Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNatural Resources Advisory Board - Minutes - 09/15/2021 NATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR September 15, 2021 5:30 – 8:00 pm Via Zoom 9/15/21 – MINUTES Page 1  CALL TO ORDER - 5:30PM ROLL CALL  List of Board Members Present  Kevin Krause  Dawson Metcalf  Drew Derderian  Barry Noon  John Skogman List of Board Members Absent  Danielle Buttke - chair  Samantha Williams  Hillary Mizia  List of Staff Members Present  Lindsay Ex, Staff Liaison  Richard Thorp, Watershed Program Manager, Utilities  Sydney Phillips Grace - Utilities Watershed Technician  Kelly Smith, Sr. Planner  List of Guests  none 1. AGENDA REVIEW  No changes 2. COMMUNITY MEMBER PARTICIPATION  N/A 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY & AUGUST  Barry moved and John seconded a motion to approve both the July and August NRAB draft minutes as presented. Motion approved unanimously 5-0-0 4. NEW BUSINESS AIR QUALITY ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 9/15/21 – MINUTES Page 2  a. Managing Urban Lakes Quality Management Guidance and Policy Development Update - Richard Thorp and Sydney Phillips Grace  The City's urban lakes provide important resources for the City such as recreational opportunities, wildlife habitat, irrigation water, and are part of the City's Stormwater infrastructure. Management of the lakes in Fort Collins have significant challenges such as not all lakes are owned by the City, management responsibilities are unclear, and there are various water quality impacts from land use and climate change.  There have been increasing water quality issues with these lakes and that is why staff from Parks, Natural Areas and Utilities are working to develop an urban lakes water quality management plan with technical guidance.  The scope of this project is limited to City-owned lakes within the City's Growth Management Area (GMA). The Lakes Water Quality Guidance will be both a technical resource to support implementation of the policy for water managers and a geodatabase with an associated map and software package. It is not a prescriptive water quality management for all of the lakes, but it will be available as a resource to private lakes managers.  The project is aligned with City Policy to sustain and improve the health of the Cache la Poudre River and its watershed. It is currently budgeted from Natural Areas and Parks until the 2022 budget is adopted.  The Guidance Plan  A draft of the guidance plan is currently being circulated and should be finalized soon. In 2022 there will be public outreach, policy adjustment and approval by Council.  All 304 city-owned lakes within the City's GMA have been graphed and ownership of these lakes has been identified, along with the various management categories.  Current water quality issues of City lakes and best practices to mitigate those issues have been identified and prioritized.  Actions to be taken to create a Lakes Water Quality Policy:  Conduct community outreach to understand the diverse perspectives in the community, especially children who use the lakes for recreation.  Send targeted surveys regarding known issues.  If there is enough money, conduct in-person or virtual facilitated workshops.  Staff will return to the NRAB with the results of the various outreach efforts and a draft policy for the board's consideration and recommendation. AIR QUALITY ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 9/15/21 – MINUTES Page 3   Discussion  Barry - Q - What are the indicators you are measuring to assess water quality of the lakes? A - This is not a water quality plan, so we are not measuring water quality.  Barry Q - So are there any on-going monitoring programs for water quality? A - Yes, for a few lakes, like Rigden lake, but most don't need that type of monitoring. This plan is a first step type of guidance for water managers to help them develop a water management plan that could include water quality monitoring, depending on the amount of resources available to do that.  Barry - Q - Water quality affects the fish population that are often consumed by people. There might be a health issue if there are heavy metals in the lakes. A - Colorado Parks and Wildlife are considering doing that type of monitoring.  Dawson - Q - What determines a body of water to be a lake? What is going on with the lakes within the City that aren't managed by any department in the city? A - Standing water bodies such as ponds, lakes, temporary lakes, retention and detention ponds, and reservoirs fall under the term "lake". The unmanaged lakes are being addressed and examined. It is a work in progress.  Dawson - Q - Where are you gathering best practices to manage these lakes? A variety of regional sources are being researched and gathered by our consultants.  John -Q - Will best practices address lakes that have not been managed well and how to remedy that? A - It will mostly be a listing of best practices and what they help to mitigate, their cost and where they have been used, based on our interviews, consultants, and surveys.  Kevin - Q - It would be nice to see transparency on how the City manages these lakes and what is used. A - That is not within the scope and budget for this project but it would be helpful for the community to do that at a later time; perhaps in a web map of the City's lakes. b. Approaches to Regulating Areas and Activities of State Interest Pursuant to Powers Established in State Law Commonly Referred to as 1041 Powers - Kelly Smith, Sr. Planner  Definition of 1041 regulations  1041 Regulations allow governments to identify, designate and regulate activities of state interest through a local permitting process. The purpose is to give local governments control over development projects occurring within their jurisdiction, even when the project has statewide impacts. A local government must designate the areas or activities of state interest AIR QUALITY ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 9/15/21 – MINUTES Page 4  and adopt guidelines pursuant to state statutory procedures and limitations to regulate them through a public hearing  The areas of state interest are: mineral resource areas; natural hazard areas; historical/natural/archaeological resource areas and areas around key facilities.  The activities of state interest to be regulated are: new/expanded water/sewer treatment; municipal/industrial water treatment; highways and interchanges, public utilities, new communities, solid waste disposal; mass transit; airports; geothermal resources; and nuclear detonation areas.  Local communities do not usually designate areas unless it is for a very specific area or reason within their jurisdiction.  Process of determining need to use 1041 powers within the City of Fort Collins  In May, 2021 Council asked staff to investigate what would be necessary to implement 1041 regulations in Fort Collins. In July staff determined the 1041 regulations would support City policy and regulatory goals.  The City will hold a public hearing on September 21 to determine what areas of interest the city would regulate. No development can occur until designation and guidelines are adopted. Once designation and guidelines are adopted, applications for permits can be accepted. Items to be discussed at the hearing are:  The intensity of current and foreseeable development pressures  The boundaries of any designated area  Why the designated area or activity is of state interest  The dangers from uncontrolled development of the area or conduct of such activity  The advantages of developing such area or activity in a coordinated manner.  The three options for local 1041 regulations that will be presented at the September 21 hearing would: 1. Address immediate development pressure. This option would regulate:  Immediate development pressure. State statues are flexible and allow more activities and areas to be designated over time. 2. Address development with lowest authority but potential for highest impact - This option would regulate:  New/expanded domestic water, municipal/industrial water projects, AIR QUALITY ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 9/15/21 – MINUTES Page 5  highways and interchanges - plus public utilities 3. Address all potential development and includes projects that may be regulated by the City's Land Use Code. This option would regulate:  New/expanded domestic water, municipal/industrial water projects, highways and interchanges, public utilities, plus public transit  Next steps  Outreach to boards and commissions  September 21 City Council public meeting to consider two ordinances to designate water and also highway projects to be regulated that would enact a development moratorium in those areas. If Council expands the scope of this project, another public meeting will be held at a future date.  A fourth ordinance is being considered that would appropriate funding to support this project.  The NRAB was asked to give feedback on the project and their preference of the three ordinances.  Discussion  Kevin - Q - Can you explain the advantages of doing these projects one at a time or all at once? A - A limited scope would have more concentrated engagement and expedite the process. Doing projects sequentially could add confusion to the community, and may not capitalize on engaging the same stakeholders simultaneously.  Dawson - Q - You said you have discussed this with 30 other communities, in those conversations have you discussed the timing of doing the projects one at a time or all at once? A - Yes, we discussed this and there were mixed opinions. One disadvantage to regulating everything is that many communities don’t end up using the regulations. Some communities even expressed there were times they should have used them but forgot they had them because it had been years since adopting them and never using them.  Dawson - Q - What kind of conversations are you having on how to transparently communicate to the community so they understand this complicated project with three options? A - Conversations with the community will begin with the public hearing. We are hiring a consultant to craft our future engagement with the public.  Dawson - Q - Can you explain how the public hearing will explain this project? A - It will be a presentation of the various considerations, options, AIR QUALITY ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 9/15/21 – MINUTES Page 6  and costs, much like tonight's presentation. It will also be an opportunity for Council to vote on the options and start the project.  Barry - Because the SPAR (Site Plan Advisory Review) process was overruled in the NISP hearing the City must invoke 1041 powers. He is concerned the City is not moving fast enough to keep up with the NISP project and will be ineffective to oppose it. He urges the City to do Option #3 and move quickly to adopt 1041 powers. Option #3 would address the increasing development pressures to deny permits. This proposal is board and irreversible.  Kevin - also supports quickly putting Option #3 in place.  John - also supports Option #3  Drew - also supports Option #3 c. Review and finalize NRAB memo drafts from August meeting  Barry created a draft of an NRAB memo to Council supporting Council's vote to oppose use of City natural areas in the development of NISP infrastructure within the City limits.  Discussion  John - suggested the letter have less in it about NISP and more about the City's current procedures and how NISP is an example on what could go wrong.  Kevin - According to the 1041 powers presentation, there could be another way to deal with NISP.  The board edited the memo in the meeting and agreed to vote to send the memo to Council. Barry will take this input, finalize the letter, and send to Council for inclusion in their packet before the September 21 public meeting. Kevin moved and Dawson seconded a motion to send this memo to Council. Motion approved unanimously. 5-0-0. d. NRAB 2022 Work Plan  Because not all NRAB members were present, the group agreed to postpone this discussion to the October meeting. e. 2022 City Manager's Recommended Budget Review - Lindsay Ex  Environmental Services Department added two budget offers as a result of the finalized Council priorities at the last Council work session.  Construction and demolition waste - It is currently unfunded but being AIR QUALITY ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 9/15/21 – MINUTES Page 7  reconsidered for funding.  Additional local air quality monitoring for particulates distributed throughout the community and website updates to help community better understand real time local air quality.  For their information, Lindsay highlighted several BFO offers of interest to the NRAB that are currently unfunded in the 2022 budget:  Municipal Innovation fund  Lincoln Center sustainable hall lighting  Contractual Specialist - Water Conservation  Large diameter tree pruning enhanced funding  Shift your Ride travel options program  Hourly conversion and increased FTE for active modes specialist  Construction and demolition position  Discussion  Kevin - perhaps ask if funds for some of the unfunded offers could be better placed elsewhere for better environmental benefit.  John - maybe focus on which buildings are the least efficient and fix them with the funds.  Kevin - it would be nice to have better air quality monitoring reports on the website.  Dawson - Q - Can the outreach part of the air quality offer be separated from the monitors for health messaging? A - Yes, a portion of an offer can be recommended. 5. OTHER BUSINESS / UPDATES a. 6-month Calendar review b. Agenda planning  October meeting will include Building Code updates, budget recommendations, work plan, recovery strategic plan, carbon inventory update and discuss a memo Barry wrote about removing a diversion in the river. c. Kevin reported on the activities of the August Bicycle Advisory Meeting. AIR QUALITY ADVISORY BOARD TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR 9/15/21 – MINUTES Page 8   They discussed Council priorities, including proximity to work and affordable housing are top of mind for them. They also discussed the Mountain Avenue reshaping and Safe Routes to School program.  Kevin also attended a webinar with a sister city in the Netherlands discussing what bicycling has become there. They are linking up to Fort Collins as a similar city to discuss current bicycling and multi-modal transportation and how to encourage people to bike. d. John reported there will be a methane emissions conference coming up at CSU in October. It will be mainly looking at methane emissions from oil and gas. e. Lindsay announced Honore Depew has been appointed as the City's Climate Program Manager in the Environmental Services Department. 6. ADJOURNMENT 8:30 pm