HomeMy WebLinkAboutTransportation Board - Minutes - 07/21/2021
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
July 21, 2021, 6:00 p.m.
Virtual Meeting Via Zoom
7/21/2021 – MINUTES Page 1
FOR REFERENCE:
Chair: Nathalie Rachline
Vice Chair:
Council Liaison:
Cari Brown
Emily Gorgol
Staff Liaison: Aaron Iverson
1. CALL TO ORDER
Vice Chair Brown called the meeting to order at 6:03 PM.
2. ROLL CALL
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT:
Cari Brown, Vice Chair
Indy Hart
York
Diego Lopez
Kevin Borchert
Jerry Gavaldon (arrived late)
Rob Owens (arrived late)
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT:
Nathalie Rachline, Chair
CITY STAFF PRESENT:
Drew Brooks
PUBLIC PRESENT:
3. AGENDA REVIEW
Iverson stated there were no changes to the published agenda.
4. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – JUNE 2021
Brown made a motion, seconded by York, to approve the June 2021 minutes as written.
The motion was adopted unanimously.
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
7/21/2021 – MINUTES Page 2
7. NEW BUSINESS
a. Transfort Focused Discussion – Drew Brooks
Drew Brooks, Transfort Executive Director, suggested the Board may want to receive a
standing quarterly update, particularly given there is no transit-oriented City board or
commission. He outlined the two federal funding sources related to the COVID
response: the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act
(CRRSAA) and the American Rescue Plan (ARP). He stated Transfort reduced its
service by about 17% and did not need to lay off any employees during the pandemic;
therefore, the majority of the dollars for Fort Collins and Transfort will be spent on
keeping the system viable into the future.
(**Secretary’s Note: Gavaldon and Owens arrived at this point in the meeting.)
Brooks outlined the specific items upon which each funding source could be spent and
detailed the main focus areas on which the funds would be spent: safety and security
improvements, operations and maintenance of existing assets, and position funding for
future grant matches for future Master Transit Plan build out projects. He noted Fort
Collins was the designated recipient of the funds for the Transportation Management
Area and is therefore responsible for apportioning dollars to the North Front Range
Planning Organization and to Berthoud Transit. He stated Fort Collins received about
$8.9 million after those apportions and noted the grant funds must be executed by the
end of the federal fiscal year, September 30th.
Brooks outlined various projects planned with the dollars, including a touchless fare
system on Dial-a-Ride vehicles.
Brown asked for more details on the one-time cost of eliminating transit fares. Brooks
replied that is a Council priority and has been considered for quite some time; however,
being totally fare free will not likely occur anytime in the near future. He stated the fare
technology would be used for tracking rides even if fares are free.
Gavaldon expressed concern the $130,000 touchless fare system is an unneeded
expenditure if fares will be free in the future. Brooks replied the current free fares are
expected to end in September and it is anticipated fares will be collected for the
foreseeable future until another funding source is available. He noted the touchless fare
system is already in place on fixed route buses and is likely the least expensive system
to install on the Dial-a-Ride vehicles.
Gavaldon asked if there was a bidding process for the initial purchase of the system.
Brooks replied in the affirmative.
Gavaldon asked how many people will use the touchless system. Brooks replied about
40% of fares are paid that way currently; however, it was only in place for about six
months prior to COVID. He stated some of these funds will be used to promote the
system and encourage its use.
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
7/21/2021 – MINUTES Page 3
Gavaldon asked how many vehicles would be covered by this investment and whether a
third-party provider will be contributing toward the cost. Brooks replied he would need to
research the exact number of vehicles covered and stated it will be a full City investment
as the hardware would remain in the City’s control.
Brooks outlined the expenditures that will be covered by the CRRSAA dollars, including
salaries, administrative costs, and fuel. He noted 1% is required to be spent on security.
He outlined the plans for the formation of a separate fund account to provide local
matches for federal grants moving forward.
Regarding the plans for ARP funding, Brooks stated there is a large safety project to add
a methane detection system that needs to be performed at the transit maintenance
facility. A maintenance technician will be funded, preventative maintenance will occur,
and some funds should be banked for future projects.
Brooks outlined proposed expenditures on the advertising contract which has included
bus stop maintenance in the past. He stated no offers were submitted that included bus
stop maintenance and staff subsequently found it would be cheaper to do that
maintenance in house; therefore, one-time grant funding will be spent on staff and a
budget offer will be included in the 2023-2024 budget. He stated the advertising
contract will also continue to be bid.
Brown asked if the budget offer for bus stop maintenance will be withdrawn as the funds
will come from the federal grants. Brooks replied it likely will be withdrawn, though it
may remain with the grant identified as the funding source.
Brown asked if the expectation to have snow removed within 24 hours after the snow
stops would remain with City staff taking it over. Brooks replied staff is hoping to do it
sooner.
Brooks discussed other proposed items on which the federal dollars would be spent
including a new bus shelter facility, expanding MAX service to North College, and
electrifying the bus fleet.
Borchert noted funding for the West Elizabeth bus rapid transit project includes a
partnership with CSU and asked if there is a possibility for funding partnerships with
private entities in the future. Brooks replied those types of partnerships are on the radar;
however, he was unsure of specific recent conversations with businesses. He
discussed the importance of reducing back and forth trips to work in terms of having an
impact on the climate crisis.
Gavaldon commented on businesses on Harmony covering the initial seed funding of
the southeast shuttle many years ago but noted Transfort backed out of the project after
about a year and a half. He also discussed examples of businesses providing bus
passes to employees.
York asked about changing maintenance facility needs with the arrival of the new
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
7/21/2021 – MINUTES Page 4
electric buses. Brooks replied a fleet electrification master plan is currently underway
with a consultant and the resulting report will address forthcoming needs in terms of
infrastructure and routes. He stated the City has already received a grant for pre-work
on charging systems. He noted that though electric buses are more expensive initially,
the long-term maintenance costs are significantly lower. He stated full maintenance of a
CNG runs between $2,700 and $3,000 and that same maintenance for an electric bus is
about $700.
Brooks discussed Council priorities in the transportation and mobility area.
Brown noted she had included a link to the Council Resolution regarding its priorities in
the meeting chat.
Gavaldon asked if the fare study could be done in-house rather than with an outside
consultant. Brooks replied to the question around the fare piece will be addressed
primarily in-house and the consultant will be asked for an analysis of other cities in that
regard. He stated City staff is over-extended without being able to hire additional
planners and stated he will not know the cost of the study until it goes to bid.
Gavaldon expressed concern the City is hiring too many consultants when it has existing
staff that could be doing the work.
Brown stated she has heard concerns about the cost of Dial-a-Ride services being just
high enough that it is prohibitive. She asked if the Council priorities list still includes an
item related to being able to get anywhere in town on transit within an hour. Brooks
replied Council felt progress was being made in that space and therefore eliminated that
language while including the language around North College and West Elizabeth.
Brooks stated evening, Sunday, and holiday Transfort service has yet to be restored
since COVID and the only reason at this point is a lack of operators. He stated staff is
working on incentive packages as several months have gone by with no applicants.
Gavaldon commended the presentation.
Hart asked what is required of Transfort operators. Brooks replied the City will train
individuals to receive a commercial driver’s license. He stated one of the primary skills
being sought is good customer service and noted most individuals are currently hired as
part-time employees moving into full-time. He stated the formation of more full-time
positions is being considered to help attract and retain operators.
Brown asked if the offer to restore full service is likely to be funded. Brooks replied he
was unsure at this point; however, he hoped it would be supported by the community
and Council.
York asked what criteria are being used to determine when fares will be charged again.
Brooks replied one of the largest hindrances at this time is the federal mask mandate
which gives the impression transit may be less safe than other parts of the community.
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
7/21/2021 – MINUTES Page 5
He stated the mandate has prevented the reopening of transit centers; therefore, passes
cannot be purchased. Additionally, many of the employees hired since the pandemic
started were never trained on how to collect fares and much of the fare collection
equipment will need to be maintained as it has been sitting idle for a year and a half. He
stated the September date has been selected to resume fares as that is currently when
the federal mask mandate is set to end.
b. Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO) – Continuing Review and Feedback
Iverson presented a list of transportation-related budget offers Board members have had
the opportunity to review.
Brown asked if any member is opposed to supporting budget offers on the top list and
suggested the Board should hold off on drafting a letter to Council until the drilling
platforms are revealed to allow for more strategic support.
Regarding the Fort Collins travel survey, Gavaldon asked if it is a one-time project.
Brown replied it is a one-time enhancement. Hart replied it is always a one-time request
and if it is funded, it occurs. He noted the Transportation Board has always been very
interested in the survey data.
Gavaldon stated he would express support for the item.
Iverson stated staff would like to have the offer be ongoing in order to collect consistent
data.
Brown stated the cost of the survey is about $60,000.
Brown outlined the offers on which members had questions including the Linden Street
Renovation Project and other capital projects.
Brown suggested having Dan Woodward, the owner of several of the offers on which
members had questions, present before the Board. Hart suggested the presentation
may not be worth the time if the offers are supported by members.
Gavaldon questioned details of the Arthur’s Ditch offer, but stated he was comfortable
leaving it on the list of supported offers, and noted he will not be present at next month’s
meeting.
Brown commented on the importance of highlighting specific offers for the Board to
support. She suggested anyone with questions on Dan Woodward’s specific offers
should forward them to Iverson and then the Board can determine whether it would like
him to present at a future meeting. Members concurred.
Brown noted the Board would need to have a draft letter related to the budget by early
October.
Gavaldon commented on the support for mountain bike trails expressed at last night’s
Council meeting. Iverson noted there is a grassroots group that has expressed support
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
7/21/2021 – MINUTES Page 6
for constructing new mountain bike trails. Hart noted the Natural Areas and Parks and
Recreation Boards would cover those items potentially more than the Transportation
Board.
York discussed Boulder’s Valmont Bike Park and included a link to the information in the
meeting chat.
Owens requested a prioritization of offer 11.13, the neighborhood traffic mitigation
program expansion. Brown stated she is not necessarily opposed to adding this item to
the list of offers the Board is supporting, but she noted it is an enhancement offer. She
asked members if they would be willing to invite the offer’s owner, Nicole Hahn, to speak
at next month’s meeting. She stated she would likely only not support this offer if many
other priority offers were not above the cutoff line.
Members and Iverson discussed inviting Hahn and potentially some other offer owners
to speak at the next meeting.
8. OTHER BUSINESS
a. Board Member Reports
York reported on the recent Planning and Zoning Commission work session during
which a Ziggi’s drive-through coffee shop north of Mulberry on Timberline was
discussed. He noted the shop could result in difficulties similar to those of Raising
Cane’s and Starbucks on South College Avenue. He stated the project’s traffic study
did not show any difficulties but suggested the Board may want to get some
additional information. Brown noted the North Timberline area is already difficult to
navigate with existing traffic. Iverson stated he would follow up with additional
information.
York also noted the Commission was interested in how the back-in diagonal parking
pilot on Howes Street worked.
Hart reported on an idea he had to allow individuals with bus passes to park free in
parking garages, at least as long as bus fares are being charged.
Owens reported on some safety concerns with the Mulberry bike lane which devolves
from protected to unprotected. He also reported on safety concerns with the bike
lane bridge over the culvert on Lemay just north of Vine.
Borchert reported on a recent North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization
meeting during which the Colorado Transportation Commission was discussed and a
presentation was heard from the CDOT state government liaison. He stated the
group decided to use subcommittees to take deeper dives into issues with topics
including long-range planning, outreach and inclusion, active and non-single
occupancy vehicles, and short-term planning. He stated the next meeting of the
group will be September 9th.
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
7/21/2021 – MINUTES Page 7
Borchert questioned the future vision of transportation and transit specifically
questioning whether individuals who may currently ride bikes partially due to
environmental benefits continue to do so if electric autonomous vehicles become the
wave of the future. He questioned whether infrastructure and planning could keep up
with such changes.
Brown noted she placed a link to the Transportation Master Plan and associated
Transit Master Plan in the meeting chat.
Lopez provided links to Northern Colorado Clean Cities electric bike equity program
and on safely navigating Fort Collins on bikes. He also reported Northern Colorado
Clean Cities will be doing a number of electric vehicle shows in the near future.
b. Bicycle Advisory Committee Report
York reported on the recent BAC meeting during which modifying its meeting
schedule was discussed, a presentation from Bike Fort Collins was received, and
budget offers related to bicycle infrastructure were discussed. Additionally, E-bikes
were also discussed.
Borchert reported on the upcoming New West Fest and Tour de Fat bike events.
Gavaldon noted he is term limited on the BAC and his term ends in November. He
encouraged Board members to consider taking on that role.
c. City Council 6-Month Calendar Review
Iverson stated City Manager Atteberry will be leaving and Council is in the process of
recruitment. He noted two August Council meetings have been cancelled and
Council will begin discussing the budget at the end of August. He also stated Council
will be discussing northeast Fort Collins planning and the Mulberry Corridor planning
effort.
d. Staff Liaison Report
Iverson stated Paul Sizemore was recently selected for the Community Development
and Neighborhood Services Director position.
Iverson noted the BAC has gone to a hybrid format and stated that while there was
support for this Board to remain remote, there is still room for changing that.
Members discussed the benefits of virtual meetings and Borchert suggested holding
periodic in-person meetings. Iverson noted the technology is available to hold the
meetings in a hybrid format should the Board desire.
Hart discussed the benefits of hybrid meetings noting it would allow all members the
flexibility to participate how they choose.
Hart commended Brown on her running of the meeting.
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
TYPE OF MEETING – REGULAR
7/21/2021 – MINUTES Page 8
9. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. by unanimous consent.