Basin e Canal Importation Prospect Rd l.-�tipr/_CreK,�`y � \ Basin 'r°°K panne (/ `m Drake Rd Spring Creek o --� Basin ch boo\V\Is Channel @�dA Foothills �- °� Basin Horsetooth Rd Horsetooth Rd Mail Creek Fox Meadows 4S Basin Basin N a Harmony Rd Harmony Rd i2ja m T� �° �• T McClellands a Basin y Fossil Creek "^..� t Basin , rr�� ~ \�� Ke~ercRde//a Cre )ek � T x EE N Trilby Rd � N O = L � N � Legend ~ High Risk Floodway I High Risk Carpenter Rd N State Highway 39 100-year floodplain Moderate Risk s W+Efo 100-year sheet flow and 500-year floodplain = S Co Water Features Poudre Floodplain Maps Are Changing The Poudre River floodplain maps are old and need updating.Updated Elevation certificates are available for some mapping provides a better evaluation of flood risk,which helps protect properties. Call 970-416-2632 to learn more. lives and properties.View the new,preliminary maps at: fcgovcom/riskmap P *rg. 72 Auxiliary aids&services are available for persons with disabilities V/TDD 777.E sta informacidn puede ser traducida,sin costo Para usted Work Session - Item 2 STAFF REPORT February • 2022 Historic Preservation • • PROJECT NAME LAND USE CODE PHASE 1 UPDATE STAFF Noah Beals, Development Review Manager Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Manager PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The engagement and analysis of the current land use code phase 1 update has resulted in five guiding principles and a set of recommendations for revision related to housing, equity, clarity, and ease of use. This presentation will outline the process to date and seek input from the Historic Preservation Commission on topics that intersection with stewardship of historic resources and community history. PRESENTER: Noah Beals EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND: The City of Fort Collins is working on Phase 1 of a land use code update that includes a diagnostic analysis and stakeholder engagement to identify appropriate recommendations for changes to the code. The purpose of the update is to bring the land use code into alignment with adopted city plans and policies, with a particular focus on housing, equity, and organization of the code document for clarity and ease of use. In addition to the current phase of analysis and engagement, the updates will also rely upon the land use code audit that was completed in January 2020 in association with the adoption of our revised City Plan. Planned updates to the code will reply upon broad community engagement and participation from stakeholders, a focus on opportunities to increasing housing capacity, and revision of zoning to address and achieve adopted plans and priorities. ATTACHMENTS 1. Land Use Code Diagnostic Final Item 2, Page 1 Packet Pg. 73 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 01.03.22 Fort Collins LAND USE CODE UPDATE Diagnostic + Code Update METTAURBAN DESIGN Peter J. Park City Planning and Design C A S C A D I A City of TABLE OF CONTENTS ,,FoorfColhns Introduction . . Diagnostic III C. . - Update Approach 1. Purpose of the Land Use 1. Key Findings Overview 1. A Transparent Process Code Updates 2. Key Findings & 2. Co-Create with Staff 2. The Evolving City Recommendations 3. Focus on Transit Corridors a. Does not support future 3. Community Engagement Priority Place Types 4. Update and Create New 4. Key Plans/Policy b. Limits Housing Capacity Zone Districts for Foundation c. Does not prioritize housing Implementing Future Plans capacity,diversity, 5. Guiding Principles affordability along transit corridors d. Difficult to Use Packet Pg. 74 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Purpose of the I e4&n,4 Use Code V PUU 1 mob: To Align the LUC with Adopted City Plans and Policies with a focus on: • Housing-related changes • Code Organization • Equity / ovR PEE ' A 3 5 THEMES: 1. Align Zoning Districts and Uses with Structure Plan Place Types 2. Create More Opportunities for a Range of Housing Options 3. Clarify and Simplify Development Standards Y - 4. Enhance the Development Review Procedures 5. Create a More User-Friendly Document Packet Pg. 75 BOARD TOPIC An City • City's past and future evolution is summarized 6elow in three eras distinguished 6y different growth patterns that • • 1900 1950s 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Land Dovclopmcnr land Use Code Updote Pre-Zonin 1929 Codc Code Amendments Guldonco Syzrcm Land Use Code pf- LUC.Ir6 Ade ld g Frsl Zon;nq Code Med;fpnq the 1929 Code Performoncr Zon;ng/PUD Int.advrrd Cvrrrnl Zone: plans d PehNn P resuu'lted from our evolving city planning priorities and policies,regulatory systems,and transportation modes. 1929 - 1980 1997 ___ First Zoning arious Code Land Dev. Land Use PHASE 1: Code mendments Guidance Code (LUC) New Land 70NINX;(A[WAM�M System Development Cod u.l'yr I it Plan for Comp.Plan fivv�I Progress rlvivf _� Updated City Plan T 1. HISTORIC 2. GROWING OUT 3. FUTURE CORE FROM THE CORE VISION Pre-1929 to Mid-1950s Mid-1950s fo 1997 i997 fo Todoy Todoy and Tomorrow DIVERSE USE SINGLEUSE SINGLE•USE DIVERSE USE MULTIMODAL AUTO-CENTRIC AUTO-CENTRIC MULTIMODAL HIGH CONNECTIVITY LIMITED CONNECTIVIT INTERNAL CONNECTIVITY HIGH CONNECTIVITY SUSTAINABLE EQUITABLE ERA IAn Evolving City Between 1925 and 1950 the City made only four Pre-1929 to Late 1950'sannexations totaling 18 acres. However,during the 1951-57 period there were twenty-seven annexations of 1,388 acres (Fort Collins Postwar HISTORIC CORE CHARACTER&BUILT FORM: Development Use Diverse mix o sg�unit,duplex, MOUNTA and multi-unit residential buildings "in 1946 the Chamber of Commerce adopted the slogan "Fort Collins E-X-P-A-N-D-S a campaign area businesses and the local newspaper supported wholeheartectly." often integrated on same block; Commercial uses/services within walking distance of residential areas :i Streets&Blocks Interconnect grid, _ - alley-loaded garages/services, ;1 - treelawns,street trees,detached sidewalks ft - Mobilit t s' DRAXE Multi-mods trams,bus transit �_ "•� - automobiles,pedestrian-friendly) PLANNING/REGULATORY �,e3r CONTEXT: Zoning Code(1929) c awl Annexations ERA I Packet Pg. 76 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Given the general lack of development during the Late 1950's to Early 1980's An Evolving City 1930s and 1940s,there was little need for zoning enforcement until the postwar period;the Fort Collins ' • • 1_ zoning board was not created until 1954.This body FROM THE CORE •Z '; dealt with annexations that expanded the city -Fort Collinsx• boundaries and dramatic subdivision development ► y� �' ►� during the postwar period and beyond. is CHARACTER&BUILT FORM:Land UseJ 't .},gat "The verb"expand,"in all its meanings,very much 'Y"' 1I •� defined Fort Collins in the postwar era.The word's dmuplex/muPt-unit residential aZt • '. L• Latin root,expandere,means literally to spread commercial uses often in separate '.. ' '•. q,•, out an apt description of Fort Collins's clusters away from single unit arealN a�t •' rr ' eo ra hical transformation in the second half of Streets&Blocks {-_:, _ the twentieth century." garages,attached sidewalks front-loaded driveways and PLANNING/REGULATORY _ -• NdRSETOOTH1959 Comprehensive Plan --—- r, 1967 Plan for Progress 1979 Comprehensive Plan r1 A •-� �IU I'� l , N , RM-11 Amendments to the 1929 Code pre.1959 � �• Annexations / rw S • + :Abuilt in ERA Il: il•lBY �. :. II I— ERA 11 Fort Collins continued to E-X-P-A-N-D following Early 1980's to Late 1990's An Evolving City postwar development patterns that prioritized accommodation of automobiles and single unit GROWING OUT '' residential most often separated from FROM • ' multi-unit residential and commercial uses. "Fort Collins ►,, �'; Land Use "tit.U 'I - ry Imo' Pri aril sin�le unit residential with F, cluple./m.Pt..nit residential and commercial uses often in separate clusters away from single unit areas il• i:l_=•t L Streets&Blocks Lj_j front-loaded driveways and garages,attached sidewalks Auto-cent_�o MIN, us transit PLANNING/REGULATORY .0RSETOOTM CONTEXT: :' Land System •' �' p-�71. Development Year Bunt 1Y60-19BU built in 1 _ 1ERA II: 19B1 1997 Wily r Packet Pg. 77 ERA II Late 1990's to 2020 GROWING OUT FROM THE CORE "Fort Collins E-X-P-A-N-D-S" 1� CHARACTER&BUILT FORM: + Land Use A _ Primarily sing e unit sidential with T' duplex/multi-unit residential uses r often in separate clusters away r: from single unit areas;commercial `' ( ~- uses/services within walking [�' .i' • - distance of residential areas - r I r' j_ i y �freets&Blocks -Vill 1 •� _ -"'.v- Interns connectivity, rontand _ -'� alley-loaded garages,treelawns, �{ street trees,detached sidewalks Mo�bilit( • ' i. Auto centricwith bus transit,BRT, +Y'1 ,1• I - ��_ and dedicated bicycle routes �- 1 i~71'•; � PLANNING/REGULATORY CONTEXT: ;� { �•?•`c L 1997 City Plan 1997 Land Use Code 2018 City Plan •4t. - I 1 r 1 i 1 I built in ERA IL 1998-2020 • ° - �' 'T _ F Today and Tomorrow • FUTURE VISION r CHARACTER&BUILT FORM: Land Use • • • • Diverse mix o s�le unit,duplex, •i and multi-unit residential buildings integrated on same block; Commercial uses/services within walking distance of residential areas '•. ' Streets&Blocks Interconnecte street grid, � = alley-loaded garages/services, treelawns,street trees,detached — �� sidewalks �. Mo�bilit� Multi-modal(bus transit,BRT, 1 automobiles,pedestrian and bicycle-friendly) _I PLANNING/REGULATORY _ CONTEXT: 2018 City Plan 2021 Housing Strategic Plan 2019 Transit Master Plan021 Acon Future _ 2022OLa dur IiU et Code Updates 1 MASTER PLAN i BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 As part of this Diagnostic,a series of interviews were conducted to get a better Engagement understanding of policy priorities and challenges with the current LUC.These included interviews with City Council Members, Planning & Zoning Commissioners in July 2021,a work session with City Staff in September 2021,and the LUC Stakeholder Interviews Working Group in October 2021. "Setbacks and other "Does not have a robust form standards menu of zone district presume greenfield options to accommodate development and create varying housing densities 'Single family constraints for infill and types." zoning has a long more urban contexts."" history of limiting options." "Need more variety in 'Zoning along minimum lot sizes and transit; too auto consider small lots." "If we can't build oriented too more outward we commercial." \ need to build more \ upward." \ 11 City Staff conducted a series of Public Engagement Information and Input Sessions in October and November 2021. Below is a summary of input from Public Information / Input Sessions those sessions. Lack of Affordability Parking/Transportation Concern that younger generations will Increasing capacity without considering parking would create major headaches in all neighborhood not be able to buy a home in Fort Collins types —3' Suburban neighborhoods already Housing Mix experiencing parking issues —31 New housing in vacant land must be done in tandem Oversaturation with one housing type with increasing access to public transit to help Desire for more diverse housing alleviate parking/traffic issues options throughout the city ADUs peopleI Changes Density Helpful, but concerns about ADUs used Smaller yards as short term rentals for visitors 0 Taller buildings Need to ensure ADUs would be for people 0 City needs to demonstrate infrastructure who actually live here and need housing •• be able to accommodate this increase in density I Source:11/1/21 High level themes from Input Sessions,Center for Public Deliberation L 12 Packet Pg. 79 BOARD TOPIC Policies ToPrinciples regulatory tool for implementing the .� POLICIES Inputs community's vision as described in variousMT adopted policies and plans so its - CDDE AUDIT critical . establish -. understanding . f the relationship •' •• licy priorities and . . PRIORITIES informationthe current LUC. Matrix Over 300 pages of adopted policies and Menu . five • GUIDING PRINCIPLES guiding principles to inform the LUC Updates, Diagnostic, and Approach The LUC Updates depend on 6road understanding and support for the DIAGNOSTIC "' PROBLEM STATEMENTS o APPROACH� guiding principles. 13 FIVr GUIDING PRINCIPLES 1. Increase overall housing capacity (market rate and affordable) and calibrate market feasible incentives for Affordable (subsidized/deed restricted) housing 2. Enable more affordability These Guiding Principles especially near high frequency/capacity (presented to City Council transit and priority growth areas on November 9, 2021) provide the foundation for 3. Allow for more diverse housing choices the LUC Updates that fit in with the existing context and/or Diagnostic and Approach future priority place types and will inform all proposed code changes 4. Make the code easier to use with emphasis on Equity. and understand - 5. Improve predictability of the development permit review process, especially for housing Packet '• 80 KEY FINDINGS & Recommendations 1. Does not support future Priority Place Types A disciplined and deliberate process: 2. Limits All proposed LUC Updates will be created and housing capacity evaluated based on how they address the findings. 3. Does not prioritize housing capacity, diversity, & affordability along transit corridors 4. LUC is difficult to use BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #1 DOES NOT SUPPORT FUTURE PLACE TYPES J, • OVERVIEW OF PRIORITY PLACE TYPES • LIMITS HOUSING DIVERSITY AND CREATES UNCERTAINTY • Mixed Neighborhood • Mixed Employment • Mixed Use Districts • DOES NOT SUPPORT COMPATIBLE INFILL • PLACE TYPE + ZONING MISMATCHES KEY FINDING #1 Priority Place DOES NOT SUPPORTTypes Overview The Structure Plan establishes the This diagnostic focuses on the guiding vision for where and how five (5) Priority Place Types for ment in the residential - idential development new housing will be developed P Structure Plan that offer the in Fort Collins. Structure Plan greatest opportunities for Place Types describe the intended built form of various more diverse housing options. _ r. t3�p -.. a Lj types of neighborhoods and PLACE TYPES mixed use districts. Nelghbothoods Rural Neighborhood �f ✓"'"f i These Place Types are distinct - Suburban Neighborhood � _ — an from zone districts. Place Types - i — YP f] Mixed are broad depictions of form and Districts character. Zone districts are Downtown District t � specific regulations that Urban Mixed-use District -- implement the vision of a Place 4 Suburban Mixed-Use District r Type. A single Place Type may be AM Neighborhood Mixed-Use District Mixed Employment District A _ implemented through multiple - - Research&Development/Flex District i c ,'- zone districts with regulations 2� a Industrial District that vary by specific context. Campus District ; i •- 18 Packet Pg. 82 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #1 DOES NOT SUPPORT Priority Place Types Overview FUTURE PLACE TYPES -1 The Place Types with the greatest supply of vacant and Land Supply:Where is the zoned capacity for housing? redevelopable land and zoned capacity are Mixed Neighborhoods and four Mixed Use Districts comprised of Mixed PLACETYPES TOTAL DWELLING UNIT CAPACITY Employment, Urban Mixed Use, Suburban Mixed Use, and Rural 0 0% Neighborhood Mixed Use Districts. Oo Neighborhoods Areas in the Suburban Neighborhoods place type will provide 2 F_relatively less capacity for new housing(8%),but this does Suburban not mean housing diversity and affordability issues are not City Plan acknowledges that much of the needed growth is going m Neighborhood s% important to address nthese areas to be infill and redevelopment, however, the current code does w ^ Mixed 63% Z '+ Neighborhood not provide clear guidance for these situations - most of the Downto The majority of new housing wF wnilt in standards and guidance are for greenfield development. This District 1% the Mixed Neighborhoods place typo.which accounts for 63%of City's housing capacity. mismatch is most apparent in the "Core"and nearby areas where Urban there are a significant number of non-conforming lots and � Mixed Use ,5% structures that resulted from code changes made after 1929 to u Suburban bringthese areas u to""modern"" postwar standards. While Mixed Use 6% p P � Mined Employment and Mixed Use investment and infill activity in these older neighborhoods are Neighborhood o% area na sing cntcpmental ationf r newey proof of their desirability today, the code makes it difficult to Mixed Use total 28%of housing capacity. Mixed 17% develop buildings that"fit- in context sensitive ways. �. Employment 19 KEY FINDING #1 DOES NOT SUPPORT Limits Housing Diversity FUTURE PLACE TYPES If detached single-family homes continue to dominate _ the city's housing supply, demand for housing is projected to exceed the city's t a capacity in the future.A more diverse selection of housing types and price points will be needed to ■ �, - meet the needs of the city's changing population. (City Plan,p. 108) 20 Packet Pg. 83 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #1 DOES NOT SUPPORT Limits Housing Diversity FUTURE PLACE TYPES Detached ADU II "Missing Middle" Housing Types NOL �N City Plan recommends allowing a variety of housing Duplex types to expand housing options. The Audit describes the following specific changes to achieve this goal: • "Current standards were described as overly restrictive and out of touch with market demands."Increase clarity and build in flexibility in order to promote a diversity of housing options and density called ® �I for by City Plan. • Define a range of options between two-family and multi-family Triplex housing:duplexes,triplexes,townhouses,ADUs (attached and detached),small-scale multifamily. • New definitions for:ADU,co-housing,triplex,fourplex, multi-family, cottage developments, live-work,student housing complex ® m • Updating definitions for:Carriage house,single-family detached, duplex m auadplex 21 KEY FINDING #1 DOES NOT SUPPORT Limits Housing DiversityFUTURE PLACE TYPES �--� Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU"s) • No specific definition of accessory dwelling units in LUC • "Carriage House" is closest description to ADU but unclear and limited where they are allowed; only allowed in Neighborhood Conservation zone districts (NCL, NCM, and NCB) • Min lot size is 12,000 sf in NCL and 10,000 sf in NCM NC districts consist of -3% of Fort Collins Carriage houses: 4 Most lots within the NC "a single-family detached districts are too small for dwelling unit, Carriage houses, as typically without street frontage, currently regulated. 1III��/ri Pg that is located behind a s []1Er�r separate, principal " z ;43 Q�Q 011 , 19 75 li ; SS i + dwelling on the same lot" i —`� ��_�__ ' : : 2 16 Carriage House DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS J `� +'� Inr spay+w„+., 22 Packet Pg. 84 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #1 DOES NOT SUPPORT Creates Uncertainty FUTURE PLACE TYPES • Limited housing types allowed under Basic Development Review In "" f Priority Place Types and Along transit • Indicator of an outdated — code: More procedural oversight to compensatefor inadequate standards — --- •`•"`� that do not align with adopted policies ��_^"?^ -- � —w_ Development -. rl.:... _: •-^' Review Flowchart ..... a" Fon Collins 23 KEY FINDING #1 Limits Housing Diversity, Creates Uncertainty DOES NOT SUPPORT FUTURE PLACE TYPES Mixed Neighborhood Place Type tl w ° %IOUNTAIN VISTA E{ Mi• VINE The Mixed Neighborhood Place The Mixed Neighborhood Place VIN Type envisions a mixture of Type makes up 34% of the City. housing types and an increase in bRERRV o� r housing capacity, however,this growth looks different in the"core" PHOSPEc, _ of the city compared to the areas P "outside the core".and the code �' = RAKE should be calibrated to the existing patterns of these areas. HORSETOOTH Mixed-Neighborhood place W w HARMONY p type is one of the primary 63% of housing capacity o opportunities for moderate 34% ofredevelopableland density housing options. o 3rj/a of vacant land ITRILBY J 24 Packet Pg. 85 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING 01 Limits Housing Diversity, Creates Uncertainty DOES NOT SUPPORT FUTURE PLACE TYPES Mixed Neighborhood Place Type g 287 K h10UNTAINVISTA Mixed Neighborhoods Place Type is mapped to areas in 16y 8 different zone districts. VINE s VINE The Low Density Mixed Use Neighborhood hnuraeRRv rw�6ERRv DISTRICTS TOTAL ACRES zone(LMN)accounts for more than 40%of the od� land area in this place type.This zone also has Low Density significant vacant acreage and capacity for new Mixed-Use 42% housing.It is an important zone for meeting the vRosPec r Neighborhood _ City's housing needs. _ Medium Density Mixed-Use 2156 - Neighborhood 11 o ArcE Low Density The Medium Density Mixed Use Neighborhood - Residential 17% (MMN)zone is also a critical area for new - HORSETOOTH housing,and it accounts for over 20%of this - place type. Employment 8% "' HARMONY Neighborhood Conservation 5% Medium Density Urban Estate 3% The Neighborhood Conservation(NC)zones J are the oldest neighorhoods in the City.The w historic patterns in the`Core'Neighborhoods TRILBY is very different from the newer parts of the City Manufactured Housing 2% and will require a different approach to ensure compatible infill development. - - - M 9RPENT R Neighborhood Conservation 1% Buffer 25 KEY FINDING 01 Limits Housing Diversity, Creates Uncertainty DOES NOT •. . FUTURE PLACE TYPES Mixed 'Neighborhood Place Type The limited range of housing LMN RL E NCM The LIMN and MMN zones allow for types allowed in each zone d0 not the full spectrum of housing types from HOUSING TYPES single-family detached to apartments. evelopment standards in these zones support housing diversity. D Single Family Detached ❑ ■ constrain opportunities to build some of Uncertainty: these housing types. Most housing types are not allowed Small Lot Single Family ❑ ❑ ❑ The RL zone allows only single- through basic development review Detached/Cottage Cluster family detached housing,which is Duple= ❑ ❑ ■ inconsistent with the vision of the Mixed and require administrative or P&Z Neighborhoods place type. review except in NCB Zone. Triplex/ouadplex U ❑ The NCM zone allows for some mix of "Missingmiddle"housing types like Townhouses housing types but restricts some options 9 yp I[] F ❑ ❑ ❑ that may be compatible with the character triplex/fourplexes,townhouses,and of this zone,such as townhouses and cottage cluster housing are grouped Accessory DwellingUnts El ❑ ❑ ❑ F1 apartment buildings with more than four units. with multi-family housing,even though Multi-Famity ❑ U The Employment zone allows for the full they can fit in with existing spectrum of housing types.However, house-scale neighborhoods. MixedllwMdKFamlly ® ❑ IU El by residential uses require review by Planning and Zoning Commission.This Manufactured Housing procedural requirement can be a barrier There are opportunities to Community W] ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to smaller development projects. allow a wider variety of housing types that fit in with ■Pemnled Adminlsuauve m=k]c..Lac 1 Review existing neighborhoods. Planning B Zoning❑ Prohibited Hoard Approval ❑ 26 Packet Pg. 86 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING 01 Limits Housing Diversity, Creates Uncertainty FUTURE. TYPES Mixed tmployment Place Type zaT low o MOUNTAIN VISTA _ � N VINE JVINE l� I>ff MVLBERRY MUI BI-RRY PROSPECT p EKE C � Mixed Employment Place Type HOR ETOOTH has the potential to help the City The Mixed Employment Place 7:4 reduce vehicle-miles traveled and support GHG reduction goals by Tyne makes up 13% of the City. W _ n,oNY integrating a more diverse mix of 8 �` " uses-such as multifamily housing, A 17% of housing capacity J supportive services and amenities w within existing employment centers. 21% ofredevelopameland TRILBY Potential need to require higher 22% otvacantland densities and transit-supportive uses CARPENTER in key locations. (City Plan, p. 148) 27 KEY FINDING 01 Limits Housing Diversity, Creates Uncertainty DOES NOT SUPPORT FUTURE PLACE TYPES Mixed tmployment Place Type ear � \ �' MOUNTAIN VISTA DISTRICTS TOTAL ACRES INE VINE Harmony Corridor 63% ` 1,1UrB. Efi RY - MULBERRY Employment 735% ~�'F�- D Low Density The Mixed Employment place type is mapped PROSPECT Mixed-Use 2% pdmariy to ivro zones:Harmony Corridor HC) P Neighborhood and Employment(E).The HC zone accounts for about 2/3 of land in the zone. (� DRAKE. The Employment(E)zone - accounts for about'/,of the land this place type. HORSETOOTH Audit Recommendations: , ARMONY • Consider consolidating HC and E • Update list of residential uses, and allow certain housing types administratively, especially for TRILBY J transition areas • Apply 6-story height limit along Harmony Corridor _- SARPEN RL� (currently at 3-stories) 28 Packet Pg. 87 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING 01 Limits Housing Diversity, Creates Uncertainty DOES NOT •.• . I- ■ . _. FUTURE PLACE TYPES Mixed tmployment Place l ype HC E LIMN Both the HC and E zones allow for a wide range of housing types,from single-family detached to HOUSING TYPE ", , ' mixed use multi-family. Single Family Detached A minimum density of 7 units per acre in both zones F] prevents very low density single-family housing from consuming land in these zones,but still allows Small Lot Single Family ❑ ❑ for single-family detached houses on approximately Detached I Cottage Ouster 5,000 square foot lots. IwpMK ® However,all housing development in these zones is subject to review by the Planning and Zoning Triplex/Quadplex ❑ ❑ ® Commission.This procedural requirement can be a barrier to smaller development projects and Townhouses El ❑ discourage residential development compared to other use types. Accessory Dwelling Units 0 ❑ ❑ Mutti-Family V-1 ❑ Permitted Administrative ■ A.—D—,•_Q___a U Review Mixed Use Mutti-Family U U U Planning&Zoning Prohibited - Board Approval Manufactured Housing ❑ ElCommunity 29 KEY FINDING 01 Limits Housing Diversity, Creates Uncertainty DOES NOT •.• . I- . —■ FUTURE PLACE TYPES.� Mixed-Use Districts Place l ype n If ® Fm - Y - ' Neighborhood Mixed-Use Districts are Suburban Mixed-Use Districts in Fort Collins Urban Mixed Use Districts are adjacent to stand-alone,grocery-anchored centers that today are low-density,auto-oriented centers. existing MAX stations and along other corridors serve the immediate neighborhood II Although largely auto-oriented today,the planned for high-frequency transit service. Most Opportunities exist to improve connections integration of higher-density residential and a areas have not achieved transit-supportive to surrounding neighborhoods,expand the broader mix of uses is encouraged to help densities.These districts offer the greatest range of amenities,and incorporate reinvigorate underutilized centers. potential for a diverse mix of uses at multifamily housing. transit-supportive densities in the near-term. Mixed-use districts provide opportunities for a range of retail and commercial services, office and employment, multifamily residential, civic and other complementary uses in a compact, pedestrian and transit-supportive setting. (City Plan, p. 99) 30 Packet Pg. 88 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #1 Limits Housing Diversity, Creates Uncertainty DOES NOT SUPPORT . . . _ _ FUTURE PLACE TYPES Mixed-Use Uistricts Place Type ` 28T. MOUNTAIN VISTA r� v VINE VINE The Mixed-Use District Place Types make up 7% of the City, but include 36% of redevelopable land M'Lr BERRY_, .- MULBERRY and are typically located along transit. l PRO"":, ��• w 11% of housing capacity p '`•ORAHF I l � c C 36% of redevelopable land HORSETOOTH 10% of vacant land •i �� i Rai HARMONY up - Urban Mixed-Use District Suburban Mixed-Use District 1 RILBY Neighbor hood Mixed-Use District CARPENT R r 31 KEY FINDING #1 Limits Housing Diversity, Creates Uncertainty DOES NOT SUPPORT FUTURE PLACE TYPES Mixed-Use Uistricts Place Type ` DISTRICTS TOTALACRES VVIIIA General `�,�(�. Commercial l 31% VINE � -� VINE The General Commercial(GC)and Neighborhood Neighborhood 30% Commercial(NC)districts account for the bulk of the Commercial land in the Mixed Use place types.Each represent MUIRERRv ERRY about 30%of the place type acreage. � i Harmony Corridor0130 The Harmony Corridor(HC)zone district accounts for the next r PRosPFc? largest amount of land area.Approximately 11%of the Mixed - Service Use place types are in this zone.The Harmony Corridor is _ Commercial 8% currently conceived as primarily an employment district It may O = be appropriate to rezone some of these areas to one of the Y foRArce a n commercial/mixed use districts that is more consistent with Community , 5% the Mixed Use place types. t Commercial - - HORSETOOTH Medium Density Mixed-Use 4% Neighborhood _ q� �w _ �/ �.. Sri HARMONY Density The Service Commercial(CS)zone is another Low o, N Mixed-UseDensity 4% important zone district for this place type. Neighborhood accounting for S%of the place type area. _L Employment 3% TRILBY Other 4% I�ARPENT R 32 Packet Pg. 89 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #1 Limits Housing Diversity, Creates Uncertainty DOES NOT •• M . . . - —■ — FUTURE PLACE TYPES ixea-Use Uistricts Place l ype a �. • Most of the City's existing commercial zones HOUSING TYPE allow for a wide range of housing types to be sugleFamltyDetached ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ approved through Administrative Review. • Multifamily uses with more than 50 units, and Small Lot single vmtiv Detached,ccttagecluster ❑ ❑ ❑ all multifamily in the NC zone, require review Duple. ❑ U U ❑ I[] by Planning and Zoning Commission.This procedural requirement can be a barrier to trplexl QuadPle>, ❑ U U ❑ some development projects. Townhouses ❑ ID ff] ❑ 9:1 • The CS and CL zones allow for single-family detached housing. This may be inconsistent Accewy Dwelg Units ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ with the vision for the Mixed Use Districts to M, ,I,IIb . ❑ ❑ ® concentrate density within a walkable distance of key services and amenities. Mued use Muhl-Fam&j ® � ® ® © • Residential uses are allowed as a secondary ManutacruredHouslna El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ use in the HC zone. It may be appropriate to communm' allow some residential uses or projects outright in order to encourage housing development in .Perr.tted K AO,.istaove this zone. nn: fmmM nnrw, Reoew Plannwq A 2D—g vrorc tea L3card approva ❑ 33 KEY FINDING #1 Does not promote compatible infill or DOES NOTSUPPORT FUTURE PLACE TYPES support envisioned neighborhood form "Eliminate or better The LUC was created primarily define compatibility to guide development of vacant standards." parcels,or"greenfield" CORE �� OUTSIDE CORE development.The updated code ' will need to contemplate infill \� and redevelopment of parcels, % and should promote compatible, r �s contextual design solutions. 1 \ �b i 1 1 _ 1 1 I 1 DOWNTOWN NC ZONE DISTRICTS LMN&RL ZONE DISTRICTS 34 Packet Pg. 90 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #1 Does not promote compatible DOES NOTSUPPORT FUTURE PLACE TYPES infill in the "Core" The historic"Core"is the oldest Core: Placetypes residential area of the City.The VINE VINE Core is mapped both Mixed Lu - Neighborhood and Suburban O Neighborhood Place Types,and it v contains the Neighborhood MULBERRY I••1 Conservation zone districts (NCL, 1��I NCM, NCB). PROSPECT The historic patterns are most closely aligned with 1929 code, Core: zoning including smaller lots,varying w NAR setbacks,and a variety of housing VINE w VINE types including duplexes and :j " O carriage houses." In the past,a U disproportionate amount of �� MULBERRY variance requests have come from RIeY the historic Core,as compared to other parts of the City. CARS NrER PROSPECT 35 KEY FINDING 01 Does not promote compatible DOES NOT SUPPORT Preserve smaller FUTURE PLACE TYPES i n f i l l i n the ""Core"" historic homes that are more affordable than the single family scrape offs that replace them.- "More flexibility r-i� p for historic compatibility." 'Adaptability in the historic neighborhoods � ��_ i� - �`;•` is crucial." • _ i 1�A • Variety of architectural s style and building types 1 (mostly single family detached with some duplexes and commercial) / 1 ` r - l I I I- . ' iY • Regular blocks with alleys I� u (mostly), buildings 1 — oriented to"primary"and rimar • � - P Y r ' "Side"streets. 36 Packet Pg. 91 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #1 Does not support envisioned DOES NOTP. FUTURE PLACE TYPES neighborhood form "Outside the Core" 5 287 Most of the development"Outside the Core"was built in -q J the last few decades, much of it since the 1990s (under MOUNUIRVsT I� the current LUC). Infill and redevelopment in these areas must consider a different context than the Core — v RE r neighborhood. Some areas have plan support for greater AlvlftEf� A oIUIBFRRV change, especially along transit corridors, however the ` „ d Mixed Neighborhood Place Type, in general, is R°ftvE1:T anticipated to accommodate much of the City's a residential capacity. DRAKE RORSETOOTN While the plan guidance for these areas is clear,the existing built condition varies greatly, different densities, RA-DR,p lot sizes, and building forms. These areas will need further study to calibrate updated design and development standards that are compatible with the existing context. i N�ILNV If�..I n 37 KEY FINDING 01 Does not support envisioned DOES NOTSUPPORT FUTURE PLACE TYPES neighborhood form "Outside the Core" These areas has developed largely since the 1990s and while still auto-centric, demonstrates some evolution toward more walkability with the reintroduction of detached sidewalks,treelawns (sometimes with trees),and alley-loaded garages. v 4—+. � � ' � � �, •fir► r�-:.`;�.�'se��'-- r � � :Vo V. i „- 'wool� mum FT -- _ - 38 Packet Pg. 92 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #1 DOES NOT SUPPORT Place Type + FUTURE PLACE TYPES N] Zoning Mismatches o MOUNTAIN VISTA N RL & UE in Mixed Neighborhood VINE JVINE DISTRICTS TOTAL ACRES MULBERRY MULBERRY Low Density Mixed-Use 42°,. Neighborhood PROSPECT Medium Density g Mixed-Use 21% w Neighborhood - DRAKE Low Density 17% Nearly20%of the Mixed Neighborhood place ` Residential type is also mapped to areas in the Low Density Residential(RL)zone.The RL zone only HORseroorH allows single-family detached housing.This is Employment g% Inconsistent with the Mixed Neighborhoods w vision,so it may be appropriate to rezone or HARMONY 0 Neighborhood create a new zone for these areas. ° a Conservation 5% Medium Density Urban Estate 3% 'Rezoning may be required �here the land uses, W lBY Manufactured Housing 2% density,and development characteristics supportedI by the place type designation significantly differs _�__ __ RPEN R J Neighborhood from underlying zoning.- -Code Audit Conservation 1% Buffer 39 KEY FINDING #1 DOES NOT SUPPORT Better Form StandardsFUTURE PLACE TYPES = Greater Predictability • Long, multistep processes do not compensate for ineffective base code standards or guarantee � Equitable Process: better outcomes. They often lead to even greater Clearly defined frustration since the negotiation begins with expectations, lower the inadequate standards and approval criteria. ��entry point"" for development, opens the • Updated Standards that are in line with the values door for local, small and desires of the community can rely less on businesses. time-consuming negotiated processes, provide more equitable access to opportunity, and result in better, "Code is too focused on use more predictable outcomes for everyone. regulation and process and not enough prtority and \ focus on predictable form." \\\ 40 Packet Pg. 93 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #1 DOES NOT .FUTURE PLACE TYPES RECOMMENDATIONS Update1. permitted residential uses and review types (outsidewithin Priority Place Types to allow greater housing diversity by right. 2. Update Zones that comprise Priority Place Types to more efficiently guide compatible infill (in the core) and development patterns envisioned in adopted city plans the core). Definitions3. Update Use Standards & - • • ' KEY FINDING #2 ►► "Feels like buyers ,,.�,,,,-..., now are closing the LIMITS HOUSING CAPACITY �� :`� door behind them." �`� -Input Session This is Urpenl!Mai11 our Answer Now In - - (ornhlned Housigo 161 MarNl(01le0e • ZONED CAPACITY • LAND SUPPLY • AFFORDABILITY Packet Pg. 94 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #2 LIMITS HOUSING CAPACIT)l The city's housing stock will need to expand significantly to meet future demand A total of about 30,000 additional homes are needed in the community by 2040. Homes of all types are needed, but high density housing must be built at the fastest rate to keep up with demand. High Density , •;, 4.1%annual (>20 units/acre) increase Middle Density 1.4%annual (5-20 units/acre) increase Low Density 1.2%annual increase (<5 units/acre) 0 10.000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 Source:City Plan,Trends ■ Existing housing stock (2016) ■ Additional housing need (2040) and Forces Report 43 KEY FINDING #2 Limited Dwelling Units LIMITS HOUSING CAPACITIl per Acre Allowed T . The overall residential Dwelling Units per Acre (DUA) allowed �- under the current LUC is generally low. • 85% of city is less than 9 du/ac • 35% is 3.6 du/ac • 31% is less than 3 du/ac ° Ij ~ a~ '�• i - e Parcel Count - Dwelling Units Per Acre 25,000 20.000 0-3 1s,000 i 3,1-6 - 10,000 �QJ ooa - 9.1-12 0 3 3 1.6 6 1-9 9 1-12 12 1-20 20• 12-2D ........---- '.: -----• ,,'•. Dwelling Units Per Acre 20+ 44 Packet Pg. 95 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #2 Current LUC allows fewer homes to be built LIMITS HOUSING CAPACIT] than are needed in the next 20 years. • .:• Demand for housing will exceed the city's zoned capacity by around 2,000 units. • If no changes are made to increase zoned capacity, housing demand is likely to oustrip supply, which drives up housing prices as more people seek out fewer homes. • Other factors affect how much land will be available (infrastructure, environmental issues), so it is important to have more zoned City zoning map capacity than needed. Zoned capacity for Additional housing housing needed Source:City Plan,Trends and Forces Report 45 KEY FINDING #2 Certain Place Types and Zones have LIMITS HOUSING CAPACIT11 more capacity for new housing Zoning changes in the Mixed PLACE TYPES TOTAL ACRES VACANT ACRES REDEVELOPMENT ACRES Neighborhoods,Suburban Rural Neighborhood,and Mixed Neighborhoods 2% 12''; C, Employment areas will expand housing 2 It Suburban capacity most effectively because there m Neighborhood 42 20% 7', is more vacant land in these areas. __ O Mixed w 34% 35°: 26 2 10 Neighborhood In Mixed Use Districts, more new Downtown housing will be built through District 2% 0% 30 redevelopment of existing properties. It 1113111 Urban 0 6% 24 will be important to ensure the code Mixed Use 4% supports redevelopment where it is U Suburban appropriate and beneficial. Mixed Use 12% '3% 11°. O Neighborhood i Housing Prototypes were used to Mixed Use 1% 11% 1% identify barriers to housing capacity and Mixed E affordability in the LUC standards that '+ Employment13% 22°= 214, apply to these Place Types. 46 Packet Pg. 96 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING 02 Prototypes Analyzed in Zones that comprise Mixed Neighborhood LIMITS HOUSING CAPACIT)i and Suburban Neighborhood Place Types PLACE TYPE AND KEY ZONES HOUSING PROTOTYPES Prototypes are models of developments that maximize the zoned capacity for housing and estimate levels of affordability of housing in that zone. Single Family Mixed Detached House 2-Story Apartments ;t Neighborhood • .r , . 6. r LMN M M N Townhouses ,JCI 3-Story Apartments RL i, _..� Suburban Neighborhood A detailed description of the Single Family Prototypes analysis was sent to City ° Detached House Council as part of the November 9 RL 1—, NCL Work Session.See Diagnostic Reports Methods for more information. 47 KEY FINDING #2 Barriers to Housing Capacity in Zones that comprise Mixed LIMITS HOUSING CAPACITl Neighborhood and Suburban Neighborhood Place Types • Maximum density of 9 units per acre in the LMN zone renders townhouse and multi-family I Mixed development less feasible than single-family f Neighborhood detached housing. • Prohibition of housing types outside of single-family LMN detached in RL and NCL limit opportunities for low MMN or moderate income households to live in these areas. RL • A variety of other regulations combine to constrain n housing capacity in these areas: o Minimum lot sizes for single-family houses encourage larger, more expensive units. 1 i �" -- Suburban o Minimum setbacks consume significant land Neighborhood 1 � area and limit infill development. A RL � i o Limitations on the number of units in each - NCL t apartment building increase the cost of , development. - 48 Packet Pg. 97 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #2 Barriers to Housing Capacity in Zones that comprise Mixed LIMITS HOUSING CAPACIT)l Neighborhood and Suburban Neighborhood Place Types On nearly all of the city"s vacant residential land, zoning only Ake permits housing types that higher N $800.000 207% , income households can afford. 220% � u 3• 193% 189% 200% 2. $700,000 — 172% .-. 5 a - 180% 3 $600,000 0 149% 160% D o a $500.000 '1 140% Q d LL 120% ro d $400.000 �% `D s �%%85% 100% 5 80%3 Z � � 2 $300,000 ---- 80% 3 Q These zones and other low density zones "o M E_ $200.00o hold 90% of vacant residential land 60% tz 40% o 12 $1001000 20% p z $0 MEN 0% CL RL Infill Single- RL Large Site NCL Infill Single- LMN Infill LMN Large Site NCM Infill NCB Infill Family Single-Family Family Detached Townhouses Townhouses Condos Condos 49 KEY FINDING #2 LIMITS HOUSING CAPACIT Barriers to Housing Capacity in Zones that comprise Mixed Neighborhood and Suburban Neighborhood Place Types The LMN zone holds 52% of vacant residential land but the maximum density standard severely restricts housing capacity and affordability. Infill Townhouses The maximum density of the LMN zone is 9 units per acre.On a lot this size,this constrains the site to 2 units. $5809000 i The min feasible sale price fora 2-unit Minimum Feasible Sales Price townhouse project on this lot size is about (per unit) $580,000.This price is only affordable to households earning$164,000 a year, which is 172%of AMI. • Nearly 75%of the lot is left undeveloped. Lot Size 9.800 sf More units cannot be added to the site x of Units 2 due to the density limit.To make this j — project work,a developer would likely Unit Size 1.500 sf choose to build larger units and target "— I• Density 9 units/acre higher end buyers. �' Parking Spaces 2 per unit Some efficiencies are gained on a larger vacant site.The min feasible sale price } Setbacks Front 15 it Side:5ft Rear.Sit for the same sized townhouse on a larger I — Building Height 2.5 stories site in the LMV apsgE i 8_gvt$495,000. Building:12% This price reniiiing:uttaffbrdabile to most I families in Fah. . 01*447SN:o,*affordable 4IJJ� Site Footprints Parking:16% to householt3S:et3rt't'Op$14;,t300 a year,or Open Space:72% 149%of AMI; 50 Packet Pg. 98 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #2 Barriers to Housing Affordability in Zones that comprise Mixed LIMITS HOUSING CAPACITl Neighborhood and Suburban Neighborhood Place Types The maximum density of the LMN zone discourages developers from building more affordable rental apartments. • The maximum density of the LMN zone 2-Story Apartments constrains the site to 49 units.If we assume an average unit size of 850 square feet,the average rent of the 29 600 project would need to be a minirnurn of Minimum Feasible Rent Price approximately$2,800 for this project to be market feasible.This rent is affordable to households earning about$120,000 or 126%of AMI. t Lot Size 5.5 acres Even after accounting for streets and a — a or units 49 small park,half of the site is undeveloped. % The density limit prohibits adding more "4 unit size 850 st units despite that there is sufficient space. Density 9 uniNaric The costs to acquire this undeveloped n land alone is about$600,000. Parking Spaces 1.69 pci unit . } setbacks Front 15 fl side:sn Rear bit Most developers would prefer to build —' BuitdingHeight 2.5stoncn single-family houses at this density level because the open space can be in private t Bunding:gx, yards,which are a more valuable amenity Site Footprints Parking;14% than common open space. Open Space:50%, 51 KEY FINDING #2 Barriers to Housing Affordability in Zones that comprise Mixed LIMITS HOUSING CAPACITl Neighborhood and Suburban Neighborhood Place Types There are few zoning The LMN zone's density bonus is too limited and too incentives for building costly to comply with to make a mixed-income project 'Parking, height,and setbacks are what income-restricted economically feasible for most private developers. add cost these areas need relief for affordable housing, and Affordable housing."" 0 Sites smaller than 10 acres must provide 10% of units those that do exist are affordable to households earning less than 80% of median unlikely to entice private income. This is a reasonable standard, but it only allows an developers to include increase in maximum density from 9 to 12 units per acre. income-restricted units. This density level remains below the densities usually necessary to make mixed-income projects viable. Current Affordable Housing incentives allow for an increase in 0 Sites between 10 and 20 acres must provide approximately density from 9 du/ac to 12 du/ac 50% of units affordable to households earning less than in the LMN zone, but other 60% of median income. This deep level of affordability is requirements, such as parking, very costly to comply with and will render many projects height maximums, setbacks, infeasible. actually make it difficult to achieve allowed density. 0 Sites over 20 acres are not eligible for the density bonus. 52 Packet Pg. 99 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #2 Barriers to Housing Affordability in Zones that comprise Mixed LIMITS HOUSING CAPACITl Neighborhood and Suburban Neighborhood Place Types The RL UE and NCL zones hold 35% of the vacant residential land but only allow single-family detached houses. Infill Single-Family Detached House . This prototype has the highest minimum feasible sale price at just over$700,000. $707,287 which is only affordable to households Minimum Feasible Sales Price that earn about$198,000 or 207%of AMI. • The key drivers of this high price are the relatively large amount of land area per Lot Size e,000�r unit(6,000 so and the assumed unit size J!of Units t of 2,000 st Unit size 2.000 At this density level,there is little Density 2 unitUncre incentive to reduce home size because R ry Parking Spaces 3 per unit additional units cannot be added to the site,and larger homes are generally more setbacks Front 20fl Side:5rt Rear 15ft profitable given fixed land costs. Building Height 2.0 stones Building:15% Site Footprints Parking:18`x. Open Space:675. 53 KEY FINDING #2 LIMITS HOUSING CAPACIT Prototypes Analyzed in Zones that comprise Mixed-Use and Mixed Employment District Place Types PLACE TYPE AND KEY ZONES HOUSING PROTOTYPES Prototypes are models of developments that maximize the zoned capacity for housing and estimate levels of affordability of housing in that zone. Mixed-Use Districts 4-Story Mixed Use 4-Story n, _- / (residential over Apartments R GC, NC, HC, commercial) i_ 4 - rIt SC, CC 6 1 i 7- IF r Mixed Employment 6-Story Mixed Use 3-Story dHC (residential over Apartments E commercial) t Packet Pg. 100 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING 02 Barriers to Housing Capacity in Zones that comprise Mixed Use LIMITS HOUSING CAICIT] and Mixed Employment District Place Types Minimum parking requirements are the primary barrier to increasing housing capacity in Mixed Use and Mixed Employment areas. • The city's minimum parking j 1 Mixed Use requirements range from 1.5 to 3 Districts spaces per unit. i• Parking consumes land area that GC, NC, SC, CC� - could otherwise be used for additional housing units. ' • Structured parking or underground parking saves land area, but is very costly to build and requires higher I �j _ Mixed Employment rents/sale prices to be feasible. ;— J'z HC • There are a variety of alternative I��1iat E strategies to manage parking ppY•demand and su I 55 KEY FINDING #2 Barriers to Housing Affordability in Zones that comprise Mixed LIMITS HOUSING CAPACIT] Use and Mixed Employment District Place Types Housing is allowed in commercial zones, but a combination of minimum parking requirements, minimum setbacks, maximum height inhibit housing development. • Standalone multi-family developments are allowed � 4-Story Apartments in the mixed use and employment zones.While i y p vertical mixed use may be desired wherever feasible,commercial spaces are not viable in all $22108 locations. Minimum Feasible Rent Price • This prototype tests the affordability of a 4-story apartment building with surface parking,allowed in most commercial/mixed use zones and the Employment(E)zone.A small infill lot is used to Applicable Zones CC,CG,Cl.CS.NC test feasibility where site area is more constrained. \ Lot Size 15.000 sf • Minimum feasible rent on this prototype is estimated at about$2,100.This is affordable to a #of Units 15 household earning about$92,000,or 96%of AMI. Unit Size 675sf • The primary barrier to deeper affordability for this j.� prototype is minimum off-street parking P' t Density 43 units/acue requirements.A lower parking ratio would allow 1� ' r Parking Spaces 1.60 Derunil more efficient use of the site and to spread fixed costs across more dwelling units. Setbacks Front 151t Side:5h Rear.Rr • A secondary barrier to affordability is minimum Building Height 4.0 slorie5 setbacks.Residential buildings are subject to Bulldlnq:22% minimum yard setbacks,even in commercial or V employment zones.These setback areas occupy 'i Site Footprints No king-b0% 28%of the site,preventing additional units and a Open Spnce,28'M more efficient use of the site. 56 Packet Pg. 101 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING 02 Barriers to Housing Affordability in Zones that comprise Mixed LIMITS HOUSING CAPACIT] Use and Mixed Employment District Place Types Commercial zones encourage mixed use development, but minimum parking requirements are a major barrier to more mixed use projects. 4-Story Mixed Use • Vertical mixed use development(residential over commercial) is envisioned in the Structure Plan as a key (residential over commercial) prototype for mixed use districts. • The citys current commercial/mixed-use zones(CC,CG,NC) $2 526 and the employment district(E)apply a similar set of standards to mixed use development. Minimum Feasible Rent Price • The NC and the CC zone allow up to 5 stories;however,it is generally not feasible to reach a 5-story density level on a smaller site unless the parking is structured or underground. Applicable Zones CC,GC.NC,L This adds significant costs compared with surface parking.In i most locations,market rents would not offset those costs. i Lot Size 15,000 of Thus,this prototype tests the affordability of a 4-story mixed Of units 17 use building with surface parking. • Minimum feasible rent on this prototype is estimated at Unit Size 675st about$2,500.This is affordable to a household earning P. - Density 44uni151acie about$110,000,or 115%of AMI.This estimate is higher than ' t other multi-family prototypes due to higher construction " Parking Spaces 1.88 per unit costs associated with mixed use buildings and relatively low Setbacks Front 0It Side:Oil Rear.Ott estimated rents on the commercial space in the building. • �.j/t o • The primary barrier to deeper affordability for this Building Height •1.05lories prototype is minimum off-street parking requirements.This Building:29% prototype assumes a ratio of 1.88 spaces per unit,including V Site Footprints Pal king: spaces for the commercial uses.About 2/3 of the site is Open Space:4% occupied by surface parking.A lower parking ratio would allow more efficient use of the site. 57 KEY FINDING #2 Barriers to Housing Affordability in Zones that comprise Mixed LIMITS HOUSING CAPACIT] Use and Mixed Employment District Place Types The employment zones (E and HQ have a substantial supply of vacant land, but they severely restrict housing capacity. -- - Housing is classified as a"secondary use"and 3-Story Apartments thus limited to 25%of the site area.This ,j effectively requires mixed use development, $2122 which few developers are willing to do. Minimum feasible Rent Price This prototype tests the affordability of a 3-story walkup apartment in the HC zone.The maximum height for standalone residential buildings in the zone is three stories. Lot Size 15,000 sf This prototype performs similarly to „) #of Units 14 the Infill Apartments prototype for the Unit Size 675 sf(average) commercial zones.The min feasible rent �0 is about$2,100,which is affordable to _ Density 40 units/ncrc households earning about$92,000,or P 97%of AMI. Parking Spaces 1.57 per unit • 3` Despite being one story lower than Setbacks Front:15f1 Side:5ft Rear:8ft the commercial prototype(which is 4 Building Height 3.0 stories stories),this prototype achieves a similar 1 Building:27% density level.This demonstrates that __ ■ _ there are minimal returns to increasing Site Footprints Parking:47Rh building height unless less parking can be Open Space:26`;s; provided. 58 Packet Pg. 102 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #2 Barriers to Housing Affordability in Zones that comprise Mixed LIMITS HOUSING CAPACIT] Use and Mixed Employment District Place Types Vertical mixed use clevelopment is encouraged in employment zones, but minimum parking requirements limit opportunities for this housing type. 6-Story Mixed Use This prototype tests the feasibility of (residential over commercial) vertical mixed use development in the Harmony Corridor zone. / $29406 The zone allows building heights of up Minimum Feasii)lo Rof,t Pr,-I to 6 stories for mixed use development, while limiting standalone residential development to 3 stories. Lot Size 15.000 4 Assuming surface parking,a 6-story „( A of Units 21 building is not practical or efficient Unit Size 675 sf(average) on most sites due to the need to W + - Density 37 uniWacre accommodate off-street parking.The P higher density allowed by a taller building i I Parking Spaces 176 per unit is offset by the land consumed by parking Setbacks Front 0 it Side:Oft Rear.Oft to Support the building. fiy Building Height 6.0 stories Structured parking may be viable in some t Building:22% locations to make 6 story buildings more Site Footprints Pniking:78%, viable,but this will generally require Open Space:0% higher rents to offset the additional costs. 59 KEY FINDING #2 HOUSINGLIMITS RECOMMENDATIONS 4. Update Zones that comprise Priority Place Types to allow greater housing capacity by right. a. Remove barriers (limitations on total number of units or square footage per MF building) b. Clarify and simplify development standards C. Explore parking reductions rr. Consider replacing max densities with improved form standards that guide better design Packet Pg. 103 LIMITS HOUSING CAPACITY RECOMMENDATIONS 5. Expand and calibrate incentives for deed-restricted affordable housing and develop monitoring tools. 6. Update definitions for affordable housing, review for consistency. a. Clarify and simplify development standards b. Provide greater flexibility for deed-restricted affordable housing a DOES NOT PRIORITIZE HOUSING " CAPACITY, DIVERSITY AND AFFORDABILITY ALONG TRANSIT CORRIDORS TRANSIT MASTER PLAN BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #3 HOUSINGPolicies to concentrate growth along transit AFFORDABILITY Future Transit Network E�—_ Composite Transit Demand 2040 "Fort Collins has a limited Is supply of vacant land in the Growth Management Area ` so future growth will have to —1- i include infill and •- �' - - 6 1 _ redevelopment, which has �\ L_ �I � __J—� not been realized previously. .►- r !r L _ The Structure Plan identifies Priority Place Types to r -- e r p r �? illustrate the challenges and opportunities associated withtil a \ 1, l infill and redevelopment, I i _ - _ _ EII��• t especially in activity centers and along major corridors, e \ i IP irk �1 and the critical role it will 10* FWgW—W'rn_T play in helping the community achieve its vision over the next 10-20 years." (City Plan,p. 107) r _ 63 KEY FINDING #3 zoning in Transit Areas A HOUSINGD AFFORDABILITY has defined in TM P) ------ `� , a, MOUNTAIN VISTA RL and then LMN are the most prevalent zones within 1/4 mile of - existing and future transit lines.These zones are primarily single family residential with dwelling units per acre limits that do not --VINE support transit oriented development. — ~ _ MULBERRY,'_ MULBERRY Share of zone Districts within a Snare of Zone Dlstdcts within a 1/d We of Existing Transit Lines lJd Mile of Existing&Future Transit Lines DISTRICTS TOTAL ACRES DISTRICTS TOTAL ACRES J E PROSPECT Low Dc-ly low D—, j Resltlenbal 28% Residential 25% Disbicr Dlstnin Low De—ty Low Density DRAKE } 1x Mixed Use 10% Mixed Use 10% Neighborhood Neighborhood uuu3u��II Medium Density ■ Metllum Density ■ Mixetl.Use g% MlxedUse 10% HORS ETOOTN. Neighborhood Neighborri If - I-m—nyCprhdpr .rs EMrmonyCorddor ■8% "Too much low h - density residential General General 8% Commmclal . Commercial ■ zoning near transit - infrastructure." � Employment i I S% Employment Public rl$% Public Open Larrck , Open lands . TRILBY LI` I J'�IIVrf Downtown 5% Downtown q% D,slnct , Dlsbnct , �, CARPENTER F CARPENTER Other 144 diner Z79 64 Packet Pg. 105 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #3 HOUSINGTransit Walksheds --' &AFFORDABILITY �..._� • r MOUNTAIN VISTA The street network connectivity within a transit area buffer determines the amount of land accessible within a comfortable '�v; F'""_ (5-minute) walk of a station.The "walkshed" maps the area actually within a 5-minute walk. This analysis uses walksheds ArpLe[RR, �' K, aX instead of mile buffers to provide a clearer picture of how well the current LUC supports Transit Oriented Development. PRos - L 5 m 5-Minute Walksheds from Transit Stops MOR TOOTH .a Existing Transit Stop Walkshed HARMOW' Q a, M Future Transit Stop Walkshed 1 7� CARPENTER! `.. 65 KEY FINDING #3 Existing Zones within AFFORDABILITY 5-minute Transit Walkshed 287 In looking at the zones within a 5-minute walkshed of existing and future t MOUNTAIN VISTA transit, RL still comprises of the most land area.This relatively low density, _• J single family district along transit corridors is not reflective of the VINE VINE community's vision for transit oriented development along these corridors. —� Share of Zone Distracts within a Share of Zone DISMOS within a t—�YY141 M�L1LBERRY ', MULBERRY n S-Minute Walk of Existing Transit Stops Slops 5-Minute Walk of Existing 8 Future Transit Slops ��• (' `•Y DISTRICTS TOTAL ACRES DISTRICTS TOTAL ACRES { 4 � ft l.sr�PROSPECT ,; Low Density Low Density Residential 29% Residential 28% District Distria ] .r Medium Density Medium Density L7 = DRAITE Mind fixed-Use 70% IO% Nei hbomoatl Neighborhood Low Density Low Density ~ Mind-Use 9% Mixed Use 9% Neighborhood Neighborhood _ NORBETOOTH General General t- Commercial Commercial 7% RUnNV Harmony corridor ,6% Harmony Corridor .7% - v Al CSU 5%Ju Empioyment 5% nsdldion Dowmown ,5% Downtown ,5% 't { District Distnct TRILBY .�. EmploVment r 5% Junsdi IJ(xiCSU •• 5% - t Other 24% Other 24-- CARPENTER 66 Packet Pg. 106 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #3 HOUSING CAPACITY Limits Housing Diversity and Capacity &AFFORDABILITY within the Transit Walkshed AAs discussed earlier, housing diversity and capacity are limited citywide, however,they CORE '� OUTSIDE CORE are even more limited within transit areas.Current DUA limits r �� of the RL and LMN zones within % transit areas do not support the City's future multi-modal vision. �% r ` dip � 1 7— IV IV I i 1 r DOWNTOWN NC ZONE DISTRICTS LMN&RL ZONE DISTRICTS 67 KEY FINDING #3 HOUSING CAPACITY The Transit-Oriented Development Overlay Zone lacks effective zoning &AFFORDABILITY incentives for deed-restricted affordable housing. City of Fort Collins The Transit-Oriented Development Overlay Zone lacks effective lia Transit-Oriented Development Overlay Zone zoning incentives for income-restricted affordable housing. w i..^. The incentive allows a 501/6-60% reduction in parking requirements.This is a ^ ,4y, substantial incentive, but there are two limitations that constrain the effectiveness of this incentive: n 4s • The reduction only applies to the income-restricted units, which ^ —• -• - usually only makeup 10-20% of units in mixed income projects. • The TOD overlay zone applies to a limited area with a limited supply of vacant land. Redevelopment projects are more costly and complex, making it less feasible for private developers to include income-restricted s ¢ units. s Recolibrate existing incentives to reflect current market conditions. Create additional development incentives for affordable housing. e , (Housing Strategic Plan, p.42) 68 Packet Pg. 107 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #3 The TOD Overlay enables more units and less expensive units in apartment HOUSING CAPACITY AFFORDABILITY buildings, but additional capacity and affordability gains are possible. i 4-Story Apartments The TOD Overlay Zone applies to standalone multi-family developments. TOD Overlay Zone i0 The reductions in minimum parking $29012 requirements compared to the base Minimum Feasible Rent Price zone allow an additional 8 units to be accommodated on the site. However,the TOD Overlay�-- Lot Size t5,000 Sf • Y Zone does + �of Units 23 not provide an exception to minimum 1 setbacks that apply to residential �� •' Unit Size 675 st buildings. Density 66 units/acre These setbacks make it difficult to Parking Spaces 0.87 per unit increase density while maintaining Setbacks Front 15 h Side.511 Rear:bn surface parking.This limits efficient use 1 Building Height 4.0 stories of the site and prevents additional I Building:3496 capacity and affordability gains. 't— Site Footprints Parking:41% Open Space:25% 69 KEY FINDING #3 HOUSING CAPACITY Mixed use apartment buildings also benefit from TOD overlay zone &AFFORDABILITY allowances, but minimum parking requirements remain an impediment. The TOD Overlay grants a 50%reduction in 5-Story Mixed Use minimum parking requirements from 1.5-3.0 1 spaces per unit to 0.75-1.5 spaces per unit. TOD Overlay Zone $2 347 This reduction allows a 59%increase in the f number of units that can be provided on the Minimum Feasible Rent Price site compared to the the base zone prototype,from 17 to 27. _ Unlike standalone apartment buildings, Lot Size 15.000 sf mixed use buildings are not subject to #of Units 28 minimum setbacks. Unit Size 675 sf The minimum feasible rent for this prototype Density 78 uniLs/ncle is about$2,300,which is 7%lower than the minimum feasible rent for the base zone s Parking Spaces 1,04 per unit prototype. y l Setbacks Front 0 it Side:04 Rear:011 1 Additional gains in affordability could be Building Height 5.0 stories made by further reducing minimum parking I ' Building:35% requirements. —tt Site Footprints Parking:5596 11 Open Space:7% 70 Packet Pg. 108 BOARD TOPIC KEY FINDING #3 HOUSING CAPACITY RECOMMENDATION S &AFFORDABILITY 7. Update Zones within a 5 minute walk to transit to allow greater housing diversity and capacity by right. 8. Calibrate efFective bonus incentives for deed-restricted KEY FINDING #4 Affordable housing and develop monitoring tools. 9. Recalibrate parking requirements to improve residential capacity in TOD. C IS HAR D TO USE LIMITED GRAPHICS LACKS HIERARCHY INCONSISTENT STANDARDS Packet ., 109 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #4 LUC IS HARD • USEI Lengthy written Standards, little to no Graphics LMN Zone Districtis 9 pages, all text. - - _,._ = - ---------- — - _--^=- - ••Can we write - __ _�. _ =_ _____-•--- -=-_-==___.__..� '-- = - -= the code in plain -" -_ _ _ -___- ---__-- _ �- �'- __ --=-�••-� language? j - _ �- "Too many words -�- not enough tables --------- and _=graphics. 73 KEY FINDING #4 LUC IS HARD TO USE Inconsistent Graphic Style 74 Packet Pg. 110 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #4 Formatting issues LUC IS HARD TO USE Print version, titles for graphics are on the previous page 00 r.r..rw..w.a_.. „Page layout is __._. �-_. wW ,,,,� -- • _,Y, not intuitive." 75 KEY FINDING #4 L UC Code Audit Recommendations LUC IS • . TO USE notated The 2020 LUC Code Audit ed\npattA'sa,W \s provides useful guidance on code code Co code organization and �a�dv5e <he�and�sew\\\t\t9h1\9h^dWhatne g�auSethUdbe e Qxt5ttn9 c9an\t%o9 d�5e Gode`k\n9�e\\a\\ov�ed u5es meets shO r non-substantive ap11 dteo an Wo to ve c\ea t0101 improvements that wouldLAND USE .hrs oP on,`etexo no`°adeacea��a�n°tip t`thecO tZheGtYs�bstaodve\ed��t��edthat address existing Fe a�rirn9s d qx\\ ands st tweed outreach soOp.su antpro9 inconsistencies and • �Pn99and�audeuPdvo\vemaoys5�Santa\ssoc ov\tweed�<s�o e d�tes�9°�hc navigation challenges. R achsW°ou\aoot\\anaWO\n°ttaeu�onsldet^dihetetotev+°u\d co mot\Let�1oo\00 oewtab\eof oath ttoversy tOr.r+hat tanbve a s a9e a�apy q a1 fy as nor,, sups Q'teP\ace\e95ta a qq and°v P,Oce uCes Ce.9., at a�•y ou\dtyP \nc\ud nVI \st\o9 ce °utteachmay ofeXrshn9\aurnoat\irngex vt\[tiro the otd\nan s s Pat\im9 tact°s) �ax.1% °n ore m(og \ocat`on neW tab\e ed t,om \nc\usron°tom or tegda a otdrnance standards • 60 �atroh°\o knob ect°rso W pe`oh oc cY°dretin9 tteXt rca\exetctse ton amon0 ec<rons nova\ 1st\n9 te. ate Sip a[echo cootdrna makers cOrt o�of to all.% ex to accompany d ed as a v?\\y'AWt[h theta\ty s key to\ectos em)Me(, consoYrdatr P Renumbeda9°t reform atwns v+ \U r of 1\lust< often v\e olkthat \ Cron ve\oP ddrn9 eta \cs Matron edO�e a ma\°t \e\ied\scassroeode teot9`ts on P1\1 °ssrb\e at\east°oat ttee p\th°u9 2 n9 he tea ch,a d p CO Se W shta tO`macY ca"htavef touts m tNe^a he\D Maya �kea�gment calls Packet Pg. 111 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 KEY FINDING #4 BEST PRACTICE: LUC IS HARD TO USE Illustrations by zone District STANDARD DISTRICTS 21-03.08 STANDARD DISTRICTS 21-03.08 CASE STUDY: � ,,<, F�- I#,"Swr&t SM Deebim t 11uJtll^95Wr»rct: Sb Dev-Mp South Bend Zoning Ordinance (2021) Winner of 2021 Driehaus Awards ^ ' •, to. I-- &.tn "®trsr ev.nF.. o .�+.s.b.rn►- GmMFbor-Fmi[Ca�v F:r.� !®zsuy SNcwws 1L_� Gmrr Faadv A- --. — - w► M �orv+Floa.�eaco,�..Fa�,,, ,. Nat��rvr -or,_o :a, r�,.w�� sn w�anr+<c -aw.nna —. ic. � �, w41YIni4 scmmav�an.mss noac:rcxaa� axa-. a ns s,uul�osnam.� nos.azroza _-- NMZ^ ! d� :snJlappheaifrw samm.g '�iva ei vim. �F Y fr�ldV•�B11�y�m. m¢n •w..� �YL'i�TM � �i Ifauld�gvM Sm imn lrbn(HcYry"nplMaim fl 2/� Foilalwhbsf - �-,j i�'1�3k MW Ui n 1`Jl��eniF�biYetl•!� Np aird�9 W i. m�Wy Amemxy A bcktl arcy /.+tYi��'SSP� t} IWIO rtlmrc�� lvad ^aN a�� 3.. � acmrerro'n ab �cmMY�iNall _ So�Y +!'Y L nvnnmra.Wtlle'ywe me" v+d �rvlvwnal ��4f�zyl a �rammvnen�+r sa srta w �ry n= �arrr+ ma.Ya I. 4 ptlutiwaafae � a�� ntrrn farz�ana - � elgaaelsaY•wmxtrare atlum ay n-warai..resmm�. �r�ra.1sd9a%me.�mn - w,al rf� r�fd,tl�� Famr1. m 1111ro s�s�a�7asvrwl,,,.a-m m+n --zs•: South Rend Zoning Ordinance +„rH xF�ozoraNeaRwrar� a3� sanr ea,omraNeaRaNnRa .—� 77 KEY FINDING #4 BEST PRACTICE: LUC IS HARD TO USE Illustrations for Rule of Measurement CASE STUDY: DEFINITIONS&MEASUREMENTS 21-02.03 21-02.03 DEFINITIONS&MEASUREMENTS South Bend Zoning Ordinance (2021) Winner of 2021 - ��•�-dam Driehaus Awards s� ;_ a, L bg b F. u r, �, —� P�r J I � ff 1r—i f 1 1 L: moo= d b b b b b b south Rend - -.. �, ��J Zo ng O dinance ,wrtNaDUDmraraalolRNxf z-u i,�wrv,t.:�. Packet Pg. 112 LUC IS HARD TO USE RECOMMENDATIONS 11. Develop consistent graphic templates for building form and use standards. 12. Reformat Zones so Form Standards and Graphics are consistent and more effectively communicate requirements. 13. Update Use standards, Definitions, and Rules of Measurement in alignment with adopted plans and define density consistently. 14. Change name from "Land Use Code" to "Land Development Code". 15. Rename Zones (without boundary changes) and consolidate to be more intuitive with clear hierarchy. tf S MMA OF Recommendaf ions BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Update the housing uses permitted 5. Consider replacing maximum 10. Recalibrate parking requirements and review types required within densities with improved form to improve residential capacity in Priority Place Types to allow greater standards that guide better design. TOD. housing diversity by right. 6. Expand and calibrate incentives for 11. Develop consistent graphic 2. Update Zones that comprise Priority deed restricted affordable housing templates for building form and use Place Types to more efficiently guide and develop monitoring tools. standards. compatible infill (in the core) and 7. Update definitions for affordable 12. Reformat Zones so Form Standards development patterns envisioned in housing. and Graphics are consistent adopted city plans (outside the core). a. Review for consistency and more effectively communicate 3. Update Use Standards& Definitions b. Clarify and simplify development requirements. (e.g.ADU"s& STR's) standards 13. Update Use standards,Definitions, 4. Update Zones that comprise Priority c. Provide greater flexibility for and Rules of Measurement in Place Types to allow greater housing deed-restricted affordable alignment with adopted plans and capacity by right. housing define density consistently. a. Remove barriers (limitations on $ Update Zones within a 5 minute walk 14. Change name from "Land Use total number of units or square to transit to allow greater housing Code"to"Land Development Code". footage per MF building) diversity and capacity by right. 15. Rename Zones (without boundary b. Clarify and simplify development standards 9• Calibrate effective bonus incentives changes) and consolidate to be C. Explore parking reductions for deed-restricted Affordable housing more intuitive with clear hierarchy. and develop monitoring tools. 81 APPROACF1 Considerationi Packet Pg. 114 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 CODE UPDATE 1. Broad • APPROACH engagement . . . . . . Updates2. UC road an active participation stakeholders 3. Focus on Transit . . to increase . . new zones . . . . r create ctively implement the . Types future plans PORT COLL] CODE UPDATE DRAFT CODE PRESERVATION TOOLS:Cottages and Addition APPROACH - � 1 . Broad community = -f engagement and education. Build on previous outreach ;� � 'h Leading up to the lst Public Review Draft . Throughout Public Review and Adoption process — _ Test and refine standards lae �o-:+r- roSeMJbex-xeosJbelY'.iw'aM.l —_ — xu�NtlM.liny wwbJsPprbtmWtllMWelmAtryn�malstlxsWy([� - ieYBu1069ibs4n �iwtlmu p.b< wwJP�Iw1iW 9A,yNpwmwlNubn.roYwnlbiNn.w 1 Packet Pg. 115 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 CODE UPDATE APPROACH 2. Co-create LUC Updates with broad and active participation from staff & stakeholders. Benefit from staff's experience and expertise -3, Create strong understanding and ownership of the changes to ensure successful implementation CODE UPDATE APPROACH �F 3. Focus on Transit Corridors to NOUNi MTV Increase Housing Capacity and �9�� _ 111- ,. Diversity. 4 Modify existing zones within 5-minute walking y distance from transit corridors to allow greater housing diversity and capacity by right. These areas provide most opportunities for 0.1AONY-- effectively using bonus incentives to create - long-term affordable housing. These areas provide most opportunities for adding more diverse housing options in ways that potentially lower GHG impacts, lower VMT, and increase transit ridership. s Packet Pg. 116 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 CODE UPDATE APPROACH � Focus on zones that comprise Priority 4. Update existing and/or Place Types assigned to areas that have create new zones to greater likelihood for evolution and/or are effectively implement the scheduled for plan updates. Prioritize based on degree of alignment Place Types in future between existing built patterns, existing subarea plans. zoning, assigned Place Types, and select EOA characteristics. CORE ; OUTSIDE CORE DOMM" NC2O/EDtlTHCIt LW&ALZ"D6W= Existing oning • Existing Zoning • Allowed Housing Types • Summary of Development Standards Packet Pg. 117 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Zone Districts Zone ■Downtown District Medium Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood Distinct ■Neighborhood Commercial District Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood District ■Community Commercial Dismot Manufactured Housing District ■Community Commercial-North College Dstnct Low Density Residential District ■Community Commercial-Priudre River District Transition District .General Commercial District Neighborhood Conservation-Buffer District ■ Lmded Commercial District Neighborhood Conservation-Medium Dens ty Dmtner 1!'L ■Sernce Commercial District Neighborhood Conservation-1 ow Density District ■ Employment District Rural Lands District fey-y,IsAsC,1i _ ■Harmony Comdor Distinct River Conservation District I] y�' ''�'_ Industrial Dstnct A Public Open Lands District p Cau Jursdiction Residential Foothills Datrict 1_ _ ■ High Density Maed-Use Nelghbgrhoed District Urban Estate Dismal �. L rrw 8 a.trr Ira% LIM �w 1r r!e zit 1x 89 Housing Types Allowed by Zone District R-F U•E RL LMN MMN HMN NCL NCM Nce In Mnrnxo - 11�Yrunlllr� rinn hirinum nnwneen' HOUSING TYPE •,rn.n n.onmmrrn a...,.nns wnerw. wl.nurs �n�nv %Total Acres 1% 10% 30% 25% 7% 0.2'b T". 2% 0.5% •Vacant Acres 2% 19% 0.5% 312% 6% 0% C D] 0--: Single Family Deua hcd ® ® U ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Smell Lod Single hcn Familyl ❑ El ❑ C F] ❑ ❑ El F Deed/CottageOuster I I Duplex ❑ U ❑ r I U El ❑ ❑ ❑ Triplex/Ruaclex ❑ El ❑ 11 U ❑ ❑ U L iovrnhouxs ❑ 11 ❑ r t 10 ❑ ❑ El Accessory Dwelling Units ❑ ❑ ❑ I_ I O ❑ Muhl•Famlly, ❑ ❑ O (^ t � � ❑ ® . Mb d Jr 101u1,64amtty ❑ ❑ ❑ I❑—I E ❑ ❑ . Manufactured Housing ❑ ❑ ❑ r, ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ �pnmunilY 1_I ■Perml`led_ter..r,.. ❑Anrm:srmWe Review OPlanning 8 ZoNnO ❑Pmmbryed e00ra Appr01'0i Packet Pg. 118 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Types of Review Basic Development Review (BDR) - does not require a public hearing Public Hearing - requires a public hearing, and is required for most development review projects in most zone districts - Administrative Review: Type 1 Staff review and Public Hearing required with a Hearing Officer - Planning & Zoning Board Approval: Type 2 Staff review and Planning and Zoning Board Hearing required. A neighborhood meeting is required While the process varies, and is much longer when a public hearing is required, the criteria for approval and the standards guiding the development do not change. So, the increase in process does not necessarily result in an improved final outcome, as the underlying standards are the some. httr)s://www.fcaov.com/developmentreview/files/dev-review- su bm ittaI-requirements_v3-3-31-2021.pdf?1625856543 91 DEVELOiMENT STANDARDS - No Sbrrdard R-F 13-E RL NCL MOM NM LMN f 1111111111■ �,' es Orrlry Zones RR:ieenei uroen L^ate Lor—6N nc'neemrae Nei6nbornoob ne;neo•rove ov Deniry Meeiul ni6n oenzi" cammw�ry xrvie negeanooa 1-n[erribr Tao 0—, SeuM Cvoex Fpo-_1�- 4rioenCe CorseMtim, Can:ervrton, Cort:ervrtion, LMi2e Jze Deriri!/MinU Mntee!!ze Com-nercei Cem ercY CamTerOel Cnm-nerd awnry wttweyARr tnn 0ensite M<OVm oensiry Buller J:e DENSITY/USE MBL Vinrnul�lunir.hael - - -' - - - 4[3] 11 Ri M - - - - u133 - Aruimumlur:t4hcrcl - 114.rvp+eenssl�nits,4aeI _ _ _ _ _ _ uLR] _ _ —"peni.mwrm _ _ _ _ _ _ tts P] _ _ LOT DIMENSIONS VJ+at 42ei:rl SOA000 2180 6.000 PG 6.000 Iaov 131 - - - - - - - - - - - Mnbt'eia=s r: 200 100 60 40 40 L10] 40 LIS; -UZI -[13] -[SS] BUILDING PLACEMENT eknfioM xt0o1-ertr a..^. W 30 20 1] U n 30 30 is e01nI 10 f26] 10 RT7 1n 118] 203[-t - 30 L20: Minavrx xebec-nanem_-e ^', 60 M 20 n n 11 v n 9 - -Rli -R2] -931 MI[24] - IOLn: Mlw rcr xebe4lRL 10 23 13 0[ml 0:2a 13 In: 2 ! 3 _ _ _ _ 203 R21 _ Mn tid!Sr04[I vil m za O DM 3 9 E311 1 r32I I ] a - - - - ma[33] - 10%3M - - AO%R3] - _ _ BUILDING FORM Vin—pt - - - - - - - - - Z0 - - 20rt -rK 20 20 Mu neiFnt[3'; 3:tar e: 3 Roriez a Nee p6] 2't it 13g l:ron+w 1401 3—m- 2]:tories 1.111] 3 stories 3 stores 3-H. •stories 3— 3:lrie: 20-901321 Baee mn< wa6rR tYlnJt - _ - _ _ _ - l.1M I43] - _ _ _ _ - 1-3 xene:1-: 1451 rc L461 +et 1R71 - vez r4¢7 - Mr�otca.en6e V6.-eninrvr 03-040W O.a-Qrjo1 Rees sat:Mrr erce;� _ _ _ _ - SOOo a p1I 1<000 p2: n� Packet Pg. 119 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Existing Built Environment • Existing Zoning • Connectivity • Building Height • Building Coverage • Dwelling Units per Acre • Lot Size 93 P`� ry�7 Lot size of Residential lots - �s ■ s f� Less than.of Residential Las try lot size nn square let .in JW •�� J : � 'a• - - ' E �• L 000 sf an 3, fW ■ •;• - - ; � 3,000-3,9995f 1.tllV 4.000-4.999 sf 3.391 .•�.��w �; �,,. -, '•^ j 9,000.6.999 sf j,776 ,:.y.all~' �� A+1 I; ^.t r.r,�♦.-•i •s.... .`N 6,000.6.999 sf 6,297 �•�•:t J �i-.-�+f at 40 .�a'`.. 7,000-7,999 sf 6.934 6.000-6,999 sf 6,057 I gypp- � s I'4•'�. ' Q _ 0-1 9.000-9,999 sf 4,960 10,000 30,999 sf 2,828 11,000-11,9990 1,9F46 :�; �� - •. 12,000sfor Greater r3,63` Packet Pg. 120 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Lot size by zone District Count of LMN Zone Residential Parcels by Lot Square Footage 4'wo count of RL Zone Residential Parcels by Lot Square Footage ooro 4.000 a�aa 3'Sm eam 3 000 an 4aPo „3,SOD � 8 � S,000 I'000 i,00a 1.500 loan oil -- n,ao,a,mtl 13,an.s.wol ISuau,rartl V,cno,v,a°I (v,tuu,ll,ttu01 IIl,DDD,tlAml >AFOD 0 -_ 1.tat let s9uareFmbR c Low 11,000,3,D001 13,o0D,s,000j 1S,DDD,),DDDI (r,000,9,0001 19,00D,11,0001 (11,0DD,t)-0t1Fl >13" InLSgwn F00lai8 i10 ?a7 267 3011 83 52 :8 •�° t� A'' .Pym' �' � �° � 3P,� 4F,plRQa+° � � � �° �.,,4P.�",-0s,� •4°� bt 59 .Footw 95 a, Building Coverage iL 35,000 30,000 20,000 k , 15,000 yc• __. 10,000 5,000 1111111111111111 .----------' - 15%or Les 15.1-30% 30.1-45% 45.1-65% Morethan65% Building Lot Coverage Wo w b{. A I 1590 or Less 15.1-30% _ 30.1-45D/o 45 1 65% - More than 65% 96 Packet Pg. 121 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 :.2 Building Height J 1 qL ap tt � I tl �1 �.._..i 97 i Connectivity "°NTANOMT" The "walkability"of an area is based on IL the amount of connections within a street _- -- network. One metric used to determine the I""■■.■" F connectivity of an area is the amount of ' intersections within a square mile, called MUBEftftV intersection density. M® In Fort Collins, the earliest built PROSPECT neighborhoods (those built before 1959) , J small, regular blocks that are well �F73 connected to the surroundingarea, and a; y these areas have the highest intersection density in the City. The other well connected areas of Fort �__ __ •,� I NRRMO"V Collins are seen in areas that were developed after the 1997 LUC; however, �► .� "` ' + - r 1( EJ�L while these areas are well connectedit r� internally, they connections ° I r ` ,.�; ttm .,m .... ij� �Z •,i ' Lower Intersection 0ensity(-10/sgml) ' —PENTER - OpftPEMEft T .T.' I Higher Intersection Density(-200/sgml) 19 Packet Pg. 122 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Walkshed + Connectivity Aq Lower Intersection Density(-10/scim!) Higher Intersection Density(-200/sqmi) 99 Trends • Recent Development (2017) • Vacant Land (2017) Packet Pg. 123 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Recent Development Activltym Fort Collins,2000-2017 ripe of Development Recent Single-Family Detached �—•-� Single-Family Attached/Multifamily D e v e l o p m e n t ■Commercial I G ■Mixed-Use 1 City Plan Development Areas . I • Activity Centers Targeted Infill and Redevelopment ? Areas ODowntown r AColorado State University • .rJ rir 1 1r 0 North College a O Fast Mulberry Corridor 1 © Campus West -- 0 Foothills Mall iO Midtown Corridor ^► r � .•! QHarmony Corridor i u . 4 I--� 101 Vacant Lands, by Land Use'g Fort Collins, 2017 ■ Residential Zoning Va c a n t Lands ■ Commercial/Mixed-Use Zoning ■ Employment Zoning /! ' ■ Zoning Other Zoning ■Other Zoning � r �r•r ® Outside Fort Collins Utilities Water service Area — Packet Pg. 124 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Data Sources & Key Assumptions • Data Sources • Affordability Assumptions • Cost Assumptions • Impact Fees • Market Assumptions Other Assumptions 103 Data Sources Below data sources provided an understanding of the market conditions,development costs, and rent and sales prices for various residential development types in Fort Collins. Six Local Developer Interviews To understand development costs, market rents and prices, and local rate of return targets,as well as barriers to development. The developers interviewed have experience ranging from developing small single family homes in planned unit developments to multi-unit mixed use projects. Four Online Data Sources' To estimate various market conditions and development costs. • CoStar:a real estate database,was used to determine the average rent price, rent per square foot,and unit size for multifamily built after 2015 in residential and mixed use zones in Fort Collins. • RSmeans:construction estimating database,was used to determine average current construction costs for various housing types, including single family homes, multifamily, and townhouses. • Redfin &Zillow:was used to determine average sale prices per sq ft,average sale price for vacant lots, average unit size, and average lot size for single-family homes and townhouses built after 2015. ')A Packet Pg. 125 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Cost Assumptions Construction .- . Single Family Detached $150 Townhouse $155 Multi-Family up to 4 stories (Wood Frame) $175 Mixed-Use or Multi-Family 5 or more stories $200 (podium construction) Land & Site Development Costs Land Cost (per sqft) Site Development Demo Cost (per sqft Cost (per sqft) floor area) Raw Land $5 $8 Finished Lots $25 - - Infill Lots $20 $15 105 Market Assumptions Market Prices & Unit Sizes Market Price Ur6an Unit Size Sulourban Unit Single Family Detached $240 1,800 (3-bed) 2,000 (4-bed) Townhouse $270 1,500 (3-bed) 1,800 (3-bed) Condominium $290 750 (1-6ed) 1,000 (2-6ed) Market Rent & Unit Sizes Rent Price (per sqft) .. .. Unit Size (sgft) Mix Unit Size (sqft) Mix 3-6edroom $1.80 1,100 10% 1,200 20% 2-6edroom $2.00 850 20% 975 30% 1-bedroom $2.20 650 30% 725 30% Studio $2.70 500 40% 500 20% 106 Packet Pg. 126 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Affordability Assumptions $95,900 (4-Person Household) Note that we selected a 4-person household AMI for all prototypes. If the AMI was based on a smaller 2 or 3 person household,then AMI would be lower and the rent and sale price estimates provided for each prototype would be less affordable for these smaller households. Mortgage Terms Broker Fees 5% Loan Terms (months) 360 Upfront UFMIP 1.75% Downpayment 3.5% Interest Rate 5% Mortgage Insurance 0.85% 107 Impact Fees System ..ment Charges ink to Fee Information Fee Formula Water & Sewer Fort Collins - Loveland Water District Tap Fee See Link Schedule Electric Electric Development Fee Estimator Single Family and/or Townhome: $1,374 per unit Multi-Family: $2,172 per unit Stormwater Fort Collins Stormwater Plan Investment Fee See Link Building Services - How to Calculate Building See Link Permit Fees Capital Improvement Expansion Fees See Link Engineering - Lorimer County Regional Road Fees See Link 108 Packet Pg. 127 BOARD TOPIC 2, ATTACHMENT 1 Impact Fees (Cont'd ) Link to Fee Information Fee Formula Poudre School District Impact Fees Building Permit Fee Schedule Single Family Detached or 2 -4 Attached Units: $1,710 per unit 5 or more Attached Units $855 per unit Thompson .. Building Permit Fee Schedule Single Family Detached or 2 - 4 Attached Units: Fees $1,382 per unit 5 or more Attached Units $946 per unit City and County Tax Building Permit Fee Schedule 4.65% on half of the total construction valuation Transportation Development Estimate: $2,000 Review Fees Poudre Fire Authority Development Review Fee 109 Other Assumptions TargetReturns Internal Rate of Return 12% Project Rate of Return 15% Property Tax Tax Rate 9.40% 9.40% Assessment Ratio 7.15% 29.00% 110 Packet Pg. 128 DATE: February 9, 2022 STAFF: Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner WORK SESSION ITEM Historic Preservation Commission SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties— Refresher/Introduction EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is a brief informational presentation regarding the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties, the City's adopted Standards for reviewing and approving projects on historic buildings within city limits. The Standards are adopted in Municipal Code Sec. 14-53. The presentation will overview the adopted federal standards, other localized guidance and standards such as the Old Town Design Standards, and some best practices regarding interpreting the Standards for project reivew. Commissioners are encouraged to come with questions about the Standards and the City's project review process. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff PowerPoint Presentation Packet Pg. 129 City of Historic Preservation Commission Work Session, February 9, 2022 Fort Collins�. - _ Am w �s Historic Preservation Standards Jim Bertolini, Historic Preservation Planner Claire Havelda,Assistant City Attorney U.S. Preservation Structure National - (CO) • . ational Park Service Historic Preservation Services Government History Colorado Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Commission National Trust for Colorado Preservation, Historic Larimer Historic Preservation Inc. County Non-Profit Advocacy Preservation Action Colorado Historical Fort Collins Historical Community members,advocates, property owners,etc., involved throughout. Foundation Society 2 BOARD TOPIC 3, ATTACHMENT 1 mown ME y of t Collins Fort Collins — Preservation Codes • Chapter 14 of Municipal Code MB1 • Includes Designated & Non-Designated Resources • Covers • Policies, Purposes, &Definitions • Designation Standards&Processes • Project Review process Landmark Loan Program • Land Use Code 3.4.7 • Development Review • Primarily for non-designated resources on development sites • Includes most permitted projects on non-single family property • Standards for evaluation and treatment housed in Chapter 14 3 PreservationMEOW • . • MB2 • National Park Service • Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties & Illustrated Guidelines on Sustainability • LOTS of supporting Briefs, Bulletins, and Tech Notes • Supporting Docs & Local Interpretation • Old Town Design Standards • Not the same as the Old Town Neighborhood Guidelines 4 Packet Pg. 131 BOARD TOPIC 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Slide 3 M131 [@Jim Bertolini] I think it is more accurate to say "includes non-designated resources . . ." rather than "primarily for." I know what you mean by that, but seems more useful to emphasize that we do landmark design review in context of development projects for both categories of resources, and also 3.4.7 compatibility requirements applies to both categories of resources as well. So not really an either/or, right? Maren Bzdek, 1/31/2022 Slide 4 M132 Great to include this distinction, [@Jim]! Maren Bzdek, 1/31/2022 Packet Pg. 132 BOARD TOPIC 3, ATTACHMENT 1 mown City of What Fort, • • Standards Cover? } Just about everything. _ NIPS Standards cover interior, exterior, and site/context. • Local regulations cover exterior and site/context. fi oie Design & building science. 0-1 rat-f� • . • • Standards for - Treatment '' • Restoration • Reconstruction \ • Preservation • Rehabilitation 6 Packet Pg. 133 BOARD TOPIC 3, ATTACHMENT 1 NNW NIZONS01 Rehabilitation 1) A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be 6) Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the replaced.where the severity of deterioration requires defining characteristics of the building and its site and replacement of a distinctive feature,the new feature shall match the old in design,color,texture,and other visual environment. qualities and,where possible,materials. Replacement of 2) The historic character of a property shall be retained and missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, preserved.The removal of historic materials or alteration physical,or pictorial evidence. of features and spaces that characterize a property shall 7) chemical or physical treatments,such as sandblasting,that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used.The be avoided. surface cleaning of structures,if appropriate,shall be 3) Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of undertaken using the gentlest means possible. its time,place,and use.Changes that create a false sense 8) Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall of historical development,such as adding conjectural be protected and preserved.If such resources must be disturbed,mitigation measures shall be undertaken. features or architectural elements from other buildings, g) New additions,exterior alterations,or related new shall not be undertaken. construction shall not destroy historic materials that 4) Most properties change over time;those changes that characterize the property.The new work shall be have acquired historic significance in their own right shall differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing,size,scale,and architectural features to protect the be retained and preserved. historic integrity of the property and its environment. 5) Distinctive features,finishes,and construction techniques 10)New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, property shall be preserved. the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. 7 Rehabilitation THE SECRETARY • 10 Standards — 3 Principles THE TREATMENT OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES O.NTH • Do No Harm GUIDELINES F !/ RESTORING& RECONSTRUCTING • Repair Before You HISTORIC BUILDINGS Replace • • Keep alterations in context a Packet Pg. 134 BOARD TOPIC 3, ATTACHMENT 1 NNW ME tf� Why do We Use Federal Standards? • Adopted in City Code • CLG status requires we base decision-making in the Standards • Provide a consistent, clear, and predictable basis for decision-making • Utilizes latest building science from the NPS • subject to local environment and architectural history 9 41EMMUsing the Standards " • • Make sure you're using the right treatment method • Almost always Rehabilitation • Remember the HPC's purview • Exterior alterations • Decision-maker on City Landmarks and in City Landmark Districts • Otherwise, making recommendations ♦ Preservation concerns 10 Packet Pg. 135 BOARD TOPIC 3, ATTACHMENT 1 mown ME y of t, • • Preservation Projects • Avoid personal opinions MB • Cite the Standards and how they are met or not met • Avoid phrases like "I like...," "I don't like...", or"I have a problem with..." • Disclose perceived conflicts or biases when necessary • Ask staff(City Attorney) if unsure • Recuse when necessary • Do you have a real or perceived conflict that would hinder you from being unbiased in your vote? • Ask staff(City Attorney) if unsure 11 QuestionsRequests • What questions do you have? • What topics would you like to learn more about? Examples include: Is How the Standards recommend approaching a preservation issue • Historic building science • Sustainability • Local History • Operating as a commissioner on a quasi-judicial board (responsibilities and procedures) 12 Packet Pg. 136 BOARD TOPIC 3, ATTACHMENT 1 Slide 11 M133 [@Jim] good note, and I always prefer that we say CAO in this case rather than just "staff." Maren Bzdek, 1/31/2022 Packet Pg. 137 DATE: February 9, 2022 STAFF: Maren Bzdek, Historic Preservation Manager WORK SESSION ITEM 4 Historic Preservation Commission SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION HPC Work Plan - Progress and Priorities EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Code requires all boards and commissions to file work plans on or before September 30 for the following year. According to the Boards and Commissions Manual, work plans should set out major projects and issues for discussion for the following year.The HPC adopted the attached 2022 work plan at its November 17, 2020 meeting. Consideration of pending priorities associated with the work plan will be a regular work session discussion item. The regular recurrence of this discussion item is intended to provide the Commission with the opportunity to measure ongoing progress and identify action items. ATTACHMENTS 1. HPC 2022 Work Plan Board Topic 2, Page 1 Packet Pg. 138 BOARD TOPIC 4, ATTACHMENT 1 City Of Historic Preservation Services Fort Collins Community Development&Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins,CO 80522.0580 970.416.4250 preservation(a)fcgov.com fcgov.com/historicpreservation MEMORANDUM DATE: November 17, 2021 TO: Susan Gutowsky, Council Liaison CC: Kelly DiMartino, Interim City Manager, Tammi Pusheck, Interim City Clerk FROM: Meg Dunn, Chair, Historic Preservation Commission ! RE: Historic Preservation Commission 2022 Work Plan The Historic Preservation Commission (formerly Landmark Preservation Commission) was established in 1968 after the Centennial celebration of the founding of our city led to a groundswell of support for identifying and preserving places important to our local heritage. MISSION -The Commission's mission is closely aligned with four out of five of the City's Guiding Themes & Principles as identified in the 2020 Fort Collins Strategic Plan: 1. Affordability o Supports the retention and rehabilitation of our existing affordable housing stock. o Assists owners of historic properties in accessing State tax credits and provides zero interest loans for maintaining historic properties. o Provides an avenue to protect smaller sized housing stock that is often more affordable than newer or larger construction. o Provides work for local crafts people rather than outsourcing construction functions to large chain stores and overseas factories. 2. Equity, Inclusion and Diversity o Recognizes the need for more complete and inclusive representation of socio- economically, racially, ethnically, and culturally diverse communities within the city. o Prioritizes inclusion in order to tell an accurate and comprehensive story of our community. o Seeks to identify, document, and preserve important sites that help to tell the full story of Fort Collins from pre-history through to the recent past. o Seeks to preserve sites that enable all Fort Collins residents to see themselves and their own history valued and represented through the City's local landmark program. 3. Environmental Sustainability o Supports the conservation of buildings and scarce building materials through the reuse and rehabilitation of historic buildings. o Supports the reduction of energy use through the reuse of materials rather than harvesting, processing, transporting, and installing new materials, all of which require a great deal of energy. 4. Community Vibrancy o Preserves the community's sense of place by identifying, documenting, and safe- guarding archaeological and cultural sites of significance. Packet Pg. 139 BOARD TOPIC 4, ATTACHMENT 1 COMMISSION MAKEUP-The HPC is a nine-member board at full capacity (2 positions have been vacant since June 2021). Per Certified Local Government (CLG) requirements, at least 40% must have professional expertise in historic preservation, architectural history, history, architecture, archaeology, or closely related fields. The current commission exceeds this requirement with 100% of members having one or more of the required areas of expertise: o Architecture: Nelson, Rose o Land Development: Bello o Historic Preservation: Murray, Rose o Archeology: W. Dunn o History: Knierim o Education: M. Dunn, Knierim SCOPE OF WORK-The Commission has responsibilities both for the City of Fort Collins and as a Certified Local Government: 1. The HPC performs the CLG responsibilities for the City of Fort Collins: o Enables City to administer preservation regulations on behalf of the state and federal governments; residents and business owners can participate in the Colorado Historic Tax Credit program which provides an income tax credit of between 20-35% of qualified expenses depending on owner and project circumstances; and City can apply for CLG grants for training, surveys, building preservation, and community education; o Requires enforcement of local legislation for the designation and protection of historic properties consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards; requires on- going survey of historic resources. 2. The HPC is the final decision-maker on exterior alterations to properties designated as Fort Collins Landmarks; determinations of eligibility for Fort Collins Landmark designation; and allocation of Landmark Rehabilitation Loan funds. 3. The HPC makes recommendations to Council on Fort Collins Landmark designations; to the Colorado State Historic Preservation Officer on nominations to the National and State Register; and to Decision Makers on compatibility of developments adjacent to and/or containing historic resources. 4. The HPC advises Council on the identification and significance of historic resources, threats to their preservation, and methods for their protection; and advises Council and staff about policies, incentives, and regulations for historic preservation. OVERVIEW OF COMMISSION ACCOMPLISHMENTS IN 2021 o Held 10 regular meetings and 12 work sessions via remote meetings and hybrid remote/in-person meetings. o Reviewed 11 design review applications for exterior alterations to designated historic resources. o Completed 11 formal education/training discussions on technical and historical topics at monthly work sessions. Packet Pg. 140 BOARD TOPIC 4, ATTACHMENT 1 o Completed CLG training requirement for preservation commissions by attending the National Trust's PastForward 2021 virtual conference and Colorado Preservation Inc's Saving Places 2021 virtual conference. Recommended 2 properties for official designation as Fort Collins Landmarks, including the first Black history landmark in the City of Fort Collins (The Thomas House at 308 Cherry Street); o Advocated for the restoration of Design Assistance Program (DAP) funding in the 2022 Budget. The DAP provides a voluntary, educational means to address technical knowledge and project planning gaps for property owners, as well as to produce design concepts that minimize the impact of alterations on historic character, improving the outcomes of 151 projects since 2012. 2022 Responsibilities and Initiatives: In 2022, the Historic Preservation Commission will continue to directly support Council's affirmed values of triple bottom line stewardship and innovation, centered in equity and inclusion. Aligning its strategic objectives with the prioritized initiatives of City Council, the Commission: Will support the Neighborhood Livability and Social Health Key Outcome Area by: o Addressing the City's affordable housing goals by participating in the re- evaluation of the land use code to identify opportunities to increase housing supply; supporting the retention and rehabilitation of existing ago "' affordable housing stock; and by assisting Housing Catalyst in federal clearance for the evaluation and sale of properties eligible for federal, state, and local designation. o Protecting historic places that are important to a broad base of our community through cooperative discussions with a community stakeholder group that will guide further exploration into the City's research on historic sites associated with civil rights in Fort Collins. o Celebrating historic resources through community recognition and appreciation opportunities, such as the Friends of Preservation Awards; virtual tours; signage and brochures; and partnerships with community history organizations on special events such as MLK Day, Pride Month, Hispanic Heritage Month, and others. o Helping to ensure compatible alterations and new development through design review and development review. Providing feedback and direction for ongoing historic survey projects. Will support the Economic Health Key Outcome Area by: o Allocating Landmark Rehabilitation Loans, and promoting State Tax Credits, State Historic Fund grants, and other financial programs for work 0 to preserve and rehabilitate eligible residential and commercial properties. o Supporting Housing Attainability and Affordability through revisions to the Rehabilitation Loan Program and the Design Assistance Program to address issues of equity, inclusion, and financial need, and better assist low and moderate-income citizens with cost-effective repairs and improvements to their homes. Packet Pg. 141 BOARD TOPIC 4, ATTACHMENT 1 o Ensuring a smooth, integrated Development Review process by providing early comments to developers and staff on Land Use Code projects; and by providing decision makers with recommendations on development near historic properties. o Promoting and subsidizing the use of Fort Collins' specialized skills and tradespeople to keep more financial resources in the community. o Promoting the Historic Preservation Division's Cost Comparison Calculator, an on-line tool that enables area contractors and residents to understand the relative costs, longevity and energy trade-offs in rehab material choices. Will support the Environmental Health Key Outcome Area by: o Incentivizing sustainable building practices and energy conservation measures in older homes through historic preservation review processes. o Promote sustainability, retention of embodied energy, and waste-stream reduction by encouraging the reuse of existing buildings and materials. o Facilitating safe, cost-effective energy rehabilitation and retrofitting, addition of appropriate solar installations to historic resources, and resource sustainability through 0%-interest loans, grants, and free professional advice. o Providing technical input and oversight on the Historic Preservation Division's technical briefs, which are designed to guide energy efficiency improvements, material repair and replacement decisions, and other rehabilitation needs in a manner that is both climate- friendly and supportive of historic building character. Will support the High Performing Government Key Outcome Area by: o Providing the best service to Council and the residents of Fort Collins by identifying and implementing innovative solutions and best practices through partnerships, continuing education, and professional trainings. o Building capacity, increasing productivity, attracting and developing ED diverse and competitive talent, and facilitating the career training and growth of young professionals by working with CSU faculty and student interns on special projects related to Historic Preservation, Archeology, Construction Management, Heritage Tourism and other related fields of study. o Furthering Council's and the City's goals and objectives through the performance of the Commission's duties. Packet Pg. 142